Slashdot Mirror
I, Robot Trailer Available
thehomeland writes "A new 'I, Robot' movie is coming out based on the Isaac Asimov book series, starring Will Smith. I saw a teaser at the theatre back at the LOTR:ROTK showing, but it looked so much like a commercial I didn't even realize it was a trailer until I saw a logo that said '3 Laws Safe'. Now there's a regular trailer as well as a nice featurette for better details."
http://www.apple.com/trailers/fox/i_robot/
irobot_m480.mov.torrent
It's MIB, Independence Day and Buck Rodgers all rolled up and smoked about half way down so you get a burnt taste in your mouth watching.
I'll wait for it on HBO.
....... Thus ends my attempt at wit or whatever
If it's an especially popular film, it might show up on the weekly/monthly Google Zeitgeist. An aggressive marketing campaign, even targetted at people who use Google, probably wouldn't stand much of a chance, though; archived data shows that people's interests are rather pop-culturey (cf. Sex and the City near its final episode) or holiday-based ("love poems" in week ending Feb. 16).
Is that the answer you were looking for?
(And no, on a personal note, I don't think people will buy it at all. There's now a whole genre of sites that look real and act real but are really stupid movie promotions. (not that I can find any of them now) Also, Will Smith is not quite so convincing as Orson Welles.
We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
http://imdb.com/title/tt0343818/
doesn't look like it
From what I heard, the new movie isn't directly based on any of the stories. It started as an original work & was adapted to add parts of the Asimov universe.
The problem is that "protecting humanity" will be used as way to trump the 3 laws and turn the robot into RoboCop, with the 3 laws conflict depicted as a variation of standard drama/action cop angst.
It might suck, it might not, but I'm 95% certain that it will have very little to do with anything Asimov ever wrote.
[Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
"I, Robot" reminds me of a Chris Cunningham video clip that he did for Bjork.
I'll bet Eando Binder was saying the same thing when Asimov stole that title from him.
I forget which book it was that asimov said the three laws of robotics were to be released into public domain, or rather anyone can use so long as a credit is sited. I know I'm probally one of the few people who actually has read any of his introductions. But near as I'm aware this is the only restriction he's placed on quoting his rules of robotics.
There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
Sure there is. The following is from "synopsis" at www.irobotmovie.com:
Will Smith stars in this action thriller suggested by the classic short story collection by Isaac Asimov, and brought to the big screen by dynamic and visionary director Alex Proyas ("Dark City," "The Crow"). In the year 2035, robots are an everyday household item, and everyone trusts them, except one, slightly paranoid detective (Smith) investigating what he alone believes is a crime perpetrated by a robot. The case leads him to discover a far more frightening threat to the human race. "I, ROBOT" uses a spectacular, state-of-the-art visual effects technique to bring a world of robots to life.
It's a common Hollywood practice to cut trailers to "hot" tracks from any source, including other movies. I've heard parts of the score from Backdraft in trailers for all sorts of films, and I wouldn't be surprised if they lifted a section directly from the score from Matrix Revolutions. Yes, when they air it, it's licensed. However, when the editors are looking for music, anything is game (I imagine that the old Napster was a great tool for them, while it lasted.)
Personally, I think cutting in recognizable sequences from other movies is an extremely risky thing to do, as anyone who can recognize the music cannot help but make a connection (either good or bad) between the film that the music was originally scored from, and the new film...
In his older books, Asimov said that the three laws of robotics could be implied or used as a plot point in other people's books, but never delineated. Many books did in fact use the laws of robotics without explaining them or citing Asimov. I don't know if he changed that stance later on in his life... I'm only about 1/2 way through reading all 500 of his books.
The ______ Agenda
Actually, most of the panic was just marketing spin.
Lars T.
To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck
Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics"
1: A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2: A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3: A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Oh, but they did break the three laws of robotics in the most obvious way in one of his stories, a number of robots were manufactured without the first law (never harm a human being...).
The plot of the story was that one of these robots made it into a large population of robots with all three laws and Susan Calvin had to sort it out (while of course saying that these lesser roboticists were morons for creating robots without the first law).
Unfortunately I do not remember the title of the short story, nor the collection in which it appeared, it was over 10 years I read it. Perhaps someone else can help me with that? This would probably be a fairly early collection of short stories by Asimov.
To help the memory, the reason they were created was to serve as help on a science station (in space, I think), where humans were submitted to low levels of radiation which killed the positronic brains instantly.
The scientists accepted the low risk of harm for the sake of observing whatever it was, but the the three laws of robotics didn't allow the robots to idly stand by and let even that low level of harm happen. And when they rushed in, they were instantly killed by radiation.
That's because it's not I-Robot. They chose to use a script called "hardwired" instead of the script written by Harlan Ellison. The decision to name it 'I, Robot' was made by some fox execs after the fact.
There is no doubt that this is nothing more than Men In Black and Independence Day. Will smith is not a sci-fi actor and he shouldn't be. He turned sci-fi into a black commedy children's movie. I'm just glad that he declined the role of Neo in The Matrix, as he was originally casted to do.
The story is "Little Lost Robot." A portion of the NS-2 (or "Nestor") line of robots were made with a *PARTIAL* first law -- "No robot may harm a human being." It left out "or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm." That was so the robots weren't compelled to rush into the radiation chamber ina futile attempt to save the human in it. The other 2 laws were left intact.
Thank you!
:)
Yes, I got that detail on removal/modification wrong. And the rest of the info fits with my memory. Now I know what to look for when I try to find it for reading it again.
Anyone know if Wil Weaton got the part?
Judging by his page on imdb I'd say no...
What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
Actually he was very good in Six Degrees of Separation.
There's a lot of talent there, but he's mostly using it to make cheap^H^H^H^H^Hexpensive action movies and some not-very-good dramas (Ali, Bagger Vance).
He's got a lot of on-screen charisma, which is actually one of the most important skills an actor can have. People respond well to him, and that's a hard thing to teach. (I'm a director, and I've tried.) He's got some range, though he's at his best when it's light-hearted (his rap career, his sitcom, Men in Black).
But I keep looking for him to follow up his very good (not brilliant, but very very good) performance in Six Degrees. I haven't seen that yet.
Keanu... well, Keanu tries. I was actually the only one on the world who liked him in Much Ado About Nothing. He was interesting in My Own Private Idaho. He was actually rather good in that awful Something's Gotta Give. He really, really wants to be a Good Actor, but he'll have to settle for being charismatic.
The movie really doesn't have anything to do with "I, Robot," as far as I know -- the original script for it was called, IIRC, "Hardwired." To be fair, it was supposed to be a pretty damn good script, but when it was bought by the studio that also had done some development work with "I, Robot" and owned the film rights to the name, they decided to merge the two concepts, because to someone with a Hollywood marketing executive's deep insight they're close enough (detective trying to solve murders committed by a robot). Really, though, it's still "Hardwired," with some of the names from the Asimov stories.
I'll be curious to see if it's still a good movie, but I don't expect it to be a good adaptation of anything related to Asimov's works. The fact that it's pretending to be is unfortunate marketing spin.
when i saw this trailer it reminded me of that story, and i was was excited. but near the end of the trailer, things go wrong... i dont seem to remember hordes of NS-2s rampaging through the building, attacking humans, and getting blown away with shotguns.
Wasn't that the name of the the female engineer who developed robotics in Asmov's stories?
autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
This movie does not deal with true asmovian robots.
The three laws were to be so deeply ingrained in the positronic brain of the robot that to disobey any of them would cause "roblock", the robot would freeze up.
As mentioned above, there were a group of robots working in a radiation laboratory. The robots would rush in to save
the humans, only to destroy themselves (the radiation frys positronic brains and is relatively harmless to humans)
so a new batch of robots was purchased with part of the first law "or through inaction..." removed.
The Robots themselves came up with a zeroeth law:
A robot may not allow humanity to come to harm, even at the expense of the other laws.
These robots could kill to safeguard humanity.
Before trying to be clever you might want to know of what you speak.
The real-life company US Robotics is named after the fictional company US Robotics and Mechanical Men in Asimov's books.
After viewing the trailer, it looks like typical hollywood fare and somewhere far away, Asimov is slowly spinning in his grave.
This movie bears no resemblance to any of the stories in the book, "I, Robot" and only a passing resemblance to any of the four books in the Robot Series.