Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla 1.7 Beta Is Faster And Smaller

ccady writes "Mozilla 1.7 beta is out. Not too many new features, but "Mozilla 1.7 size and performance have improved dramatically with this release. When compared to Mozilla 1.6, Mozilla 1.7 Beta is 7% faster at startup, is 8% faster at window open time, has 9% faster pageloading times, and is 5% smaller in binary size." I'll be downloading it."

41 of 738 comments (clear)

  1. Oh no, there goes Tokyo... by kentyman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Go Go Mozilla!

    --
    You know where you are? You're in the $PATH, baby. You're gonna get executed!
    1. Re:Oh no, there goes Tokyo... by Zakabog · · Score: 5, Funny

      History shows again and again How open source points out The folly of closed, MOZILLA!

      If you don't understand this joke go listen to some Blue Oyster Cult

    2. Re:Oh no, there goes Tokyo... by gnalre · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wrong, the success of windows has proved that you have to make software more complex, slower and take more resources to succeed.

      By giving people pandering to the lowest common denominator you are only killing yourself in the long run. Please stop it Mozilla before it is to late!!!!

      --
      Choose your allies carefully, it is highly unlikely you will be held accountable for the actions of your enemies
  2. Mozilla 1.6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, I got here first using 1.6. Looks like some people will need 1.7 to get here faster next time

    1. Re:Mozilla 1.6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      This type of poll sucks

      Yes
      No

    2. Re:Mozilla 1.6 by kundor · · Score: 4, Funny
      Dude, lynx is so dead. Links is the text browser of the FUTURE!

      It'll be dominant within months, just wait.

    3. Re:Mozilla 1.6 by Trejkaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Faster? You mean like the guy that beat you to the first post?

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    4. Re:Mozilla 1.6 by tbuskey · · Score: 4, Funny

      I used to change my user agent to say it was running IE on CP/M-86.....

    5. Re:Mozilla 1.6 by jonadab · · Score: 5, Funny

      > I used to change my user agent to say it was running IE on CP/M-86.....

      I like to play fun games with my ua string, too. One of my favourite tricks
      is to claim to be running my browser on an X11 GUI on PC-DOS 3.3, but claiming
      MSIE on X11 is fun too (especially, MSIE on an X11 GUI on a Microsoft OS).
      Other user-agent jokes I've seen include the following:
      * Claim to be running a significantly future version, (e.g., claim MSIE 11.5
      or Mozilla/7.0 or use a future Gecko build date, et cetera)
      * Claim to be both MSIE and Gecko in the same user-agent string
      * List Emacs as the operating system
      * List Klingon, Quenya, or Sanskrit as the localization language
      * Claim an utterly impossible browser/OS/hardware combo, like iCab on
      OpenVMS on SPARC, or, even better, claim a combination that's not only
      impossible but also ancient, like NCSA Mosaic on ITS on a PDP8.
      * Claim a virtual machine architecture (e.g., the z-machine, glulx,
      parrot, jvm, ... anything that's never been implemented in hardware)
      as your hardware architecture.
      * Make wrong and incompitible version claims (e.g., start with Mozilla/2.0
      and then give a 2003 Gecko build date or claim to be MSIE 6.0)
      * Claim to be running on Hurd, BeOS 6, or some other vaporware.
      * "NoBrowserNeeded (My TCP/IP stack is connected directly to my brain.)"

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    6. Re:Mozilla 1.6 by kundor · · Score: 3, Funny
      I have Hurd installed on my computer. It's not vaporware.

      You could make the valid contention that it's "nobodywantstouseitware," however.

      Anyway, couldn't you list Emacs as the operating system, the browser, the gui, and the hardware architecture? (I'm sure that must be an extension.)

    7. Re:Mozilla 1.6 by GrumpySimon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, those of us using IE have to type in the http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/01/30/042824 2&mode=thread&tid=113&tid=126&tid=133&tid=172&tid= 186&tid=95 Damn URL's so it does take us a bit of time to get around...

    8. Re:Mozilla 1.6 by LittleBigLui · · Score: 2, Funny
      ... IE for Solaris? It was astonishingly bad, but it did exist.


      IE astonishingly bad? Is that like an astonishingly round circle?
      --
      Free as in mason.
    9. Re:Mozilla 1.6 by ultranova · · Score: 2, Funny
      That makes me wonder, if when TV ads say 9 out of 10 doctors recommend X, did they only ask 10 doctors?

      No, of course not. They asked however many doctors they needed to get those 9 recommendations, be it 90 or 900. Then they decided that their sample was those 9 doctors and 1 who didn't recommend the product.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  3. Slashdot-GO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Not too many new features, but "Mozilla 1.7 size and performance have improved dramatically with this release. When compared to Mozilla 1.6, Mozilla 1.7 Beta is 7% faster at startup, is 8% faster at window open time, has 9% faster pageloading times, and is 5% smaller in binary size." I'll be downloading it.""

    Not if we get there first.

  4. great by mr_tommy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hear its got 20% more zilla too!

  5. and 10% more by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Funny

    Statistics than you'll ever need...

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  6. Compared to IE.... by MarauderJr · · Score: 5, Funny

    The next service pack of Internet Explorer plans to have longer load times, more crashes, and open a few more exploits into a Windows system.

    Modzilla keeps getting better all the time.

  7. Not fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I got here so fast using konqueror that the server hadn't even recorded my post by the time I left.

  8. In other news... by cperciva · · Score: 4, Funny

    When compared to Mozilla 1.6, Lynx is 99% faster at startup, 99% faster at window open time, has 50% faster pageloading times, and is 90% smaller in binary size.

    In all seriousness, it's easy to improve figures like this just by removing features.

    1. Re:In other news... by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Let me guess: Your text editor of choice is ed, isn't it?

    2. Re:In other news... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 3, Funny

      It is the standard text editor.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  9. Dramatically faster?? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fastest speed up is not even 10%. That's about an extra 0.01 tits/second. Want more speedup than that.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  10. Re:This is why I dropped Netscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    On the one hand, the dodo. On the other hand, the road-runner.

    And in a crash-hole between them, the coyote.

  11. Actually... by twoslice · · Score: 0, Funny
    That should read

    The next service pack of Internet Explorer plans to have 25% longer load times, 120% more crashes, and open 58% more exploits into a Windows system.

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  12. Re:Mozillamatic.js by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    More like my-site-will-remain-obscure-amatic.

  13. Re:Yes, it is smaller and better by no+longer+myself · · Score: 5, Funny
    the visitors use IE and that makes it the standard

    Admittedly, I get most of my site's hits from Slashdot, but I find a rather pleasant mix of Gecko, Mozilla, Opera, Apple Webkit, and occasionally someone using IE. Actually, I think Google surfs my site more than anyone. (I did tell "Slurp" to take a flying leap.) Of course it does flop over to nearly 80% IE from time to time, but I've also noticed that IE users are only interested in some file named cmd.exe or root.exe, and I've never offered either of those files from this box. It must be a Microsoft thing...

    Personally I'm hooked on using Firefox, but I design my pages to look good in any light. ;-)

  14. Unlisted Speed Change by jmt9581 · · Score: 5, Funny
    When compared to Mozilla 1.6, Mozilla 1.7 Beta is 7% faster at startup, is 8% faster at window open time, has 9% faster pageloading times, and is 5% smaller in binary size.

    After the news is released on Slashdot, it's now 40% slower to download. :D

    --

    My blog

  15. Re:Yes, it is smaller and better by alphakappa · · Score: 4, Funny

    I visited kavlon.org and lost my vision for a few minutes.

    --
    "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
  16. Re:I'm using it right now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Post pictures. (wink)

  17. Re:Segfaults? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    99% less than IE does

  18. Re:This is why I dropped Netscape by Imperator · · Score: 4, Funny
    On the one hand, the dodo. On the other hand, the road-runner.

    And this should serve as a warning to anyone else who thinks about getting stoned and posting here.

    --

    Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  19. Re:Thunderbird... buggiest thing on earth by syrinx · · Score: 4, Funny

    I use Firefox and Thunderbird for all my stuff, but I definitely agree that TB has a way to go. The biggest problem that I've noticed is that occasionally it will just start acting slow, and I have to close it and start it up again.

    That said, I love Firefox, and if I'm forced to use IE (say, on someone else's computer), I feel like killing people (its designers, mainly). Is that what they mean by "killer app"?

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  20. Re:Yes, it is smaller and better by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Funny
    NO NO NO NO NOOOOOOO!!!!!

    Faster, smaller, and has fewer bugs!?

    Will these people ever learn? Every version must either leave in the old bugs, or fix them but create more new ones. Bugs in this version are the reason people are going to pay for the next version, hoping they'll be fixed.

    And of course performance improvements are a big mistake too. You want to make it slower and slower, so that people will buy new hardware, thereby driving sales of your OS, which is joined at the hip with your browser.

  21. Re:This is why I dropped Netscape by DataPath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cuh IE yotie

    --
    Inconceivable!
  22. Re:Who fucking cares by cjsnell · · Score: 2, Funny

    You will not be able to go to a fair of almost any kind without seeing mozilla used (I've been to quite a few that had little or nothing to do with computers and seen mozilla or a browser using the gecko engine used).

    You, my friend, have obviously not been to the Bandera County Rodeo and Fair. Absolutely no Mozillas to be found, though there are some nice heifers!

  23. Re:This is why I dropped Netscape by uncleFester · · Score: 3, Funny
    And in a crash-hole between them, the coyote.

    .. but is it an Acme Portable Hole?

    -fester

    --
    -'fester
  24. I guess that makes it..... by laddhebert · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Mozilla 1.7 Beta is 7% faster at startup, is 8% faster at window open time, has 9% faster pageloading times, and is 5% smaller in binary size."

    I guess that makes it.....

    29% Better!

    -L

    --
    Don't Panic.
  25. Another improvement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When compared to Mozilla 1.6, Mozilla 1.7 Beta is 7% faster at startup, is 8% faster at window open time, has 9% faster pageloading times, and is 5% smaller in binary size.

    Now with 200% more statistics!

  26. Re:Yes, it is smaller and better by archonit.net · · Score: 2, Funny

    When was the last time IE was updated???? Hey that's a bad call. Microsoft updates IE almost every other week!!! What you meant was... "When was he last time IE was updated for reasons other than a security patch?"

  27. Re:MNG? by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 2, Funny

    How could I tell? There are no pages I could test it on...

  28. Re:This is why I dropped Netscape by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
    .. but is it an Acme Portable Hole?

    Knowing Wile E. Coyote, I hope not. The very first thing he'd do is try to lurk inside there while he takes his Acme Bloody Huge Roadrunner-Slaying Device out of its infinite-capacity Acme shipping crate. The consequences of this sort of thing, I'm reliably informed by D&D geeks, are bad.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.