Australian Record Industry Has Best Year Ever
Hecatonchires writes "ARIA (Australian Record Industry Assoc.) had their best year ever, but are fudging the figures because they run counter to their anti-filesharing arguments."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Mirror here: http://www.silenceisdefeat.org/mirrors/www.smh.com .au/articles/2004/03/28/1080412234274.html
Seriously. No one calls "patent infringment" "patent, stealing", no one calls "trademark infringement" "trademark stealing".
Copyright infringement isn't stealing either, though they can both be independently illegal. The difference here is that the copyright holder doesn't lose his rights. His exclusivity is infringed upon, but nothing is taken.
If people are going to insist on analogizing it to something else, I would suggest TRESPASSING. If I put my foot in your yard, I've trespassed. But you still have your yard; you just aren't enjoying it exclusively.
Anyone who calls copyright infringement "stealing" has an agenda, and shouldn't be trusted.
The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
File Sharing Increases CD Sales
it does suggest that file sharing can't be hurting sales that much
It doesn't suggest that at all. Consider if sales were up ten million over last year with filesharing, but would have been up twenty million without filesharing. Filesharing would have thus hurt sales by ten million.
I have no idea whether filesharing actually helped or hurt anything, but at least try to keep your logic straight.
Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
There isn't much bio information on the website but he is in his second year of presenting Triple J's current affairs program and was previously a reporter for same. You can listen to the show online.
He has written some interesting articles for the Sydney Morning Herald in the past, including this one on the decline of Sydney and another on censorship of CDs.
cheers
marty
"I can't buy want I want because it's free. Can't be what they want because I'm me." -Corduroy, Pearl Jam
Amen. From the British Phonographic Industry website:
Summary
The value of sales of music topped 500m in the final quarter of 2003, the second highest quarterly total ever recorded, representing an increase of 4.5% on the same period in 2002. Clearly the demand for recorded music in the UK remains strong.
$ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
@(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
That quote doesn't say that file-sharing helps record sales. It says "... are buying more CDs after file-sharing", which is not the same as saying "... are buying more CDs due to file-sharing".
It is stating the findings of the research - that after file-sharing that particular group of people are buying more CDs than they were before hand. Causation isn't claimed, only correlation which is the point being made.
Maybe CD prices have dropped between the before and after file-sharing time frames. Maybe the economy boomed and hence spending on CDs. Maybe the price of DVD players dropped and suddenly a large number of people had a device that can also play CDs in the lounge room.
The quote you provided makes no claim as to the reasons why, it merely states the correlation. Exactly what the "correlation is not causation" crowd demands.
lol, your numbers are all wrong, and you didn't even cite a source.
f eb 2003/tc20030213_9095_tc078.htmo .uk/1/hi/technology/3117505.stmc om/music/features/0008.htmle r.co.uk/content/archive/26710 .htmlt /Summar y/0,1338,14854,FF.html
Truth is that CD sales went up since p2p networks were released, but I'm not claiming there is a connecton.
Truth is CD sales went down when with the economic downturn, but I'm not claiming that economics and CD sales have any connection whatsoever.
Truth is CD sales went up with each new p2p network released and went down when the p2p networks were shut down, But I'm not claiming there is any connection.
Truth is that record compaines have fewer new realeses now than before, but I'm not claiming that that fewer realeses == fewer sales.
I'm not claiming anything, I'm just telling you the truth. It's all in these following links.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/
http://news.bbc.c
http://www.azoz.
http://www.theregist
http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Repor
So by this rationale, getting on the bus without paying is stealing. Parking your car in the city without paying is stealing. Reading a paper in the store is stealing.
What about if your neighbor calls you and asks you to play your new CD so loud that he can hear it through the wall? If you do, are you an accomplice to his stealing the music?
Clearly, your claim is flawed.
Howevere - what would be really intresting to know is how the independent artist and/or labels are affected by the p2p filesharing. I believe p2p filesharing of music helps people discover new and different music - which, more often than not, come from independent artists/labels.
According to this article: What record industry slump? Independent labels say business has never been better.
Check the link for the full context.
Enjoy your job, make lots of money, work within the law. Choose any two.