Slashdot Mirror


Hitachi Shows Off A Fuel-Cell PDA

prostoalex writes "Hitachi made a PDA, powered by a fuel cell. The device runs for 5 hours, and they plan to expand the battery power to 40 hours. It weighs 700 grams, which makes it heavier than most of the models out there. The commercial production will start next year, a picture is available from MobileMag." (This earlier mention of Hitachi's work talks about how such fuel cells could be used to charge or power other things, from cellphones to laptops.)

27 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. precent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Although it has a greater cost then that of traditional power sources, it is completely 100 precent pollution-free.

    \Pre"cent\, n. [L. praeceptum, from praecipere to take beforehand, to instruct, teach; prae before + capere to take: cf. F. pr['e]cepte. See Pre-, and Capacious.] 1. Any commandment, instruction, or order intended as an authoritative rule of action; esp., a command respecting moral conduct; an injunction; a rule.

    Yes folks, that's right! This device follows all of the 100 rules of anti-morality pollution.

  2. Water as waste product by Ratface · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Is that a fuel-cell PDA in your pocket, or are you just pleased to see me??"

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
  3. Methanol by carm$y$ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not sure I'd like to walk with methanol in my pocket. Hell, one whiff and you're blind... not sure even if it's allowed in a plane.

    --
    -- No sig today
    1. Re:Methanol by millwall · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not sure I'd like to walk with methanol in my pocket.

      People walk around with methanol lighters. Never really heard of anyone being so chicken that they can't even carry a lighter.

    2. Re:Methanol by JanneM · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, "one whiff" and you're certainly not blind. Methanol is only dangerous if ingested, and even then, small amounts will not cause any permanent damage. And while flammable, it is no more so than ethanol, which is allowed in airplanes by the bottle.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:Methanol by tantalus · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm not sure I'd like to walk with methanol in my pocket. Hell, one whiff and you're blind... not sure even if it's allowed in a plane.


      Though it can be dangerous including causing retinal toxicity, ethanol comes far from blinding you with one whiff. You can read the World Health Organization's health and safety info for methanol here.

    4. Re:Methanol by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Funny

      one whiff and you're blind

      Almost as bad is dihydrogen-monoxide, one 'whiff' of that stuff causes severe breathing problems. Did you know that many commercial foods are processed with dihydrogen-monoxide? We should boycott those as well.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    5. Re:Methanol by carm$y$ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Please check the "Acute effects" here:
      http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/hlthef/methanol. html
      Lists "inhalation" as well as "ingestion", and I personally know a guy who almost got blind when a 200 gallon container fell on the floor and spilled the methanol inside (dangerous workplace...).

      --
      -- No sig today
  4. Fuel Cell? Was gonna show a plutonium powered PDA by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...But some self-proclaimed doc stole the plutonium and left me a bunch of pinball machine parts.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  5. How much? by stecoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cool but how much does it save me over than using rechargeable Double-A batteries? I just hope the fuel cells aren't something like $400 for a $300 PDA.

  6. Shouldn't they just concentrate on laptops by mustrum_ridcully · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wouldn't it be a better idea if they concentrated on fuel-cell powered laptops instead of PDAs? I would kill to have a laptop whose battery lasted 40hours, and was topped-up using cigarette lighter gas (butane)!

    I don't see the battery manufactures jumping for about this one, if fuel cells do get sufficiently small and cheap then there'll be a few very worried companies out there.

    1. Re:Shouldn't they just concentrate on laptops by no+longer+myself · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Fuel cells won't make any corporations worry one bit. First of all, the typical corporation has "Covenants Not To Compete", so the only way they will displace existing technology is if the biggest corporate powers deem it to be in their best interests.

      That being said, the cost of using these devices will undoubtedly be familiar to purchasing printer ink. 40 hours my seem like a long time, but that can be used up in less than 2 days. There's also the "depending on the device load" clause that will no doubt be bundled into the EULA. Oh... You forgot to mention that you had to agree to terms and conditions just to use a new-fangled battery.

      But wait! They've got this stuff all laid out! If you thought the price of conventional batteries would drop... BZZZZZZZT! Nope. They've got a dual edged blade on this one. "Well the demand for conventional batteries has decreased, so we can't make them in the volumes like we used to, so the price has to increase." Oh yeah, so the fuel cell cost will drop? BZZZZZZT! "Due to the increasing demands and the difficulty in producing the PIM material we have no choice but to raise consumer prices." I hate to break it to you, but it's not a carrot on a stick. It's an orange turd!

      Will it leak? Will it explode? Can I take it on a plane? Will the exhaust (steam) burn you?

      These are all questions that will work to artificially keep the price high. The manufactuers will whine ad nauseum that the FUD is holding them back, and they need to be subsidized and then de-demonized by the evil-libral-media-machine.

      Legislatures will have endless uses for this technology as well... in the red herring department. "Oh look! Someone just effed up the rights of millions of people! Quick! Let's stir up some controversy over fuel cell technology so people won't notice!"

      Of course you've go the whole chicken vs. egg hydrogen economy issue as well. Since hydrogen is derived from less clean energies, then it's already tainted. Nya-nya-nya-nya-nya-nya!

      I used to be waaaaaaaaay optimistic about the whole fuelcell revolution, but now that it's future has already been carefully laid out by corporations, it hardly thrills me as anything more than one more piece of technology that will somehow eventually be used against me or perhaps even you when you most depend upon it, and least expect it.

      Sorry so long, and I know it's not very optimistic, but thanks for listening... Try to have a nice day. :-)

    2. Re:Shouldn't they just concentrate on laptops by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That is the funny part, most people dont realize how much power generating capacity they have around them every day. I do long range biking and camping. My cellphone, zaurus, GPS, digital camera, and toshiba Liberetto all get recharged with either the solar panel I have, the Motorola hand crank charger they made 2 years ago for cellphones, or from the generator I have on the bike. I have never had to want for power on long camping/biking trips away from a car or electrical grid. Now some of you nature freaks will lose their mind at the amount of gear I carry with me but I prefer to document my travels and take gobs and gobs of photos (uploading to the liberetto at night is nice to clean out the CF cards and gives me a chance to look at the shots) I can recharge all my gear sitting and connected in the left rear pannier bag from the bike mounted generator that runs on a tire, within the 7 hours I am riding that day and is trickle charged by the Smallish solar panel on top of the pannier bags.

      this fuel cell devie is cool, but still nowhere near as clean and renewable as human power/solar... and their first products needs to be a pocket power source instead of a laptop or PDA.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  7. Hydrogen environmentally friendly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    qoute from the article:

    Although it has a greater cost then that of traditional power sources, it is completely 100 precent pollution-free.

    At the moment hydrogen is not environmentally friendly at all. It has te be chemically extracted from fossil fuels or electrically extracted from water. When the times comes that hydrogen is produced with truly clean energy (be it renewables or fusion) THEN is will be truly environmentally clean.

    1. Re:Hydrogen environmentally friendly? by SlashDread · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have a point. But only a half baked point.

      You read the article, you quote the article. But you misquote. Nowhere does it say hydrogen is 100% pollution free. And nowhere do they misspell "precent" Here is the real text:

      "A fuel cell is a pollution-free and highly efficient power source and it is expected to be used for automobiles and in households, although its greater cost than that of traditional power sources limits its applications at present."

      BTW, It IS possible (and it is already happening NOW) to produce clean hydrogen.

      Already, Iceland, "harvests" hydrogen by using hot water springs. Also, hydrogen created from Solar energy, or really any clean energy source, is also truely clean.

      Remember, hydrogen is no energy -source- per se. It is a handy energy -carrier-. So is oil. (And we misuse it as a source) We still need clean sources to -make- hydrogen.

      But in USING oil ALONE lies enviromental consequences. Not so with hydrogen. It is the -usage- which is 100% clean. So the article claims "The fuelcell is clean" and the article is right.

      "/Dread"

  8. Rename? by CleverNickedName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not so much a "Palm Pilot" as a "Pocket Bomb".

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
  9. Re:duh uh by mirko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Parent's right, it's too heavy for a PDA.
    Let's call this a CDA (Carriable Digital Assistant).

    I personally use a Samsung Digimax Battery to achieve around 11 hours uptime with my Zaurus which is definitely more portable than this.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  10. Slashdot Summary Wrong -- Article More Surprising by InnovativeCX · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hitachi made a PDA, powered by a fuel cell...they plan to expand the battery power to 40 hours.

    This is incorrect. If the submitter were to take the time to read the actual article...or the editors...they would have noticed this more surprising tidbit:

    NEC Corp. has developed a notebook personal computer (PC) powered by a fuel cell that runs for five hours and plans to extend the operating time to 40 hours for commercial sale in 2005.

    Toshiba Corp. has developed a fuel cell-based notebook PC that runs for five hours and a handheld-device fuel cell that weighs 130 grams. Toshiba plans to commercialize them in 2005.

    While a PDA that runs for a paltry five hours and weighs over a pound isn't exactly impressive (quite the opposite, in fact), a laptop with a forty-hour battery [fuel cell] would be incredible. Not only would that solve the problem of waiting for endless charging cycles to complete, it would also resolve the issue of batteries losing their life over time (I type this on a PIII-900 Gateway that scarcely lasts an hour and half with a second battery installed).
    The only issue now seems to be rechargability, as I don't believe that this is possible with a fuel cell.

    In any case, this is a tremendous step forward.



    -Scott
  11. Extra feature... by OwlWhacker · · Score: 3, Funny

    A fuel cell generates electricity when hydrogen from fuel such as hydrogen and methanol combines with oxygen leaving pure water as a by-product.

    Awesome, you can also use it as a flask.

  12. H20 by PRES_00 · · Score: 4, Funny

    [i] the only waste will be pure water.[/i] Yeah, a stain will go well with that big bulge in your pant's pocket!

  13. Wired Article by drskrud · · Score: 4, Informative

    And interestingly enough, in April's issue of Wired there's an article about how battery capacity and power consumption need to be focuses in the future for American companies. I didn't expect to read about some attempts the very next on Slashdot... although granted, Hitachi is Japanese.

  14. A little uncertain about a few things by Phekko · · Score: 4, Interesting
    • A fuel cell is a pollution-free and highly efficient power source and it is expected to be used for automobiles and in households, although its greater cost than that of traditional power sources limits its applications at present.
    This refers to using the cell, not getting the power in it I'm sure. I think making alcohol takes more power than you get burning it, does the same apply to burning in a fuel cell? Or did I accidentally smoke the wrong stuff again?

    Another thing I didn't get is the expected lifetime of the cell. IOW how many times can you expect to charge the sucker before the same happens to it as did to all of my cellphone batteries. If you are expected to get as much as 40 hours from a cell (which, stripping the marketing hype and suchlike, translates to roughly 20 hours, maybe) does it mean you get 95% of that after the second charge? Or after the 100th charge? Or what? Sorry for being ignorant. If you know, please enlighten me.

    I sure hope they get PDAs to the point, where your battery lasts a week again (as it did in my original Palm Pilot) and hopefully it can be done in a somewhat environmentally friendly way, too. Is this the way? You tell me, please (pretty please)
    --

    Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
  15. Finally by okmijnuhb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally someone has solved the huge air pollution problem posed by PDA usage.

  16. Re:Not entirerly true by ljavelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you could say that this is actually more polluting than conventional energy sources

    More than a NiCD, Li-ion, or NiMH battery? Those systems also require that you put energy into them, and they are extremely far away from being 100% efficient.

    It should be obvious to the casual observer that plugging a device directly into the wall is more energy efficient than using a portable energy storage system with a device. There is simply no such thing as 100% efficiency in any energy storage products.

    The big question is how much energy you can store in the smallest space with the smallest amount of nasty chemicals. Charging efficiency is only a small part of the picture - heck, I'm confident that driving your SUV for a mile uses more energy than all the batteries I have ever used in my entire life... and then some.

    In addition, the chemicals involved in traditional "batteries" are known to be very toxic. If you want to talk about polutants, look at all the cell phone batteries that are thrown away year after year.

    Energy efficiency isn't the only piece of the pie when it comes to polutants. Especially when you consider the toxicity of traditional batteries.

  17. Not only that by Walkiry · · Score: 3, Informative

    The full quote I want to address is this: A fuel cell generates electricity when hydrogen from fuel such as hydrogen and methanol combines with oxygen leaving pure water as a by-product.

    Excuse me, but if you're using methanol there's a Carbon atom that has to go somewhere, usually goes as CO or CO2. Although there's some struggle about CO2 being a pollutant, the fact is that you don't only produce water.

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  18. wind-ups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think wind up technology is more impressive and practical. I own two baygen windup radios that store the energy in a coiled spring, then drive a mini generator to power the radios. They work, the concept works. I also have a small tri-power radio that is very interesting. Shirt pocket size, multiband. It has a built in solar cell which will charge internal fixed batteries (ni cads I guess, never looked at them). There's also a battery bay that holds conventional AA batteries. That's a redundant power supply. In addition, there's a small fold out crank on the side that runs a mini generator to add-to any of the solar input, a couple minutes of very easy cranking gives a long radio play time. That particular thing doesn't involve a spring like the baygens, but it could. either way it works as advertised, it's spiffy.

    I think a PDA could be constructed along those lines somehow. The chemistry involved with using normal human muscles is very efficient, much more than other other fuel/power source. A similar PDA could also have an external jack for charging from a normal AC to DC wall wart or another DC source such as from your car while driving or an even larger solar panel/whatever, making it quad power.

    zogger

  19. Re:Sweet... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I built most of it because of the huge hole there is in portable power generation. The most expensive item was the military surplus Solar panel kit, an aluminum book that when unfolded exposes 2 high efficency "purple" solar cells that generate 12 volts at 200ma in bright sun.. I can get almost 250ma out of them if I point it directly at the sun instead of laying flat. closed it's the size of a textbook and 1/2 inch thick. The motorola hand generator was bought at gander mountian on clearance. it's for motorola cellphones and was limited to 3 volts until you remove the NICAD batteries inside and re-solder the winding points. I now get 12V @100ma out of that also. finally I modified 2 of the cheapie bicycle light kits that have the generator for creating the electricity. they each generate ~7VAC 250ma(ok so they are altenators) so I simply recitify the voltage and use one backwards to generate about 13 volts DC. total money spent WITHOUT the Military solar panels is less than $50.00US the solar panels cost me $150.00US but were worth it due to the high output and efficency. I charge NiMh AAA and AA cells during the day off the whole thing as well as the cellphone and laptop. One of the key's though is that my battery packs are all fresh and I leave fully charged. you dont usually drain everything dry and try to recharge but I generate enough electricity during the day to replace what I use.

    I could generate more if I modified a kiddie trailer to hold bigger solar panels and gear driven generator off the wheels.... but you don't want to get too ambitious to generate power... or you will end up reducing your ability to bike very far and reduce the gear load you can carry. (generating 1.2 amps at 110V will get you about 30 minutes before being wiped out.. you also want to disengage all your power generators when you are looking at a hill.. it is suprising how that extra resistance can make a difference when you are going uphill!

    finally, I use a libretto because of the low power consumption with a self modified battery. the older 50C had nicad batteries which are complete crap. you must hand rebuild with li-ion or Nimh and learn to love a P-I 45Mhz processor... (Yes, Linux + blackbox + abiword + other apps are very useable on this slow of a laptop.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.