Slashdot Mirror


Fighting the Forced Ranking of Employees?

Allen asks: "The company I work for has a forced ranking system for performance reviews. Employees are ranked from 1 to 5, with 5 being the best, in a bell curve arrangement. Department managers are required to identify: 10% as 5s (excels), 20% as 4's (exceeds), 50% as 3s (fully meets), 15% as 2s (partially meets), and 5% as 1s (requires action). In an department of 100 employees, this means that 5 employees must be identified and labeled as ones, and at least 20 employees as below average. The net result is every employee in the department is competing against their peers to increase (or maintain) their ranking. We're supposed to work together as a team, and support each other to get the product out the door, but the forced ranking system encourages us to instead stomp on each other, and stab each other in the back, in order to secure a higher ranking. That and, after working our collective rears off to get a new product out the door, several of us were given below average rankings that we believe are undeserved. How would you fight a forced ranking system at your job? I enjoy the technology I work on, and I enjoy working with my peers, but this forced ranking system is very demoralizing."

8 of 194 comments (clear)

  1. You can post it AC by trompete · · Score: 2, Informative

    What company do you work for? Unisys has a 1-5 ranking system on a bell curve.

  2. i got a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    change jobs. your company's main competitor might be interested in you.

  3. You can't beat 'em by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 2, Informative

    So join 'em. You're going to have to learn the skills necessary to step all over your coworkers in order to claim your spot at the top. You can't beat the system, so you have to play by its rules, or walk out.

  4. Re:4 step process by shaka999 · · Score: 2, Informative

    1.5 After having found a new job ...

    Your burning some bridges here. While I don't disagree this is a nice action I'd be sure I have a place to work before I started complaining.

    --
    One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
  5. Like peer reviews by djohnsto · · Score: 2, Informative

    The company I work for uses a similar rating system, but requires peer reviews to be supplied to your manager to be rolled into your official review. Normally, each person writes 2-3 reviews for his peers / managers, and they have 2-3 peers write reviews for them. This means that a large part of your official review is how much you helped other team members. It's kind of a pain in the ass during review period, but it tends to almost completely eliminate the backstabbing described in the original post.

    --
    Dan
  6. Re:Face Reality by Kosgrove · · Score: 3, Informative
    " Your working for a bunch of A$$H0LES running the company who care more about being sadistic to its employees rather than focus on customer satisfacation.

    Start looking for a new job and when you get one, get revenge by quiting on the spot with out notice and leave them hanging dry."


    I swear to god, you get the worst career advice on this site. No wonder everyone here always bitches about their jobs, or not being able to find a job, etc. You cannot have the arrogant attitude so many geeks have and expect to do well in the workplace.

    It's a small world out there. NEVER leave a job without 2 weeks notice unless it's an emergency (or you're being sexually harasses, etc). That's your professional obligation, and if you ignore it, it may come back to bite you in the ass big-time. Never burn a bridge you don't have to, not matter how unfair, exploitative, or justplain lousy a former employer was.
  7. Re:4 step process by glimes · · Score: 3, Informative

    You aren't burning bridges.

    At this point, the bridges are *already* charred
    hunks of ash held together by rusted nails.

    Recognize that the corporation's personnel department
    has placed your team on the far side of a chasm and
    applied flame throwers to the trestle.

    If this behavior is not corrected immediately by higher
    level management, where "immediately" is "fast enough
    that the question of retroactive pay adjustment never
    has to come up" -- then the corporate management has
    watched the bridge burn, probably roasting marshmellows,
    and is refusing to build another.

  8. Re:Good system by gowen · · Score: 2, Informative
    Random process => normal distribution = bell curve
    Whoever told you that "random process => Bell curve" was a idiot. Yes, many things are normally distributed, yes the central limit theorem says that sampling many identically-distributed variables will give you a bell curve, but thats it.

    Really. If you get into small groups, or have something whose distribution is non-normal there is absolutely no guarantee that the results will be normal, or even approximately normal. A sample standard deviation, from a small sample, will have an F-distribution, for example.

    A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. Next time you want to know about statistics, ask a statistician, not a bloody engineer.
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.