Slashdot Mirror


Sci Fi Confirms Forthcoming Farscape Miniseries

Albinus writes "The Sci Fi Channel has decided to continue the Farscape series in the form of a miniseries, according to a short article on SciFi.com. Apparently, 'The four-hour miniseries picks up where the cliffhanger series finale left off and will reunite John Crichton (Ben Browder), Aeryn Sun (Claudia Black) and the rest of the Moya crew.' Hopefully this will generate a renewed interest in the show and bring it back permanently." We reported on earlier rumors to this effect late last year.

24 of 345 comments (clear)

  1. Trends by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Looks like there's a trend starting to develop here.

    And I think it's for the better too... Sci-Fi Mini Series.

    The Dune ones, the new Battlestar Galactica, for example, and now this Farscape one.

    I think it's a good way to keep stories fresh and entertaining, with a tight plot, compared to some season-long space operas that drag on way past their expiry date...

    I'm all in favor of this format.

    1. Re:Trends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >I think it's a good way to keep stories fresh and entertaining, with a tight plot, compared to some season-long space operas that drag on way past their expiry date...

      Dunno why, but while I was reading this sentence I thought "Enterprise" (a.k.a. "Star Trek Enterprise").

    2. Re:Trends by TobiasTheCommie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Contrary to most series, Farscape did already have a tight plot, with fresh stories. Like Babylon 5 Farscape have a continous ARC, and if you don't follow the series you will get lost. This makes it hard for people to get into the middle of the series. But it keeps me happy. So yes, mini series are usually interesting, with good stories. But i would rather have a series with good plot, good arc, and good storie, than a mini series. Just because i get more with a series.

      --
      Tobias Ussing http://www.nearby.dk
    3. Re:Trends by Bendebecker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Battlestar Galatica is becoming a series (oh, the humanity!). The dune ones are probably only miniseries because Herbert is dead. The rest are mostly just ABC/NBC two part movies that Sci-fi got the rights to air. Farscape is on miniseries probably becuase they didn't want to risk the investment of an entire season - sort of testing the waters. I really hope they bring it back. It deserved at least proper last season at least to wrap up all the dangling threads, if for nothing else because it supposedly saved sci-fi. Plus, it was winnning awards even for the last season and the reruns were getting nominations. Yeah, I know cable is a business, but maybe sci-fi should sacrifice some of their budget even if they don't get great ratings just for the pr. A sacrifice for fans will get them a huge amount of respect that would probably pay off with higher viewership of the channel in general in the long run.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    4. Re:Trends by superflippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not just Anime, but many Japanese TV series have a planned expiration date. They're sort of like extra-long mini-series. For example, I saw one about a boy whose girlfriend shrank to 6" high. It was a fun teen drama that lasted about 8 or ten episodes. Long enough to get to have a decent story arc, not so long that the gimmick got old. After it was over, they ported a couple of the most popular actors into a new 8-10 episode teen drama series with an entirely new story.

      --
      Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
    5. Re:Trends by Bendebecker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You should also check out Rouroni Kenshin - wandering samarui - great anime. Also you might want to check out Lupin the 3rd - its a late 70's tv series but some of the main characters seem almost identitical (not visually) to the ones in Cowboy Bebop. Soem people like it even though it is old and kinda of more kiddie-ish than Bebop.

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
    6. Re:Trends by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not entirely sure it's just Japanese TV -- I seem to recall Neil Gaiman mentioning on his site that most British series have a certain planned run, and then the most popular get revived periodically. I'm pretty sure TV shows in Latin America are the same way. (No twenty-year runs for spanish soap operas -- one season and they're done.) Our seven-plus-year 26-episodes-a-year shows are really the other end of the spectrum from this, but I suspect it's easier and cheaper to have a certain cast rehash old jokes for seven years than keep coming up with new ideas (or at least new retreads of old ideas). Or maybe not -- the Friends (ugh) cast was making *bank* by the end of their run.

      That's in some ways why I'm glad Firefly was cancelled (I know, I know, perish the thought). The series wasn't old yet, and now they can work it into a movie and maybe a miniseries. With the exception of soap operas, I think *most* stories are better told that way, be it as a book, movie, TV show, graphic novel, or whatever.

  2. Power of the people by neomagi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If the series is actually picked back up, it could prove inspirations for all the other shows that were cancelled, but are still fighting to get back on the air. the save farscape crew did a good job of trying to rally support.

  3. Yeah right by fahrvergnugen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Nice pipe dream, but since the series wasn't cancelled due to lack of interest, I doubt it'll happen.

    --
    Even Jesus hates listening to Creed.
  4. Full series return unlikely by curtlewis · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do shows ever really recover from cancellation? Sure, there's some convulsions before rigamortis sets in, but rarely is there a rebirth, if ever.

    Now, if it WERE to happen, I'd be immensely happy. I'm a big fan of Farscape. The humor is priceless ("Bill Gates can't guarantee Windows, what makes you think you can guarantee my safety?").

    I look forward to the miniseries eagerly and I must admit I wonder how they'll write themselves out of the series finale where Crighton and Sun were literally vaporized.

    (grabs popcorn)

    1. Re:Full series return unlikely by BlacKat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just a note, but the season finale ending was exactly the same as it would of been had they gone on to shoot season five.

      The even left the "To Be Continued" part on the end despite the fact that Sci-Fi cancelled the show.

      Personally, I am very happy they are going to at least finish the story. After watching 88 episodes I would really like to know how it all ends. :)

      If there is enough interest, who knows, maybe it will make a comeback. Either as another miniseries, or as a full- or half-season.

      Lets just hope the production quality of this miniseries meets or exceeds the quality of the previous four seasons. It would be a shame if they cut corners now and made it less then it could of been. :)

    2. Re:Full series return unlikely by canajin56 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree it won't come back, but not for that reason. The reason it won't come back is because it will be OVER. The next season of Farscape was going to be the LAST. It got cancled, and the miniseries is taking its place to wrap everything up. The writers have finished the series they wanted to make. Everything must end.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    3. Re:Full series return unlikely by Jahf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My understanding is you're basically right, but he was at one point told that he'd only get 4 seasons and so had to cut the Shadow War content down significantly, then when the ratings justified the 5th season after the 4th season was almost done finishing he got to take time to finish various aspects in the last season.

      If so then he got his 5 seasons, but not the 5 seasons he -wanted-.

      That explanation made sense to me because after over 3 years of build up the Shadow War seemed to end -awefully- quickly and easily. But as with all SciFi show mythos it could be incorrect.

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  5. Move On to Firefly !!! by rqqrtnb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At risk of getting modded down as off topic here or as a troll (he says with a straight face), let me suggest that all you Farscape fans out there get behind Firefly!!! Farscape is about a hunk surrounded by hot babes and puppets flying around in the gut of some kind of space-creepy. Firefly is about a real group of people with guns, no aliens, bonding for that warm family feeling in a hunk-of-junk honest-to-god spaceship that let's you go aaahhh... at the end of the ep. Much more satisfying.

  6. What is farscape's appeal? by TwistedSquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can anyone explain what makes them like the show? I've caught bits before but I couldn't see much in the characters or visuals that was particularly good or new. This is not meant to be a flame - loads of people seem to like it but I can't see why.

    1. Re:What is farscape's appeal? by metlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I started watching Farscape right from the first show - and one thing that appealed to me was that it had an awesome sense of humour.

      While Star Trek has a secure kind of feeling, Farscape is devoid of that. In Star Trek, you have the federation, a set of "values" and you know that they can never lose.

      Farscape has none of that - you are a bunch of renegades being hunted, you do not have a "federation" to save you and its more realistic than Star Trek would ever be - the other is ideal, while this is more plausible.

      And more than anything, Farscape comes through as being "cool" in a way that is missing in most space operas. And just when you think you have it all figured out, they do something absolutely unexpected (take off a character, introduce new plots, old enemies that join you and the like) and the story twists beautifully.

      More than anything, you do not know what is going to happen next - that thrill, combined with cheeky "earth" attitude and a sense of humour makes it one of my most favourite shows ever.

      So, there! :)

    2. Re:What is farscape's appeal? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, there's everyone else reasons (plot, originality, etc).

      But mostly, I like the culture clashing. Like John relates the absurd things going on to Star Trek, Star Wars, Groundhog's Day, etc.

      Viewers probably remember (and love) the scene when a drunk Crichton starts spewing Klingon phrases at a group of hulking mercenaries. Or when asked if he understood any of the Quantum physics that were explained, he responds "Yeh, some of it. I watched a lot of Star Trek." And how "Newton... Einstein... Rosenberg... we break all of their laws and theories just stepping out to get some lunch."

      Seeing how we (as humans, maybe just Americans) might react to stuff you've only dreamed about or seen on science fiction. Up until now, it's always been about a group of highly trained (insert groups of people) or people used to what's going on. Here, we have a 20th century human (which the other characters once described as barbaric) dealing with all of this.

      We think we know it all. We have a very narrow view of things. Farscape shows how possibly ill-conceived our notions are.

  7. Brilliant by NedR · · Score: 5, Interesting
    While I was upset when Sci-Fi cancelled Farscape, this is, admittedly, probably the best possible way to bring it back. Farscape was always best in blocks of three or four episodes, particularly the "We're So Screwed" arc right before the series finale. It seems like the show excelled most when Chrichton and the gang were in a seemingly impossible situation, and then the writers had three hours or so to go completely nuts. It will be interesting to see what they do with a miniseries, especially considering the title hints that things could get even messier than usual.

    Also, I had a feeling that Chrichton and Aeryn weren't dead at the series finale. Any theories though on how they're coming back?

  8. Rebuild it all? by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but they completely destroyed all the sets etc. when they cancelled the series - so are they now going to rebuild it all to make this miniseries? Now there's a lack of forward planning if ever I heard one.

    Jedidiah.

  9. Yup Yup Yup by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    And I think it's for the better too... Sci-Fi Mini Series.

    Yes! I could only stand a few sci-fi series for a few episodes, until I got the feel of the shallow writing, (dripping with moral lessons) or lame conflict ("It would be my honor to run away screaming like a little girl from that ravenous bugblatter beast for you, Captain") That some series dragged on for years longer than they should have only, IMHO, harmed sci-fi series.

    A quick story, with no commitment to continuity, would work for me, and I'd possibly get back to watching more of it. (I've felt simlarly about sitcoms, but you know how networks think, they want a season, something they can count on, drag it out for years, etc.)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  10. Downside to the Farscape world by MobyDisk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a rule that says that the longer a series goes on, no matter how good it is, it will never gain viewers, only lose. This rule applies to shows that have a complex evolving world, like Farscape. It is because viewers cannot comprehend the series unless they have been watching from the beginning. I watched the first season of Farscape, but after trying to rejoin it after a season or two, I was completely lost. Compare that with the Star Trek series', where you could pick-up from any season and get acquanted quite quickly. The ST world was much "simpler" and didn't evolve as much (it was more like a sitcom in this aspect). The Farscape world is just far too alien (IMHO, this is what made the series awesome).

    This is the downside to the fictional-story-drama genre. Babylon 5 was similar.

    Thus, the prognosis for Farscape is that it is over. You cannot regain the viewers you lost unless you somehow backtrack to a point where they can rejoin. I bet this show will do GREAT in syndication, when people can easily rewatch old episodes and catch-up.

  11. Amazing, but not for the reason you'd think by webwalker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    SCIFI treated Henson pretty shabbily when they were producing the original series, and backed out of the series for the 5th season when Henson wouldn't take less money for the same number of episodes delivered (as well as SCIFI insisting that they should get virtually unlimited re-run rights, which would tie up the series syndication in the USA for a long time. You know SCIFI: they'd run it in repeats until it was dead if they could do it for free.)

    The fact that Henson would back up in the arms of SCIFI for the American distribution is really odd, as it was SCIFI that made such a mess of it in the first place. But I think someone needs to read the fine print: SCIFI's exclusive license to run repeats ends this fall (they had a 2 year contract.)

    I'd be willing to bet my leather Scorpy suit that Henson hooked a deal for distribution in return for an extension of SCIFI's lock on the American distribution. And it means that fans are stuck with SCSFI's crappy attitude toward hard science-fiction and their decision that "Sci-Fi" means Horror-Fantasy.

    So expect SCSIFI to make a big hoorah that "We're bringing this signature show back because we care about and listen to our fans." Phooey. I cancelled my extended cable because after Farscape and Firefly went off-air, there wasn't any decent Sci-Fi left to watch on SCIFI. Tremors2? Fear Factor?

    I'll camp out at a friend's place for the mini-series, but I'm not going to sign up with SCIFI again until they demonstrate that they are proactive, rather than reactive.

    RMW

    --
    flames > dev/null
  12. Re:The problem is. . . by neomagi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the long term goals of the save farscape movement was to get another network to pick up the series. if interest were high enough in the mini-series, then maybe one of the other networks which showed interest would move and pick up the series.

  13. Re:Am I the only one? by Mr+Pippin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually, I considered this to be one of the best SCI-FI attempts I have ever seen. Too bad it started getting weak plotlines in the last two seasons.

    The general outline was "Obtain a central enemy. Over a period of time, have the enemy become an ally while obtaining a new enemy."

    My overall preference for the show was that the majority of the characters had depth to them versus most of the sci-fi chaff thrown at us.

    For instance, I think Scorpius is on the best fleshed out enemies I have ever seen. He is a very well done chaotic-good representation, in my opinion. In fact, they did a show letting the audience know his ultimate motivations, and why he is the way he is. The good part of this show was that none of the other characters in the show ever saw this.