Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Government Raids Intel Tokyo Offices

mordicus writes "Reuters is reporting that Japanese Trade Officials have raided Intel's Japan Offices. From the article: 'Japan's fair trade watchdog raided the offices of Intel Corp's Japanese unit on Thursday and a government source in Tokyo said the chip giant is suspected of violating antitrust laws.' Japan seems to be rather vigilant in enforcing its antitrust legislation. Microsoft's Japanese unit was target of a similar operation less than two months ago."

52 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. Two down... by JosKarith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft last month, Intel now.
    So, who's for the chop in May then?

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    1. Re:Two down... by thestarz · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does SCO, by any chance, have offices in Japan?

      --

      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  2. Yikes! by Knight+Thrasher · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's their reasoning, I wonder? They think Intel is stealing processor stuff from Nintendo?

    1. Re:Yikes! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

      Prolly not.

      I bet that this unit just needed new computers, and didnt have the budget to buy them.

    2. Re:Yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Intel has been trying to stop Japanese OEMs from using AMD chips.

    3. Re:Yikes! by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Amusing, since the japanese have a good number of monopolies of their own. I wonder if they raid themselves?

      Still I can't look down on someone who raids microsoft AND intel.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:Yikes! by ThisIsFred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, well that makes sense. Otherwise I'd have see the humor in the fact that the Japanese government is protecting industries that beat Intel in the past by flooding the RAM chip industry at a loss, then jacking up the price after the competitors were eliminated.

      Anyway, go AMD!

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    5. Re:Yikes! by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a feeling you're thinking of the South Korean government who was backing Hynix with multi-billion dollar subsidies. Both the US and EU hit Hynix cheaps with a substantial tariff last summer, which drove up the price of DDR to a point which it's only just now starting to recover from.

  3. Re:Kudos to Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's hard to declare Intel a monopoly (which is has to be if you are going to accuse it of monopolistic practices) when the latest numbers I've seen show AMD at 12% of the market and climbing, prior to this "invasion".

  4. Japan vigilant? by James+Lewis · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Japan seems to be rather vigilant in enforcing its antitrust legislation."

    Well, at least they have been against American companies.

    1. Re:Japan vigilant? by bcolflesh · · Score: 3, Funny

      Exactly - the Yakuza, err Japanese Government don't really care to have competition - so Intel gets it's pinky cut off.

    2. Re:Japan vigilant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you know any Japanese company which has a >80% worldwide marketshare and has been abusing it?

    3. Re:Japan vigilant? by bcolflesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hello Kitty?

    4. Re:Japan vigilant? by Simonetta · · Score: 5, Informative

      I suspect that this 'raid' is mostly political. Japan historically has vastly different standards between what Japanese companies can do and what foreign companies can do in Japan. If there is ever a question of whether to forward the interests of a Japanese company or apply the law as written fairly when such a situation would benefit the foreign company, the Japanese government will always support the local team.
      Check out the dozens of books written about Japanese business-government practices with American companies in the 1980s.
      With all respect due, I don't see how anyone could use the words 'Japanese anti-trust law' together seriously unless they are referring to a government-keiretsu coalition to destory a foreign company and assign their market to a Japanese concern. There's just too much history to suggest otherwise.

    5. Re:Japan vigilant? by Cassius105 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is the same for any country really

      thats why MS got off lightly in the american anti trust case

    6. Re:Japan vigilant? by K-Man · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Japanese gained over 80% market share for DRAM in the 80's, and then a mysterious fire destroyed a glue factory that was needed for some aspect of production. Alas, production dropped. DRAM prices went through the roof, and stayed that way until the Koreans broke the monopoly in the 90's.

      But there was no hint of wrongdoing. Would you like some whale sushi?

      --
      ---- "If we have to go on with these damned quantum jumps, then I'm sorry that I ever got involved" - Erwin Schrodinger
    7. Re:Japan vigilant? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you know any Japanese company which has a >80% worldwide marketshare and has been abusing it?

      Sony, Matsushita and Mitsubishi might count, they each have a huge corner in some market somewhere and have been pretty beligerent at times.

    8. Re:Japan vigilant? by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The fire at the resin plant was a total smoke-screen, it had a negligible effect on production or costs.

      The DRAM shortage that occured at that time had a LOT of reasons associated with it, but the short version is that it all boiled down to supply and demand. Despite having a large chunk of the international DRAM market, none of the companies were making any money because prices were so low. So, to try and fix this, they decided to constrain the supply a bit. Supply goes down while demand was going up at the same time. End result? Huge increase in price. The resin plant fire was just a nice scapegoat to point blame at.

      The Koreans broke the monopoly because they didn't worry about making any money. They figured that they would get marketshare first while their government propped the company up and then eventually start making money several years down the road. This worked fairly well for Samsung, who are now the worlds #1 memory manufacturer. It didn't work at all for LG Semiconductor or Hyundai Semi (now groupped together as Hynix). Both of those companies lost billions of dollars and they continue to lose billions of dollars, though the Korean government still props them up. Fairly recently they were found to violate some trade restrictions because of these government handouts and now need to pay fairly hefty levies to sell their products in the US.

      In any case, while this is all slightly off-topic for the article, it is something that is going to be rather important to remember in the next 6 months or so. Several memory companies have announced plans to reduce production while at the same time advising that they will be unable to meet demand. In other words, they're doing it all over again, restricting supply in order to boost revenue (and maybe even make a profit, since most memory companies are not at all profitable). Expect memory prices to rise fairly significantly throughout the course of this year and don't be at all surprised if an earthquake in Taiwan or a resin plant fire in Japan is blamed for the hike.

  5. Re:Kudos to Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Japanese merely enjoy "raiding" things. Look at China, for example.

  6. Raid by Rkane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it just me, or does anyone else think they might have chosen a more descriptive word for what happened? When I think of a raid, I think of things like a drug bust where they bang down the door and come in with guns drawn. I may be wrong, but I have a feeling this "raid" was more like some guys in suits showing up and demanding to speak with certain people and look at certain files, etc. Then again, Intel does hire some sneaky folk, and you never know if they have a stockpile of BFG-9000's in the back room waiting for the FTC to come.
    Needless to say, calling it a "raid" gives the wrong impression (to me).

    1. Re:Raid by Knight+Thrasher · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Raids typically DO include officers, in and out of uniform, in suits, etc, and they bring enough people to wisk away the employees from data without any potentially incriminating evidence being destroyed. Yeah, it's a raid. Nobody ever said if you're suspected of violating anti-trust laws you have lots of rights. =)

    2. Re:Raid by ThetaKestrel · · Score: 2, Funny

      True dat. First thing that came into my mind was "Japanese government raids Intel offices; all they found was ice cream and lemonade."

    3. Re:Raid by JayPee · · Score: 2

      Honestly, I'm hoping it -is- just like a drug bust. The thought of large scary men in black jumpsuits and masks with the latest in hip assult rifles terrifying Intel and Microsoft employees fills me with perverse glee.

  7. Other related news by kpogoda · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And in other related news: Microsft, SCO and the RIAA have teamed up to counter this threat by sucking up all of the countries legal and technical resources in a frivolous and long-term legal battle. On a more serious side, it is about time a country gets tough on this subject. My biggest fear is that Japan will not be able to counter these international economic threats. The U.S. government was not even powerful enough to take on Microsoft. Their best bet is to cooperate in the Asian market with OpenSource. Have you ever seen or used Asian versions of Microsoft products? They are even worse than the American counterparts. It is no wonder they are feeling a bit angry. My prediction is that the Asian market is going to give BIG Corporate American business a big surprise in coming years.

  8. “third world countries” by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For the most part, American companies have learned they can walk all over "third world countries" (although there are refreshing South American exceptions). Japan used to be such a country. That they are no longer (and haven't been for many many years) in that class and also very nationalistic, it's not surprising that they aren't interested in Intel and Microsoft's monopolistic conduct, especially since they themselves have quite a high-tech economy.

    Unfortunately, many countries are not in the same position to aggravate or turn down Western business, even if in the medium and long run they lose in the deal. For many "third world" countries, short-term existence (and political graft) are the only thing on the radar.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  9. Vigilant? by jeroenb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Japan seems to be rather vigilant in enforcing its antitrust legislation.

    Considering that Microsoft has probably been breaking antitrust laws for 10+ years, I wouldn't call this "vigilant".

  10. personally by SteelRat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that it is refreshing to see some trustbusting and pricefixing countermeasures in our cosey little global economy.

    you know, more than just obvious corporate welfare, subsidies and pandering. At least the Japanese look after their own a little.

  11. Giant robot involved? by Geek_3.3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    From all of the recent /. stories, I imagine a lot of japanese robots doing the raiding...

    That or I watch too much anime. Probably a bit of both.

  12. Not Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    You are wrong if you think any American company is going to march into Japan and tell the Japanese how to run their business. Very wrong!

    The Japanese are known for protecting their own, at any cost, from non-Japanese threats. To say such protectionism a cornerstone of their culture is an understatement. Chances are that Intel tried to go John Wayne* on their Japanese suppliers/distributors, and they replied to the threat in their own special way: Using Tokyo to respond for them.

    * - Being an American currently living in Japan, I can say that acting American in a Japanese Business setting is like walking upto the plate, in baseball, with 2 strikes against you.

  13. No Knock Raids by DietVanillaPepsi · · Score: 4, Funny

    No-knock raids have been going on in America for quite some time to combat those crazy marijuana and crack users. It's about time that other countries pick up on the value of no-knock raids in taking down corporations that violate anti-trust laws. Had it gone down American-style, someone would have ended up dead.

  14. Wonder why they don't raid Sony *wink wink* by adzoox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sony is like the Microsoft of Japan. Billboards dominate the streets. They certainly dominate the media and the advertising dollar there. Interesting how they would "raid" a US company who, to me, seems no more guilty than the dominant player there. It also lends creedance to revenge - seeing as Sony recently made a HUGE order of Transmeta Chips and didn't go with intel version of the ARM processor.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:Wonder why they don't raid Sony *wink wink* by Ubergrendle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sony doesn't have a monopoly in any segment of domestic products that I can think of. I remember seeing an interview with a head Sony designer and he had a very sobering thought: "Any technology we bring to market will be copied by 2 or 3 major competitors within 6 months. What separates us from our competitors is branding, consistency in design, and a reputation for quality."

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  15. japan and crime by Raleel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IIRC, japan takes it's crime very seriously, compared to say.. the US (disclaimer: I'm a native of the USA). Criminals move with the expectation of being caught, because the cops in Japan are highly efficient, work selflessly, etc etc. I hear some figure about how criminals in Japan have a 80-90% chance of being caught, where as in the US, it's more like 20-30%.

    Is it still that way?

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    1. Re:japan and crime by foidulus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The well connected criminals don't get caught, organized crime is HUGE in Japan, and since the gangs are VERY politically connected, police only do token raids on the Yakuza to show the citizens that they are devoted to busting crime. Prostitution is illegal, but there are prostitutes EVERYWHERE! It's run by the Yakuza, so the police do nothing about it. Though the police do seem interested in busting some of the growing number of foreign gangs in Japan(mostly Chinese and Korean).

    2. Re:japan and crime by El+Cabri · · Score: 3, Funny

      House burglars in Japan are probably often caught while they are putting their shoes back on after they leave the crime scene.

    3. Re:japan and crime by miu · · Score: 2
      Couple of important items left out of that picture: institutionalized corruption and racketeering. The stink with Haliburton and the VP would just not be a big deal in Japan, it would be business as usual. The corruption involved in the Boston "Big Dig" project would be business as usual in Japan.

      I don't live in Japan, but I have family there and the general attitude seems to be that the US is heaven compared to Japan. Normal people just accept that the police and politicians are corrupt and sold out. As long as politicians can deliver the pork most people are apathetic.

      Unless something changes in the next generation Japan may start to have more violent crime. It's not that the tools of social control are failing to work, it is that the demands have become so high that young people are starting to fall out of the system.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  16. Not just them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If a Japanese company had a position in the US markets as dominant as Microsoft or Intel, I imagine you'd see some action from DC.

  17. Kudos? by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Interesting
    While Intel is shoving Press-hot down consumers throats, AMD is doing a nice job.

    You can't believe this is in the interest of fair trade, not in Japan, where business has the government firmly wrapped around its little finger? Surely you don't believe this was not at the behest of griping japanese electronics manufacturers who have had a difficult time competing with Intel on their home turf. This is the country that dumped consumer electronics and automobiles on the world, subsidized by taxing their own citizens. This is the country that negotiated hardball and grudgingly every millimeter of trade concessions for years.

    When Japan, Inc. does things we like, like make handheld devices with Linux embedded, we applaud. When they do things we're less thrilled, we overlook. Japan, Inc. makes some damn fine stuff, but don't confuse that with government-industrial policies.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  18. Re:Kudos to Japan by txviking · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Antitrust laws are not only used against monopolies (which means it is already too late in some way), but also for anti-competitive behaviour.

    It is best for the consumer if all those backroom deals and exclusive contracts disappear and the consumer has the free choice. That would be a concept, wouldn't it?

  19. Unlike a lot... by zogger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...of other nations, Japan makes no secret of the fact that they are a highly nationalistic country, and that they will do whatever it takes to protect their markets. Most other western industrialised nations are more fragmented and disingenous about it. Japan since WW2 and their rebuilding, sees economics as just another form of warfare basically, and acvts accordingly. They are polite about it, but ruthless. They are also really up the creek with the yen and the dollar, and are exploring different ways to ease the burden of supporting a still grossly over valued dollar. They have too many investments tied to it, but realise they needed major serious diversification like years ago, and are in max overdrive to rectify what to them is a national economic disaster in the making if it's not addressed past the lip service level. Same thing in the US, just we have.... stupider central bankers. They thought that they could keep pushing funny bux forever, like no one would ever notice. another subject there, but that is happening as well.

    There's probably also a lot of other internal political action (politics=money, like any other place) going on around this, but I don't follow their internal affairs adequately enough to comment on it to any significant degree.

    As an aside,I am also highly surprised that in this day and age that *any* intel chips get used in Japan.

  20. it could be... by MoFoQ · · Score: 2, Informative

    it could be that microsoft ratted intel out for leniency....u know...the wintel issue from back in the day, before AMD became as big a contender as they are now; to the point that AMD now dictates what's in the X86-64 extension instruction set, etc. (even the rumor mill is spewing out that Intel will implement some of those extensions for some of their 32bit P4's later on)

  21. Re:Kudos to Japan by RazzleFrog · · Score: 2, Informative

    (which is has to be if you are going to accuse it of monopolistic practices)

    Says who? You can have monopolistic practices without being a monopoly. Isn't that what everybody has been saying about Microsoft all these years?

    According to Columbia Guide to Standard American English the -istic suffix means:

    "in imitation of" or "having some characteristics of,"

  22. Re:Kudos to Japan by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Antitrust laws are not only used against monopolies (which means it is already too late in some way), but also for anti-competitive behaviour.

    It is best for the consumer if all those backroom deals and exclusive contracts disappear and the consumer has the free choice. That would be a concept, wouldn't it?

    I think you'll find the land of the Zaibatsu wrote the book on backroom dealing.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  23. Or in haiku... by yarisbandit · · Score: 3, Funny

    japan vigilent
    intel antitrust frolicks
    ruined by truncheon

    1. Re:Or in haiku... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cherry blossoms fall
      The moon rises in the sky
      Intel has been pVVn3d.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  24. Just a few more raids by wheelgun · · Score: 4, Funny

    Intel and Microsoft? They need to raid a case maker, a hard drive maker, a video card maker and a motherboard maker and they'll be all set to play Half-Life 2 at the precinct. ;)

  25. Because Sony knows its home turf. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And its laws. American companies get away with far more than they should here. It wouldn't be surprising that they think the rest of the world is just as forgiving. For a company like Sony that has been created in Japan, they know what they can and cannot do inside and out. It makes sense that Japanese companies are not being busted, they probably all realise how harsh it can really be if they mess up. It's a learning lesson American companies will have to learn quickly. Ever wonder why the XBox has done so bad in Japan? It's because Microsoft cant get the leverage they can in other countries without breaking a metric ton of laws. Microsoft in turn has slammed Japan over and over saying they dont need them, etc .. While doing this, they've pretty much lost all respect for any Japanese developers jumping on the XBox2 ship. They've doomed their console hopes because they finally have to play fair somewhere and it bit them in the ass.

  26. Re:Kudos to Japan by txviking · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish AMD was the only processor manufacturer in the world, then everyone could only buy processors that are high quality for a low price.

    I wonder if the price of AMD would be so good if they would be a monopoly ...

    I still like choices. Let AMD and Intel and maybe some more companies compete. This creates innovation and good prices

  27. Read the Intel Book by GPLDAN · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Read the book "intel Inside". The insider account of the culture of fear and paranoia fostered at Intel, with propaganda posters on the wall about how "it's nice to work at Intel", constant employee surveillance, the Randall Schwartz of Perl fame lawsuit, etc etc.

    It's Orwellian nature makes it perfectly suited for Japanese culture. Should be a slam dunk. Except, as another slashdotter pointed out, the profits are rolling back to Andy Grove and his clan. The Intellies probably cut some deal with Taiwan and a Japanese company lost out, and before you know it, the offices are being raided.

    With Intel's culture, a government raid is the biggest kick in the balls you could deliver. Start going through computer files and the network there, and people would be flipping out. What if they uncovered the AMD sabotage plot?

  28. On the flipside of that... by gosand · · Score: 2, Informative
    Read the book "intel Inside". The insider account of the culture of fear and paranoia fostered at Intel, with propaganda posters on the wall about how "it's nice to work at Intel", constant employee surveillance, the Randall Schwartz of Perl fame lawsuit, etc etc.

    I haven't heard of this book, but may have to check it out. One of my oldest friends works there, we grew up together (in our 30's now). I was just out visiting him, and I have to tell you that Intel seems like a nice place to work. He gets very nice stock options. He has been getting decent to very good bonuses for the last 7 years. After 7 years, they get a sabattical - 3 months paid time off, plus his vacation for the year. He gets to telecommute 1 day a week, as does most of the other people he works with. They have a very casual attire policy.

    He said their policy is to always compensate their employees better than the industry average, and much better than the industry average during times when the economy is bad. Which is much better than where I work now, where I am consistently reminded that "I am lucky to even have a job." But he is a quality control engineer, I am a software guy. I know this guy, and he wouldn't bullshit me. He really loves his job at Intel.

    Now that says nothing about their business practices. He did say they are very careful about trade secrets, and there is this feel that people are watching you. But Intel does have trade secrets that a lot of people would like to steal.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  29. Re:Discriminatory. by fredrik70 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mind you, we don't know if they're targeting japanese companies as well. This is news over here just because there're a american company involved. If there were a japanese company involved it wouldn't be news over, would it?

    --
    if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  30. Wrong statistic by achurch · · Score: 3, Informative

    I hear some figure about how criminals in Japan have a 80-90% chance of being caught, where as in the US, it's more like 20-30%.

    No, Japan's about on par with the US there--in fact there've been news reports lamenting how the Japanese rate of catching criminals is "down" to 20% lately. The 80-90% figure is your chance of getting convicted if they take you to trial, and that's mostly because the police don't bring charges unless they're more or less certain they can convict you. (Even if you show up at the police station and confess to a crime, the standard procedure goes something like: confession --> interrogation --> confirm details --> okay, now we arrest you.)