Slashdot Mirror


Tiny Surveillance Aircraft Fly in Tucson

An anonymous reader writes "Science Daily reports that thirteen teams from the United States, Korea and Germany will be in Tucson April 9-11 to compete for $6,000 in prize money during the 8th International Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) Competition. MAVs are tiny, radio-controlled airplanes that carry video cameras."

12 of 106 comments (clear)

  1. Interesting definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    MAV- micro air vehicle Its just the people who want to use them that dictates they have cameras, all the early ones were purely micro air vehicles, nothing more, just people proving they could make stuff that small that flew under remote control. Why doesnt it surprise me that someone not only found a questionable use for them, but managed to subvert the entire acronym?

    1. Re:Interesting definition by Feanturi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why doesnt it surprise me that someone not only found a questionable use for them...

      It's that "Good/Evil is in the user, not the tool" thing though. I would love to be able to fly a tiny little thing and wear goggles that let me see where "I'm" going. Sure, one could spy; or one could just have a grand ol' geeky time exploring hard to reach caves or condemned buildings or even network plenums.. Seems like having a camera on it is just a sensible way to control the thing. If the first ones didn't have that, well yeah, the tech was early still.

      I, for one, welcome our acronym-subverting overlords.

  2. Re:Do these people have morals? by rebeka+thomas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    do they care that the technology they're helping develop will be used to KILL people in future wars, perhaps even against their own country?

    I think nothing sums up the problem with american society today.


    Actually as a country the USA does more to save lives than it does to kill. Groundbreaking research in medical and safety innovations, in search and rescue, being at the head of the forefront when natural disasters strike around the world, more donations to foreign nations in need for food, medical supplies and fresh water, and better care worldwide in general due to US invention.

    I think if you look at the number of deaths it pales into insignificance. Let these kids play with their planes, it's all in fun

    --
    RST
  3. Wouldn't it suck... by $1uck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If your very expensive micro/nano surveilance device was defeated by chick-a-dees? (or any other small avian). Really what would keep songbirds from trying to eat these? or raptors from taking down the bigger ones by mistake?

  4. The real experts in video technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now if only it was a Micro Upskirt Video Vehicle contest, the Japanese team would win for sure!

    1. Re:The real experts in video technology by boudie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, and he who lose control makes gash landing.

  5. When is the A-MAV contest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    When is the contest for Anti-MAV? Tiny rockets that shoot down MAVs.

  6. Re:Do these people have morals? - by supertsaar · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, While I agree with your final conclusion, (the fun bit) I think perhaps its a good idea to take a look at some facts about where the US ranks worldwide in giving econonomic aid.

    Its on position 20, with a very skinny $23.76 per person per year.

    Number one is Luxemburg, with a whopping $352.30 per person.

    All terribly off topic, but I had to...:)

    --
    The Bigger The Headache The Bigger the Pill
  7. MicroWarfare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/robotics/2 001/1/MicroWarfare/print.phtml

    more on microjet at
    http://defence-data.com/f2000/pagefa1006.htm

  8. Re:Do these people have morals? by jridley · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You're right, technology should never be brought to war. We should go back to carpet bombing instead of laser guided munitions. We should go back to sending scouts in instead of video cameras, so they can get shot. Hell, let's go back to hand-to-hand bloodbaths.

    Wars are going to happen, period. Politicians are just as willing to kill 1000 as 10 to achieve their goals. It's naieve to think that they'll be more likely to go to war because we have a camera in an RC plane.

    The most likely result of having spy planes like this would be LESS casualties. Imagine being able to fly a video fly into a building where there's a hostage crisis going on and getting real time video. Imagine flying into a mosque and having video telling you who's in there, where, etc. The place could easily be filled with civilians, and we'd avoid attacking them. Or, it could be filled with armed troups, and we'd have proof to the world that we're justified in attacking.

    Almost all war-related technological innovation of the last 50 years has been targeted at reducing civilian casualties, collateral damage, and exposure of our own troops to fire.

  9. Cool pictures and some movies of these thingies by MBAFK · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Vision-Guided Flight for MAVs

    Looks like these little blighters can be tricky to fly, they are using a computer to track the horizon to help keep them level.

  10. Re:Ornithopters by RoyalCheese · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always thought it would be beter just to shrink the camera, and transmitter/receiver so they are small enough to be carried by an insect (maybe a wasp or a locust) and let the insect carry the equipment around. Then the operator could provide sensory stimulus to the insect by radio feedback, and direct it (forward, backward, left, right, up down). Then there is no power supply to worry about (power drawn from the insect's own potentials or maybe peizo electric from the wing flapping) and the insect can refuel itself by visiting flowers/ jam sandwiches or enemy picnics.