Slashdot Mirror


Non-Lethal Sniper Rifle: You're Tagged For Life

gbjbaanb writes "Cool new urban battlefield weaponry for the geeks to fear. The Id Sniper is a nonlethal sniper rifle that fires tiny GPS microchips into the body of the target. The idea is that a rowdy crowd can be tagged for later 'processing' by law enforcement officials. Apparently the chip hitting you will feel like a mosquito-bite lasting a fraction of a second. Although it looks, and sounds like a cyberpunk weapon, its for real from a Danish company that has already shown it off at a Chinese Police exhibition. check out the tracking software." Here's hoping this is cautionary artwork.

121 comments

  1. LOL by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was just talking about this with a friend, and now it's real!

    Use it to 'mark' the kids your child hangs out with so you can always keep track of what they do. Love and trust your kid, but be wary of his/her friends!

    1. Re:LOL by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Except it isn't. At least, not in sniper rifle form.

      Though it does remind me of IMIPAK. The only proposed defense against it was slavery.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  2. this is absolutely horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can only hope that this is an april fools joke coming in too late

    1. Re:this is absolutely horrible by akgunkel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It has to be. There is no way you could achieve injection this way without causing some real injury. Assuming you could get this to work at all, would it really "feel like a mosquito-bite lasting a fraction of a second?" I don't think so... ever been shot with a BB-gun? That hurts a lot more than a mosquito-bite even if it doesn't break the skin.

  3. Good aim... by Beatbyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Besides the fact that this is invasion of privacy (in the weirdest possible way), what happens when the sniper decides to shoot and it hits your eyeball?

    It may be a tiny device but you're either dead or blind either way.

    1. Re:Good aim... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Although this is almost certainly a parody, most non-lethal weapons for crowd (read: riot) control can cause serious injury. Things that explode and fire pyramids of hard rubber, hard baseballish balls shot at high speeds. These are non-lethal in the sense of "we're trying not to kill, but we're willing to accept some losses".

      There are appropriate times for these weapons, but they are all too often used casually.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    2. Re:Good aim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A journalist got a "beanbag" (cloth filled with lead pellets) embedded in the side of his head last december at a protest in florida.

    3. Re:Good aim... by plumpy · · Score: 1

      most non-lethal weapons for crowd (read: riot) control can cause serious injury.

      They're actually referred to as "less-lethal" weapons, since pepper spray, tear gas, etc. CAN and DO kill. Just not as much as, say, a bullet.

    4. Re:Good aim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pepper spray, tear gas, etc. CAN and DO kill. Just not as much as, say, a bullet.

      Not as OFTEN as a bullet. When they do kill they do it every bit as much as by any other means. You can't be just a little bit dead.

    5. Re:Good aim... by satanami69 · · Score: 1

      This is the best grammar nazi post ever!

      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
    6. Re:Good aim... by notsoclever · · Score: 2, Funny
      What?! That's not what the pet shop owner told me!

      Pardon me, I have to return a parrot...

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people: ones who understand ternary, ones who don't, and ones who think this joke is about binary
    7. Re:Good aim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No kidding, check out some pictures here. Click on the numbers next to the Photos label at the bottom of the story, notably numbers 1, 5, and 6. And remember this is Oakland and it wasn't a riot it was a peaceful demonstration.

    8. Re:Good aim... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      The "funny" thing is that the military still likes to call their much more harmfull new WMDs non-lethal.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    9. Re:Good aim... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll become an accepted fact that citizens are assuming this risk when they go out in public. They should expect that they may be tagged as a part of life in the 21st century. If they fail to wear protective eyegear, whose fault is that?

      If they gather in a public place and for political reasons, that is doubly tempting fate! They should rather be surprised if they don't get tagged, at a minimum.

      Expect upgrades to the GPS microchip to have the ability to administer pacifying and/or lethal drugs into the human target, by satellite control.

    10. Re:Good aim... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      What, the Air Force's 2000lb concrete laser guided bombs? As my ex-Army buddy likes to say, it's nice to see we've gotten advanced enough that we can go back to throwing stones at our enemies...

    11. Re:Good aim... by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      No, this stuff.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  4. It's not 4/1/04 by scumbucket · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Dear Editors,

    Today is not April Fool's day...........

    --
    CMDRTACO CHECK YOUR EMAIL!
    1. Re:It's not 4/1/04 by moreati · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seconded
      I call parody (product number 2 from the same site.)

    2. Re:It's not 4/1/04 by palironsat · · Score: 1

      You know, is it just me, or is that "middle east terrorist suspect" a priest? It's a sad state when a man of the cloth in a highly Catholic country (is it REALLY Mexico City?) is a terrorist...

      And then there's the fact that it runs on OpenBSD (stolen from post below) and Windows 3.11 (wtf?) - I'm sorry, but unless it runs on MS/DOS 5.0, it's just not worth getting. Save up for something that's more "standards compliant."

      A 3D rendered rifle, and the other product thingy on their page, also a rendering, and not a photo. Remind anyone of a certain vaporware system that we've seen before? **please don't sue me!**

  5. Runs on OpenBSD? by jazman_777 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I know it's just a joke. _No_ commercial software runs on OpenBSD.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    1. Re:Runs on OpenBSD? by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 1

      And who writes for win 3.11 anymore?

  6. Here is what happens by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Besides the fact that this is invasion of privacy (in the weirdest possible way), what happens when the sniper decides to shoot and it hits your eyeball?"

    It is just the first step. Eventually, you will look like this

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  7. I know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I'll just microwave myself everytime I come home from rioting!

  8. Good Job, Junior Citizen! by Bravo_Two_Zero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Almost more disurbing... check out the JuJu in the Products section of the company's site. Creepy!

    --


    Amateurs discuss tactics. Professionals discuss logistics.

  9. Check out the Home Page by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    Here. All it says is "this is not the way..."

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  10. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's a nice 3D studio render there :)

  11. Mike Oldfield "Maestro" again by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of Mike Oldfield's Maestro music/VR videogame.

    In the default/demo mode, you can hit the spacebar and fire at whatever is in front of you. The bullets resemble tiny circuitboards.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  12. Yep by GreyOrange · · Score: 3, Funny

    Full body Aluminum foil get-ups just got more popular.

    --

    Insert Witty Remark Here ===>____________________________
  13. BS by jsimon12 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That is not a "GPS Chip" on the website, it is a tiny microchip used to ID dogs and cats. The website is surprising slim on any details and to me appears to be a complete farse.

    1. Re:BS by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      Be that as it may the chips that are implanted in pets do work. There is no reason why they couldn't be used in humans. Of course, according to my cat the implantation is extremely painful and you would notice it. Also the chip is easily detected (that's the idea) so real bad guys would have no trouble finding and removing it.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    2. Re:BS by s0l0m0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure, they work.

      To identifiy a pet when you have it at a location where it can be scanned (such as a vet or the humane society). It does not allow you to track your pet.

      And my dog thinks your cat is a pussy.

  14. It's fake. by stienman · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's fake. The "GPS Pellet" is nothing more than a picture of a common transponder (RFID). Even if they could get the GPS electronics that small, and fit a tansmitter in there, the battery needed for more than a few minutes of GPS calculations would be significantly larger than the capsule.

    Furthermore, the GPS signal doesn't go very deep through human tissue, it degrades as it goes, and a transmitter strong ernough to be received more than a few hundred yards away would be comparable in size and power consumption to a cell phone.

    Interesting concept. It's not impossible, but it's not cost effective now.

    -Adam

    1. Re:It's fake. by photon317 · · Score: 1


      I believe it could possibly be real. When they call it a "GPS chip", what they really mean is that it's an RFID transponder, which when combined with their RFID tracking stations will GPS-locate the wearer of the chip. The idea would be to pepper a metro area with their transponders, which do have GPS hardware, and to track the transponders the person passes by.

      Of course, current RFID transponders have far too limited a range (a few feet) to do this effectively. But who knows if they've managed to work out something that can transpond across a city block.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    2. Re:It's fake. by wscott · · Score: 1

      They just need to make a deal with Walmart and a couple other major stores to be notified if a certain range of RFID tags are seen.

    3. Re:It's fake. by sfjoe · · Score: 2, Interesting



      There is no way you could reliably hit a target with a projectile that lightweight. To put the velocity behind it that you'd need to have enough kinetic energy to penetrate the skin would vaporize anything that small. Not to mention that it would become useless in even a light breeze.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    4. Re:It's fake. by photon317 · · Score: 1


      Building a proper projectile around that capsule wouldn't be too hard. Obviously the RFID capsule itself isn't what's chambered into the rifle. More than likely you would construct something similar to a standard centerfire rifle cartridge, but with a new-design projectile for implanting the things. Some lead weight in the back, a razor sharp front edge for piercing the skin, and the right velocity at the end of the flight path (enough to penetrate the skin with a razor isn't much). The real challenges/downfalls within this are:

      1) The cartridge would have to be for a certain range to target. If you want adaptability in range to target, you'll have to carry several rounds, maybe one that says 50-100m, one that says 100-200m, etc.

      2) The lead weight on the outside/back of the razor rfid payload will neccesarily smack the target's skin right after insertion. It wouldn't be a very hard hit, but it might be more noticeable than the insertion itself.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    5. Re:It's fake. by geoswan · · Score: 1

      Range? Lol. The article said the chips would be tracked "by satellite".

    6. Re:It's fake. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      To put the velocity behind it that you'd need to have enough kinetic energy to penetrate the skin would vaporize anything that small.

      I strongly disagree. Look up Discarding Sabot rounds.

      If the charge won't scramble the electronics, maybe you could fire them with a magnetic linear accelerator, also.

      Windage, however, remains a problem.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:It's fake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For issue the first, there is a solution. Simply use a liquid propellant rifle with a variable injection system. The amount of propellant varies with the distance you want to shoot. The injection system could be tied into a (laser?) rangefinder. Just point and shoot, the gun takes care of the rest.

      The real problem would be getting the terminal ballistics right. The slower your projectile goes the more chance it has to be affected by outside forces (wind would be the prime one). Nothing like shooting the person 2 to the left of the guy you wanted to tag, cause a breeze picked up.

    8. Re:It's fake. by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      PASSIVE rfid's dont need to a battery.

      WHEN WILL PEOPLE LEARN ABOUT RFID'S ???

      The 'emforcement' could corral everyone in an area and one by one scan them with a passive rfid reader which ENERGIZES the rfid tag with the tiny bit of electricy on that specific frequency.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    9. Re:It's fake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, you look up discarding sabot rounds. The sabot is very dense, and has a lot of kinetic energy. The point of a sabot is to increase/focus damage, not eliminate it.

      Unless you have some magical way of shedding mass just before it hits the human -- and having the shed mass diverge enough to miss -- you can't have it both ways. If it has enough mass X velocity to fly true for a hundred feet or so, it will cause damage to the target.

    10. Re:It's fake. by stienman · · Score: 1

      I know RFIDs. This article isn't talking about RFIDs. It's talking about a GPS satelite person tracking system. Then it has a picture of a freaking RFID tag.

      I'm saying that it can't be what they claim it is (GPS and/or satellite tracking transmitter).

      The idea behind this system is that the people won't know that they're wearing this tag, and that they can be tracked remotely. RFID tags this small can only be read from so far away.

      So, in short, this is not what it claims to be. If it's RFID, then it can't possibly do what they suggest. If it's GPS then the picture is a mock up, or false. They don't mention either possibility on the page.

      And yes, you're right, RFID tags do not need a battery to operate - in fact that is one of their advantages. They can use batteries if one wants them to be active or transmit further.

      And no, people will never 'learn' about RFIDs the way you seem to want them to. Most people don't even know about computers, they just know how to use them.

      -Adam

  15. This would NEVER be abused in the USofA, right?? by Syowr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Snake Plissken: Got a smoke?
    Malloy: The United States is a non-smoking nation! No smoking, no drugs, no alcohol, no women - unless you're married - no foul language, no red meat!
    Snake Plissken: Land of the free.

  16. robo-shrimp in the stomach? by Doviende · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    a little modification, and it's just like the matrix.

    --
    "The value of a man resides in what he gives,
    and not in what he is capable of receiving."
    --Albert Einstein
    1. Re:robo-shrimp in the stomach? by shpoffo · · Score: 1

      to redouble your seriousness - take a look at the GPS unit that gets shot into the body

      The first thing I thought of was the Matrix bug

      -shpoffo

  17. Big "A-10 Warthog" Mosquito by kmahan · · Score: 2, Informative

    After looking at the "GPS-chip Verichip(r)" all I could think was that if that hit me with enough force to penetrate my skin it would hurt a lot more than any mosquito bite I've ever gotten. Maybe if the mosquito had malaria and I was hospitalized for a couple of weeks the pain would be equivalent.

    Even assuming wire a LOT finer than typical magnet (coil wrapping) wire, that looks like one hell of a big device. Maybe you are required to bend over so they can inject it as a suppository.

    Just a little late for April 1st...

    --
    Invalid Checksum. Retrying.
  18. Good vs. Evil vs. ??? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it's for real from a Danish company that has already shown it off at a Chinese Police exhibition.

    This sentence leads to some interesting concepts:

    * If the Chinese authorities had this cyber-weapon at their disposal, would lives have been saved at Tiananmen Square?

    * If the demonstrators had been tagged instead of shot outright, would it have been any better for them in the long run?

    * Isn't the whole idea incredibly creepy?

    Actually, I have my doubts that a map, like the one tracking the terrorist padre in the demo, is currently possible. Remember the distance-squared law, frequently mentioned in other RFID articles?

    This sounds more like a James Bond tracking device than anything possible in the Real World.

    Something similar that *would* be useful against *real* criminals would be a TollTag gun -- fire a vehicle tracker into the body panel of a fleeing vehicle, and track it as it travels the freeway system in a wired-up town like Houston.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Good vs. Evil vs. ??? by hookedup · · Score: 1

      Uh, Tianamen Square happened in 1989. Even if this technology is real. It's about 15 years too late..

    2. Re:Good vs. Evil vs. ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If the Chinese authorities had this cyber-weapon at their disposal, would lives have been saved at Tiananmen Square?

      You missed a crucial word there. Yes, of course it's too late, that's why it's a question posing a hypothetical situation where they did have this technology.

    3. Re:Good vs. Evil vs. ??? by deepvoid · · Score: 1

      No, more people would have died. Remember, alot of people "got away". Something that this technology, at least theoretically, would have prevented. Police would just show up at the "offender's" home or work and pack em off to slave labor camps, I mean, reeducation, to make those cheap Chinese goods we seem so hungry for these days.

      --
      Fast machines, powerfull AI, impulsive invention,... All I lack is a good espresso machine!
    4. Re:Good vs. Evil vs. ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if America had the nuclear bomb 2 years before they did, thousands of Allied soldiers would not have died.

      but they did.

      and America didn't have the bomb then.

      It's the same scenario... christ, almost sounds like someone saying "if that cat could talk, I wonder what it would say to you?"

  19. Fake can be just as good by babbage · · Score: 3, Informative

    This can't be real.

    The image of the rifle in question looks like CGI from a video game -- if it was real, why not just use a photo rather than a photo-realistic synthetic graphic?

    And their other product, with the silly cartoons, is even more implausible. But let's not get distracted by the obvious fake -- the gun is more interesting anyway.

    As a hypothetical exercise, could this kind of coverty GPS planting work? Let's say that the GPS beacon / transmitter is small enough to be mistaken for an insect's sting, so no bigger than a grain of sand. What then?

    1. Do GPS receivers that small currently exist? Are they reliable? What power supply do they need, and how long could an implanted one continue to operate?
    2. Would it be possible to remotely track these devices from, say, NSA headquarters in Fort Mead, Maryland? The graphics suggest that they can monitor a tag's movement on a 1000 mile journey from Maine to North Carolina -- was this data gathered from close to the target (in which case why bother with the beacon since you can presumably track them with more conventional means), or was the data gathered remotely (in which case how powerful can that little transmitter be?

    I don't believe for a minute that this is real, but I had no problem believing that various Three Letter Agencies would love to treat this as a prototype for devices they would like to build. How close are we to being able to approximate this with current technology?

    1. Re:Fake can be just as good by BurritoJ · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely correct... Some more supporting arguments:

      - A 'GPS Bullet' small enough to be injected would not have any range to speak of. Atmospheric drag would stop it long before it got close to the target.

      - If you can make a 'GPS Bullet'... Why spend any time/money developing a rifle? There are lots of ready-made rifles already available.

      - If you insist on making a rifle, make it feasible. ie. not a crappy long-barrel pistol with a scope and a shoulder stock that will fold up whenever it is touched.

      - Do they really expect anyone to believe that their software runs on every operating system known to man? All the versions of Windows, all versions of MacOS, SunOS, Linux...?

      - The 'GPS Bullet' they show would appear to be ~1cm in diameter based on the wire/spool embedded in the plastic. I guarantee that the pain will be more noticable than a mosquito bite.

      The list goes on and on... it's a hoax and a poorly implemented one at that.

    2. Re:Fake can be just as good by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, their camera with wireless (satellite) comm capability is just at the edge of feasibility. A wireless camera about that size with WiFi and cell-phone capability is feasible right now, but we have obvious problems with WiFi access and/or transmission speed. Satellite capability would obviously be useful in situations where there is a serious prospect of the camera (and maybe the photographer) being destroyed, but that's hard to do without a somewhat larger piece of hardware.

      But it's probably not far away. This could put a serious crimp in the style of a lot of thugs, including those employed by their governments. Even if you notice the photographer, by the time you grab their camera, the picture of your actions could well be beyond your reach.

      The current crop of cell phones with crappy cameras is just the camel's nose under the tent. In a few more years, we'll have serious wireless cameras available.

      (Anyone have any links to the best wireless cameras right now?)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    3. Re:Fake can be just as good by Alan+Shield · · Score: 1
      (Anyone have any links to the best wireless cameras right now?)

      This do?

    4. Re:Fake can be just as good by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Hey, cool! I didn't know about that one. It's a bit pricey, but that's to be expected now.

      My one pointed observation is: FTP????? WTF?

      Someone should explain to them that FTP sends everything, including login id and password, in the clear. So anyone with a good sniffer can intercept all your packets, assemble your pictures, and they also know your login id and password.

      But I suppose what you'd do is use an anonymous login, with the ftp directory off in its own partition so your competitors can't bring your whole server down by filling the disk with garbage. You still have the problem of authentication, if you're at all paranoid about what the local thugs/government might do to mess with your comm links to the guys in the field.

      Meanwhile, you should be complaining about this to Nikon, and insist that the next generation do scp instead. Maybe you could tell them it's called "ssl", and if they don't recognize that, explain that ssl is what the commercial web sites use to protect things like credit card numbers. They really oughta encrypt the camera's communications.

      But this camera is awfully close to what the satirist was talking about. I want one.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  20. Timely Invention by 4of12 · · Score: 1

    [Note: I've had plenty of reservations all along about the US decision to invade Iraq and still believe it was not the right thing to do.]

    Now that US Marines are confronted with some of the worst of all possible scenarios(*) this technology would be helpful.

    (*) Namely, a large crowd of demonstrators, 97% comprised of unarmed civilians, wearing civilian clothes, has 3% composition of similarly-dressed individuals but toting Kalishnokov's and firing at the Marines.

    Current option: Marines could start firing into the crowd, risk injuring unarmed civilians, and create even more ill-will.

    Or, now, sharpshooters could fire GPS mosquitoes at armed demonstrators for later surveillance, weapons-search missions. If they hit an unarmed civilian, it's not as much of a PR catastrophe.

    Finally, after giving the Iraqi people democracy and an progressive constitution guaranteeing regular elections, women's suffrage, human rights, freedom of worship, no state-sponsored religion, leave them to deconstruct all of that and fashion their own hell - we've got enough of our own hell to deal with already.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  21. Where's the crap-science filter? by Flumph · · Score: 4, Informative

    GPS antennas must be pretty big, because the signals from orbit are pretty weak.

    Small projectiles are less stable. A projectile the size of a grain of sand could barely cross a room.

    The kinetic energy required to overcome air friction would make the impact pretty serious, if you could magically overcome the instability problem, and magically make the tiny projectile carry that much kinetic energy without vaporising it.

    As for tracking the thing, where's the transmit antenna? RFID tags have a short range, and they're a lot bigger than a mosquito-sized impact. No antenna means no signal range.

    And as other posters have noted, there's no room for a power source, the GPS signals don't penetrate well, etc. etc.

    Ardent Pedantry R Us,

    Flumph

    1. Re:Where's the crap-science filter? by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      so the demo must have been faked?

      --
      [o]_O
    2. Re:Where's the crap-science filter? by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      The chip exists, but this site is definetly a parody. Never the less the fact that RFID chips the size of a grain of rice exist today should give us pause. This has been discussed for implantation in paroles, who could be tracked by RFID readers installed in various locations.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    3. Re:Where's the crap-science filter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chips are that small, but the antenna isn't.

    4. Re:Where's the crap-science filter? by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

      I didn't read the rest of the comments before I read what I posted-^ so please ignore me >_

      --
      [o]_O
  22. Feel free by Cranx · · Score: 1

    Feel free to shoot this with far less discrimination than using a lethal weapon. Got a small demonstration that you think might get out of hand? Shoot everyone now just in case. Oh, people can still die from this? Well, it's safer than firing lethal weapons at them. If a surly mother or overly-concerned consumer buys the farm once in awhile on a picket line, well, maybe they should have stayed at home instead of being out agitating.

  23. Probably not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If the Chinese authorities had this cyber-weapon at their disposal, would lives have been saved at Tiananmen Square"

    Probably not. The Red Chinese regime has seen no problem at all with executing more than 30,000,000 civilians so far. Less-lethal means of stopping the pro-democracy demonstrators would have still meant killing them later. Why waste a trigger-pull while you have them in your sights?

    Chairman Mao: "The One-Bullet Manager"

  24. Doesn't the by stimpy · · Score: 1

    priest in the picture look like Duke, from Doonesbury?

  25. On the Radio by frantzdb · · Score: 1

    This was on the radio last night. See here: http://nextbigthing.org/ (the third item)

    1. Re:On the Radio by Technician · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link and the admission the thing is a fictional media art project.

      Snipped from the China Police link.

      "His recent works has been created within the framework of his self-styled "sci-fi art" (or "fictionist") concept where he takes "an imaginary product from the future" and tests it out today, in a real environment.
      He did this most notably in his MY DOOMSDAY WEAPON project where he created "the most horrible weapon in the world" (- a piece of "pre-crime technology" designed to mark demonstrators with GPS (Global Positioning System) chips "before the crime is committed
      "

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  26. Holy smokes.... by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Here we go again, waiting for the conspiracy theory crowd to get their claws on this one.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  27. Sorry kids, it's a fake by ug52slh · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its based on an essay in Abuse your illusions called "How I crashed a Chinese Arms Biazaar With A Rifle That Doesn't Exist"

    My favourite use would be tagging girls in night clubs and then stalk them. So much easier than asking for phone numbers.

    1. Re:Sorry kids, it's a fake by Wormholio · · Score: 1

      I heard the author interviewed by Terri Gross on Fresh Air yesterday. It's definitely a fake, but an interesting story.

      --
      "Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire." -- William Butler Yeats
  28. Mod me down, please! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't believe I fell for it. The site is such an obvious fake. These guys are laughing their collective butts off at our readiness to don the tinfoil hat and march into battle.

    Mod me down... after replying to such a fake, I don't deserve Karma.

    Now, what do we do about Timothy, the editor, and gbjbaanb, the submitter?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  29. A more plausible solution is to use paint by maddugan · · Score: 1

    Use 'infra-red paint' paint balls. Better real-world sniper range than a grain of sand and ruffle the same affect as a rubber bullet. Target knows they got hit, so maybe they will stop what they are doing and worry about the mess. Then use a infra-red camera to track local movement, they have to break away for a restroom break eventually.

  30. Probably not real, yet by Jahf · · Score: 1

    As pointed out by others, this is almost surely not a reality yet.

    And no, it's not going to use a real GPS transmitter.

    But the implications of this even as a thought (and while not real I bet it -has- been proposed to government folks as a concept) strike right back at the heart of the RFID debate.

    While RFID may not be strong enough via commercial application to track this more than a few dozen feet, I am sure that with the right amount of money a much more sensitive receptor could be engineered. Even if not, having many very inexpensive receptors in various locations could form a detection mesh.

    I sort of think that if anyone shot an RFID tag into me at high velocity I would probably be aware of it, but there are plenty of other ways to tag a person or item without them necessarily detecting it (anyone here ever slip a library anti-theft tag into someone's backpack?).

    Since it comes down to the same ideas as gun control (ie, the criminals can always get the guns even if it is illegal just like the government can always aquire RFID trackers even if they legislate them out of the public sector), we're back to the same idea of needing to find ways to destroy and/or shield RFIDs.

    --
    It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
  31. okay, obvious fake by MarvinMouse · · Score: 1

    Any GPS transmitter that small that implants something without you knowing will have so little energy in it, that unless oyu have sensors everywhere, there is no way whatsoever to track it. Especially track a person from satellite.

    Unless there is some miraculous battery I don't know of, this is an obvious fake.

    --
    ~ kjrose
  32. I'm from Denmark by Xel'Naga · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'm 100% certain it's a fake. I remember seeing interviews on the television with the guy behind this, talking about his experiences in China with this completely nonexistant weapon.
    I'll try to dig up a link with the real story about this.

    Xel'Naga

    1. Re:I'm from Denmark by Xel'Naga · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Googling finds this: http://www.lixen.dk/artikel-arkiv.asp?code=2003-2- blackbox

      Kunstneren Jacob S. Boeskov, redaktør på 'Answering Machine', rejste i sommer til en våbenmesse i Kina under dække af at være våbenhandler. Med sig havde han billeder af det fiktive våben, ID Sniper. Artiklen om Kina-turen i Black Box beskriver, hvordan Jacob S. Boeskovs fiktive våben tiltrak sig så stor interesse på våbenmessen, at Boeskov til sidst var mere eller mindre ødelagt af frygt for at blive opdaget.

      The artist Jacob S. Boeskov, editor at "Answering Machine", this summer travelled to a weapon-con (?) in China, pretending to be armsdealer. He brought pictures of a fake weapon, ID Sniper. The artikle about the trip to China in "Black Box" (Magazine, Xel.) tells who Jacob S. Boeskovs fictious weapon attracted great interest at the weapon-con, untill Boeskov was terrified if he was revealed.

      Xel'Naga

    2. Re:I'm from Denmark by Xel'Naga · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The artist who pulled this stunt, explaining how he faked this
      Click on "My doomsday weapon".
      Xel'Naga

  33. Clearly this is just a concept by n1ywb · · Score: 1
    This obviously isn't a real product... YET. It's a scary thought, but I'm personally confident that the technology required to implement something like this is still at least 10 years away. But then again who knows?

    Major problems
    • Power: How does the "gps chip" get power?
    • Signal reception: You can block GPS signals with your hand. They're essentially line of sight.
    • Signal transmission: Where is it going to transmit to?
    • Chip size: It's as big as a grain of rice. It'll hurt like hell and leave a serious wound when it hits.
    • Chip fragility: The damn thing will self destruct when fired from a gun.


    Okay so for all of the above and more, we can conclude that this product is not for real. So what are the motivations of the people responsible for the web site? Who knows. FUD is probably one of their goals. Establishing prior art, maybe? Scaring you, probably.
    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  34. BAHAHAHAHAAHAH by n1ywb · · Score: 1

    I wish I'd seen THIS page on their site before I submitted my first post, now I'm starting to think that HUMOR is their goal

    http://www.backfire.dk/EMPIRENORTH/newsite/product s_en002_instructions.htm

    Notice how everybody in the instructions is white except for the one "suspicious" guy. These guys must have had a brain storm after watching Brazil.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
    1. Re:BAHAHAHAHAAHAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check the link at the bottom of the graphic: www.whitehouse.ORG
      Dead giveaway.

  35. But we all know... by xgamer04 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you recieve the mark of the beast involuntarily, you can still switch sides, right? ...right, guys?

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  36. GPS.... by lcde · · Score: 1

    Time to get my gps jammer working

    http://www.phrack.org/show.php?p=60&a=13

    --
    :%s/teh/the/g
  37. It doesn't have to get power by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    It looks more like a RFID tag, the one injected in pets. They can then be scanned when the tag is close to a transmitter.

    So no you couldn't track someone with it as in james bond. You would need to place scanners in places like public transport entrances, hospitals, shops, banks, all the places people have to go. Then anyone you want can be easily tracked moving through the transmitters and arrested at your convenience.

    I am reminded of a similar project several decades ago. It was a bit more primitive. It was a yellow star sewn onto the clothes.

    This looks like a hoax but not a funny one. Oh well at least for this we can rely on the christian fundamentalists to be on the good side. Marking someone like this is the devils work.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  38. Just like in the Matrix... by empaler · · Score: 1

    ... it seems that this isn't really real, either... ;)

  39. It's not parody, it's art. by Leven+Valera · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This was a performance art project...this artist (Danish, iirc) put together this idea, took it to a international arms fair, and then documented the reaction of the crowd...read about it in one of Russ Kick's books.

    Sorry folks, nothing to see here, move along, citizens.

    --
    Woot w00t w007.
    1. Re:It's not parody, it's art. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nothing to see?! you're crazy, this is /. and there's plenty of anti-privacy, anti-globalisation, wierd-science discussion to get out of this article!

      Certainly beats another SCO article now doesn't it?

  40. Great idea by empaler · · Score: 1

    Why the hell even bother to go inside? Most places have lines outside, and noone will object to you standing on a dark roof with a sniper rifle (as opposed to inside, where this possibly could get you kicked out for rowdy behaviour).

    Then again, why not a nude beach? Might as well have a good look at what you're going to get (take) before choosing...

  41. I just hope my wife doesn't get one! by kendoka · · Score: 1

    Hell with the government! She'd be hell on wheels if I had to wear a collar like that!

  42. Endothem motor by empaler · · Score: 1

    Just need something the uses bodyheat to draw out power.

  43. If it is possible, it's not GPS. by benchbri · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I call bullshit on this one.

    But, since it is an RFID tag, this could be employed much like how they are using it. To make this system a reality:

    1. Overcome the laws of physics and common sense to be able to shoot a grain of rice-sized transponder through a sniper rifle, and penetrate no more than 6 inches into the skin, no matter how close the target is, in any envronment/situation
    2. Use the RFID tags to "scan" people coming/going from airports, trains, busses, ports, etc. Odds are, the people that run this are going to know where the subject is within ~100 miles, and their travel records could provide further intelligence.

    Not goin' to happen anytime soon, although putting a camera in a sniper rifle and hooking up to a db is a stroke of genius. Makes me wonder who they stole the idea from.

    1. Re:If it is possible, it's not GPS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure it would be physically impossible to design a projectile that could implant a chip no more than 6" into a person. First of all it could have a sabot(?) those things that fit around the actual projectile to allow it to be shot out the muzzle. (They use these with M1-A tanks with the depleted uranium slugs which don't have a tight fit with the muzzle. Imagine a plastic/rubber version that would carry the chip to the person's skin).

      Also although such a weapon would be completely illegal in the U.S. what about situations like in Iraq? As I mentioned in a previous post:

      "My college roommate is now a diplomat with the U.S. foreign service. He says oftentimes visa applicants believe the U.S. has a supercomputer that keeps tabs on everyone so that when they apply for a visa, the U.S. checks their records. So what if whenever someone applies for a visa (or a job working for the U.S. overseas) we wave a scanner over them? If we had a decent database that could pinpoint when that chip was implanted in them, we might have an idea what kind of violent activities they were up to! (Either that or they're going to have to get used to the idea of surgery after demonstrations!)."

      Sorry but the Big Brother side of me keeps thinking this idea actually has legs!

  44. Ladies and gents, it's a fake - Now with proof! by AEther141 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The site was created as part of a hoax to see if the chinese police would actually buy something like this. They did. The whole sordid affair is documented in this book.

  45. Hoax: Admission by the Creator by WaldoJMU · · Score: 4, Informative

    Jakob Boeskov, the purported "CEO" of "Empire North", is a satirist. Here is a link to his personal homepage, along with an explanation of the FAKE GPS Sniper Rifle (emphasis is mine):

    http://www.backfire.dk/JB/indexreal.html

    "Giant balloon sculptures, voodoo-cursed technology and blueprints for hi-tech weapons smuggled into Chinas first international weapons fair - in the world of Jakob S. Boeskov the amazing meets the political in a unique mix.

    Coming from a background in comics, Copenhagen based artist Jakob S. Boeskov seems destined to work with satire and pastiche. Using a palette of different media such as web, paintings, writings, 3D drawings and animations, as well as collaborations with musicians, writers, voodoo priests (!) and industrial designers he "hacks and bends" media, reality and technology to give a startling and shocking view of life in the 21st century.

    His recent works has been created within the framework of his self-styled "sci-fi art" (or "fictionist") concept where he takes "an imaginary product from the future" and tests it out today, in a real environment. He did this most notably in his MY DOOMSDAY WEAPON project where he created "the most horrible weapon in the world" (- a piece of "pre-crime technology" designed to mark demonstrators with GPS (Global Positioning System) chips "before the crime is committed"). Jakob S. Boeskov brought drawings of this weapon to China Police 2002, Chinas first international weapons fair, where the international weapons dealer elite and greeted this nightmarish weapon with much enthusiasm."


    Happy April Fools Day, 11 days late! :)

  46. Coming to an FPS near you by mingust · · Score: 1

    If you can track the monsters coming to find you, just run away when you know you're low on ammo!

    --
    ~mingust
    1. Re:Coming to an FPS near you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's already in a game, Splinter Cell 2.

  47. Tried by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    I believe back in the 50s and 60s both the US and USSR attempted to use radioactive tagging to track people. Sucked to be the subject. A subdermal device would not be useful as it is too small to have enough power for satelite. A variation on an RFID would be interesting, though - you could literally pick people up as they moved through town.

    --
    -- $G
  48. Here's the scoop: by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Informative

    from www.jakobboeskov.com

    For this daredevil project Jakob S. Boeskov infiltrated an armsfair in Beijing with "the ID Sniper - the worlds most horrible hi-tech weapon" Too fantastic to be true? No its not! Read parts of the story here:

    In June 2002 Jakob S. Boeskov travelled to the belly of the dragon to meet the enemy eye to eye - infiltrating China Police 2002 the first international weapons fair in China. He brings with him four hundred fake business cards, a promotional poster of a horrible hitech weapon, and the worst stomach cramps ever. Tag along to the Kingdom in the Middle and meet robot salesmen, enthusiastic Chinese entrepreneurs and singing teenage policemen.

    Basically, the idea was to come up with the most terrible weapon imaginable, and to test it in a real environment. We had three days to finish up the weapon. Our fake company, Empire North, already had a logo and a slogan ("The Logical Solution" aping the Nazi classic "The Final Solution") but we had no weapon yet. Genius designer Von B and I worked overtime, and in two days we had the ID Sniper ready.
    The day before I was leaving, BLACK BOX editor Mads Brügger called designer Von B and asked him to change the design, because "it was too far out and he couldn't be responsible for what happened, if I was found out."
    Changing was not possible at this late stage. I guess he knew that. Maybe he was just, more or less elegantly, trying to shake off his share of the burden. I can understand it, because we were all becoming afraid. Afraid of what would happen if I was found out, and afraid of what might happen if the weapon was taken seriously. Would it be copied? Would we be responsible for the production of one of the most inhumane weapons in the history of man? We justified our project by telling ourselves that right now, a few people were walking around with socalled VeriChips implanted in their bodies, chips manufactured by the company Applied Digital Solutions. We kept reminding ourselves that right, now prisoners in Sweden are doing time at home wearing GPS chip wristbands. It would merely be a question of time before the technology would be used preemptively on suspicious persons, and as we repeatedly told ourselves, all new technology has been used for military purposes, and this technology would too, we concluded. Why not bring it out prematurely, so at least we could have a small part in getting a thorough discussion about this kind of technology? With this question, we basically came up with a brand new art concept. Let's for now just call it scifi conceptual art, defined like this: take the essence of an imagined future, turn it into a concept and present this concept in present day reality. Report the reactions.
    Would this new concept lead to a brave journey, searching for truth or would it just be a highly irresponsible prank? There was only one way to find out, and that was to do it.
    This is how it was done.


    FACTS
    THE ID SNIPER RIFLE AS PRESENTED ON THE EMPIRE NORTH POSTER


    GPS microchip based identification rifle

    Empire North is proud to present the preliminary showcase of the ID Sniper Rifle a brand new tool in longterm riot control, and antiterror management. Please notice that some aspects of this cuttingedge technology are still in its outmost infancy, and more research is needed before the ID Sniper Rifle is a reality. Hence we are welcoming investors and business partners to join us in the important quest of developing the ID Sniper Rifle.


    What is the ID Sniper Rifle?

    To put it short, the idea is to implant a GPS microchip in the body of a human being, using a highpowered sniper rifle as the long distance injector. The microchip will enter the body and stay there, causing no internal damage, and only a very small amount of physical pain to the target. It will feel like a mosquito bite, lasting a fraction of a second.
    At the same time, a digital camcorder with a zo

    --
    AccountKiller
  49. since I'm out of mod points... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wanted to say that I agree with the poster. Although I am quite liberal (and think that the next regime change should be in Washington D.C.), we're screwed unless we can find a way to "liberate" Iraq without destroying it. This means pacifying demonstrations without killing everyone. Even though THIS rifle is B.S. (my friend at Boeing designs the GPS satellites) if a rifle like this could implant RFID chips (like the ones in my dog) it would make demonstrators think twice about protesting (especially violently).

    My college roommate is now a diplomat with the U.S. foreign service. He says oftentimes visa applicants believe the U.S. has a supercomputer that keeps tabs on everyone so that when they apply for a visa, the U.S. checks their records. So what if whenever someone applies for a visa (or a job working for the U.S. overseas) we wave a scanner over them? If we had a decent database that could pinpoint when that chip was implanted in them, we might have an idea what kind of violent activities they were up to! (Either that or they're going to have to get used to the idea of surgery after demonstrations!).

  50. load the chips in a shotgun shell? by geoswan · · Score: 1
    I agree the gun looked fake. And the details were suspicious.

    If you don't care if the rioters see you fire at them, and you don't care if they feel the pain of the, um, "injections", could chips like those used for pets be loaded into something like a shotgun shell?

    After the riot you could scan pedestrians to see if they got chipped. Snap their pictures then. Have the turnstiles at the Subway activate hidden cameras to take the pictures of chipped riders automatically.

    If you are scanning people shortly after they get chipped it doesn't matter if the chip is merely embedded in their clothing.

    Use different id chips for each riot.

    "Ah, Tom Hayden, my chip readers shows you were at both Seattle and Chicago 1968. Coincidence? I think not. You must be a terrorist ringleader. I have a one-way ticket to Guantanamo Bay for you my friend."

    No, I don't like this idea.

    1. Re:load the chips in a shotgun shell? by geoswan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When I got my cats "chipped", 12 years ago, the "chip" was about 2 millimetres by 2 millimetres.

      About the size of a piece of confetti. Or maybe quite a bit smaller.

      What if you had riot control personnel carrying shotguns loaded with shells that shot out clouds of RFID confetti?

      Back in the days of punch cards and paper tape some people used the "chad" from those cards in place of confetti. But it wasn't a nice thing to do. Chad, punched from card stock, with sharp edges, is much harder to remove than regular confetti. There is a small amount of oil in punch cards and punch tape.

      You can't just brush it off.

      If an artifact can make chad hard to brush off, then how difficult could you make it to brush off dozens or hundreds of stealth RFID chad, specially designed to be hard to find and brush off? Your demonstrator only has to miss one for you to be able to read their chip with a reader. When they get on the subway, for instance. Even if they have stashed a complete change of clothes the chip might be in their hair.

    2. Re:load the chips in a shotgun shell? by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      Mod this down! Don't let the authorities find out. Well...I guess they already have. That is such a good idea and a disturbing one at the same time.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
  51. This cant be real.. by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Someone confirm its just a bad joke..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  52. Their other product -- by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Juju..

    "citizen narc"

    This whole thing must be a joke....

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  53. "less lethal" not "non lethal" by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 3, Informative

    Indeed. So-called "non-lethal" projectile and chemical weapons are not really non-lethal. That's propaganda: it's what the police call them to make them sound safe. Aw, a fluffy little bean bag. Aw, a plastic bullet. How much can a little thing like that hurt.

    The reality is organ damage, serious wounds, broken bones, spinal injury, miscarriage, blindness, and death. And that's when the police don't deliberately aim for maximum injury, or fire at point blank range - the sadistic bastards.

    Some weapons manufacturers more accurately label those same weapons "less lethal", meaning they still kill people, but they're not specifically designed for killing.

    Such weapons are meant to be used by professional, trained officers in the correct way: such as aiming at people's legs, or the ground, and from a minimum distance. They come with specific instructions to this effect, and warnings of what will happen when these instructions are ignored. Police officers routinely ignore them.

    When a police officer aims the same projectile weapons at someone's head, or at their neck, they are intending to kill that person or break their spine, and sometimes they succeed. Disturbingly, police actually do that in crowd control situations.

    Even when they hit your back or legs, they can cause severe organ damage and/or broken bones.

    And we haven't discussed the chemical weapons, yet. Exercise for the reader.

    Here's a fairly good and accurate article.

    -- Jamie

    1. Re:"less lethal" not "non lethal" by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Troll?

      I thought the information was accurate and relevant to the parent post, which discusses the lethality of non-lethal weapons, although arguably offtopic from the original article.

      A moderation of Off-Topic would have made sense. Troll makes no sense to me.

      -- Jamie

    2. Re:"less lethal" not "non lethal" by Ayandia · · Score: 1

      The reality is organ damage, serious wounds, broken bones, spinal injury, miscarriage, blindness, and death.

      I can believe most of those, but when is the last time you saw a pregnant woman in a crowd rolling a cop car over? Smashing parking meters, setting fires or looting stores and houses?

      Isn't adding "miscarriage" to that list going a bit far? I'm sure it can happen, but an over-the-top statement like that makes it reek of propaganda. (These are the weapons of the baby-killers!!!)

      We outnumber the cops, and some people like to get violent when they have a large crowd to get lost in. The police should not be using these less-lethal weapons casually, but there are situations where they are needed for the police to protect people and their property when those folks with less self-control make trouble.

    3. Re:"less lethal" not "non lethal" by Jamie+Lokier · · Score: 1

      I can believe most of those, but when is the last time you saw a pregnant woman in a crowd rolling a cop car over? Smashing parking meters, setting fires or looting stores and houses?

      The police use projectile and chemical weapons at non-violent protests too. That is wrong, of course, but it happens. It is a lapse in the professionality of the police.

      Experienced people can often tell when the police are about to turn violent, for example if you see one smacking his/her hand with their baton like they're in the mood for hitting, or there's a sudden build up of personnel, these are signs of action pending from the police side. It isn't always possible to tell, as they sometimes perform surprise attacks.

      However, most people who engage in non-violent protest are not very experienced, and are surprised by the level of attack and are unprepared if they are unlucky enough to be attacked. Sometimes its as simple as sitting in road in a circle holding hands and singing, when suddendly someone is hit by a baton round or plastic-coated bullet, or a CS gas cannister lands between someone's legs. (Those things cause 3rd degree burns, by the way. Never touch one.).

      Any time they want to disperse crowds. It's true they're used more often during a riot, but even a bunch of people walking away from a private meeting get targetted sometimes. (I'm thinking of Miami last year). That is not appropriate use of police force.

      Obviously it is wise for a pregnant women to stay away from any kind of protest, because of the potential danger. Many will. But some women care strongly about causes, and think that chanting songs and carrying placards is something that they should continue to do.

      There is also a problem with weapons being used for evictions and dispersing parties. When such a police action is anticipated, the most vulnerable people can stay away. But they cannot always be anticipated, especially if the police are performing a surprise raid to search for immigrants (who, surprise surprise, are occasionally pregnant).

      In my opinion, the problem is not the use of weapons per se, but that police, in their own imperfect way, have a documented and consistent tendancy to use them inappropriately and dangerously, well outside the parameters they are theoretically intended for.

      Judicial oversight does not tend to punish these failings: lack of justice for police brutality is legendary worldwide, and so they continue. It is everywhere, like it's a built-in human tendancy, but nonetheless that does not excuse each officer's responsibility for their actions, especially when an officer steps beyond the bounds of professional behaviour. They are supposed to be professional maintainers of law as well as order, which means their behaviour should be held to a higher standard than untrained people, and if they cannot attain that standard they should not be in that role.

      -- Jamie

  54. Parody site link by brad77 · · Score: 1
    Definitely not the real deal.

    Take a look at the link at the bottom of the JUJU instructions pointing to whitehouse.org/homeland.

    Looks like hours of fun.

  55. art, blah blah blah. by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    I guess you could call it "art", whatever that means. I personally wouldn't lower it down to that level though. Let's face it, what people call art these days is meaningless self-masturbation, and this is far more interesting than that.

    I think it's more like journalism, or some kind of subversive research. As someone else pointed out, this isn't "nothing to see here". Your claim would seem to be the "Oh my god look at that horrible device" is the thing to see, and since it doesn't exist, forget about it. The far more startling fact is that this thing isn't that far away from what's possible. Sure, you couldn't really do the GPS tracking because of power requirements. But what about shooting someone with just an RFID? The range of the transmitter wouldn't be very good of course, but it would be proof later on that someone was at the protest.

    --
    AccountKiller
  56. Non-lethal my ass by Deanasc · · Score: 1

    And who is liable for the first person who dies from an infection from this device? There's a reason why you rub the skin with alcohol before and after a shot. I see no safety precaution here. I also see no mention of sterility for the device itself.

    --
    I've hit Karma 50 and gotten a Score:5, Troll... I win!
  57. The GPS-tag gun is a joke... by barakn · · Score: 2, Interesting
    but it reminds me of when the Hell's Angels held their annual rally in Missoula, MT in 2000 (the full story in 4 parts: 1, 2, 3, 4). They decided to party at a local ski hill, and the army of police officers that had been recruited from far and wide attacked the local citizenry in the downtown area instead. A friend of mine whose sole indiscretion was to have a job downtown that let him off at midnight was pepper-sprayed while trying to make his way home. The moral:

    Just because you've been GPS-tagged doesn't mean you're guilty.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  58. Should be used during car chases by mc6809e · · Score: 1

    Innocents get killed regularly by people running from police.

    Maybe police should tag the cars of those that run, then stop the chase. They could then track the car later at sane speeds.

  59. Mod Parent and Grandparent up by SB9876 · · Score: 1

    Mod the parent and grandparent messages up.

    I'm a bit torn between marvelling at the genius and the stupidity of someone willing to pretend to be an international arms dealer for the sake of art and a few yuks.

  60. It is a joke. by Anhaedra · · Score: 0

    I guess nobody noticed this, under the article title.

    from the is-this-a-joke dept.

    --
    Please flee in terror in an orderly manner.
  61. This can't be real.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, what the hell is that guy doing in North Carolina? There is nothing here but toothless rednecks. Obviously, the image is fake.

  62. Re:April Fools Injection by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
    • Something this small could never transmit it's location for lack of power. Where are the batteries? Even if it runs off blood glucose, then it's antenna would be tiny and impotent, not like Bender's
    • Probably causes cancer.
    • A little device floating around one's bloodstream is a recipe for a stroke
    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  63. People, this is fake by foxcorp · · Score: 1

    For those of you still wondering whether this thing is for real...well its not. Check the guy's behind (Jakob S. Boeskov) this website. He has this weird thing with "fictionism". Quote: Basically, the idea was to come up with the most terrible weapon imaginable, and to test it in a real environment. We had three days to finish up the weapon. Our fake company, Empire North, already had a logo and a slogan ("The Logical Solution" aping the Nazi classic "The Final Solution") but we had no weapon yet. Genius designer Von B and I worked overtime, and in two days we had the ID Sniper ready. The day before I was leaving, BLACK BOX editor Mads Brügger called designer Von B and asked him to change the design, because "it was too far out and he couldn't be responsible for what happened, if I was found out." Changing was not possible at this late stage. I guess he knew that. Maybe he was just, more or less elegantly, trying to shake off his share of the burden. I can understand it, because we were all becoming afraid. Afraid of what would happen if I was found out, and afraid of what might happen if the weapon was taken seriously. Would it be copied? Would we be responsible for the production of one of the most inhumane weapons in the history of man? We justified our project by telling ourselves that right now, a few people were walking around with so-called VeriChips implanted in their bodies, chips manufactured by the company Applied Digital Solutions. We kept reminding ourselves that right, now prisoners in Sweden are doing time at home wearing GPS chip wristbands. It would merely be a question of time before the technology would be used pre-emptively on suspicious persons, and as we repeatedly told ourselves, all new technology has been used for military purposes, and this technology would too, we concluded. Why not bring it out prematurely, so at least we could have a small part in getting a thorough discussion about this kind of technology? With this question, we basically came up with a brand new art concept. Let's for now just call it sci-fi conceptual art, defined like this: take the essence of an imagined future, turn it into a concept and present this concept in present day reality. Report the reactions. I just can't believe some of you really thought this was for real.

  64. It's a spoof by a performance artist by couch_warrior · · Score: 1

    The ID sniper is a deliberate hoax by a politically motivated "perofrmance artist". He REALLY went to the Chinese police weapons show, but with a BOGUS product, just to see what would happen... http://www.backfire.dk/JB/

    --
    "Sic Semper Path of Least Resistance"
  65. Better way to tag protesters: by king-manic · · Score: 1

    A low pressure firehose spraying dark blue skin staining food coloring.

    Taged, lasts at least a week, non-lethal (unless they drown), and if it's a vegtable dye also biodegradable.

    --
    "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
  66. If 'twere real by Chucklz · · Score: 1

    Imagine... DEFCON Some guy: "Wow, Homeland Security is really trying to keep us safe, look, they even got snipers. Me:"Ouch, Goddamn... Someone set us up the tracking" Big Brother "We get signal... Main screen turn on. Move all agents for great justice"

  67. Shenanigans!? I better get my broom! by jonskerr · · Score: 1

    Shenanigans!? I better get my broom!

    --
    O~ Him that studies revenge keeps his own wounds green. -- Francis Bacon