Slashdot Mirror


A La Carte Cable TV Channels?

ryantate writes "I was reading TV Tattle and came across an interesting story in the Washington Post about people who spend less than $30 per month on cable buying a la carte. To do this you need a huge C-band dish, but Sen. John McCain wants to require a la carte pricing on digital cable. Content companies like Viacom are fighting it -- they don't want people to be able opt out of their less established channels. And at least one economist type, this guy in the Financial Times, seems to think we'll end up paying just as much under a la carte pricing. EchoStar is game but says Viacom and others are refusing to go along. "

4 of 382 comments (clear)

  1. An idea by va3atc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One time payment category
    Cheap terrestrial antenna : $40
    HDTV decoder to pull stuff off antenna : $130

    Monthly stuff
    Netflix for unlimited DVD rental: $20/month

    Grab your local news off the antenna (in HDTV if available), watch your favorite TV shows with your Netflix account

    FYI: There is some unlimited DVD rental folks that work exactly like Netflix here in Canada
    Movies for me
    Cinema Flow

    I'm interested in trying one of them, anyone have previous experience with them?

    --
    Candle burns its brightest in the dark
  2. I sort of agree with Viacom by esac17 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A lot of times small cable channels get their business or make their money by late night channel surfers who have nothing better to do. Or the mom who is at home watching days of our lives and decides that during commercials she is going to flip through channels. The show that they are watching will very often catch the eye of the 'surfer' and next thing you know, you have a customer.

    If it was cheaper to go a la carte, I can't imagine anybody wanting to pay for anymore than what they already know, so you are are sort of screwing out the little guys who want to get recognized. They can't afford to buy commercial spots on other television stations (plus why would they let them), so this is their only form of advertisement. I remember a television channel that started up a couple years ago, and I was just flipping through and they had a show on the history of sex. I was interested so I started watching it.

    But hopefully this will all be gone with OnDemand starting to become more common. The little guy can create a show and have it on OnDemand, and then you pay .30 or so for it. Now THAT would be cool.

  3. The way it should be by Outosync · · Score: 5, Insightful

    With my current Dish Service I'm on their minimum plan that gets me the channels I wish to watch. I only watch about 10% of the channels provided yet I'm paying for all of them. I recently decided that I wanted Showtime so I can watch a couple of the shows on there (Penn & Teller's BS, Dead Like Me) but to get it I have to upgrade my entire plan and pay for more channels that I wont watch.

    And they wonder why people are just downloading shows off the Internet.

  4. Profitable, a la restaurant a la carte. by blcamp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can only see this as a way for Cable to profit:

    "Buy Package A (25 channels) for $29.95"
    "Buy Package B (35 channels) for $34.95"
    "Buy Package C (50 channels) for $39.95"

    (The cable company picks the channels)

    or:

    "Pick any 25 channels for $35.95"
    "Pick any 35 channels for $42.95"
    "Pick any 50 channels for $49.95" ...or something like that.

    Just like in a Mickey D's, you can either get a combo meal for $3.99, or mix and match yourself for $7.00+.

    My preference, frankly, is one channel: the one connected to my broadband router.

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher