WebCrawler Turns 10 Today
Brian Pinkerton writes "WebCrawler, one of the first search engines on the 'Net, turns 10 today. You can read a short history of WebCrawler. When I wrote WebCrawler, one could do a credible job of crawling, indexing, and searching the Web from a single desktop PC. Today, the reality is a little bit different."
Heck, while reminiscing, I remember when excite was my start page, and when I used them for email. I remember they were the first "start" page to have groups. I stopped using them 4 years ago when their email stopped working.
I guess if anything, we can learn the web is not going to be the same in 5 years as it is today. My question is, "is it better"? Personally, I think it was better back in the day. I would like to see a search engine that does not display any spam or sales or sex sites as hits. I now do most of my searches on google doing "search parameters site:edu".
Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."
Try http://209.24.201.206/bp/WebCrawler/History.html for the history.
No worries, just go here
I doubt that someone like Google would send you a copy of their source these days - even if you asked nicely.
The next best thing.
search appliance
I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
In all fairness if the majority of the websites today that are Slashdotted would not use a mySQL dynamic solution to serve pages, they'd be okay.
Of course a few years later I said "Wow, this AltaVista thing is great. I'm never touching WebCrawler again." And then I went "Wow, this Google thing is great. I'm never touching AltaVista again."
I've found that my posts don't format quite right w/o a sig.