Slashdot Mirror


WebCrawler Turns 10 Today

Brian Pinkerton writes "WebCrawler, one of the first search engines on the 'Net, turns 10 today. You can read a short history of WebCrawler. When I wrote WebCrawler, one could do a credible job of crawling, indexing, and searching the Web from a single desktop PC. Today, the reality is a little bit different."

25 of 136 comments (clear)

  1. e-mailing results by qewl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ah the nostalgia of receiving search results via e-mail :)

    --

    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
  2. They used to be my google.... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember when webcrawler was the only search engine I touched...

    In 1996 it was nice and simple. Then as the time went on it got a bit too cluttered for my liking. Now looks like they're trying to googlize themselves with the current interface.

  3. Whoa! by outZider · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Holy crap!

    I remember WebCrawler, but lost touch with it in around 1996, when I started religiously using AltaVista. They sure have changed a bit. ... but do they have any relevance anymore? They're owned by InfoSpace. :P

    --
    - oZ
    // i am here.
  4. Wow by z0ink · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does anybody else remember getting a WebCrawler promotional CD 10 years ago? I didn't even have a CD-ROM then!

    --
    Steal This Sig
  5. Holy search engines batman! by ylikone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who uses webcrawler anymore? I didn't even know they still exist. Anybody remember opentext.com search?

    --
    Meh.
  6. When did they give up.... by David+Hume · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...on their own web search technology and become a metasearch engine? From the WebCrawler About Page:

    WebCrawler uses innovative metasearch technology to search the Internet's top search engines, including Google, Yahoo, Ask Jeeves, About, Teoma, FindWhat, LookSmart, and many more.

    With one single click, WebCrawler searches the best results from the combined pool of the world's leading search engines -- instead of results from only one single search engine.

    And WebCrawler makes it easy to refine your search so you can find the most meaningful results right away. No wonder it's a leader in the search industry.


    Was it 2001? The History states:

    2001 InfoSpace acquires WebCrawler. Excite, now Excite@Home, went belly up. In the bankruptcy, Infospace acquired WebCrawler. Today Infospace runs WebCrawler as a meta-search engine. And they've given Spidey a new name and turned him purple!


    Oh, and if it is not being otherwise used, has the code for the WebCrawler spider been open-sourced? :)

  7. Boy, does this take me back... by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...to the days when the search engine market resembled the microcomputer market of the '80s. Several competitors, all with (roughly) the same market share, each with a certain number of hits that the others didn't have. I had to use at least a few of them to assure myself that I was getting something reasonably close to what the whole Web could offer on my search topic (even though no search engine comes close to penetrating all of the pages out there).

    If I was looking for something, I'd query Lycos, AltaVistas, Infoseek, Excite, Webcrawler, and Magellan. And, later on, Google. Vastly different results, site designs, site objectives. I won't say it was the most streamlined, elegant experience, but it was kind of fun.

  8. Oh, Yahoo too. by Faust7 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh yeah, and Yahoo as well. Forgot to include them.

    Interestingly, their look has changed very, very little from their olden days.

    1. Re:Oh, Yahoo too. by sflory · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yahoo in the past has never done their own search engine. They've used a number of backends including google. This is has been true up until they aquired Inktomi. Late last year they launched Yahoo search using Inktomi's search engine.

      --
      IANALBIPOOGL (I am not a Lawyer, but I play one on GrokLaw.)
  9. Wow. Just. Wow. by TWX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember using Webcrawler back when I got my first 14.4 Slirp connection back in 1994. It was the only way to search!

    and then came the marvels of altavista.digital.com.

    I'm so glad that google came along...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  10. WebCrawler was the best, back in the day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    WebCrawler was the best search engine, back in the day when search engines were all new and Yahoo wasn't a search engine but a human-moderated list of sites.

    --
    Callas

  11. Wow - the 1996 wayback WebCrawler page STILL WORKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://web.archive.org/web/19961023234707/http://w ww.webcrawler.com/

    Presumably connects to the current crawler which still accepts the old format :)

    --
    Callas

  12. Re:Wow - the 1996 wayback WebCrawler page STILL WO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1996 WebCrawler

    I have NO idea how that space got in there...

    --
    Callas

  13. Re:I remember using Webcrawler before google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think I remember why I left WebCrawler.

    WebCrawler was simple and effective. But then AltaVista emerged. I started using AltaVista.digital.com, and from there WebCrawler went down hill - lots of advertising and junk that kind of made me hate it. What was once seemless and simple became noisy.

    I used AltaVista for a number of years, but once again advertising got the best of it. It turned super-sophisticated, with a lot of advertising fluff and "features". Altavista was becoming overly commercialized. They had a "simple" version that was better (I forget the name [begins with an "R"?]), but soon the result sets were scewed towards advertisers and abusers.

    In 2001, I made the switch to Google. It was everything that WebCrawler once was in terms of ease of use and quality of results. I've been more or less happy with Google ever since.

  14. WebCrawler on NeXTStep - before Open Source by ben_kelley · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is scary to think that at one point I e-mailed the WebCrawler people to ask them how it worked. In response they sent me a copy of the source (Objective C for NeXT) so I could compile it up on my NeXT PC (I had a "black" NeXT - 68000 based) to index my intranet web server.

    I doubt that someone like Google would send you a copy of their source these days - even if you asked nicely.

    I could never get it to compile, and I deleted it long ago, but I kind of wish I had kept it now. An interesting piece of internet history.

    1. Re:WebCrawler on NeXTStep - before Open Source by sacremon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I sometimes sit back and think about some of the various projects that first saw life on the NeXT platform:

      the first web server
      Webcrawler
      Doom and DoomII

      Pretty good for a machine that only sold ~70,000 units total, not including the versions of NEXTSTEP for ix86/SPARC/PA-RISC.

      I still have a Color NeXTStation stashed away in a closet. I was using it as a print server till about two years ago.

      --
      If you can't beat them, embrace and extend them.
  15. public search engine by jacquesm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd happily contribute cash to a publicly funded and publicly run search engine.

    Anyone game ?

  16. I didn't even know they were around anymore. by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And the odd part is I don't even remember the interface being as cluttered as the very early one linked through the archive in an earlier post. I suppose I moved on very early, although I remember when as far as I was concerned they were the only game in town.

  17. Takes me back by SuperBigGulp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember using WebCrawler on my very first SLIP dial up account and thinking "How cool is this?" I had used AOL for a couple years prior but was hoping trade in their UI (and limitations) for Netscape. The funny thing is that I wasn't sure if I could find enough content on the web.

    Also a great testament to the original design and concept that search engines still look and work a lot like WebCrawler, 10 years on.

    Happy birthday, and thanks for the walk down 32K memory lane

    --
    Someday a Slashdot ID of 177180 will mean something.
  18. The more things change... by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Originally there was WebCrawler (among others). In late 1996, AOL acquired WebCrawler and turned it into AOL Netfind. Later, apparently, Excite bought it from AOL, made it a separate service, and Excite became the engine that powered AOL Netfind. After that apparently InfoSpace bought it in the Excite sell-off.

    But after AOL bought it I lost track of it, because it started sucking (returning lots more stale links than before), and altavista.digital.com burst upon the scene (anyone else remember "kayak sailing San Juan islands"?).

    My guess would be that the meta-search switch initially happened when Excite bought them.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
  19. Wow... by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think WebCrawler was my first search engine ever...

    From there I graduated to MetaCrawler, which parsed WebCrawler and all the other currently popular web search engines at the time.

    For some reason or another MetaCrawler started sucking and I used InfoSeek for quite some time... then they were acquired by Go.com and it went downhill from there.

    I remember what I'd search the internet for back in those days tho. It was always "jedi knight" and "giga pets" (remember those cute tamagotchi rip-offs? =p)

  20. More WebCrawler History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to be one of the Excite@Home engineers who looked after Webcrawler. WebCrawler and the Excite front end all belonged to the same code base called My Excite Start Page (known internally as MESP at Excite).

    The WebCrawler at Excite was pretty much an unsupported product when I was there. All I ever did were maintenance releases, never any new stuff for WebCrawler. WebCrawler was actually the Excite front end, except it had the WebCrawler logos instead of Excite.

    The search engine was the Excite search engine as well as all links on the front page pointed to Excite media properties.

    On a personal note, I was always somewhat saddened to see a piece of Internet history neglected the way it was but by December 2001, Webcrawler received very little traffic (I forget the numbers).

  21. WebCrawler Sale Sensation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    WebCraweler's Brian Pinkerton formerly worked at NeXT, and I remember being in the the NeXT kitchen when news arrived in 1995 of his sale of WebCrawler to AOL. The sale price was around $1 million, and everyone was absolutely awed that a software company could sell for so much. This marked the beginning for me of the dot-com era: Just a few month later, other companies started or run by ex-NeXTers sold for millions, then tens of millions, and at least one for hundreds of million. Soon after that, NeXT CEO Jobs took Pixar through an IPO, for a personal gain of about $1 billion!

  22. Ah... back in the day by StefanSavage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I remember back in 1994 WebCrawler was running on three machines in the corner of Sieg Hall 433. They were rigged up so one could reboot the others via a serial line, but occassionally that machine would crash too. That was when Brian would call in and say "Hey, Webcrawler is hung. Could you go reboot it?". I'm guessing this doesn't happen much at Google...

  23. Re:The WebCrawler Search Voyeur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    yeah, I remember that. I think I ended up staring at the screen for the afternoon with my jaw on the floor in between giggle fits...

    It was like a really horrible glimpse inside the mind of my fellow man... but, funny...