Slashdot Mirror


Hardware Hacking

Blaine Hilton writes "Hardware Hacking starts by going over the basics of electronics, just enough so you can understand what is happening later in the book. This gentle beginning means the book is great for people who work with computers on the software side, or people who like to play with electronics. You do not need to be an electrical engineer to understand what they are talking about in this book. As the title suggests, the authors walk you through different methods and processes of modifying common hardware." Read on for the rest of Hilton's review of Hardware Hacking. Hardware Hacking author Joe Grand, Ryan Russell and Kevin Mitnick pages 537 publisher Syngress rating 8 reviewer Blaine Hilton ISBN 1932266836 summary Walks anyone through the process of modifying common electronic hardware.

The authors' explanations of many of the terms and concepts used in the book are very good. For example, the description of "power" on page 20 is the best description of the term that I've ever heard or read. From first-hand experience trying to explain this concept to others I wish I'd known such a lucid explanation -- it explained the concept much better than longer, dryer text would have.

Another positive point to this book is the pace and order of the book. It starts with part one, which is an overview of working with hardware; part two is a collection of hacks that one can do on different devices. If, like me, you never really did any thing with the Atari, you could skip those chapters and still proceed with the book. This book is easy to carry because there the authors frequently provide directions to other resources rather than trying to cram everything into this one book.

Like I said, I'm not too interested in Atari hacking, but the idea presented in this book (in an Atari-centric context) for a standard power connector is good for other things too. This is one of the biggest strengths of this book: The examples themselves are highly specific, but the thinking behind them can easily be generalized.

The first part of the book briefly explores tools that are going to be used later in the hacks and how to use them. However I found it a bit odd that the authors tell you to use a heat gun and heat-shrink tubing, but do not list these items in the tools section.

The fun really begins in part two with the actual hardware hacking. I have never really done anything with hardware before. It seems like whenever I took something apart I could never get it back again, and that those times that I did get something back it would never quite work as it should again. Those experiences have taught me to not mess with things I shouldn't and, this is why I think it's great that part two begins with the ubiquitous and cheap CueCat. I had a couple of these lying around and didn't really care about them so I jumped right in, following the many clear explanatory photos.

Starting with something like this gave me the confidence that I can take stuff apart, and if I'm careful, it will go back again.

The order of chapters seemed a bit odd in part two, though. A book must be arranged in some type of order, and my gut feeling is that it should be by order of difficulty. The second part started off great, going over tools and then the CueCat, but then it seems like the chapters that follow are tossed in at random. This could be from my lack of hardware experience, or that the chapters were designed to be random. This fact really didn't distract from anything though. Just don't expect a linear progression.

I was able to appreciate the integration between the hardware and the software. Hardware Hacking also goes over the software side of the hardware involved.

One of the areas I wish they had given more attention to was in the chapter on the Macintosh where they are hacking a CRT monitor. I believe that the safety warning should probably be a bit bolder, especially considering the earlier, prominent advice about static energy and grounding.

The authors have used part three as a technical reference, including some frank talk about Linux vs. Windows in chapter six. Sure, many people like Linux better, however you have to take into consideration who will be using the system. In a system the whole family uses, it has to be user-friendly enough for the whole family to use.

If changing hardware to better suit your needs sounds like something you would like to try, but you don't know how and are worried about what might happen, then this book may just be able to convince you go for it, along with enough information to make your next warranty-voiding attempt a success.

You can purchase Hardware Hacking from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

189 comments

  1. Good review by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    I might just have to pick it up and brush up on my electronics skills. I'm sure it would come in handy someday.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Good review by ejaw5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      A good book to pick up is _The Art of Electronics_ by Horowitz and Hill. It goes over a lot of circuit theory and digital computer architecture. It's straightforward and easy to read. I recently checked it out from the library and it covers a lot of things I've learned in my theory classes. It gives many examples of good circuit design ideas and bad ones. I may end up buying a copy to keep as reference.

      --

      $cat /dev/random > Sig
    2. Re:Good review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely. The Art of Electronics is one bad ass book. Some of the circuit theory is a little dry, unless you're into that sort of thing.

    3. Re:Good review by the+morgawr · · Score: 1
      I'll second that is's a good electronics book. The one place it's lacking is it's coverage of the newer GaAs and InP transistors (mostly MESFETS used in communications). Then again I don't know of a book that DOES cover that stuff well....

      Also if you need a general EE reference (circuits, filtering, fields, compatability, etc) I'd go with Kaiser's Electromagnetic Compatibility Handbook. It's not released yet but I have a pre-press edition for review and it is THE most thorough book on basic EE that I have ever seen.

      --
      The policy of the United States is worse than bad---it is insane. -- Ludwig von Mises, Economic Policy(1959)
    4. Re:Good review by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. Horowitz and Hill is the book for anybody wanting to learn about electronics. If you can find a copy at the right price, buy it - you'll never regret it.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    5. Re:Good review by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      I bought my copy of Horowitz & Hill in 1982 and I have never regretted it.

      It's targeted, or it originally was, at the 'advanced scientist' who wants a good all-purpose electronics text/reference for laboratory instrumentation development. Sort of a shortcut text for those who didn't have time for a core EE courseload but actually USE a lot of electronics in practical applications.

      --
      resigned
  2. somewhat misleading.. by Tirel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You do not need to be an electrical engineer to understand how computer hardware works

    I'm sorry, but that's just bull. Sure, you may attain some elementary level knowledge about hardware without a good solid educational foundation (some-thing on the level of Tom's Hardware), but you will never understand the low-level functions, optimizations and important design decisions without it.

    Come on, I know you're trying to sell a book here, but lets not openly lie (like some).

    1. Re:somewhat misleading.. by Schweg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's a little harsh. There are always levels of understanding about any concept. Just a few of them:
      1. Enough understanding to use an item. This can be rather little, if the internal details are encapsulated well enough.
      2. Sufficient to interface to or enhance an item. This requires more information, but the interfaces generally mean that you need less information about the internal details as well.
      3. Sufficient to build an item. This requires significantly more knowledge, but depending upon the state of the art attempted, may not require a professional practitioner.
      4. Sufficient to design an item. This is really where professional training and practice come into the requirements, but this level is not required to be able to do interesting things with most hardware!

    2. Re:somewhat misleading.. by syslog · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't be so patronizing. The review's author clearly said that he was talking about understanding how "computer hardware works," not "how to build your own computer in 21 days."

      I have a MS in CompSci and a few electrical eng. courses. I certainly don't have the skills to build a computer, but I most certainly understand how it works.

      Regards, naeem

    3. Re:somewhat misleading.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, you do not need to be an electrical engineer to watch your karma get modded down.

      nice job Tirel.

    4. Re:somewhat misleading.. by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      I dont know what you mean by building your own computer, certanly not from scratch (plastic, silicon, copper etc), but assembling the parts and plugging it all up properly is not hard to do.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  3. Sample Chapter by ryanr · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sample chapter here if you're interested (.pdf). That's Joe's intro chapter. I did the HTPC chapter (the Linux vs. Windows Chapter 6 mentioned.) :)

    1. Re:Sample Chapter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      As the co-author of a hardware book I would have assumed you understood some of the physical speed limitations of the internet. Posting a fat picture-laden pdf to slashdot throws some doubt on your abilities.

      smell that?

      I sure hope you have more than glue from that glue-gun holding your server together.

    2. Re:Sample Chapter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an anonymous coward, I would have assumed that you understood some of the limitations of your credibility. Posting a snide comment anonymously to slashdot throws some doubt on your abilities.

      smell that?

      I sure hope you have more than a GED holding your ego together.

    3. Re:Sample Chapter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why the )*(UR didn't the review include where the sample chapter was located?

      Read my "Review of the Review".

      I have no reason to buy this book based upon the review.

      And an author's appearance on /. doesn't mean I should be polite and guilt myself into buying the book.

    4. Re:Sample Chapter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares if the author shows up? No one is forcing you to buy a book. If you don't want to buy it, don't buy it. I don't see any guilt trips here.

    5. Re:Sample Chapter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like an author who has a touchy ego. As far as whether the author and|or reviewer deliver, I'm open to saying what I want to. If the review sucks and I'm able to say why, I'm entitled to say it. I have worked on many books and I've worked on many topics which became books. That doesn't make me perfect and it certainly doesn't make me any better. It does, however, puts me in a position to point out some of the things others who haven't been through the ropes some things they need to consider before they place their $$$ based on a review. If the review sucks, then it can't be trusted to discern whether to buy the book [or not]. Guilt? I don't feel guilt. I feel obligated to help others.

  4. more info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this review needs more specific info on the different hacks

  5. Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Work * Time
    Yup, that's an elusive one all right.

    1. Re:Power by wramsdel · · Score: 0

      Apparently it is, since I think you mean "Work / Time".

    2. Re:Power by Ktistec+Machine · · Score: 1
      Work * Time
      Yup, that's an elusive one all right.


      Apparently so. It's Work/Time. (energy per unit
      time) E.g., 1 watt = 1 joule per second.

    3. Re:Power by PetWolverine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Previous replies have pointed out that your formula is wrong. I would also like to point out that not everybody knows the definition of "work" used in physics, and many people have trouble grasping it when it's explained. You may know that work = force * distance, but do you know, conceptually, why this particular formula is how physicists decided to define the word "work"?

      My high school physics teacher warned his students of the pitfalls of trying to use this term as if it were intuitive with the following example. When you lift a weight, you do a certain amount of work. When you hold the weight in place at a certain height, are you doing work? Most people will answer "yes", because it's hard to hold the weight there, so they feel that they would be doing some "work" by doing so. The proper answer, from a physics perspective, is "no", because while you're applying a certain force to the weight to hold it up, the distance through which you move it is zero, so that work = force * 0 = 0.

      Just a little reminder that the physical definitions of common terms can't always be used intuitively. By the way, if I remember correctly, the answer to the question I posed in the first paragraph is that force * distance has the same units as energy, so that work can be seen as a quantity of energy being transferred.

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
    4. Re:Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while you're holding it up, you could be moving it a great distance from another inertial reference frame.

    5. Re:Power by metlin · · Score: 1

      The proper answer, from a physics perspective, is "no", because while you're applying a certain force to the weight to hold it up, the distance through which you move it is zero, so that work = force * 0 = 0.

      Nope. You have the force of gravity acting upon your hand, and you are doing work to stay put in that position. You did not frame the problem completely - when the system includes another object (Earth) exerting an opposing force, it's no longer as simple as force * distance.

  6. Mouse hack by tcd004 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here's a great hack for fixing a broken mouse

    Tcd004

    1. Re:Mouse hack by microTodd · · Score: 3, Funny

      Here's a good one for hacking your game boy advance.

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
  7. Shrink Tubing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    If for nothing else, this book is good because the authors mention heat shrink tubing. Good lord do I hate electrical tape. As a "tool" it's a shitty one.

    1. Re:Shrink Tubing by deadlinegrunt · · Score: 1

      ...Good lord do I hate electrical tape. As a "tool" it's a shitty one.

      Just slightly above duct tape in the "tool" chain. And everyone knows nothing defines quality like wrinkles in the duct tape.

      --
      BSD is designed. Linux is grown. C++ libs
    2. Re:Shrink Tubing by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dammit, it's not harware hacking without electrical tape. Lots of it. Rolls of it. I buy the tubes of 5 rolls.

      Heatshrink is a *BITCH* to remove. It tends to harden when heated so a razor will barely cut it.

    3. Re:Shrink Tubing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Electrical tape sucks. After only a month or so at the job, it turns into gloppy sticky mess. I've actually found that masking tape, believe it or not, often does a better job.

      But the best is silicon tape. Horribly expensive, but it sticks only to itself, and once stuck never comes off. I've had silicon taped stuff sitting outside on things like antenna connectors for years and it looks like new. Apart from the layer of grime on it. If you really do want to remove it, it's fairly easy to remove with scissors.

    4. Re:Shrink Tubing by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't have a girlfriend but I do know a girl that would get mad if she heard me say that.

      Your Mom?

    5. Re:Shrink Tubing by mangu · · Score: 1

      Also, you can use tape in places where heatshrink won't fit. Ever seen any Y-shaped heatshrink? No, I dont'think so...

    6. Re:Shrink Tubing by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ever seen any Y-shaped heatshrink? No, I dont'think so...

      Actually, yes, I have. It was used in some mil-spec fiber-optic connectors. But you certainly won't find any at Radio Shock.

    7. Re:Shrink Tubing by phre4k · · Score: 1

      with no shops for electrical parts in town i found it easier to use just standard medical tape which is given away for free here. What can i say? I am lazy and cheap :)

      --
      "Nobody really checks their email any more. They just delete their spam"
    8. Re:Shrink Tubing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heatshrink is a *BITCH* to remove. It tends to harden when heated so a razor will barely cut it.

      Then you're using the wrong kind. If you think you might need to rework in the future, use the clear polyethylene stuff. It does get slightly harder, but it's very cuttable with a Single-Edged Razor Blade.

      Electrical tape is the GOTO of insulation--you should think very hard about whether something more elegant would work, unless you're only really interested in quick'n'dirty.

    9. Re:Shrink Tubing by tim_mathews · · Score: 1
      Heatshrink is a *BITCH* to remove.

      Isn't that the point though? In the marine industry, that's all we use. Actually, it's heatshrink with heat activated adhesive inside. That makes a great seal. Probably as good as the insulation on the wire.

    10. Re:Shrink Tubing by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      Umm DuctTape is as the top of the tool chain... It builds just about anything :) Not only is it a tool.. But its considered to be a basic building staple for making stuff :)

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    11. Re:Shrink Tubing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heatshrink is a *BITCH* to remove

      Two words: cuticle scissors

  8. This smells like a repeat review.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    .. same book, but reviewed by someone different. I didn't read today's review and I'm too lazy to do a search (Slashdot's search engine sucks), but wasn't this same book reviewed by someone else not too long ago?

    1. Re:This smells like a repeat review.. by ryanr · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, that was the O'Reilly book with a very similar name: http://books.slashdot.org/books/04/02/23/2036241.s html

    2. Re:This smells like a repeat review.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - I made a comment about "echo echo echo" elsewhere. I think there were two hardware hacking books on roughly the same day.

  9. Because the target audience isn't thick?? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2, Troll
    However I found it a bit odd that the authors tell you to use a heat gun and heat-shrink tubing, but do not list these items in the tools section.
    Because the kind of people reading Hardware Hacking will probably extrapolate that "heat-shrink" requires you to apply "heat" to it in order to make it "heat", using some kind of "heating" apparatus.

    But you're right, it is a pretty big leap to expect people to grasp what the "heat gun" does...
    1. Re:Because the target audience isn't thick?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hrm?

      If there is a "tools" section at all, then it should be complete. Having an incomplete tools section is worse than having no tools section at all.

      Whether I can figure out "heat-shrink", has little to do with whether I have some lying around for when I get to that point.

    2. Re:Because the target audience isn't thick?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok dumbass troll, I'll help you out here. You buy a book that lists out tools needed. So you collect all of the hardware listed and start reading. All of sudden the author mentions tools that aren't in the list. Your frustration wouldn't be at not knowing what the tools do but at not having the tools readily on hand.

      As an amateur cook who likes a good Mise en Place I know how frustrating it is when an ingredient all of a sudden appears in the text of the recipe that wasn't included in the ingredient list.

    3. Re:Because the target audience isn't thick?? by joespandex · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the "Tools of the Warranty Voiding Trade" chapter at the beginning of the book serves as a -guideline- for the various tools needed for hardware hacking and modifications in general. There are 3 sections, ranging from beginner to advanced. We obviously can't list all possible tools in this section (since not all hacks use the same tools), as it is meant to give the reader an overview to the types of tools that are necessary.

      However, each hack within each chapter of the book lists the -specific- tools needed to succeed (like your ingredient list). This way, you'll know exactly what you need for the hack and won't be halfway through wondering where you can buy widget X.

      Joe

    4. Re:Because the target audience isn't thick?? by bendude · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      Finally someone who's read the book and can offer an informed opnion.

      Wait a minute... You're new here aren't you?

      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  10. "Hacking" in title by donnyspi · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    When I saw the word "hacking" in the title, I should have guessed Kevin Mitnick would be involved in some way :)

    1. Re:"Hacking" in title by WwWonka · · Score: 1

      When I saw the word "hacking" in the title, I should have guessed Kevin Mitnick would be involved in some way :)

      My god, Mitnick is still around for his age?

      I thought by now he'd be hard at work on his next books, "Hacking your Walker and Wheelchair for Extra Speed" and "How to Social Engineer Your Way Out of the Nursing Home for a Day".

    2. Re:"Hacking" in title by xxdinkxx · · Score: 1

      ha ha not. You! Back to your parents' basement, NOW!

    3. Re:"Hacking" in title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this Offtopic? It discusses the title of the friggin book!

    4. Re:"Hacking" in title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Kevin was a technical reviewer like joespandex posted somewhere else in the thread. He didn't write any of it.

      Don't believe everything the media says about people.

    5. Re:"Hacking" in title by DoraLives · · Score: 1
      Engineer Your Way Out of the Nursing Home

      The sins of your youth shall be visited upon you with redoubled fury in your old age.

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
  11. Good for beginners by Grant29 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While it's always good to learn some of the basics, the real hardware hackers have a drive that most people don't have. You have to be willing to break a few things beyond repair while making mods. Also, the creativity of some of the hardware hacks I've seen is outstanding. You can't learn the truely unique hardware hacks from a book. The unique ideas are often the hardest part.

    --
    Hot Deals

    1. Re:Good for beginners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure nothing "truely[sic] unique" could ever possibly be learned from a book...

    2. Re:Good for beginners by dslbrian · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually for relatively small scale projects, and working with embedded controllers (from "basic stamps" to 8/16/32-bit controllers, ie. 8051 and such) I've found that Circuit Cellar is a pretty good magazine. They've had articles on wireless apps, robotics, and other stuff with a focus on hardware and practical details. A pretty fun read if your into tinkering with hardware (disclaimer - I'm speaking as a EE, so your definition of "fun" may differ).

    3. Re:Good for beginners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Circuit Cellar refused to print an advertisement for this Hardware Hacking book because it had "Hacking" in the name. Boo hoo.

    4. Re:Good for beginners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Thank you for another content-free post.

    5. Re:Good for beginners by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      (disclaimer - I'm speaking as a EE, so your definition of "fun" may differ)

      This is a little off-topic, but if you're an EE and you think hardware hacking is "fun", then you're certainly not a typical EE. I work in a huge company full of EE's, and I've never met anyone here that actually cared about tinking with anything electrical (or anything at all really). I think I'm the only EE I know that does.

      Basically, I think that spitting out "EE" like that is perpetuating a bad stereotype, that engineers are inquisitive, hands-on people who like to tinker with things. The reality, from what I've seen in industry, is that engineers are typically just regular people who picked engineering as a path into middle management, and have no real interests in anything different from mainstream people: getting drunk (the younger ones), buying a huge house and bigger SUV, watching TV endlessly, and basically being good little consumers like the rest of America.

    6. Re:Good for beginners by Ass,+Ltd.+Ho! · · Score: 1
      This is a little off-topic, but if you're an EE and you think hardware hacking is "fun", then you're certainly not a typical EE. I work in a huge company full of EE's, and I've never met anyone here that actually cared about tinking with anything electrical (or anything at all really). I think I'm the only EE I know that does.

      Agreed. I'm another one of those few. Most of my classmates in school were there to get the grades and then go get some stupid programming job (maybe firmware instead of high level OO code, just to differentiate themselves from the CS majors).

      But this trend works for me! It's job security. Someone is going to have to keep building all this crap, and if that's only the three of us, so much the better. We'll have bigger SUV's than all of them!

      --
      HO
    7. Re:Good for beginners by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I disagree. When you're working for a big company, it doesn't matter much how much you like tinkering with stuff; your job isn't going to be like that. It'll be about working 10 hours/day at your computer running simulations, because your job is just a tiny, narrowly-focussed portion of the overall design. This is when you aren't wasting time in pointless meetings discussing when you should have other meetings. The company can just open a new design center in India to do this, and even if they aren't tinkerers either, they'll do the job just as well as anyone else. No passion is required with these corporate engineering jobs, and in fact, it's really a hinderance instead of a benefit, because it causes you to quickly become disillusioned and cynical.

      The only way having a real interest in this stuff is going to help you is if you start your own small company and design your own products, because then your passion for the work drives you to do it better.

    8. Re:Good for beginners by dslbrian · · Score: 1

      I work in a huge company full of EE's, and I've never met anyone here that actually cared about tinking with anything electrical

      This is similar to almost any field, whereby you generally don't have hobbies that are TOO much like work, because it comes across as the same as working. However that said, I know quite a few EEs who are the 'build your own hardware from scratch' kind of people like myself. My day job is analog/wireless IC design. The mag that I referenced was primarily embedded design (discrete stuff that you can get your hands on). These jobs are worlds apart from each other even though they are both EE jobs. I find toying with embedded stuff is "fun" for me because its new and interesting to me. Its also tangible and practical in the sense that I can show resulting projects to other people (unlike IC design where you would need a high powered microscope to show them anything).

      I agree there are plenty of middle management types who could care less about what they do as long as they aren't asked to do anything significant. You know these types right off when you interview them, they don't know how to actually DO anything, since they don't work in the "trenches" and they don't make the big coporate decisions either.

      ...basically being good little consumers like the rest of America.

      Ah yes, speaking of stereotypes, the stereotypical slam on Americans. Hate to burst your stereotype, but not all of America is full of middle management idiots. If you can't find intelligent people in a place as diverse as America then your not looking. Its too bad if your stuck in a job that has you surrounded by people who are complacent to do the bare minimum on their job and nothing else, but it hardly represents the industry as a whole. I've worked with dozens of very sharp people, and its been my experience in industry that over time the smartest ones group together and go off to form their own companies. Try looking outside of the huge coporate sweatshops and you might see something different.

    9. Re:Good for beginners by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is similar to almost any field, whereby you generally don't have hobbies that are TOO much like work, because it comes across as the same as working.

      I got into EE because I wanted a job that I actually liked. But the reality was that companies find a way to take something interesting and make it into drudgery. My day job involves validation of ICs in the pre-silicon design stage. I can't say this is exactly what I was shooting for when I was in college; it's just what happened to have open positions, and I think that's how most of the industry is. If I had a choice, I'd be doing embedded HW/SW design, but (esp. given the current job market) it's not easy to get into a position you're really interested it.

      I agree there are plenty of middle management types who could care less about what they do as long as they aren't asked to do anything significant.

      The middle management I've been exposed to isn't trying to do anything insignificant; in fact, their careers are important to them, and they try to do a good job (defined by "good" in a corporate sense, of course; this has more to do with "meeting market windows" or some such rather than just making great products). But my beef is that these people (typically engineers who have been promoted into positions of management) really have no passion for any actual engineering. They're not the geek stereotype of people who'd rather lock themselves in a room full of equipment and avoid other people. They do work hard at what they do, which is engineering management (I don't know if they really love it or not, but they certainly don't slack off), but I know that the reason I went into engineering was because I wanted to work with things, not deal with people. If I wanted to be a manager, I would have gotten an MBA instead. And what's worse is that, in this culture, if you just want to be an engineer and not a manager, you're eventually going to be kicked to the curb because this is seen as not having any ambition and the company doesn't want people like this around.

      Ah yes, speaking of stereotypes, the stereotypical slam on Americans. Hate to burst your stereotype, but not all of America is full of middle management idiots.

      Yes, it's a stereotype, but like many stereotypes, it comes from truth. There's always people who don't fit the stereotype, but I'd say a majority of Americans do fit the consumerist stereotype; if they didn't, the corporations wouldn't be so successful in exploiting this. I'm American, but I have to agree when I hear non-Americans make stereotypes like this, because I see it around me every day. I just take comfort in knowing that I don't fit the negative stereotype.

      Its too bad if your stuck in a job that has you surrounded by people who are complacent to do the bare minimum on their job and nothing else, but it hardly represents the industry as a whole.

      Again, the people at my workplace aren't slackers I don't think. They do work hard at their jobs, because it brings them a paycheck, and a lot of them are trying to advance their way into middle management so they can have an even bigger paycheck. My complaint is just that, even though these are all engineers, none of them seem to be in it out of interest in actually building stuff; they're only here because they can make money at it, and then go buy a huge SUV so they can feel important. It's just a means to an end for them.

      Try looking outside of the huge coporate sweatshops and you might see something different.

      I've been trying to do this, but such jobs are very few and far between.

    10. Re:Good for beginners by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      You have to be willing to break a few things beyond repair while making mods.

      Oh, come on. It's worse than that. The 'real' hardware hackers have been 'breaking things beyond repair' since before they could read and write. They dragged home electric things that got them in trouble with mom while in grade school. And they've been modifying, scrapping out, reusing parts from things for nearly that long.

      An early inspiration for some of us was the Brains Benton novel series, i.e. the book Brains Benton (a red-headed genuine nerd from the old days) turned an ordinary AM radio into a transmitter that he and Jimmy (his 'regular kid' sidekick) used to trap the criminals.

      --
      resigned
    11. Re:Good for beginners by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      I get treated weird on the job all the time for actually liking the tech. I have more, and better, oscilloscopes, test equipment, and other tools at home than I am assigned at work. There's a genuine distate that 'professionals' hold for people with 'enthusiasm' for the tech who work in the field. And lord help you if you're not on the management track and striving for that 'office with a door' within ten years of entering the field.

      But there are also bosses and company owners who will go out of their way to find 'enthusiasts' to work for them in critical capacities.

      It's important for there to be large dull organizations where knowning how to attend meetings and spew out fucking ISO-9000 drivel is important. But it's also important for there to be people who can do the creative work.

      Luckily there are a lot of people willing to do the former and leave the cool stuff for some of the rest of us to have gainful fun doing.

      --
      resigned
    12. Re:Good for beginners by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1
      ...because it causes you to quickly become disillusioned and cynical.

      I wonder if this poster has come to this point yet. I think he is still a bright eyed idealist.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
  12. atari hacking by millahtime · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Like I said, I'm not too interested in Atari hacking,

    Who wants to hack an Atari. They are so hard to come buy that if you screw it up you'll be kicking yourself for months. Trust me, I know.

    1. Re:atari hacking by calethix · · Score: 1

      Are they really that hard to come by? I think my brother has 1 or 2 that he was trying to decide what to do with.
      I thought about taking 1 but decided it would probably just add to the collection of junk in my closets/basement that I had when I was a kid.

    2. Re:atari hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:atari hacking by MadHobbit · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's broken, you'll -want- to hack it. I've got a 600XL (my first computer *sob*) and a 130XE, and the power supplies have both fizzed (pretty common problem). I wired up a new unit out of an old AT PSU...ugly, but it works. It's nothing impressive, but it was a minor hack, and it got my old machines up and running again.

      And *then* I could play Super Cobra!

  13. What a dick I am... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    'in order to make it "heat"'

    Should of course be: 'in order to make it "shrink"'.

    1. Re:What a dick I am... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shrinkage?

      Like on Seinfeld?

  14. Book Breakthough? by jkitchel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Another positive point to this book is the pace and order of the book. It starts with part one,...

    That struck me as kind of funny. I'd hope that all books start out that way. God help us when books start at part two.

    1. Re:Book Breakthough? by Mateito · · Score: 5, Funny

      > God help us when books start at part two.

      Or when movies start at Part IV.

    2. Re:Book Breakthough? by SteveM · · Score: 1

      Isaac Asimov wrote a scifi novel that started at chapter six. I think it was The Gods Themselves.

      Chapters one through five did eventually show up.

      SteveM

    3. Re:Book Breakthough? by the_mad_poster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Of course, were you a true geek, you'd know that it should have started at Part 0.

      We're going to have to revoke your Slashdot ID now...

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    4. Re:Book Breakthough? by jkitchel · · Score: 1

      touché

    5. Re:Book Breakthough? by djeaux · · Score: 1
      God help us when books start at part two.

      Go check an organic chemistry textbook. They generally start with part twenty-six...

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    6. Re:Book Breakthough? by sparkywonderchicken · · Score: 1

      They should only start on part two when part one is on back order.

    7. Re:Book Breakthough? by BrynM · · Score: 1
      God help us when books start at part two
      So you've read MS development documentation, namely DirectX, before eh?
      --
      US Democracy:The best person for the job (among These pre-selected choices...)
    8. Re:Book Breakthough? by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Or when trilogies begin and end with Part One.

      (History of the World)

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    9. Re:Book Breakthough? by sjwt · · Score: 1

      or have five parts..

      The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy in Five Parts

      Thank you Douglas Adams.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  15. Mitnick by vasqzr · · Score: 5, Informative


    I seen his name, instinctivley picked the book up, and read a few chapters, spent nearly an hour leaned up against the shelf and Barnes and Noble. I guess they have chairs there for a reason...

    It's a pretty good read, but it's not quite for the 'Tech TV' crowd, it's actually kind of advanced and detailed.

    1. Re:Mitnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You saw, SAW his name! That was the major error. The typo "shelf and" instead of "shelf at" was more understandable, also the misspelling of "instinctively." You should also have taken the "and" before "read" and moved it in front of the "spent."

    2. Re:Mitnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I seen[sic]...
      I automatically read the whole post as if you were a Tornado witness.

      An then ah just heard this roar like this.... WAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH.... that's when I thought it gawt ma!

    3. Re:Mitnick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's funny, but Engrish might not be the super-parent's first language, you insenstive clod!

  16. How about wetware hacking? by linzeal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Personally I think the far more interesting engineering that geeks forget to study is the human one. As we have evolved larger brains most humans have neglected to study some of the proposed methods one can learn to change it with. Besides the obvious future augmentation with nanotechnology or its ilk we have a scant few that have pondered its intracies. Most of them are flakes, all of them are partially 'out there' but maybe you have been a little 'out there' to get 'in here'.

    Hardware hacking of all kinds is cool, but as I more intimately familiar with mechanical engineering and know that I have to take electrical engineering courses beginning next year perhaps this book will help. Can anyone second the review?

    1. Re:How about wetware hacking? by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      I get my info on wetware hacking here.

      As I'm sure someone will complain if I don't mention it, I will warn you that the Web site is very poorly designed. However, if you're willing to dig for it, there is a wealth of information in the Erowid Psychoactive Vaults on how to use drugs without getting killed, which drugs to use for what ends, and where to look for more information on a given drug.

      Happy tripping!

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  17. Amazon has it cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1932 266836

    From what I heard, this book came out right before O'Reilly's did and they're sufficiently different to own both.

    1. Re:Amazon has it cheaper... by ryanr · · Score: 4, Informative

      And Bookpool cheaper still:
      http://www.bookpool.com/.x/ierdixxv34/ss/1?qs=hard ware+hacking

      Disclosure Note: I wrote part of the book, and the deal the publisher has with Bookpool sometimes results in slightly higher royalties for me. They do often have the best price, though.

      You can do your own comparison shopping, of course:
      http://isbn.nu/1932266836/shipover/

      Your best deal usually depends on shipping.

    2. Re:Amazon has it cheaper... by nossid · · Score: 1

      Us swedes can find the cheapest store (with shipping) here.

    3. Re:Amazon has it cheaper... by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1


      How very honest of you. I think I will look very seriously at this book because of this. I am a software hacker and have always wanted to know a bit more on the hardware side.
      Thank You.

      Sera

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    4. Re:Amazon has it cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's "we Swedes".

    5. Re:Amazon has it cheaper... by TastyWords · · Score: 1

      What follows is a pretty good list for buying books. The top ones are pretty much 'bots such that by the time you get to Amazon, BN, and Half, you'll have already seen the prices as part of the 'bot output. Also, it builds in any discounts, coupons, and shipping. It's also handy for providing retorts in the discussions when people say, "Amazon's cheaper!" or "BN is cheaper!" because they only check those two sites.

      BookPool
      AddAll - Compare & Shop
      Best Book Buys - Compare many sites & Shop
      Barnes & Noble
      Amazon
      Half - mostly used books

    6. Re:Amazon has it cheaper... by ryanr · · Score: 1

      Good list, thanks!

  18. This book is a walking DMCA violater's manual! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had to take a shower after handling this book at my friendly Bookstar, so dirty I felt just from reading these recipes for being an ILLEGAL COPYRIGHT and PATENT violating criminal! I see nothing but wicked intructions on violating the legally and rightly conferred DMCA rights of the benevolent corporations of this country. I will be referring this unholy tome to the proper authorities so that this matter is handled promptly.

    1. Re:This book is a walking DMCA violater's manual! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      This is surely a witches book and must be burnt!

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:This book is a walking DMCA violater's manual! by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 3, Funny
      Friend computer strongly encourages you to turn in mutant commie traitors who even think about modifiying the sacred hardware of friend computer. This is solely reserved for programmers with ultraviolet clearance. As for your contact with this abomination, friend computer requires you to visit the next confession booth to receive proper reward for your information...

      All hail friend computer!

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    3. Re:This book is a walking DMCA violater's manual! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your filthy Paranoia reference sickens me.

    4. Re:This book is a walking DMCA violater's manual! by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 1
      Traitor. Prepare for summary execution.

      All hail friend computer.

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    5. Re:This book is a walking DMCA violater's manual! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's "violator's" you moron

    6. Re:This book is a walking DMCA violater's manual! by cpghost · · Score: 1

      "Remember that it's illegal to connect pin 5 of the foobar chip with pin 9 of the whizbang microcontroller of your mobile phone, thus allowing you to snoop other conversations in your vicinity. This very simple modification, as shown in figure 5, is prohibited by law. Don't do this."

      Should we really write books this way (again)?

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  19. Good review - NOT by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What are these hardware hacks? What is done with the CueCat? Are they removing the serial number chip from the CueCat or are they turning it into a laser pointer or what? What did they do to the Atari, and which Atari? Mod it to play Xbox games? Turn it into a general purpose computer? A home automation control center? What? What other hardware is hacked, and will I need to do the hacks? If I can buy something cheap on eBay and turn it into something cool, great, but if this is just about adding expensive components to expensive or rare stuff, forget it.

    A review should tell me why I might want this book; this review did not.

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    1. Re:Good review - NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  20. w00t!!!! by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    I saw Hilton, and thought "Finally, /. has finally included the last piece of the puzzle, the only thing that a geek could want beyond techno whozits and whatzits.

    /. is now featuring Paris Hilton pr0n

    then I read the Article, and all hopes were dashed. Thanks alot :(.

    1. Re:w00t!!!! by idontgno · · Score: 1
      I'm not quite sure /us is ready for Paris Hilton hacking our hardware.

      I'm just sayin'.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:w00t!!!! by Paulrothrock · · Score: 2, Funny

      Blech. Paris is a retarded blonde idiot. Why would I want her? Geekgrrls make better sex partners because of their inherent curiousity.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    3. Re:w00t!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. As long is it's not spelled "grrl".

      Partly agreed on the Paris. She's also hideous.

    4. Re:w00t!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hideous? Please. Just because you can _say_ you'd pass up Paris, doesn't mean you'd ever get the chance to, nor convince me you actually would.

      If she's hideous and she'd never hit on you, what does that make you?

  21. echo echo echo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This book has appeared before!

    Who screwed up?

    It's bad enough bad stories get posted and good ones get filtered, but repeats shouldn't get posted, either.

    1. Re:echo echo echo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read carefully. This review is for "Hardware Hacking: Have Fun While Voiding Your Warranty". The other similar review was for "Hardware Hacking Projects for Geeks". Similar, yet completely different.

    2. Re:echo echo echo by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      You could have saved time by just saying, "You're new here, aren't you?"

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  22. Thanks for all the comments! by joespandex · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Thanks to Blaine for the no-nonsense review. It's nice to hear people's thoughts without being sugar-coated.

    For what it's worth, the full title of the book is "Hardware Hacking: Have Fun While Voiding Your Warranty".

    As for the real mindset of a (hardware) hacker, true, that cannot be taught. But, it doesn't mean that more mainstream readers are not curious about tinkering with hardware. Getting people to think outside of what they are normally taught is the important thing and hopefully they'll benefit from the book.

    I wanted to try and include something for everybody in this book. So, the introductory EE, coding, and OS chapters are for people who might not have a sense of those things (to tell you the truth, I use the EE chapter, which I wrote, as a reference guide all the time). The hacks range from easy (changing the LED in a Macintosh mouse or Atari 7800 Power indicator) to complex (Marcus Brown's Playstation 2 Independence Day hack). And, there's a wide range of hardware to play with, too.

    I'd like to think there is something for everyone (well, almost everyone). You don't have to have extreme hardware skills or have an engineering degree to enjoy the book and rip your products apart. The worst you can do is break something, but that's part of the fun! :)

    Joe

    PS - PDFs of the TOC, Foreword, and Introduction can be found here.

    1. Re:Thanks for all the comments! by Violet+Null · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Some comments on your website. I'm using Firefox.

      First, my monitor is huge. Frickin' huge. And it's set to a really high resolution. Your website, though, seems to be set to an absolute height (592 px) and width (770px), and so is this tiny box taking up about a third of the screen, centered. Wouldn't be so bad, except I have to scroll down. A lot. With all this blank space around, unused.

      Second, 'Books & Chapters' is confusing placed underneath 'Computer Security', which makes it difficult to find it again after I've moved away. Even more confusing, since I expected it would be under 'Consumer Electronics' and 'Hobbyist & Experimental'. I'd prefer to see those subcategories done away with altogether.

    2. Re:Thanks for all the comments! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most style guides suggest using a fixed width page of around 600 pixels. For example:

      this one

      I know. It sucks on a big screen.

    3. Re:Thanks for all the comments! by Violet+Null · · Score: 1

      Those are guidelines for graphics. Text will wrap just fine unless you tell it not to. Instead of a fixed width and height, you could use, say, 90%, still get the border effect (if desired), and not have to worry about the resolution of the display at all.

  23. Kev's an author? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much did Kevin contribute or did they put his name on it for a % of the cut - just to help sell the book?

    It's not the first time a publisher adds someone's name as "sales bait". (e.g., he wrote the intro?)

    1. Re:Kev's an author? by joespandex · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Kevin was the technical reviewer for the book. Since he has a technical background, but not specifically related to hardware/engineering, we thought it would be fun to get a different perspective. He gave us some extremely useful comments but didn't write any of the text.

      If you didn't notice, his tagline on the cover is obviously tongue-in-cheek, as there is nothing illegal in the book.

      And yes, his name does help sell books. But no, he doesn't get a cut. :)

      Joe

    2. Re:Kev's an author? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IOW, he whored out his name for money so you could sell books to people who thought he was involved in writing the book.

      Very classy.

    3. Re:Kev's an author? by joespandex · · Score: 1

      Actually, no. If you read the first part of my post, you would understand why we used him. He's a friend of mine, has a good technical knowledge, and provided good comments. Maybe if I knew you, we would have asked YOU to be the technical reviewer.

      Joe

  24. Badger Hacking? by C.+Alan · · Score: 1

    But is there a chapter on Hacking your dead badger linux box?

    I know, I know, I brought it up again... So kill my karma.

    1. Re:Badger Hacking? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Is it dead so long that it has grown Mushroom Mushrooms?

  25. Electronic Grounding Helps Technically by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been a long time OS tech, working my way up since the days of DOS and BBS's, etc. After I took a 6 month course in the basics of electronics and TV/VCR/Computer repair back in the early 90's I've found that diagnosing and/or understanding how the underlying hardware works helps greatly. I'd definately recommend to all you puter techs out there to learn the basics of electronics, if it be via this book or a cheap course at the local CC. (of course my best advise for aspiring techs is to learn the scientific method and good troubleshooting skills)

    Jonah Hex

    1. Re:Electronic Grounding Helps Technically by wedgehead · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quite the contrary, electronic grounding reduces potential to zero.

    2. Re:Electronic Grounding Helps Technically by KevinDumpsCore · · Score: 1

      Coincidently, an anti-static wrist strap will help with electronic grounding!

  26. Why I've never been a hacker of hardware by dmorin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I remember my first job out of college where they made their own circuit boards for a medical device. While something compiled on my 286, I watched the EE do all kinds of tests and simulations at his desk. Finally I said, "That looks boring. Fire that bad boy up and see what happens."

    He looked at me, pointed at a chip and said "See that? Those cost $100 apiece. I have 4 of them, and they take 3 weeks to order. I can't afford to blow it up." And went back to his work.

    I always remembered that as the best demonstration of the difference between hardware geeks and software geeks. Software geeks abide by neither the laws of physics nor economics.

    1. Re:Why I've never been a hacker of hardware by Ass,+Ltd.+Ho! · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I always remembered that as the best demonstration of the difference between hardware geeks and software geeks. Software geeks abide by neither the laws of physics nor economics.

      Yeah, and if you didn't have some real engineers around to understand and operate within the constraints of those laws, you wouldn't have had that precious 286 on which to compile.

      --
      HO
    2. Re:Why I've never been a hacker of hardware by joshguthrie · · Score: 1

      Nor Quality Assurance

  27. Re:Tillman was a dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he died in afghanistan, not iraq. moron.

    bush sucks, kerry in 04!

  28. Did some say ATARI? by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So which Atari hacking are we talking about? Arcade PCBs, 2600s, home computers, Atari Calculators, Atari UNIX boxes [!]. what?

    Regarding hardware hacking in general, I think one of the best ways to get started is with a BASIC Stamp, like from parallax. It really lets you expore the interface between software and hardware.

    I kind of wish the review gave me a better feel for the book. I'm getting better in my hardware, but I'm not beyond a good textbook to lean on for some things.

    1. Re:Did some say ATARI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Did some say ATARI? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      So which Atari hacking are we talking about? Arcade PCBs, 2600s, home computers, Atari Calculators, Atari UNIX boxes [!]. what?

      For those who think a mere link to the books TOC isn't actually an answer to the question, the book seems to concentrate on mods for the early Atari consoles, like the 2600, 5200, and 7800. Other notable devices listed as subjects in the TOC include:

      PlayStation 2
      802.11 devices
      iPod
      Nokia 6210
      Palm devices

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  29. Review of the Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Totally positive review. Only a small area or two which says, "...odd...". Aside from that, there's nothing negative about the book. Why is that? Is the book perfect? Is the reviewer out of their realm and isn't qualified to review it?

    I'm leery of any reviews which are completely positive. A reviewer should sit down and make a list of topics they expect should be in a book based upon what's presented on the book's cover and introduction. How high|low should the skill level be? How about themes|elements in each project? Even if it's cheesy; e.g., [Title]stuff [Goal] stuff [Hardware Needed: stuff, [Steps] stuff, [Testing] stuff, Confirming it works [suff], Debugging stuff. What types of topics (book level) should be covered? Are the topics [which are] presented progressive - i.e., do the have the things everyone learned in Freshman Comp: a beginning, a middle, an end? Are the topics consistent with an expected skill level? To be blunt, the review sucks. There's nothing to truly indicate whether I'd be willing spend my money on this book.

  30. Chapter on the DMCA? by David+Hume · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the Publisher:

    Modern game systems, too! Hack your PlayStation 2 to boot code from the memory card or modify your PlayStation 2 for homebrew game development


    Which makes me ask, is there a chapter on your potential liability under the DMCA? --

    Section 1201 Impedes Competition and Innovation.

    Rather than focusing on pirates, many copyright owners have chosen to use the DMCA to hinder their legitimate competitors. For example, Sony has invoked section 1201 to protect their monopoly on Playstation video game consoles, as well as their "regionalization" system limiting users in one country from playing games legitimately purchased in another.

    * * * *

    Sony Attacks Playstation "Mod Chips"

    Apart from using the DMCA against vendors of personal computer emulators of Sony's Playstation, Sony has sued a number of manufacturers of so-called "mod chips" for alleged circumvention under the DMCA. In doing so, Sony has been able to enforce a system of geographical regional restrictions that raises significant anticompetitive issues.

    So-called "mod chips" are after-market accessories that modify Playstation consoles to permit games legitimately purchased in one part of the world to be played on a games console from another geographical region. Sony has sued mod chip manufacturers in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. In the U.S., Sony sued Gamemasters, Inc., distributor of the Game Enhancer peripheral device, which allowed U.S. Playstation users to play games purchased in Japan and other countries. Although there was no infringement of Sony's copyright, the court granted an injunction under the DMCA's anti-circumvention provisions, effectively banning the use of a technology that would permit users to use legitimately-purchased non-infringing games from other regions.


    Drinkers Purgatory
    1. Re:Chapter on the DMCA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No mod chips were used in the book, at least from what I can see. So maybe you should stop jumping to conclusions and do some research before spouting your mouth off.

  31. Dun, dun duhhhhhhh! by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Will this book be banned under the DMCA? Will the author be held without trial or media attention? Will the new European DMCA laws mean even Europe can't read it? find out in next weeks exciting episode of "When Fucking Corporate Asswipes Dictate Stupid Laws to Corrupt Senators!"

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:Dun, dun duhhhhhhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When Fucking Corporate Asswipes Dictate Stupid Laws to Corrupt Senators!"

      As true as this is, I don't think anyone is going to care if you hack an ATARI 2600.

  32. How about wetware hacking?-CTRL,ALT,REBOOT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem with wetware hacking is if you screw up? You're so FUCKED. Screw up your hardware, you're just out the money, and the gadget.

  33. Mental image by computational+super · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... hacking a CRT monitor. I believe that the safety warning should probably be a bit bolder, especially considering the earlier, prominent advice about static energy and grounding.

    I suddenly have this mental image of Wile E. Coyote standing over an open monitor, covered in black soot, smoke swirling off of his head...

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
    1. Re:Mental image by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Thats actually pretty accurate, huge fuckin caps and other HV stuff in CRTs. Not something i'd want to open...

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Mental image by Grayraven · · Score: 1

      I've taken a shock from an IBM 8513 monitor, not an experience I'd like to recommend. It's not a good idea to try to extend the high voltage cable with something else.
      Although the way I felt how the electricity moved up my arm was kind of interesting. I'm guessing it spread through the blood vessels and I could literally feel every one of them.

      --
      "Source... The Final Frontier" -- keepersoflists.org
    3. Re:Mental image by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Thats interesting, i've been shocked many times, but only real bad once or twice but i've never thought hard about the sensation. You may be correct, i'd think that blood (a liquid high in electrolytes and othe highly conductive things) would probably be the best conducting tissue in your body.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  34. Electronic Grounding Helps Technically-Debugging. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favorite site when it comes to learning debugging, software or hardware.

  35. The economics of paper failure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I always remembered that as the best demonstration of the difference between hardware geeks and software geeks. Software geeks abide by neither the laws of physics nor economics."

    Oh I don't know. One can always write books about the consequences. That's abiding by the laws of economics. But basically you understand the basis of the whole "if skyscrapers were built like software..." metaphor.

  36. The XGameStation by Langley · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check this out some time: XGameStation.

    This may have been posted to Slashdot before, but it is worth bringing up again since its been at the "Pre-Orders Coming Soon!" stage to quite some time now.

    This is Andre LaMothe's little project (little?), that when it comes to fruition will be a bad-assed tutorial on not only hacking together your own computer but all the neat programming that goes into getting it up and running as a fully functional console game system.

    Anyway, I can't wait to get my hands on one (not that my apartment floor is an ideal workspace to build one), so hopefully the more eyeballs that go to the site will perhaps play a small part in getting the very ambitious project out the door.

    I guess, the book reviewed here will be a great way to gain a foothold on the skill necessary for the XGameStation.

  37. Then again, does the book violate the DMCA? by David+Hume · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No mod chips were used in the book, at least from what I can see. So maybe you should stop jumping to conclusions and do some research before spouting your mouth off.


    Thanks for the calm, rational and respectful reply. Did more research. Turns out that, at least as far as Sony is concerned, the presence of a "mod chip" is not necessary to allege a violation of the DMCA. Indeed, as noted by Prof. David S. Touretzky at Carnegie Mellon University, merely publishing information aiding circumvention of a copyright protection or management system can cause Sony to assert a DMCA claim:

    The creator of aibohack.com, who uses the pseudonym "AiboPet", was distributing modified versions of Sony's software for the AIBO robot pet. Clearly this was a copyright violation that Sony had the right to protest. But he was also publishing some basic information about the protection scheme for the AIBO's memory stick. In their letter to him, Sony claimed this little essay violated the DMCA and asked that the file be taken down.


    Victor Matsuda, Vice President, Entertainment Robot America, Sony Electronics Inc. stated in his letter of October 24, 2001:

    Similarly, your response regarding the copy protection protocol does not justify your actions. Your discontinuation of "Format AIBO" is certainly a step in the right direction. However, your site still contains information providing the means to circumvent AIBO-ware's copy protection protocol constituting a violation of the anti-circumvention provisions of the Digital Mellennium Copyright Act.


    This leads to the obvious question. Will Sony assert that the book Hardware Hacking violates the DMCA? Think this isn't possible? Then consider when HP used the DMCA to quash a vulnerability publication.

    1. Re:Then again, does the book violate the DMCA? by metlin · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the calm, rational and respectful reply.

      Dude!!! Welcome to Slashdot :-p

  38. Yes but its... by cryptogryphon · · Score: 1

    ..the quote you have to love.

  39. Mod chips? by NineNine · · Score: 1

    I'd *love* to see a nice, step by step explination as to how to mod my PS2, speaking of hacking. As is, I had to ship it to a guy who did it (and he did a perfect job putting in a DMS3 chip), but I would've liked to be able to do it myself. As is, there's virtually no information on how to solder those little tiny connections yourself out on the web that I could find.

    1. Re:Mod chips? by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      I'd *love* to see a nice, step by step explination as to how to mod my PS2,

      Web search for "thebroken", an amateur "TV" show devoted to hacking. The episodes are downloadable. On one show, they walk through installing a mod chip for each of the 3 videogame consoles.

    2. Re:Mod chips? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I actually saw it. It sucked. They were a couple of kids who pretty much said, "take the cover off and install the chip". Not the sharpest knives in the drawer, those kids. But thanks for the info.

  40. furby? by nappingcracker · · Score: 2, Funny

    if this is the book im thinking of, it will tell you how to hack a "furby". pretty slick. turn your furby into funzo!

    --
    |plastic....or gasoline?|
  41. "secuity of the devices" by dyefade · · Score: 1

    this from amazon.co.uk:

    "Hacking in this sense refers to modifying these devices to perform in a manner not originally intended; not compromising the security of the devices"

    shame that Amazon assume that people will immediately read "Hacking" as "Cracking"

    1. Re:"secuity of the devices" by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      "Hacking in this sense refers to modifying these devices to perform in a manner not originally intended; not compromising the security of the devices"

      Of course, compromising security is only one of many ways to use a device in an unintended manner.

      Computer-vandalism is a subset of hacking, so using the word "hacker" to mean an electronic intruder is not wrong, despite occasional heated protests.

  42. Linux vs. Windows?!?? by necro2607 · · Score: 0

    Ummm.. how the hell did the "Linux vs. Windows" argument come up in this book? It's called "Hardware Hacking", not "Typical OS-related Arguments"...

    Am I the only one getting sick of hearing about "Mac OS vs. Windows" or "Linux vs. Windows" constantly, with the same old, dry, overused points being stated over and over? *sigh*...

    1. Re:Linux vs. Windows?!?? by ryanr · · Score: 1

      Well, thanks for assuming that the points I made were old, dry and overused. :)

      It came up because I did a chapter on HTPCs, and built a Windows HTPC and a Linux HTPC, and discussed the relative merits of each platform.

  43. different author by Snotnose · · Score: 0

    Had the author's name been Paris instead of Blaine then the title would have a completely different meaning....

  44. Chapter 6 by IO+ERROR · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The authors have used part three as a technical reference, including some frank talk about Linux vs. Windows in chapter six. Sure, many people like Linux better, however you have to take into consideration who will be using the system. In a system the whole family uses, it has to be user-friendly enough for the whole family to use.

    Four year olds can use Linux easily. But Windows frustrates four year olds as much as the rest of us. I sincerely hope this chapter discloses this hard truth...

    And now I wait to be modded -1, Troll...

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    1. Re:Chapter 6 by grepistan · · Score: 1

      +1, Telling it like it is...

      --
      Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
      -- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather
  45. I agree. Tilman gave up everything for nothing by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    he was just another sheeple

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  46. Bah! Why back in the day..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    REAL men didn't have shrink tubing or heat guns, no sir! WE had to skin badgers with our teeth, use that, wrap it around the circuitry, then hold our hands in active lava tubes for it to cure!

    And we LIKED it!

  47. Hardcore hardware hackers!?? by mgt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you list a multimeter as a tool for "Hardcore hardware hackers only", well that when my interest for the book drops from 5 to 0.

  48. Re:OFFTOPIC reply to Dumbass by yomegaman · · Score: 1

    I've often noted that it's only relatively wealthy people like JS Mill - who don't have to fight in the wars themselves - that say stuff like that. Think it's just a coincidence?

    --
    ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  49. who exactly by grepistan · · Score: 1

    is this lamented personality, for the benefit of clueless Australians who can't be bothered googling the phrase and dealing with the increasingly crappy news sites?

    --
    Real stupidity beats artificial intelligence every time.
    -- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather
  50. Ok, my bad. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Informative

    To be honest, I quickly skimed the writeup because I was in a rush to see if I could manage to get a fp. At least I didn't troll. I was actually suprised I wasn't modded down. In any case its not the best review. I also went down to B&N and reviewed the book myself. Its not good. The Cue cat is "hacked" to remove the unique identifier. The Atartis are "Hacked" to modify their controllers ( 2600 is rotated 90 for lefties, they modify a nintendo (NES) controller to work with it, make a 5200 paddle wheel, and replace a red led with a blue one. Other chapters are equally disapointing. The one on Tivo replacements is a simple myth tv howto and a section on doing the same on windows. The Terrabyte drive was by far the coolest hack, but I wouldnt' consider it very cool simply because of the high cost of the supplies. For some unknown reason the last chapters are on Operating system archetecture ( where they reveal that drivers are used to control hardware!) and an intro to programming (variables are used to store data in memory!). Craptacular. On the front their is a quote from mitnik that makes absolutely no sense he's quoted to the effect "If I had this book ten years ago, the FBI never would have caught me". WTF? Was he captured using the UID of the Cue Cat? Or maybe it was because he couldn't use the right handed 2600 controler! So unless you want to build a terrabyte firewire raid drive, I wouldn't reccomend it.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:Ok, my bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I don't understand this obsession with being the first post. All that does is prove to everyone that you have even less of a life than the rest of us. Go you!

  51. Re:Tillman was a dumbass by dkirchge · · Score: 1

    Whether you agree with the war in Iraq or not (for the record, I was in the US Army once myself and I do not support the war), the invasion of Afghanistan was based on solid evidence of terrorist activity and was approved by the UN BEFORE we invaded.

    All that aside, you really can't help but respect a man who decides that he can make a personal contribution to something that he believes in and then does it with no interviews to the press explaining his decision or expectation of personal gain, indeed, he wound up giving up everything for that.

    I'd like to see you have the balls to make that kind of a decision.

  52. It s a number. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    1 is a cool number. who doesn't want to be #1? I admit it is childish, but you know if we all acted like adults .... well, I don't know what would happen, but I would predict it would be something not as cool as whatever it is like when we don't all act like adults. Thats for sure. Speaking of which why does everyone call it the first post? I thought this was a place for computer nerds! it should be zeroith post!

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    1. Re:It s a number. by freeJustin · · Score: 1

      FORTRAN does its idexing from 1.

  53. Misuse of "engineer" by tttonyyy · · Score: 1
    You do not need to be an electrical engineer to understand what they are talking about in this book.

    Electrical Engineer? I wasn't aware that my computer had any household wiring in it. Perhaps you mean Electronics Engineer? ;)

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
  54. Not that great anyways by NoWhere+Man · · Score: 1

    It really doesn't matter.

    I picked up the book recently and was disappointed by it. It really doesn't provide the indepth knowledge anyone would be looking for.

    All in all I would say if you never touched electronics before, then go for this book. If not, your just gonna take it back like I did.

    --

    "Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gautier
  55. numbering from 0 insted of 1.. by sjwt · · Score: 1

    Im so sick of answering that question when i lable things these days.. i just shug and say
    "i felt like it"

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  56. sjwt, Burning his karma since 1977 by sjwt · · Score: 1

    War, what is it good for?
    Teaching American Geography.

    --
    You have 5 Moderator Points!
    Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  57. you claim Linux is not family friendly? by Die+Microsoft+Die · · Score: 0

    The only not family friendly is your ignorance in setting up a linux box. Tonight I saw a black rolls royce. Then I realised it had the "LINUX Live Free or Die" license plate on the front. I was astounded. I will likely not ever use MS product for the remaining duration of my life. Some of you crow about the USA K-12 being so bad. MS does its part to keep the USA dumb as a brick consumer society -like the dweeb who wrote this article. Somebody buy him a tractor, a grease gun, and some Craftsman tools.

    --
    If you hate them, do it properly and hate them fully.