Slashdot Mirror


AutoZone Responds To SCO

loftis writes "Groklaw is reporting that AutoZone has responded to The SCO Group's Lawsuit. Here is a link to the Groklaw community's discussion where you can find all the filings in raw form. Here is a text copy of the filing without amendments. AutoZone has pretty much said to the court, SCO has to prove 1) they own the code, and 2) that Linux infringes. Since SCO is litigating these two issues in other cases, they ought to wait until those questions are answered. Or, they say, 'If we cannot wait, we need SCO to tell us what we are infringing upon with specificity.' Since we know how SCO will answer the second question, and the court likely will too, since they amended the filings from SCO v IBM and SCO v RedHat and SCO v Novell, it seems to me (IANAL) that they should get to wait."

17 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Isn't it obvious? by phaetonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pep Boys is funding SCO with cash!

  2. Jesse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Shouldn't they just send over Jesse and the boys to do some mods on the SCO folks?

    1. Re:Jesse by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > Ventura? Jackson? James? Helms? Who are you talking about?

      One of these things is not like the other.
      One of these things does not belong.

      Answer: Jesse James. He's the only one worth voting for!

  3. used to waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    have you ever gone to autozone? they keep you waiting for years before someone finally decides to help you. i think SCO saw this one coming

  4. Huh? by Guy+Innagorillasuit · · Score: 4, Funny

    So they don't trust SCO's word? What's this world coming to when a fine outfit like SCO can't be trusted?

  5. hide-this-SCO by glassesmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny
    From AutoZone's filing:
    SCO's "hide-the-eight-ball" tactics in the IBM case leave AutoZone with little realistic belief that SCO will voluntarily identify the basis for its claims without this Court's intervention. SCO filed its Complaint against IBM more than a year ago; yet, at least as of April 18, 2004, SCO still had not provided IBM with any reasonable identification of its claims.
    I would like to play a little "hide-the-eight-ball" with.... oh, forget it, too easy.
  6. me! me! by GillBates0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Since we know how SCO will answer the second question

    ask me! *raised hand*

    "there are trillions even quadrillions of infringing lines in linux. all your atoms comprising our lines of code are belong to us. hence you clearly and specifically infringed on SCO's rights."
    Sincerely,
    Darryl

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  7. In other news... by WwWonka · · Score: 5, Funny

    After pissing off a legion of auto-philes by suing Autozone, SCO has now set their legal sights on the organizations of the NRA, the KKK, and the NY Association of the Russian Mafia for infringing on intellectual property by using Linux in their daily operations.

    1. Re:In other news... by WwWonka · · Score: 5, Funny

      How many AutoZone customers do you think have ever heard of SCO? For that matter how many do you think would care anyway?

      Ah, good point.I imagine their customers think "Linux" is some sort of disposable window cleaning towlet that keeps rain off their windshield!

  8. The Infringing Module by The_Rippa · · Score: 5, Funny

    The module SCO is talking about is the one implemented in the AutoZone system that make sure six different colors of shifter knobs are always in stock and the simple part you need for your car never is.

  9. Personal Ads by ryanvm · · Score: 4, Funny

    it seems to me (IANAL) that they should get to wait.

    Is it just me, or does IANAL sound like a code in the personal ads?

  10. SCO's specific claim by rewt66 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Three IPs for the Linux kings under the sky,
    Seven for IBM in their halls of stone,
    Nine for SGI doomed to die,
    One for the dark Darl on his dark throne
    In the land of Utah where the shadows lie.
    One IP to rule them all, one IP to find them,
    One IP to sue them all and in the courtrooms bind them,
    In the land of Utah where the shadows lie.

    (Yes, this has also been posted once on Groklaw. No, this isn't a karma whore - I'm the guy who posted it there. And no, I don't necessarily think that SGI is doomed to die, though things haven't been looking good for them lately...)

    1. Re:SCO's specific claim by ReverendLoki · · Score: 5, Funny

      RE: SGI, of course they're not. BSD's doomed to die, as everyone who reads /. should know by now.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  11. All will be revealed at the proper time… by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't fret, AutoZone, it's all safe in a briefcase in Germany...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  12. Re:Ok.. by zx75 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I got -15683... but I think my counter rolled over.

    --
    This is not a sig.
  13. Re:when will we see proof? by Lehk228 · · Score: 3, Funny

    well hopefully there will be an SEC investigation and Darl will be working in the license plate manufacturing industry.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  14. They'll never bother the NRA by big-giant-head · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nahh they'll never take on the NRA...... Moses would just cause a local river to rush over SCO headquarters and obliterate them. Besides having the pillar of fire appearing at all the pretrial hearings would be pretty un-nerving for Darl......

    --

    So Long and Thanks for all the Fish.