Slashdot Mirror


Rescuers Prep for Hybrid Car Accidents

mykepredko writes "I've driven a Toyota Prius for two years now and found this CNN article regarding the training required to rescue people trapped in hybrid cars to be slightly alarming. As an EE, I would expect that the electrical system is designed to be as well protected and fail-safe as possible in an accident, but if I'm ever in an accident, I'll make sure that any responders are wearing rubber gloves and boots and if any cutting is done, the roof is the only area they touch." Toyota has an accident guide indicating that if the airbags deploy, the hybrid battery pack should be automatically isolated.

142 of 620 comments (clear)

  1. Wait a sec .... by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 5, Funny
    Rescuers prep for hybrid car accidents
    The growing popularity of hybrid vehicles poses a new danger for rescuers at accident scenes: a network of high-voltage circuitry that may require some precise cutting to save a trapped victim
    ........


    Copyright 2004 Exxon Mobile. All rights reserved. This material may be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
    Hmmm, something seems fishy here.
    --

    "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    1. Re:Wait a sec .... by Minwee · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes, it does. The article I read had an entirely different copyright:
      Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
    2. Re:Wait a sec .... by ardmhacha · · Score: 5, Funny

      Copyright 2004 Exxon Mobile.

      Are they some sort of cellphone company ?

      If you are going to alter the article you could at least spell it correctly :)

    3. Re:Wait a sec .... by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah well ... appearently sarcasm is lost on the moderators.

      --

      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    4. Re:Wait a sec .... by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You turkey, that's not what it says :)

      Though that is a very intersting point that I hadn't thought of. I've been looking to build an electric (only) powered car to get me to work and back, to save wear and tear on my gasoline powered car (and so if it breaks, I have another way to get to work) and to "Save the Environment!"(tm).

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    5. Re:Wait a sec .... by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

      Welcome to Slashdot, where reading comprehension is optional.

    6. Re:Wait a sec .... by TheUnFounded · · Score: 2, Funny

      *sigh*

      Crazy mods! Mod the parent funny, please!

      Mod here: +5, Insightful :-D

    7. Re:Wait a sec .... by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 4, Funny
      something seems fishy here

      I agree. Especially the part about a low-speed rear-end collision "opening a portal to hell."

      --
      -- clvrmnky
    8. Re:Wait a sec .... by swordboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Copyright 2004 Exxon Mobile. All rights reserved. This material may be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

      The reality:

      ChevronTexaco is an investor in ECD Ovonics - the company that owns the popular NiMH battery technology that is popular in hybrid autos. Toyota gets their NiMH batteries from Matsushita/Panasonic, who are conveniently not paying the 3 percent royalty. So, the two companies have been tied up in the courts for years now battling this out. Last year, they moved into arbitration and that will be released this month. Although it was wrong for Matsushita to steal the technology, it is going to look bad when Toyota hybrids are banned from importation due to a lawsuit coming from a ChevronTexaco joint-venture.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    9. Re:Wait a sec .... by clichekiller · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't necessarily believe the original intent of this poster was missed by the moderators. If by his posting his intent was to indicate that the gasoline companies would like nothing more then to discredit the burgeoning alternative energy cars then I think he suceeded. Not that the article is any way incorrect.

      I did research on solar power cars back in the late 80's as part of an independent research project at my college. The more I dug into the subject the more I began to discover that all the juicy technical information regarding the subject was owned either by gasoline or oil companies. I was blown away. It was the first time I was confronted with the realities of business. What can I say call me naieve.

      --
      Sir, there is a dragon outside with an armful of armor. He's inquiring if we offer free refills.
    10. Re:Wait a sec .... by Eccles · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it's those Exxon boys down in Mobile, Alabama who wrote this up....

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    11. Re:Wait a sec .... by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is /. There is a very good chance that the parent poster was serious.

    12. Re:Wait a sec .... by therblig · · Score: 2, Informative

      I heard a news segment on NPR a few months ago about hybrids, and they said that Ford was far enough behind in hybrid technology that they were licensing some hybrid technology from Toyota. I don't know if that covers this, though. Honda has already had hybrids here as long as has Toyota.

      --

      I struggled for days and days and all I got was this lousy sig.

    13. Re:Wait a sec .... by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Informative

      No no no,

      this thread is going into miss-information fast

      The system developed for the Prius was made by a 3rd party company which is partialy owned by toyota. Toyota took their works and continued the development of their system. Ford worked with the same 3rd party company, but largly designed their system theirself (ford by far leads in R&D on hybrids, just haven't put anything out till late summer). They did make a deal with toyota over some of the controls, mainly to avoid patent violations, but it does not share tech, just look at the 2 systems in person and it's obvious, or talk to someone who has worked on one them.

      Honda does not use the same type of system at all. The use a integrated flywheel, motor, altenator. It's sandwiched between the engine and tranny. Its a crappy lame hybrid, same thing as GM is putting out in their trucks as an option. Most would not call it a hybrid, at most call it a mild hybrid. But Hondas marketing is at work.

      The CVTs in the vehicles are differant. Ford and toyota get their cvt via the planetary gearset used for the powersplite between the engine, generator, motor/wheels. There is no tranny to speed of, just the powersplit unit. The insight and civic use a normal transmission or you can get it with a cvt that is of a complicated deal using cones and belts and what not. They are very differant.

      Also there is no patent infringments with using the planetary for the powersplit since this idea is as old as gearing it'self.

      Also though you said nothing, i doubt ovonic has any claim over nickel metal hydrid batteries. Since that tech has been around for long anough for any patents to expire, plus their is so many ways to make such batteries you could get around them, and ovonic is more active with lithium ion batteries. And the Ford escape hybrid uses Sanyo batteries if anyone cares.

    14. Re:Wait a sec .... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Funny

      >> agree. Especially the part about a low-speed rear-end collision "opening a portal to hell."

      Maybe this is Id's way of gearing up for the Doom3 release.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    15. Re:Wait a sec .... by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I believe they were called "Pintos."

    16. Re:Wait a sec .... by silverhalide · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've always had a vision of an electric car getting in an accident and welding itself to whatever it hit.

    17. Re:Wait a sec .... by hazydave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's not quite the story.

      Panasonic/Matsushita, like every other NiMH battery licensee, pays all their royalties to Ovonics. If they had not, Ovonics could have actually blocked the import of the Prius to the USA. Unlike most of the licensees, they've done their own share of improvements to the technology, and have their own patent portfolio.

      The thing with Panasonic and Ovonics is not the royalties per se, but the patent license itself. Ovonics has had no interest in making D-Cells, they were, from the start, after the Hybrid car market... only it didn't quite exist. At the time Toyota started work on the Prius, and even until recently, Ovonics was only R&D, no production facilities at all. Their NiMH license was for small cells only: AAs, Cs, Ds, cellphone and laptop batteries, but not the giant cells you'd need for Hybrid cars.

      So Panasonic and Toyota got together on this, and built a hybrid anyway. The original (1997-2000) Prius actually used plain old everyday high-output D-Cells. For the 2001-2003 model, Panasonic supplied prismatic cells in packs of six, to Toyota. They, in turn, not being subject to any legal agreement between Panasonic and Ovonics, built up 38 of these (28 in the 2004 model) and voila -- hybrid power pack.

      So basically, it sounds like Panasonic had smarter lawyers than Ovonics. The main focus of the lawsuit by Ovonics was to prevent Panasonic from doing similar things in deals with Ford or GM, in any hybrid projects they had in the works. As well, it's likely they were after some of the Panasonic technology -- Panasonic has the highest output cells, by far, of any NiMH vendor.

      And it's also a limited time thing... Li-Ions or Li-Polys are likely to take over in the hybrid market, once they figure out how to keep them alive for 150,000 miles. And, I suppose, ensure they won't spontaneouslyh explode.

      Honda, an investor in Ovonics, apparently doesn't have any issue. But they make very weak hybrids anyway. The Toyota system is much cooler... and I'm not just saying that as a 2003 Prius owner.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
  2. All I can say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that this news is shocking.

    1. Re:All I can say by red+floyd · · Score: 3, Funny

      But at least they're current!

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  3. Not a great assumption... by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful
    but if I'm ever in an accident, I'll make sure that any responders are wearing rubber gloves and boots and if any cutting is done, the roof is the only area they touch

    If you are in an accident bad enough to need "responders" to get you out, odds are not great that you'll be conscious.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Not a great assumption... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As an EMT, I pulled a great many conscious people out of cars. Now, sometimes I wished they had been knocked out ... "Yes, damn it, we're going to get you out of the car, and you're going to be okay, now would you please hold still and shut up!"

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Not a great assumption... by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope, most any person who is trapped - dead or alive - has to be pulled out, and since we are the only ones trained to do it, guess who gets called out?

      The difference is that we generally wouldn't go emergency if it was a definate body recovery. But IO have certainly cut my share of dead and alive patients out of cars.

      The thing about all of this is that, in an accident bad enough, you can't guarantee any emergency system within the car is going to work. I don't care *what* the manufacturer says, if it were my guys they would be wearing any protection we could give them.

      The problem isn't just limited to Hybrid cars. Think about the cars that have side-impact airbags, air cushions, etc. Anywhere we want to cut could contain within it an airbag ready to deploy. Worse, even those manufacturers don't have a standard for how long before a system is deenergized. At least with steering wheel airbags we can put a special cover over it.

    3. Re:Not a great assumption... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lucky you. I was a volunteer firefighter for about a year. I saw two accidents, with injuries in both. In one accident, an infant died. Not pleasant.

      The next day at work, a coworker brought in her newborn infant. I never thought I'd be so happy to see something small and pink and wrinkly and wriggly.

    4. Re:Not a great assumption... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 3, Funny

      I never thought I'd be so happy to see something small and pink and wrinkly and wriggly
      "but enough of what my wife tells me"

    5. Re:Not a great assumption... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think they should just start equiping them with ejection seats... If the crash is bad enough that the car starts to crumple, pyrotechnic bolts would cut the roof on the car and a charge would eject the occupents. Obviously a tip sensor would ensure you didn't get ejected into the pavement if the car is upside down.

      Then a special sensor would calcuate the height of the other vehicle. If it looks like it might be an SUV, another charge fires the battery pack out the front of the vehicle.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    6. Re:Not a great assumption... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hopefully the responders are not only wearing rubber gloves but also skintight tight black leather pants and stiletto heels. Oh wait -- is this forum public?

    7. Re:Not a great assumption... by Durrik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't know if you're serious or not. But this is a bad idea.

      A lot of accidents (I don't know the percentage but I'm sure its most) happen at intercetions. And that usually means traffic lights. Ejection seats would have a very good chance of shooting a guy right up into one. Not to mention trees, buildings, and a whole bunch of other things that are along the side of the roadway.

      Another problem is that if any part of the system fails then the ejector is a going to be in a world of hurt. One of the many reasons a combat pilot wears a crash helmet in his fighter is because if he has to eject and the canopy doesn't go, the helmet helps him get through the glass. You're not going to get everyone in cars wearing crash helmets.

      Say the car is flipped over and the ejector is automatically turned off, and the car is onfire. You now have a person strapped into a chair with alot of very explosive rocket fuel right next to his butt.

      That brings up the nice nifty seatbelts. The standard lap and shoulder restraints aren't going to do for an ejector seat, and we have enough problems getting people to use the seatbelts as they are.

      Also while driving a person's seat is usually partially under the steering wheel, and the legs under the dashboard to get to the pedals. An auto ejection won't allow a person to clear those obsticals before he is rocketed through them.

      Multiple people in the car will also be a problem. You can't fire the seats all at once because the parachutes would get fouled on each other. But then you can't fire them independently because the people remaining in the car will get burned by the rocket exhaust. You can't fire them all of in different angles because that increases the chance of lauching a person into a building, or high voltage line.

      I'm sure there are more problems with putting ejector seats in cars then these.

      --
      Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
    8. Re:Not a great assumption... by Woody77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a volunteer FF, and we get LOTS of training on how to properly cut up cars, especially the new ones that are more deadly to us trying to rescue you, than they are to you and your 60mph argument with a tree.

      Insane numbers of airbags, compressed gas cylinders strategicly located in our best cutting points, airbags that don't always go off, and therefore might go off at any point in time while we're cutting the car apart.

      And now they're adding several hundred volts to the mix.

      Luckily we don't need to cut through the center of the floor boards very often (common wiring route for the big linces).

      But then, the automotive companies don't seem to have concern for making a car that's easy to cut apart. They main focus on not killing you in the first place.

      The Mini's are the most impressive I've seen. 60mph into a telephone pole (annihalated the pole), and then into a redwood tree. No broken glass, but the engine compartment was demolished. Incredible how much energy it soaked up, without harming anything past the firewall. Too bad it caught fire as the gas tank was torn open by the bottom of the telephone poll...

    9. Re:Not a great assumption... by Woody77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, older cars were bricks that just transfered the energy directly to the interior (think billiard balls).

      Newer cars have "crush zones", and a prime example is the Mini. Head-first into an immovable object and it crumples away, slowing the car gradually, as the front of the car crushes.

      The trick is getting it just right. To soft, and you crush the occupants. Too hard, and it's not useful.

      They've been slowly getting there over the years.

      The focus of the manufacturers IS actually major impacts, and not small impacts. The car is meant to be totalled with as little damage to the occupants as possible.

      I've seen several head-on into trees that totalled the car, and the driver walked away without a scratch. An impact that in an older car (or a full-size truck) could have seriously injured the people inside.

  4. Sound Effects by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never mind you electric car drivers, what about we poor bicyclists and pedestrians who can't hear you coming?

    I'd like to suggest new electric cars be equipped with Jetsons-style "whuwuwuwuwuuwu" sounds as a safety feature. Actually, this might very well be an untapped commercial opportunity: custom car sound effects. Drive a wagon train! Drive a steam train! Drive the U.S.S. Enterprise! Be ironic and drive a Hummer!

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re:Sound Effects by einstein · · Score: 4, Funny

      half the fun of my prius is sneaking up on people in parking lots.

      ok, I kid.

      it's probably only a 3rd.

    2. Re:Sound Effects by sohojim · · Score: 3, Funny
      Drive a wagon train! Drive a steam train! Drive the U.S.S. Enterprise!

      Or be like the kids in my neighborhood and drive a mobile dance club.

      thump thump thump thump thump thump

    3. Re:Sound Effects by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Downloading drive-tones for your car, hmmmm, untapped business opportunity!

      Why not an electric toothbrush, or electric mixer? Come on, the Enterprise is in space, it doesn't actually make sound! ;)

      The Shadow vessel scream from B5! That'll wake you cyclists up!

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    4. Re:Sound Effects by RLW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's cool! They should add sound effects for other operations like when the door is opened or closed it could sound like a garbage truck deploying it's automated can picker-upper-dumper. Hit the fuel door release and it makes a gurgling sound.

    5. Re:Sound Effects by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I had the option, I'd choose an unmuffled Harley Davidson sound for stop and go traffic, complete with reving effects. And for highway, I'd select the Junkers Ju-87 Stuka diving siren, just to impress the bystanders.

      BTM

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    6. Re:Sound Effects by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Never mind you electric car drivers, what about we poor bicyclists and pedestrians who can't hear you coming?

      I'd like to suggest...


      I'd like to suggest that mothers starting telling their children to look both ways before crossing the street.

      --
      -- dR.fuZZo
    7. Re:Sound Effects by ewhac · · Score: 5, Funny
      Or be like the kids in my neighborhood and drive a mobile dance club.

      thump thump thump thump thump thump

      Thump thump thump? The kids in your neighborhood are into waltzes?

      Schwab

    8. Re:Sound Effects by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ironically, you're probably right, they need some sort of "white noise" or wuwuwuwuwuwwuwu sound so that us humans aren't messed up by the lack of sound coming from the machines. Telephone lines have, since the invention of the telophone practically, had a feedback loop which directs a little bit of the signal noise on the line back through the receiver. Even in this age of digital communications where lossless line communications (i.e. zero noise on the line) is more than possible, phone companies still inject just enough noise on the line. Why? Because people need to hear at least a low volume of 'noise' or else they think something is wrong.

      Maybe the bigger and badder the machine (i.e. cars and planes and stuff), the more noise is needed as an indicator of imminent danger if I don't get out of its way?

    9. Re:Sound Effects by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, BTW, did you ever wonder why your old dial-up telephone modem made those high-pitched annoying tones exactly the same way no matter what kind of modem you had? Those tones are three (maybe 2, I forget) distinct ring tones that instruct the repeater on your telephone line to shut off the noise on the line to set up lossless digital communications.

    10. Re:Sound Effects by Jardine · · Score: 2

      I'd like to suggest that mothers starting telling their children to look both ways before crossing the street.

      Think of the blind children!

    11. Re:Sound Effects by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cute. But for all our sakes, I hope that some sort of standard emerges. I don't want to be crossing the street, and be warned to jump out of the way by "Ride of the Valkries" or "Sounds Made by an Angry Cat One Fine Tuesday Morn."

      Ideally, it would be a sound fairly similar to other cars of its size, projected mostly in the direction of travel. On the upside, the people inside the car would barely have to hear it. But this also means adding a "check vroom-vroom noise" light to the dashboard.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    12. Re:Sound Effects by Technician · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In nice weather, I roll the windows down. I can hear a bycycle aproach and not slow down for the stop sign while riding on the left side of the road. Making extra noise at the stop sign would keep me from hearing the cyclists that don't stop for stop signs assuming that I saw them before pulling out in front of them. They need to add the noise and bright lights to bycycles (like a harley) so they can be seen and heard. I usualy do see a bicycle at at an intersection IF they come up to the intersection in the proper lane and stop for the stop sign. That's not the cyclist I pull out in front of because I didn't see them. It's the ones on the other side of the road that didn't stop that don't get seen. A pedesterian gets seen because he is at the corner when the driver looks checking trafic, not 35 feet back from the corner traveling 30 MPH into the intersection.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    13. Re:Sound Effects by cavemanf16 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do a google search on "echo suppressors for POTS" or maybe "how a DSL modem works". Also search for topics like this one.

  5. Beingg a volunteer firefighter.. by Jerdie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have heard that electrical wiring in the new hybrids run through all sorts of places, including roof and roof posts.
    I have also heard of their being multiple batteries.
    Also, some new mini-van with a glass roof has extra reinforced roof posts that my fire dept's hydraulic cutting tools cound't cut.
    Finally, the presence of air bags everywhere all over the car frame is great, they can explode at random times.
    New cars are making it really hard to get people out of them safely after an accident.

    --
    Programming is simply the application of logic to creativity
    1. Re:Beingg a volunteer firefighter.. by sohojim · · Score: 4, Insightful
      New cars are making it really hard to get people out of them safely after an accident.

      Yes, but the people tend to be alive after these accidents. Anyone can yank a corpse out of a mangled Honda. Believe me, anyone!

    2. Re:Beingg a volunteer firefighter.. by RLW · · Score: 2, Funny

      Explosive bolts! Every car could equipped with an RFID tag reader (which is on it's own hardened circuit). Then the FD can bring out it's disassembly wand and when it gets close to the car, poof, the bolts go off and the car shell splits like an orange! Oh, and instead of air bags and seat belts cars should deploy foam in the passenger compartment in case of an accident; like in "Demolition Man".

    3. Re:Beingg a volunteer firefighter.. by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have heard that electrical wiring in the new hybrids run through all sorts of places, including roof and roof posts.

      On the bright side, you won't need to carry a defibrillator to these accident scenes. :)

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    4. Re:Beingg a volunteer firefighter.. by bechthros · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are indeed two batteries. The last time I rode in a Prius, I accidentally covered some ventilation holes in the shelf behind the back seat with some paperwork.

      In fifteen minutes, the car was non-operational.

      Turns out the back battery is the one that does the electric motor, and it really doesn't like to get hot, ever. Removed the offending paperwork and it was back to normal almost right away.

  6. And this just in by andih8u · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, and in other accidents the gas tank could blow up, yada yada. I'm curious about battery acid myself.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
    1. Re:And this just in by ibpooks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hybrids have gas tanks and lubricants too. They have twice as many hazardous substances to leak out and burn or electrocute.

    2. Re:And this just in by bgeer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, you have been watching too many movies. Gas tanks can't blow up. Gasoline itself is not explosive, only gasoline vapor that has mixed with air is explosive. What this means is that the gas has to first leak all over the place to create sufficient surface area for it to evaporate quickly, and then it has to be ignited. It unfortunately happens, but it's not nearly as easy as most people think. Battery acid also has to evaporate in order to be explosive, and off the top of my head it probably has lower vapor pressure than gasoline.

    3. Re:And this just in by jafiwam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Needs fuel plus oxygen plus ignition, which 800 apparently had.

      Motor vehicles have vapor, but not the ignition and usually not the oxygen.

      Flight 800 had a mostly empty center tank of approximately 13,000 gallon capacity. Between 500 and 1,500 times that of a normal car.

      It had approximately 50 - 100 gallons of fuel in it, enough to create good vapor for the remaining 13,000 gallon capacity.

      That fuel was also not gasoline, but kerosene (more or less) a very different substance. So the explosive air/vapor mixture yields very different explosive energy in jet fuel vs. gasoline.

      So you are comparing a fire-cracker to a friggin MOAB and saying "see they both can explode, therefore the firecracker is just as dangerous as the MOAB."

      It's still safe to say that after all the cars on the road and all the collisions and so on that gasoline when contained in the tank is resaonably safe.

      I am sure if you had Googled, you'd have realized your comparison doesn't work at all.

    4. Re:And this just in by Samlind1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For those of the redneck persuasion an old amusement around the gas station is a coffee can full of gas. Throw lit cigarettes into it to put them out. Which it does. Without an explosion. Potenitally of more immediate interest is the airbags now in every car, and also the seat belt pre-tensioners that fire a few milliseconds before the airbag mostly in more expensive models so far. The pre-tensioners pull your lap belt in about 2 inches to sit you in the seat more firmly. All these things are known as pyrotechnic devices. Actually, you could look at an airbag as a piece of ordnance pointed at your face, with a really smart trigger. Airbag factories all have patches over the the holes in the roof. Although the airbags are far better now than the early models in resisting inadvertent firing, still it does happen occasionally. There are two results. One result is the module was sitting the right way with the airbag opening facing up or at least facing away from anything. In that case it deploys with great force, but doesn't move much. The other condition is that the airbag opening is facing something, like sitting on a table with the airbag opening down (pretty typical), and in that case the airbag opens with great force and launches itself with great force away from any surface the airbag hits. In the case of the table, probably through the roof. So undeployed airbags are potentially really dangerous, and make getting someone out of a wreck much more complicated. Usually, they go off as designed. Thank goodness.

  7. As opposed to the safety of... by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And this is opposed to the safety of an internal combustion engine?

    Where any accident will involve the spraying and leaking of a dozen gallons if highly flammable fluid?

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    1. Re:As opposed to the safety of... by grub · · Score: 2, Informative


      That's still a concern, hybrids have both a gas or diesel engine and battery power.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:As opposed to the safety of... by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 2, Informative

      You, my friend, watch way too many movies.

      Back here in the Real World, gas tanks are hardened, so that only the most violent shock would produce a rupture, and are also positioned at the opposite end of the vehicle from the major source of ignition (ie the engine).

      You really have to try really hard/be very (un)lucky to get a car to explode.

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
  8. Current VS. Voltage... by mekkab · · Score: 5, Informative

    vs. dumb-asses.

    500 volts? 45 volts is enough to kill you... at 10 amperes!

    Seriously, aren't we nerds, or something?!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Current VS. Voltage... by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Informative

      Butcha can't force current through a body without raising voltage. Your body is fairly resistive, and 45 volts _probably_ wouldn't hurt you, because I=V/R

      -Jesse - plays with 45 volts underwater occasionally.

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    2. Re:Current VS. Voltage... by mopslik · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's the reasoning behind why 100-200mA is lethal but >200mA is just severe burns and respritory failure?

      It's right in the article provided in the link...

      As the current approaches 100 mA, ventricular fibrillation of the heart occurs -an uncoordinated twitching of the walls of the heart's ventricles. There's no worldly help for the victim.
      ...
      Above 200 mA, muscular contractions are so severe that the heart is forcibly clamped during the shock. This clamping protects the heart from going into ventricular fibrillation, and the victim's chances for survival are good.

  9. Re:That's shocking!!! by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a lot of resistance to that sort of humor.

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  10. Upside-down by boatboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if any cutting is done, the roof is the only area they touch.
    And if the car is upside down?

  11. Racing cars.. by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Racing cars have a standard placed cut off for the motor/fuel line inside the drivers door for rescuers, why not something like that for the hybrids?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Racing cars.. by GuyinVA · · Score: 2, Informative

      The standard place on race cars for electrical cut off is the RR corner, normally on the rear panel. Normally a big red switch. Sometimes a push/pull rod conected to the switch mounted in the trunk. This is because most race cars have their battery mounted in the RR corner of the trunk/boot.

    2. Re:Racing cars.. by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

      Racing cars have a standard placed cut off for the motor/fuel line inside the drivers door for rescuers, why not something like that for the hybrids?

      There is. In my Prius, it's in the trunk on the left side of the battery pack. Pull out the orange disconnect plug. Upon loss of the 12 volt system, the high voltage circuit breaker in the trunk opens so simply cutting the small 12 volt battery cable will do the trick.

      In the Honda Insite, the disconnect switch is in the back under a small square cover.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  12. You're right. by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 4, Funny

    Copyright 2004 Exxon Mobile. All rights reserved. This material may be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    You're right, something is fishy. ExxonMobil probably wouldn't spell thier own name incorrectly.

  13. The radio by stealthmidget · · Score: 5, Funny

    But the big question remains: will the radio still work after an accident? Anyone ever notice in those shows you see about car accident rescues (Rescue 911, cops, etc.), everytime they arrive at the scene of an accident, the radio is NEVER on?

    1. Re:The radio by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My CD player was still playing White Zombie (on two 10" subs) long after I got into a wreck in my 91 Honda CRX. After the police showed up to investigate, one of the officers had my walk back to my car and turn that shit off. Oh well, must have been too much tension in the air for music.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:The radio by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, they digitally remove the music from every scene to avoid paying royalties...

      --
      ± 29 dB
  14. Why the concern? by GuyinVA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My dad has a Civic Hybrid. All the necessary cabling runs under the car next to the frame rails. If rescuers are haveing to cut that deep, you're SOL anyways. Normally rescuers have to use the jaws of life on doors, and the associated A,B,C pillars. No electricals go thru there, other than side airbag sensors.

    Sounds like another internet scare article put out by a 'reputible' source...

  15. Voltage issue... by r84x · · Score: 5, Informative
    IANA Electrical Engineer, but I do know that it is not the voltage that is an issue, but the amps. I am from a farm, and I regularly come into contact with our electric fence, which runs at 10,000 volts.

    From the article:

    The battery powering the electric motor carries as much as 500 volts, more than 40 times the strength of a standard battery.

    --
    Karma: Can there be a void?

    .. -. - . .-. .-. --- -...

    1. Re:Voltage issue... by Enigma_Man · · Score: 4, Informative

      Amperage is what matters, but you can't have Amps without the Volts. Also in the case of your electric fence, it also doesn't have the Watts to maintain the Volts to supply the Amps. Even though it's a 10,000 volt line, when you touch it, the power supply can't give enough juice, so it'll actually drop to around 100 volts or so (measure it with a multimeter! fun science experiment!) while you're touching it.

      If you were to touch a 10,000 volt power line though, that would be a different story alltogether, because it has enough watts going for it, that when you touch it, you get the full 10,000.

      -Jesse IAAEE

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    2. Re:Voltage issue... by cexshun · · Score: 2, Informative

      They actually covered this on Myth Busters (best tv show ever). Urinating on something as powerful as the third rail of the subway is not enough to do anything because urine is not a steady stream, but lots of tiny droplets. The current would have to jump though the air many times to get to you, and it loses power with every jump of a gap. So it never gets to you.

    3. Re:Voltage issue... by pclminion · · Score: 2, Informative
      A 500 volt battery with a low impedance will kill you instantly. You are right that it is the current which kills, but it is the voltage which causes the current.

      Your electric fence can't deliver a lethal shock because the circuit is formed through the earth (soil). The soil has a high impedance, so very little current flows even across 10000 volts. The fence initially delivers a very strong shock because your body acts like a capacitor charging up. Once you are "charged" (i.e., at a high voltage) the current only trickles through because the soil has such a high resistance.

      A 12 volt car battery is capable of delivering thousands of amps if it is shorted through a small resistance. Hypothetically, if you took a steel wrench and shorted the contacts, the wrench would melt from the huge current. However, 12 volts is not enough to penetrate your skin, so if you grasp the battery terminals with your hands nothing will happen.

      There's no simple rule such as "Only the current kills." The short answer is that unless you really have a good idea of how electricity actually works, you are better off staying away from anything that says "high voltage" or "high current." Electricity can behave in ways that are hard to predict, even for people experienced in handling it. It behaves according to laws, but there can always be something you hadn't thought of.

    4. Re:Voltage issue... by Mr.Surly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, and an alkaline "D" cell can put out over 10 amps, at 1.5 volts. Considering the lethal current is 30 milliamps, you'd think people would be dropping dead all the time from putting batteries in their flashlights.

      The thing is, you have to have:

      1) A current source that can provide the lethal amount.
      2) A voltage source that can provide enough voltage to push said current through your chest area (heart).

      The resistance of your body depends on several things: Hydration, surface conductivity (sweat), body composition (fat vs muscle). My old electronics safety classes taught that as little as 30 volts can be lethal under the right conditions.

      Electric fences (and static electricty) provide very high voltages, but only for an instant, and at very low currents.

    5. Re:Voltage issue... by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Informative



      What exactly were they trying to point out? I fail to understand it.

      I know someone who pissed on an electric fence once at a barn party - it's not the radius of the flow, it's the continuity of the stream. He *did* get tingled (not badly) - and I don't care what Myth Busters (who?) say.

      Test it! Go drink 3 beers in an hour and piss on a live fence. :) I guarantee you that you'll feel it. Briefly, but you will. The guy I was referring to said it felt like 9v on the tongue but somewhat more painful.

      If getting shocked from pissing on an EF is being regarded as an urban legend, than there are some people who need enlightenment.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  16. cutting someone from the car? by pudge_lightyear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Judging by the size of the hybrids that I've seen, I doubt that after being hit by any of the overly large gas guzzling SUV's on the road today, there will be much car to actually cut.

    The problem with these things isn't the danger of electricity, it's the danger of being under my suburban!

    1. Re:cutting someone from the car? by Croaker · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know what would be great? If they engineered the hybrid to detect when it's being rammed by some twit in an SUV, and shunt all of its electrical charge through the other vehicle in the milliseconds after collision.

      Sure, your SUV may smash my hybrid, but you'll be extra crispy. Especially if that voltage gets into the coils of the heated seats you got your ass planted on.

    2. Re:cutting someone from the car? by richieb · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually SUVs are less safe, because they are likely to get into accidents that smaller cars can avoid. After all if it takes you extra 100 feet to stop you are more likely to hit something.

      Don't take my word for it. Check out this article, which appeared in the New Yorker magazine few months back.

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    3. Re:cutting someone from the car? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 2, Interesting
      but when I run my Suburban on E85, I get over a hundred miles per gallon of gasoline.

      Care to back this up?

      In reality, you are off by an order of magnitute. Accoridng to a government source, you actually get 10 MPG in the city, and 14 MPG on the highway. The gas mileage on that vehicle with E85 is actually worse than gasoline.

      The only advantage of that alternative fuel in that vehicle is it reduces the polution index. You burn more fuel but you put out less pollution.

      Perhaps you are really just someone who desperately wants to justify a vastly oversized vehicle that they likely do not need. What is it with Americans and our intense desire to take up more space and resources than anyone else?

      For the record, I drive a 2003 Honda Civic Hybrid. Its battery package is safely enclosed in a Kelvar shell that prevents leakage in the event of an accident. If the car is mangled enough that the back-half of the vehicle is ripped apart length-wise, there is no need to rescue me because the car would have to be beyond recognition. The electrical system also has plenty of failsafes to prevent dangerous shocks. Overall and on average, my vehicle is no more a liability to others in an accident than any other car.

      And no matter what you say, SUVs remain a tremendous threat to those with smaller vehicles on the road. No amount of nonsense, canned responses, or irrational whims will change the laws of physics.

  17. Whaa? by gthrash6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "They know not to cut into a hybrid's doors -- that's where many of the cables are --" Why in the world would there be high voltage in the doors? Maybe they mean the door sills? Or did Toyota save a buck by standardizing all their motors on 500V?

  18. Sound effects as a safety feature by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 3, Interesting
    After reading a driver's review of the GM Impact (later renamed EV-1) in which the reviewer noted that the car was quiet enough to mow down birds in the road, I realized that some kind of noisemaker, directed forward, might well be necessary to give pedestrians and others adequate notice of such vehicle's approach.

    Anyone driving a vehicle which is sufficiently loud (e.g. cycle with loud pipes) to prevent others from hearing the quieter vehicles should be subjected to immediate confiscation of their sonic assault weapon. This would have the worthwhile effect of turning the ex-driver into a pedestrian, so that they could appreciate the hazards of overly loud vehicles from the opposite perspective.

    1. Re:Sound effects as a safety feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Loud Pipes Save Lives. If a trucker can't hear your bike over the sound of his downshifting truck engine with the exhaust brake on, you're a "small model of the barren earth, which serves as paste and cover to" the freeway. (apologies to The Bard, Richard II act 2 scene 3)

      Similarly, these silent cars perhaps ought to have a noisemaker, one that's user activated, with a button or something.

      Oh, wait, that's called a horn.

  19. stored energy is stored energy by brucehoult · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You see a lot of panicy stuff about how dangerous
    all that electrical energy in the batteries is,
    but when it comes down to it if the car has the
    same range as a similar normal car then there is
    exactly the same amount of energy in the batteries
    as there would normally be in a car's fuel tank.

    But these aren't pure electric cars. They only
    have a few km of range on the batteries and most
    of the energy is in the fuel tank just like any
    other car.

    1. Re:stored energy is stored energy by Quobobo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thank you
      for formatting
      your post
      in a way
      that accomodates
      my very rare
      300x1200 resolution
      screen.

  20. This story is almost wholly bogus. by RareHeintz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Extended comments at Gizmodo makes it clear that this is 99% rumor/FUD. Does anyone bother chacking the facts on these things before they're posted?

    OK,
    - B

    1. Re:This story is almost wholly bogus. by sohojim · · Score: 3, Funny
      Does anyone bother chacking the facts on these things before they're posted?

      Was that a rhetorical question? :)

    2. Re:This story is almost wholly bogus. by Mikoca · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It is pretty obvious that this article is purely composed of corporate FUD. For example, in the article they speak about cables in the doors, which I find pretty ridiculous as an idea (where would these cables be going?) and, indeed, the diagram on the PDF above shows the cables to be running along the bottom of the car's frame (the most obvious, safe and logical solution). What confounds me is how CNN didn't even bother to check the article for basic compatibility with reality. Just because Americans are so sensitive about safety, an article like this, especially if aired on TV once will be enough to spread rumours and destroy the oh, so logical upsurge of Prius sales. The article, in fact, is honest enough to admit the reasons it was published:

      "Concerns about hybrids are increasing in large part because of their growing popularity."

      Obviously, somebody in the industry hasn't done his homework preparing for the new millenium and is trying to save himself through using his connection in the cable networks. What really bothers me is how they are using the innermost concerns of people to plant them in a world of fear. They almost make it unpatriotic to buy hybrids as thus you are endangering the heroic rescuers besides yourself. Not that CNN really surprises me with this move. I've lost all faith in their capability as any kind of source of information.

    3. Re:This story is almost wholly bogus. by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Extended comments at Gizmodo makes it clear that this is 99% rumor/FUD.

      Thanks for the info! I was almost thinking about reconsidering my plans to buy a Prius later this year, then I thought about how unlikely it would be to route lossy high-voltage the long way around the frame. Then I saw your link, and that sealed it -- I'm getting a Prius first chance I get.

      I'm just afraid folks will fall for it like they've fallen for the cellphones at gas stations myth. Every gas pump in Texas has a label perpetuating this silliness!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    4. Re:This story is almost wholly bogus. by RareHeintz · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, I'm glad to hear that I had a hand in someone buying a hybrid. Woohoo!

      Second, it's not just Texas. I haven't kept track, but I regularly buy gas in NY, MA, CT, NJ, and sometimes PA and ME, and I see those labels more often than not.

      OK,
      - B

  21. Re:That's shocking!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's it. You're grounded young man!

  22. Saabs had explosives by netringer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had pre-airbags 1980's Saab 9000 that that had explosive charges on the seat belt mounts in the door pillars intended to tighten the seat belts at the moment of impact.

    Both door posts had warning stickers not to crush the car or bad things would happen.

    I guess the junkyard crushing machine operators got occassional surprises!

    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    1. Re:Saabs had explosives by jweage · · Score: 3, Informative

      They still exist. They are called seat belt pre-tensioners and are used on lots of vehicles now. The best occupant protection sytems tend to have belt pre-tensioners.

  23. Next generation hybrids... by SynKKnyS · · Score: 2, Informative

    Next generation hybrids--such as the Lexus V6-hybrid SUV--will have the eletric motor running the rear wheels while the gas motor runs the front wheels. This should cut down on dangers as the motors will be quite isolated from each other.

    However, in ANY car wreck, a badly mangled car is dangerous.

    1. Re:Next generation hybrids... by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, no - the system will be identical to the Prius - only more voltage.

      In the case of the 4wd model, you'll find electric motors in both the front and rear, along with the gasoline engine up front. The battery will still be in the back end though.

      In any case, wires are routed underneath along the frame rails - not through the doors or top pillars. And each side of the circuit is generally done in different locations of the car to prevent someone from cutting through both + and - cables at the same time. In a severe wreck, even if one of the two battery lines were to be exposed/cut/etc., the rescue person would most likely be okay. This is a DC battery and unless you had both wires open and created a clean path from - to +, there's little chance of anyone becoming electrocuted. And even if such a rare event were to occur, there's a fuse in the battery that will blow as soon as the short occurs. AND - if the fuse doesn't blow, the moment the battery shorts - one or more of the individual modules (which run at about 7.2 volts) would most likely melt or whatnot and open the circuit.

      Read what Toyota has posted here:

      http://techinfo.toyota.com/public/main/erg.html

      You'll hopefully feel more at ease about the car.

      --
      $ man woman *
      -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  24. Even weirder: Prius race cars. by tgd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Last year, the Rallye International de Quebec, up in Quebec City (which I'm sure most of you could've guessed from the name), had a Toyota Prius rally car running. Toyota was doing in the CARS series to show off that their hybrids could hold up to that kind of abuse.

    The car sucked... badly... in almost all of the stages, because it was really fast for the first mile or two until it ran out of battery, and then the dinky motor wouldn't be able to give it enough power to keep up with anyone.

    There was one stage at the hippodrome, though, where they were running a mile or so course on a twisty infield and part of a horse track. It was very competitive on there. It was so surreal though to have one roaring rally car after another go flying by, and then when the Prius ran, the first car went screaming by, followed a bit later by the Prius -- where all you could hear was the tires on the dirt/gravel.

    1. Re:Even weirder: Prius race cars. by Cheeko · · Score: 4, Informative
      In the Prius the gas motor provides power as you said, but in high toque situations it can augment the power of the electric motor with the gas motor as well. Often times this is during higher speed driving (passing on the highway), hence why the car gets such incredible city milage versus only getting outstanding highway milage.

      THIS LINK provides a description of how the Prius' drivetrain uses the gas and electric motors in tandem.

    2. Re:Even weirder: Prius race cars. by tgd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your friend needs to try driving it harder. Its easy to make the battery run out of juice... keep your foot down to the floor for a mile or so. When that juice is gone, the car is slower than a busted down Geo Metro.

    3. Re:Even weirder: Prius race cars. by photon317 · · Score: 3, Informative


      FYI, most production cars are incapable of 200. Usually drag is the limiting factor. A late model high-end Camaro or Firebird, for example, with minimal upgrades (chip, intake, exhaust type stuff) will generally drag-limit itself around the 155-170 range dependant on a few factors. A 'Vette in the same boat might make 180-185-ish due to it's better aerodynamics. In any case, even on a wide open empty road, anything over 150 is pretty fucking scary in a production passenger vehicle of any kind - especially taking into account unpredictable things like rocks and small animals that might be in your path.

      And generally, you don't get arrested at 100 either. I routinely hit 120 in the major city that I live in when traffic opens up enough to allow it without being overtly rude to other drivers. A little knowledge of where the police usually set up speed traps in your city, combined with a radar detector and a vigilant eye, can usually keep you ticket free even at those speeds.

      --
      11*43+456^2
  25. They do. by holygoat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Toyota say that the hybrid battery is supposed to be isolated if the airbag activates. So it's fuss over nothing.

  26. Not sold on the hybrids by tbone1 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Last summer I was looking for a new car with really good mileage and went with a VW Golf TDI over the hybrids. There were several reasons for this (among them, I can't fit into Japanese mid-size cars, but those built for Germans are fine ... go figure).

    The diesel in the VW is proven technology, but I was also worried about how the hybrids would be in an accident. Plus, the Golf TDI runs like an NBA player from his kids' wives. I know it will go 125MPH, but I was still accelerating when I decided to back off.

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    1. Re:Not sold on the hybrids by tbmaddux · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The diesel in the VW is proven technology, but I was also worried about how the hybrids would be in an accident.
      Electric motors are also proven technology. The Honda Insight has a 4 star rating in NHTSA crash tests for front- and side-impact. You can read about the lightweight and stiff construction of the Insight here. Note that the elevated rear compartment holding the IMA computer and battery as well as the spare tire and wheel are all providing additional passenger protection.

      Other hybrids: all part of the Prius gets 5 stars on front impacts. Civic Hybrid would be no different from regular Civics.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  27. Some important facts... by clockmaker · · Score: 5, Informative

    As the owner of a 2004 Prius, and being an engineer, I have never felt in danger.

    First, the High Voltage system is isolated from the car body completely. Not even "ground" is shared. The cables and parts are shrouded in tough orange plastic.

    Second, the article is incorrect on two points: the battery is only 200+ Volts, not 500V. The 500V is only between the inverter and motors.
    Also, there are no high voltage components in the doors.

    Because the airbag accelerometers are used to monitor whether the car is in an accident, the main battery relay shuts off right next to the battery long before any metal starts twisting its way into high voltage areas. The bigger danger is the battery (several NiMH cells) being split open, but it is protected by its location and special shrouds.

    My biggest fear in an accident is that the E-personnel are scared into paralysis by rumors, and don't rescue me.

    BTW, you can see the Toyota Emergency Responder guide at http://techinfo.toyota.com/

    1. Re:Some important facts... by glpierce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Also, there are no high voltage components in the doors."

      That one caught my surprise, too. Considering that the doors are pretty much a dead end, I couldn't fathom why there would be. Power doors and windows don't need any more juice in a hybrid than any other car.

      --
      G
  28. Re:This is already a problem with headlights by Enigma_Man · · Score: 2, Informative

    That 20,000 volts for the HID isn't a problem, because the wattage is low. If you stuck your finger in it, it'd shock you for an instant, and then not be able to provide enough current to keep shocking you. You'd be 100% A-OK Super-great deal A+++

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  29. Not just the Big Orange Cables... by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 4, Informative
    I own a Prius and one of the first things I looked at is the Big Orange Cable location -- the maintenance book spends a lot of time reminding you to never cut into, touch, mangle, or otherwise molest the Big Orange Cables that carry the big wattage from the batteries (in the back) to the controller (in the front).

    But after an accident, any part of the wiring harness could be energized relative to the frame -- you just don't know, for example, if the dome light circuit is going to happen to be connected to the same bank of circuits that were smushed into the Big Orange Cable in a front-quarter collision that also happened to damage the fail-safe circuit breakers.

    It's a big deal -- I imagine your training is similar to what the rural fire volunteers are getting here in Colorado: if it's a Prius, don't touch it!

    Reminds me of the college kids who like to play with radiation warning labels: ``heh-heh. My laptop has a radiation sticker on it! Cool! heh-heh.'' The problem is that if you get in (for example) a car accident and one of those labels is visible anywhere around the car, there is no first aid for you until the radiologic response unit arrives from across town.

    1. Re:Not just the Big Orange Cables... by cft_128 · · Score: 2, Informative
      In the US we only have 'dirty' diesel fuel available. The turbo diesels are much much better than before, but they still have worse emissions than gasoline engines, especially hybrid ones. They are only allowed in 45 states, places like California and New York will not allow them until low-sulphur clean diesel is available in 2006. Biodiesel will be a nice alternative, but we do not have enough of it to replace more than about 5% of our current fuel use and it has high NOx emissions. Biodiesel can currently be found in the midwest but it typically blended with dirty diesel (I've seen reports that it is usually on 20% biodiesel). Having said all that diesel's CO and C02 emissions are very good, and they now have clean diesel fuel available in Europe.

      Hybrids I think will be our stepping stone to the next generation of transport technology (some sort of full electric would be my guess, hydrogen if we get a cheap efficient way to get hydrogen) - we have the infrastructure to support it (gas stations are everywhere, diesel is no where near as prevalent) and hybrid technology is young, the efficiency should be improving nicely with time.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

  30. Diesel is safer than petrol by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Diesel fuel is a lot safer in that respect. A freind of mine who drove a diesel car was in an accident once, and he and his girlfriend had to be cut out. If they'd been driving a petrol car there'd have been a bigger chance that they'd have been burned to a crisp.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Diesel is safer than petrol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      One time my tabby cat was in an airplane crash. Had there been a circus troupe on the flight, my tabby cat would have had a much better chance of seeing a clown.

  31. Reminds me... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Funny

    of a guy who felt the call of nature and went to relieve himself behind a hedge, as you do. Little did he know that there was an electric fence running through the hedge - he soon found out the hard way that water conducts!

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Reminds me... by r84x · · Score: 2, Interesting
      (reminds me...) of a guy who felt the call of nature and went to relieve himself behind a hedge, as you do. Little did he know that there was an electric fence running through the hedge - he soon found out the hard way that water conducts!

      Happened to a friend of mine when I was about 10 or so. Funny at the time, but he was pissed... in more ways than you know.

      --
      Karma: Can there be a void?

      .. -. - . .-. .-. --- -...

  32. Then there are toxic chemicals by Banner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Those batteries can be pretty nasty. I'm not just talking the battery Acid either. Some of the batteries in electric cars have to be heated to 200 degrees to work properly. And a lot of them contain some pretty nasty and toxic chemicals. Far worse than gasoline.

    And if they explode due to a short or a fire, they'll not only act like shrapnel, but very poisonous shrapnel. I wonder if there are any safety regs dealing with this subject?

    1. Re:Then there are toxic chemicals by be951 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Those batteries can be pretty nasty. I'm not just talking the battery Acid either. Some of the batteries in electric cars have to be heated to 200 degrees to work properly. And a lot of them contain some pretty nasty and toxic chemicals. Far worse than gasoline.

      The Prius uses NiMH batteries. They have a highly caustic (pH 13.5) electrolyte, but other than that are apparently non-toxic. Vinegar or Boric acid can be used to neutralize any electrolyte that leaks, but leaks are not likely since the solution is absorbed into the cell plates and shouldn't normally leak even when the battery module is cracked.

    2. Re:Then there are toxic chemicals by T_O_M · · Score: 2, Informative

      "batterys have to be 200 degrees to operate . . ."
      What planet are you from?
      NiMh cells are, in fact, kept COOLED to room temperature by means of a blower system.

      Perhaps you are referring to that mythical "hydrogen fuel cell" thinggie that Detroit has squandered several billion in taxpayer's money just to tell us "in 20 years"?
      T_O_M

  33. As an EE... by Tailhook · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As an EE, I would expect that the electrical system is designed to be as well protected and fail-safe as possible, but...

    As an intelligent human being, I'd expect a micro-car full of batteries to be likely to kill anyone stupid enough to ground on it after it has been mangled in a wreck. As someone having no overt desire to drive a giant battery, I have no reason to pretend otherwise. As a thoughtful individual, I won't be surprised when CNN points out how high pressure Hydrogen tanks are also an extreme hazard in accidents, and some other xE is astonished by the consequences of his eco-choice.

    We have been refining automotive internal combustion systems for about a century. Everyone involved, from mechanics and insurance adjusters to rescue personnel, has an inherent understanding of the dangers. No great evolutionary change in our species has occurred during that time; we're still the same super-brained primates we were back then. So it stands to reason that we're going to have to learn the lessons in order to cope with these new machines, and that we'll do it the hard way; one nasty wreck after another...

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  34. Definition? by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hybrid Car Accident"? Is that where an SUV crashes into a mini, and the result averages out to a sadan?

  35. Um, no by Scott+Richter · · Score: 4, Informative
    You see a lot of panicy stuff about how dangerous all that electrical energy in the batteries is, but when it comes down to it if the car has the same range as a similar normal car then there is exactly the same amount of energy in the batteries as there would normally be in a car's fuel tank.

    There are two problems with the above: it neglects the rate of energy transfer and the barrier to it. With a gasoline engine, both are reasonably high unless someone's walking around with matches, and emergency crews are smart enough not to smoke. The risk of shock is higher than detonation.

    Also, there's no analogous concept of capacitance for gasoline. However, if the wrong cable gets severed, your ass is fried with an electric. Also, because stored electrical energy is less obvious than a puddle of gasoline, it's harder to avoid.

    So there's about 5 reasons why one need fear hybrids in a crash more than regular cars

  36. More Detroit FUD BS by T_O_M · · Score: 5, Informative

    Another load of premium male bovine excrement from out friends in Texas and Munich/Detroit.

    My THIRD Prius, an 04 (I've owned an 01 and 03 - both completely problem-free), is currently sitting in Port Newark. I am also a retired rescue captain so I can state with some authority that Prius fundamental design is such that it would take a deliberate act of stupidity for a rescue technician to manage to make contact with both the positive AND negative high voltage leads at the same time since both are ground-isolated and separately encased in conduit.

    In real-fife rear-end accidents, only ONE Prius battery was damaged and it's safety issue was some minimal leakage of electrolyte; NOT "Deadly High Voltage"!

    In fact, the Japanese national fire safety bureau (the official name escapes me at the moment) insisted that Toyota place the HV conduit inboard far enough that the "Jaws Of Life" can't possibly make contact in one or two "bites".

    Sigh...

    "I don't understand it???
    I'm afraid of it!
    KILL IT!!!"
    T_O_M

  37. Off the top of your head? by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 2

    I think I speak for many of us when I say I'm baffled that you have both battery acid AND gasoline on top of your head in sufficient quantities to correctly surmise which has a lower vapor pressure.

    Tim

  38. Re:Zero Compassion by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Screaming back at them seems less than useful, however a slap in the face it may be.

    On the face of it, that's a good assumption. But in REALITY, you need to do whatever you have to to get basic information like WHERE ARE YOU? Sometimes people need a jolt to calm down.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  39. *dry look* by Control+Group · · Score: 4, Funny

    That'll be tough; his comedy license isn't current. Besides, he's been charged with battery in the 9th circuit court...and though he's been conducting himself well, the outlook is negative and he'll probably end up extradited to his native Poland for incarceration. Luckily, he's an optimistic sort, so at least the cell's Pole will be positive.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  40. Loud Pipes Kill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    To increase safety, a vehicle needs to be heard by people in front of it. Loud pipes put the majority of their noise in back of them. All these "safety devices" do is make it harder for people to hear vehicles closer to them, not to mention making it more difficult to converse, rest.... (Sleepy drivers are the cause of many accidents, and loud cycles can certainly make it hard for people to get sufficient rest.) After prolonged exposure they make it hard for people to hear anything at all.

    Most truck/cycle accidents are caused by trucks turning across the path of cycles. If the bright headlight isn't enough to make the truck driver aware of the cycle, noise in the cycle's wake isn't going to help. It is especially not going to help if the trucker rides an unmuffled bike on his off hours and can't hear very well himself.

  41. Re:Current VS. Voltage VS. Frequency VS. Time by tttonyyy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    vs. dumb-asses.

    500 volts? 45 volts is enough to kill you... at 10 amperes!

    Seriously, aren't we nerds, or something?!

    Apparently not as much of a nerd as you'd like to think, since you forgot to factor in frequency and duration.

    High currents can be passed through (over) the human body at higher frequency a) because they tend to travel over the surface of the body and b) because the nervous system is less likely to react to frequencies 100Hz and upwards.

    Also, you really should have mentioned duration, since this governs the energy delivered (which is, after all, what causes the most physical damage). Energy is Voltage * Current * Time. Electric fencers operate in the kV range, but only(!) deliver a few joules.

    dumb-asses

    Back at ya. ;)

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
  42. Re:Two words... by jonabbey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Judging from http://techinfo.toyota.com's 2004 Prius responder guide, Toyota has been quite responsible in routing the cables under the floor pan, where emergency responders are unlikely to need to go. The system is also designed with a relay powered by the 12 volt auxiliary battery that the car's computer has to enable in order for the high voltage lines to be energized. If the car deploys its air bags, that relay is designed to open, disconnecting the high voltage pack from the rest of the car.

    In other words, it doesn't sound as though Toyota are being morons about the whole thing.

  43. This is mere FUD in all likelyhood. by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I have heard from my friends in the automotive industry (take that vague description FWIW) that the trend is for all vehicles, not just hybrid and electric vehicles, to move towards drive-by-wire systems over the next ten years or so. So any rescue problems that a Prius will have, so could any other motor vehicle. This isn't going to stop me from buying a Prius or Civic Hybrid next time I'm in the market for a car.

  44. Duh... by ecloud · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't cut into the gas tank, don't cut into the battery either.

    If only it was completely electric, then the greatest danger of all (gasoline spilling and igniting or exploding) would be eliminated. And an impact switch can isolate the battery pack in case of collision. But, they just keep making foreign-oil-dependent bombs on wheels for us to drive around in. (as well as deploying other kinds of bombs in other places to maintain our oil supply)

  45. KVL by Cyclopedian · · Score: 4, Funny

    I invoke the Kirchoff Voltage Law and declare this pun-ful thread to be dead.

    Is there any resistance to this idea?

    -Cyc

  46. Re:Current VS. Voltage VS. Frequency VS. Time by Woody77 · · Score: 2, Informative

    power = voltage * current

    energy = power * time

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. Look out! The sky! by raygundan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The "Giant Battery" in the original Prius was pretty small, not much bigger than two or three standard car batteries (depends on what you drive). I believe the battery in the new Prius is even smaller. And it's not a micro-car-- it's roughly the same size as the new honda accords. Small battery, average-sized sedan.

    It wouldn't be a big deal for a rescue crew to just pull it out before they cut anywhere else, making sure the power is cut. Probably a good idea with a normal battery in a wreck that bad, on the off chance that a spark would ignite any gas vapour.

    I would suggest that the government standardize a location for a cutoff switch, though, making this sort of thing easy and painless for rescue crews. No such thing exists for fuel lines (except in race cars) but that hasn't stopped us from driving.

    By the same token, high-pressure hydrogen is not as big of a deal as most people are assuming, either. Crack the tank, and where does the hydrogen go? Up, quickly. It doesn't linger around at ground level, or pool under or inside the car like gasoline.

    In general, cars are large, dangerous machines. They involve hundreds of thousands of watts of power, and nothing you can ever do will make handling that sort of power perfectly safe, whether the power is sitting still in a gasoline tank, a large battery, or a hydrogen cannister; or converted to kinetic and thermal energy in the form of a two-ton metal box moving at high velocity and a large steel engine block filled with blistering-hot oil and coolant. Better driver training standards and enforcement (why so many speeding tickets, but so few tickets for unsignalled lane changes?) in America would go farther than anything else.

  49. ObSimpsons by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm an ELECTRIC car. I don't go very fast or very far, and when folks see you driving me, they'll think you're gay.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  50. Uh oh, better stop my research... by GPLDAN · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was working on a car powered by nitro-glycerin. It runs great, but blows up a city block if you get into accident. I originally deemed this as a feature. A sort of deterrent against tailgating. Better re-evaluate...

  51. Stay in school by Safety+Cap · · Score: 3, Interesting
    As an EE, ... if I'm ever in an accident, I'll make sure that any responders are wearing rubber gloves and boots and if any cutting is done, the roof is the only area they touch.
    On my Toyota Prius, there's a service plug that one need only pull out and the hybrid's batteries are disconnected from the rest of the system. This is not new news. Carrying around some of your mom's playtex dishwashing gloves is unnecessary.

    Did you hear? There are conveyances that carry TOXIC, FLAMMABLE fuel in LARGE TANKS and in HOSES from the tank to the engine!!! If the conveyances get hit, there could be an EXPLOSION!! If I'm in an accident, I'll make sure that any responders are wearing fireproof hazmat suits, and if any cutting is done, the roof is the only area they touch!

    --
    Yeah, right.
  52. Toyota's own response - boy are they quick by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Toyota isn't taking this one sitting down.

    Toyota Press Release

    Toyota Prius Engine Safety in the Event of an Accident
    For Immediate Release

    (05/04/2004) Torrance, CA

    The Toyota Prius gas-electric hybrid vehicle has many safeguards to help ensure safe operation for drivers and protection of emergency response professionals in the event of an accident. The high voltage batteries are contained in an extremely strong protective case located in a portion of the vehicle very unlikely to be penetrated in a collision. Drivetrain management computers continuously monitor all system functions performing hundreds of tests each minute. In the event an abnormal condition is detected, all high voltage circuits are disabled and high voltage is contained inside the protective case.

    Further, two safety mechanisms are in place that shut off the engine and disconnect high voltage if an airbag is deployed or if there is a sudden deceleration indicative of an accident. High voltage cables and components are heavily insulated, shielded, isolated and the cables are painted bright orange for easy identification. The controller box is a sealed unit and has warning labels.

    To reassure emergency response professionals when the Prius was introduced in 2000, Toyota placed advertisements in trade publications and sent letters to industry organizations announcing the availability and dissemination of Emergency Response Guides. Today, all Emergency Response Guides for Toyota's alternative fuel vehicles, including Prius, RAV 4 EV, CNG Camry and Highlander Fuel Cell Hybrid are available at Toyota's technical information web site and Toyota continues to advertise in appropriate professional publications.

    Electrically driven Toyota vehicles like the Prius, RAV 4 EV and e.com have been available in the U.S. since 1998. Like all vehicles, they can be involved in emergency situations. They have established a good track record for electrical safety and we are not aware of a battery case breach or any personal injury in the U.S. related to hybrid or EV electrical systems.

    # # #
    Contact:
    Toyota Product News


    Apparently Toyota is pretty protective of it's technology.

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  53. Re:This actually makes me feel better about hybrid by Woody77 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hopefully won't be.

    My dept. has rep from Hurst come by yearly to let us know what ways of killing us the auto companies have come up with next. Then we spend an evening tearing up cars. Not a bad night, it's normally pretty fun.

    But the key is that we try to stay very aware of what's in the newest cars, and even sometimes a few of us will go a dealership to look at the new models, and take a look at the key things we need to keep an eye out for.

    While the new technologies have made a greater chance of surviving the wreck, they've also increased the time that you're likely to be stuck in the car if we need to go cutting.

    My favorite so far are the polycarbonate windows. They don't shatter in an accident, and they compress and store energy, waiting like a coiled spring. Hit them with a sledge hammer and they won't break. But start cutting into the roof, and they try to launch the roof off the car if they've been compressed and bent.

    Also fun is the poor guy who rolls his bmw 745, has some minor dents/scratches in the roof, but can't get it out (doors won't unlock). However, we can't shatter out the windows, so we have to tear off the doors. Instead of just replacing the glass, the car is likely totaled by insurance.

  54. Not really by nonameisgood · · Score: 3, Informative

    1 - the path through the body is the key - if it passes through the heart at some level (low mA) you can/will/do get V-fib (VF)
    2 - you must have voltage to get to the heart - less than 80 will seldom do it, but this depends on skin moisture and pH, how much water you have on board, do you drink Gatorade or just sweat alot...
    3 - high-current electrocutions do kill people, because you don't get this high current instantly or constantly - imagine 2 A, followed by a trailing off to 80 mA - gotcha.
    4 - Gauss plays some role - if your skin carries the current because it is wet or otherwise highly ocnductive, you may feel a shock at a lower voltage, but no cardiac issues (except fright).
    5 - Cars are running on DC, which requires that you basically make contact with two dissimilarly polarized surfaces - it cannot ground to the earth - old electronics technicians only use one hand for this reason.
    Stick a 9-volt on your tongue and tell us about it.

    --
    Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component of spiritual devotion. Jon Krakauer
  55. From a Prius owner: by Eneff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is difficult, but possible, to have the electric motor run out of juice.

    Flooring the thing for a few miles would probably do it. I remember taking the bugger to 100 and that engine was working way too hard to fuel the electric battery.

    The one time I ran out of juice from normal usage was going through Western New Mexico to Albuquerque with no stops. There is a long incline going into the city after a slight incline over the whole trip. The car wasn't ready for it and had to slow down to 55.

    Yes, that motor is only good enough to keep you sustained at 55 by itself.

    (Note: I still heartily reccomend the car for most everyone, and the 2004 model has a higher HP gas engine so I'm sure the problem isn't pronounced.)

    1. Re:From a Prius owner: by hazydave · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, no, that's not true, the "55 by itself" thing.

      The way the Prius works, you actually have two motor/generators. MG1, the small motor, which starts the engine and, at low speeds, acts as a generator, and MG2, the large motor, which is on the final drivetrain and gives you that big torque when you start up.

      MG1 serves another function: it balances the power between the ICE and MG2/wheels, providing the effect of a CVT, even though the Prius has fixed gearing. So when you're going slow, MG1 acts as a generator, dragging on the "power-split device" and providing the effect of a low gear (it's running against the movement of the ICE).

      But above about 60mph, MG1 has to, instead, push in the direction of the ICE motion, acting as a motor rather than a generator, to provide the effect of a high gear. During this, MG2 is engaged as a generator to provide MG1 the power needed to do this. So there's no charging, period. But also, no dependency on the batteries: you can and do get to the top speed of 99mph (for the 2001-2003 car) regardless of the battery charge.

      --
      -Dave Haynie
  56. Re:Look here: by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 2, Informative

    My other negative reaction is, if I'm in the middle of nowhere and it dies, or I go to start it and it just doesn't work... then what? I can do a lot to get a conventional vehicle back on the road. With this thing it either works or you are done.

    1. Roadside assistances comes standard during the warranty period.
    2. It's a Toyota - when's the last time you had a Toyota break down? Any Toyota I've ever had or been involved with has just ran and ran and ran....

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  57. Mod parent up by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Absolutely right. Body path is the real key - the values given there were mostly (I suspect) wrt to direct application to the heart. At least I hope so, I've received a lot of shocks at 12-24v+ & 200ma+ and gotten little other than a tingle. I've also been 110'ed a few times and a couple higher, but not cross body thank Bog! :) although one 220 across my hand left me with a couple nice burn scars, and hurt worse later on than at the time.

    Actually the worst one I ever received was cross-body ?v at ?mA - from the spark plug wires on an older truck when I brushed my forearm against a couple wires - I was soaked to the skin, playing with the carburetor settings on an old Dodge truck. The plug wires were also soaked. Didn't knock me down but it hurt like hell for a second or so until my arm lost contact with the wires. The only place I was "grounded" was my other forearm resting on the edge of the engine compartment. Slight burns in both places where my bare arms were touching.

    That one sucked a lot more than the couple of 110v I got. I went inside and quite literally had the twitches for a while. There is no sensation that is even slightly like it. In hindsight later that night I realized I should have known that the slight glow around the wiring was arcing along the wires due to the rain coating them. Those buggers have a lot of voltage running thru them. Learned a good lesson there, I did.

    Long time ago, but I can still remember how much that one hurt...moral of the story is, don't fuck around a open engine compartment with the motor running when you and it are both soaked by rain :) Good thing I was pretty young, probably would kill me nowadays...

    Don't tell me I'm a lucky bastard, I know it already...

    SB

    --
    It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  58. Late effects by nonameisgood · · Score: 2, Informative

    The chance of irregular heartbeat following electrocution is something like double the norm for 72 hours post shock for common voltage/amp combinations. Until the HMOs got involved, it was not uncommon to be hospitalized for 1-3 days following even relatively minor (110 VAC) experiences when the victim/patient had symptoms like muscle contracture.

    Like almost everything doctors do, it was based on (bad) experiences "he's fine, send him home." D'oh.

    --
    Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component of spiritual devotion. Jon Krakauer
  59. This article is crap... by silverhalide · · Score: 2, Informative

    First off, I am an engineer and have studied the Prius quite a bit. High Voltage safety on production hybrid/electric vehicles is great. First off, 500 volts is absolutely wrong, the battery pack in the Prius runs at a hair over 200 volts. Second, no high voltage wiring is run in the doors or roof or anywhere besides under the undercarriage of the vehicle between the packs and the inverters. Third, there are main cutoff relays located inside the battery boxes that are hooked to an inertial switch that will disable any voltage coming from the boxes if an impact is detected. This is the same switch that kills your fuel pump if you get into a wreck. Fourth, the high voltage pack is completely isolated from the vehicle's chassis, unlike the 12-volt system which has one side attached to the frame. What this means is should through a near-impossible combination of events one of the leads get cut into the frame and become energized, it would be impossible for you to complete a circuit and get shocked because the other end is still isolated. (houshold wiring can shock you because your feet complete a circuit through the earth, but this isn't the case in a vehicle!) If both ends of the pack were to connect to the frame, the fuse built into the pack would blow from the short-circuit. The only real danger is from a ruptured battery pack itself, but that's pretty easy to spot. Nothing to see here, move along.