Slashdot Mirror


Rescuers Prep for Hybrid Car Accidents

mykepredko writes "I've driven a Toyota Prius for two years now and found this CNN article regarding the training required to rescue people trapped in hybrid cars to be slightly alarming. As an EE, I would expect that the electrical system is designed to be as well protected and fail-safe as possible in an accident, but if I'm ever in an accident, I'll make sure that any responders are wearing rubber gloves and boots and if any cutting is done, the roof is the only area they touch." Toyota has an accident guide indicating that if the airbags deploy, the hybrid battery pack should be automatically isolated.

70 of 620 comments (clear)

  1. Wait a sec .... by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 5, Funny
    Rescuers prep for hybrid car accidents
    The growing popularity of hybrid vehicles poses a new danger for rescuers at accident scenes: a network of high-voltage circuitry that may require some precise cutting to save a trapped victim
    ........


    Copyright 2004 Exxon Mobile. All rights reserved. This material may be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
    Hmmm, something seems fishy here.
    --

    "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    1. Re:Wait a sec .... by ardmhacha · · Score: 5, Funny

      Copyright 2004 Exxon Mobile.

      Are they some sort of cellphone company ?

      If you are going to alter the article you could at least spell it correctly :)

    2. Re:Wait a sec .... by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

      Welcome to Slashdot, where reading comprehension is optional.

    3. Re:Wait a sec .... by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 4, Funny
      something seems fishy here

      I agree. Especially the part about a low-speed rear-end collision "opening a portal to hell."

      --
      -- clvrmnky
    4. Re:Wait a sec .... by swordboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Copyright 2004 Exxon Mobile. All rights reserved. This material may be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

      The reality:

      ChevronTexaco is an investor in ECD Ovonics - the company that owns the popular NiMH battery technology that is popular in hybrid autos. Toyota gets their NiMH batteries from Matsushita/Panasonic, who are conveniently not paying the 3 percent royalty. So, the two companies have been tied up in the courts for years now battling this out. Last year, they moved into arbitration and that will be released this month. Although it was wrong for Matsushita to steal the technology, it is going to look bad when Toyota hybrids are banned from importation due to a lawsuit coming from a ChevronTexaco joint-venture.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    5. Re:Wait a sec .... by clichekiller · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't necessarily believe the original intent of this poster was missed by the moderators. If by his posting his intent was to indicate that the gasoline companies would like nothing more then to discredit the burgeoning alternative energy cars then I think he suceeded. Not that the article is any way incorrect.

      I did research on solar power cars back in the late 80's as part of an independent research project at my college. The more I dug into the subject the more I began to discover that all the juicy technical information regarding the subject was owned either by gasoline or oil companies. I was blown away. It was the first time I was confronted with the realities of business. What can I say call me naieve.

      --
      Sir, there is a dragon outside with an armful of armor. He's inquiring if we offer free refills.
    6. Re:Wait a sec .... by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 4, Informative

      No no no,

      this thread is going into miss-information fast

      The system developed for the Prius was made by a 3rd party company which is partialy owned by toyota. Toyota took their works and continued the development of their system. Ford worked with the same 3rd party company, but largly designed their system theirself (ford by far leads in R&D on hybrids, just haven't put anything out till late summer). They did make a deal with toyota over some of the controls, mainly to avoid patent violations, but it does not share tech, just look at the 2 systems in person and it's obvious, or talk to someone who has worked on one them.

      Honda does not use the same type of system at all. The use a integrated flywheel, motor, altenator. It's sandwiched between the engine and tranny. Its a crappy lame hybrid, same thing as GM is putting out in their trucks as an option. Most would not call it a hybrid, at most call it a mild hybrid. But Hondas marketing is at work.

      The CVTs in the vehicles are differant. Ford and toyota get their cvt via the planetary gearset used for the powersplite between the engine, generator, motor/wheels. There is no tranny to speed of, just the powersplit unit. The insight and civic use a normal transmission or you can get it with a cvt that is of a complicated deal using cones and belts and what not. They are very differant.

      Also there is no patent infringments with using the planetary for the powersplit since this idea is as old as gearing it'self.

      Also though you said nothing, i doubt ovonic has any claim over nickel metal hydrid batteries. Since that tech has been around for long anough for any patents to expire, plus their is so many ways to make such batteries you could get around them, and ovonic is more active with lithium ion batteries. And the Ford escape hybrid uses Sanyo batteries if anyone cares.

    7. Re:Wait a sec .... by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I believe they were called "Pintos."

  2. All I can say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that this news is shocking.

    1. Re:All I can say by red+floyd · · Score: 3, Funny

      But at least they're current!

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  3. Not a great assumption... by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful
    but if I'm ever in an accident, I'll make sure that any responders are wearing rubber gloves and boots and if any cutting is done, the roof is the only area they touch

    If you are in an accident bad enough to need "responders" to get you out, odds are not great that you'll be conscious.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Not a great assumption... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As an EMT, I pulled a great many conscious people out of cars. Now, sometimes I wished they had been knocked out ... "Yes, damn it, we're going to get you out of the car, and you're going to be okay, now would you please hold still and shut up!"

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    2. Re:Not a great assumption... by Anml4ixoye · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope, most any person who is trapped - dead or alive - has to be pulled out, and since we are the only ones trained to do it, guess who gets called out?

      The difference is that we generally wouldn't go emergency if it was a definate body recovery. But IO have certainly cut my share of dead and alive patients out of cars.

      The thing about all of this is that, in an accident bad enough, you can't guarantee any emergency system within the car is going to work. I don't care *what* the manufacturer says, if it were my guys they would be wearing any protection we could give them.

      The problem isn't just limited to Hybrid cars. Think about the cars that have side-impact airbags, air cushions, etc. Anywhere we want to cut could contain within it an airbag ready to deploy. Worse, even those manufacturers don't have a standard for how long before a system is deenergized. At least with steering wheel airbags we can put a special cover over it.

    3. Re:Not a great assumption... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Lucky you. I was a volunteer firefighter for about a year. I saw two accidents, with injuries in both. In one accident, an infant died. Not pleasant.

      The next day at work, a coworker brought in her newborn infant. I never thought I'd be so happy to see something small and pink and wrinkly and wriggly.

    4. Re:Not a great assumption... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 3, Funny

      I never thought I'd be so happy to see something small and pink and wrinkly and wriggly
      "but enough of what my wife tells me"

    5. Re:Not a great assumption... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think they should just start equiping them with ejection seats... If the crash is bad enough that the car starts to crumple, pyrotechnic bolts would cut the roof on the car and a charge would eject the occupents. Obviously a tip sensor would ensure you didn't get ejected into the pavement if the car is upside down.

      Then a special sensor would calcuate the height of the other vehicle. If it looks like it might be an SUV, another charge fires the battery pack out the front of the vehicle.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    6. Re:Not a great assumption... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hopefully the responders are not only wearing rubber gloves but also skintight tight black leather pants and stiletto heels. Oh wait -- is this forum public?

    7. Re:Not a great assumption... by Woody77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a volunteer FF, and we get LOTS of training on how to properly cut up cars, especially the new ones that are more deadly to us trying to rescue you, than they are to you and your 60mph argument with a tree.

      Insane numbers of airbags, compressed gas cylinders strategicly located in our best cutting points, airbags that don't always go off, and therefore might go off at any point in time while we're cutting the car apart.

      And now they're adding several hundred volts to the mix.

      Luckily we don't need to cut through the center of the floor boards very often (common wiring route for the big linces).

      But then, the automotive companies don't seem to have concern for making a car that's easy to cut apart. They main focus on not killing you in the first place.

      The Mini's are the most impressive I've seen. 60mph into a telephone pole (annihalated the pole), and then into a redwood tree. No broken glass, but the engine compartment was demolished. Incredible how much energy it soaked up, without harming anything past the firewall. Too bad it caught fire as the gas tank was torn open by the bottom of the telephone poll...

  4. Sound Effects by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never mind you electric car drivers, what about we poor bicyclists and pedestrians who can't hear you coming?

    I'd like to suggest new electric cars be equipped with Jetsons-style "whuwuwuwuwuuwu" sounds as a safety feature. Actually, this might very well be an untapped commercial opportunity: custom car sound effects. Drive a wagon train! Drive a steam train! Drive the U.S.S. Enterprise! Be ironic and drive a Hummer!

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re:Sound Effects by einstein · · Score: 4, Funny

      half the fun of my prius is sneaking up on people in parking lots.

      ok, I kid.

      it's probably only a 3rd.

    2. Re:Sound Effects by sohojim · · Score: 3, Funny
      Drive a wagon train! Drive a steam train! Drive the U.S.S. Enterprise!

      Or be like the kids in my neighborhood and drive a mobile dance club.

      thump thump thump thump thump thump

    3. Re:Sound Effects by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Downloading drive-tones for your car, hmmmm, untapped business opportunity!

      Why not an electric toothbrush, or electric mixer? Come on, the Enterprise is in space, it doesn't actually make sound! ;)

      The Shadow vessel scream from B5! That'll wake you cyclists up!

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    4. Re:Sound Effects by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I had the option, I'd choose an unmuffled Harley Davidson sound for stop and go traffic, complete with reving effects. And for highway, I'd select the Junkers Ju-87 Stuka diving siren, just to impress the bystanders.

      BTM

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    5. Re:Sound Effects by ewhac · · Score: 5, Funny
      Or be like the kids in my neighborhood and drive a mobile dance club.

      thump thump thump thump thump thump

      Thump thump thump? The kids in your neighborhood are into waltzes?

      Schwab

    6. Re:Sound Effects by Technician · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In nice weather, I roll the windows down. I can hear a bycycle aproach and not slow down for the stop sign while riding on the left side of the road. Making extra noise at the stop sign would keep me from hearing the cyclists that don't stop for stop signs assuming that I saw them before pulling out in front of them. They need to add the noise and bright lights to bycycles (like a harley) so they can be seen and heard. I usualy do see a bicycle at at an intersection IF they come up to the intersection in the proper lane and stop for the stop sign. That's not the cyclist I pull out in front of because I didn't see them. It's the ones on the other side of the road that didn't stop that don't get seen. A pedesterian gets seen because he is at the corner when the driver looks checking trafic, not 35 feet back from the corner traveling 30 MPH into the intersection.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  5. Beingg a volunteer firefighter.. by Jerdie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have heard that electrical wiring in the new hybrids run through all sorts of places, including roof and roof posts.
    I have also heard of their being multiple batteries.
    Also, some new mini-van with a glass roof has extra reinforced roof posts that my fire dept's hydraulic cutting tools cound't cut.
    Finally, the presence of air bags everywhere all over the car frame is great, they can explode at random times.
    New cars are making it really hard to get people out of them safely after an accident.

    --
    Programming is simply the application of logic to creativity
    1. Re:Beingg a volunteer firefighter.. by sohojim · · Score: 4, Insightful
      New cars are making it really hard to get people out of them safely after an accident.

      Yes, but the people tend to be alive after these accidents. Anyone can yank a corpse out of a mangled Honda. Believe me, anyone!

    2. Re:Beingg a volunteer firefighter.. by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have heard that electrical wiring in the new hybrids run through all sorts of places, including roof and roof posts.

      On the bright side, you won't need to carry a defibrillator to these accident scenes. :)

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  6. And this just in by andih8u · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, and in other accidents the gas tank could blow up, yada yada. I'm curious about battery acid myself.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
    1. Re:And this just in by bgeer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, you have been watching too many movies. Gas tanks can't blow up. Gasoline itself is not explosive, only gasoline vapor that has mixed with air is explosive. What this means is that the gas has to first leak all over the place to create sufficient surface area for it to evaporate quickly, and then it has to be ignited. It unfortunately happens, but it's not nearly as easy as most people think. Battery acid also has to evaporate in order to be explosive, and off the top of my head it probably has lower vapor pressure than gasoline.

  7. As opposed to the safety of... by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And this is opposed to the safety of an internal combustion engine?

    Where any accident will involve the spraying and leaking of a dozen gallons if highly flammable fluid?

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  8. Current VS. Voltage... by mekkab · · Score: 5, Informative

    vs. dumb-asses.

    500 volts? 45 volts is enough to kill you... at 10 amperes!

    Seriously, aren't we nerds, or something?!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:Current VS. Voltage... by mopslik · · Score: 3, Informative

      What's the reasoning behind why 100-200mA is lethal but >200mA is just severe burns and respritory failure?

      It's right in the article provided in the link...

      As the current approaches 100 mA, ventricular fibrillation of the heart occurs -an uncoordinated twitching of the walls of the heart's ventricles. There's no worldly help for the victim.
      ...
      Above 200 mA, muscular contractions are so severe that the heart is forcibly clamped during the shock. This clamping protects the heart from going into ventricular fibrillation, and the victim's chances for survival are good.

  9. Re:That's shocking!!! by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a lot of resistance to that sort of humor.

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  10. Upside-down by boatboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if any cutting is done, the roof is the only area they touch.
    And if the car is upside down?

  11. Racing cars.. by grub · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Racing cars have a standard placed cut off for the motor/fuel line inside the drivers door for rescuers, why not something like that for the hybrids?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  12. You're right. by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 4, Funny

    Copyright 2004 Exxon Mobile. All rights reserved. This material may be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

    You're right, something is fishy. ExxonMobil probably wouldn't spell thier own name incorrectly.

  13. The radio by stealthmidget · · Score: 5, Funny

    But the big question remains: will the radio still work after an accident? Anyone ever notice in those shows you see about car accident rescues (Rescue 911, cops, etc.), everytime they arrive at the scene of an accident, the radio is NEVER on?

    1. Re:The radio by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, they digitally remove the music from every scene to avoid paying royalties...

      --
      ± 29 dB
  14. Why the concern? by GuyinVA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My dad has a Civic Hybrid. All the necessary cabling runs under the car next to the frame rails. If rescuers are haveing to cut that deep, you're SOL anyways. Normally rescuers have to use the jaws of life on doors, and the associated A,B,C pillars. No electricals go thru there, other than side airbag sensors.

    Sounds like another internet scare article put out by a 'reputible' source...

  15. Voltage issue... by r84x · · Score: 5, Informative
    IANA Electrical Engineer, but I do know that it is not the voltage that is an issue, but the amps. I am from a farm, and I regularly come into contact with our electric fence, which runs at 10,000 volts.

    From the article:

    The battery powering the electric motor carries as much as 500 volts, more than 40 times the strength of a standard battery.

    --
    Karma: Can there be a void?

    .. -. - . .-. .-. --- -...

    1. Re:Voltage issue... by Enigma_Man · · Score: 4, Informative

      Amperage is what matters, but you can't have Amps without the Volts. Also in the case of your electric fence, it also doesn't have the Watts to maintain the Volts to supply the Amps. Even though it's a 10,000 volt line, when you touch it, the power supply can't give enough juice, so it'll actually drop to around 100 volts or so (measure it with a multimeter! fun science experiment!) while you're touching it.

      If you were to touch a 10,000 volt power line though, that would be a different story alltogether, because it has enough watts going for it, that when you touch it, you get the full 10,000.

      -Jesse IAAEE

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  16. cutting someone from the car? by pudge_lightyear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Judging by the size of the hybrids that I've seen, I doubt that after being hit by any of the overly large gas guzzling SUV's on the road today, there will be much car to actually cut.

    The problem with these things isn't the danger of electricity, it's the danger of being under my suburban!

    1. Re:cutting someone from the car? by Croaker · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know what would be great? If they engineered the hybrid to detect when it's being rammed by some twit in an SUV, and shunt all of its electrical charge through the other vehicle in the milliseconds after collision.

      Sure, your SUV may smash my hybrid, but you'll be extra crispy. Especially if that voltage gets into the coils of the heated seats you got your ass planted on.

  17. Sound effects as a safety feature by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 3, Interesting
    After reading a driver's review of the GM Impact (later renamed EV-1) in which the reviewer noted that the car was quiet enough to mow down birds in the road, I realized that some kind of noisemaker, directed forward, might well be necessary to give pedestrians and others adequate notice of such vehicle's approach.

    Anyone driving a vehicle which is sufficiently loud (e.g. cycle with loud pipes) to prevent others from hearing the quieter vehicles should be subjected to immediate confiscation of their sonic assault weapon. This would have the worthwhile effect of turning the ex-driver into a pedestrian, so that they could appreciate the hazards of overly loud vehicles from the opposite perspective.

  18. stored energy is stored energy by brucehoult · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You see a lot of panicy stuff about how dangerous
    all that electrical energy in the batteries is,
    but when it comes down to it if the car has the
    same range as a similar normal car then there is
    exactly the same amount of energy in the batteries
    as there would normally be in a car's fuel tank.

    But these aren't pure electric cars. They only
    have a few km of range on the batteries and most
    of the energy is in the fuel tank just like any
    other car.

    1. Re:stored energy is stored energy by Quobobo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thank you
      for formatting
      your post
      in a way
      that accomodates
      my very rare
      300x1200 resolution
      screen.

  19. This story is almost wholly bogus. by RareHeintz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Extended comments at Gizmodo makes it clear that this is 99% rumor/FUD. Does anyone bother chacking the facts on these things before they're posted?

    OK,
    - B

    1. Re:This story is almost wholly bogus. by sohojim · · Score: 3, Funny
      Does anyone bother chacking the facts on these things before they're posted?

      Was that a rhetorical question? :)

    2. Re:This story is almost wholly bogus. by Mikoca · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It is pretty obvious that this article is purely composed of corporate FUD. For example, in the article they speak about cables in the doors, which I find pretty ridiculous as an idea (where would these cables be going?) and, indeed, the diagram on the PDF above shows the cables to be running along the bottom of the car's frame (the most obvious, safe and logical solution). What confounds me is how CNN didn't even bother to check the article for basic compatibility with reality. Just because Americans are so sensitive about safety, an article like this, especially if aired on TV once will be enough to spread rumours and destroy the oh, so logical upsurge of Prius sales. The article, in fact, is honest enough to admit the reasons it was published:

      "Concerns about hybrids are increasing in large part because of their growing popularity."

      Obviously, somebody in the industry hasn't done his homework preparing for the new millenium and is trying to save himself through using his connection in the cable networks. What really bothers me is how they are using the innermost concerns of people to plant them in a world of fear. They almost make it unpatriotic to buy hybrids as thus you are endangering the heroic rescuers besides yourself. Not that CNN really surprises me with this move. I've lost all faith in their capability as any kind of source of information.

    3. Re:This story is almost wholly bogus. by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Extended comments at Gizmodo makes it clear that this is 99% rumor/FUD.

      Thanks for the info! I was almost thinking about reconsidering my plans to buy a Prius later this year, then I thought about how unlikely it would be to route lossy high-voltage the long way around the frame. Then I saw your link, and that sealed it -- I'm getting a Prius first chance I get.

      I'm just afraid folks will fall for it like they've fallen for the cellphones at gas stations myth. Every gas pump in Texas has a label perpetuating this silliness!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  20. Saabs had explosives by netringer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had pre-airbags 1980's Saab 9000 that that had explosive charges on the seat belt mounts in the door pillars intended to tighten the seat belts at the moment of impact.

    Both door posts had warning stickers not to crush the car or bad things would happen.

    I guess the junkyard crushing machine operators got occassional surprises!

    --
    Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
    1. Re:Saabs had explosives by jweage · · Score: 3, Informative

      They still exist. They are called seat belt pre-tensioners and are used on lots of vehicles now. The best occupant protection sytems tend to have belt pre-tensioners.

  21. Even weirder: Prius race cars. by tgd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Last year, the Rallye International de Quebec, up in Quebec City (which I'm sure most of you could've guessed from the name), had a Toyota Prius rally car running. Toyota was doing in the CARS series to show off that their hybrids could hold up to that kind of abuse.

    The car sucked... badly... in almost all of the stages, because it was really fast for the first mile or two until it ran out of battery, and then the dinky motor wouldn't be able to give it enough power to keep up with anyone.

    There was one stage at the hippodrome, though, where they were running a mile or so course on a twisty infield and part of a horse track. It was very competitive on there. It was so surreal though to have one roaring rally car after another go flying by, and then when the Prius ran, the first car went screaming by, followed a bit later by the Prius -- where all you could hear was the tires on the dirt/gravel.

    1. Re:Even weirder: Prius race cars. by Cheeko · · Score: 4, Informative
      In the Prius the gas motor provides power as you said, but in high toque situations it can augment the power of the electric motor with the gas motor as well. Often times this is during higher speed driving (passing on the highway), hence why the car gets such incredible city milage versus only getting outstanding highway milage.

      THIS LINK provides a description of how the Prius' drivetrain uses the gas and electric motors in tandem.

    2. Re:Even weirder: Prius race cars. by photon317 · · Score: 3, Informative


      FYI, most production cars are incapable of 200. Usually drag is the limiting factor. A late model high-end Camaro or Firebird, for example, with minimal upgrades (chip, intake, exhaust type stuff) will generally drag-limit itself around the 155-170 range dependant on a few factors. A 'Vette in the same boat might make 180-185-ish due to it's better aerodynamics. In any case, even on a wide open empty road, anything over 150 is pretty fucking scary in a production passenger vehicle of any kind - especially taking into account unpredictable things like rocks and small animals that might be in your path.

      And generally, you don't get arrested at 100 either. I routinely hit 120 in the major city that I live in when traffic opens up enough to allow it without being overtly rude to other drivers. A little knowledge of where the police usually set up speed traps in your city, combined with a radar detector and a vigilant eye, can usually keep you ticket free even at those speeds.

      --
      11*43+456^2
  22. Not sold on the hybrids by tbone1 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Last summer I was looking for a new car with really good mileage and went with a VW Golf TDI over the hybrids. There were several reasons for this (among them, I can't fit into Japanese mid-size cars, but those built for Germans are fine ... go figure).

    The diesel in the VW is proven technology, but I was also worried about how the hybrids would be in an accident. Plus, the Golf TDI runs like an NBA player from his kids' wives. I know it will go 125MPH, but I was still accelerating when I decided to back off.

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    1. Re:Not sold on the hybrids by tbmaddux · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The diesel in the VW is proven technology, but I was also worried about how the hybrids would be in an accident.
      Electric motors are also proven technology. The Honda Insight has a 4 star rating in NHTSA crash tests for front- and side-impact. You can read about the lightweight and stiff construction of the Insight here. Note that the elevated rear compartment holding the IMA computer and battery as well as the spare tire and wheel are all providing additional passenger protection.

      Other hybrids: all part of the Prius gets 5 stars on front impacts. Civic Hybrid would be no different from regular Civics.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  23. Some important facts... by clockmaker · · Score: 5, Informative

    As the owner of a 2004 Prius, and being an engineer, I have never felt in danger.

    First, the High Voltage system is isolated from the car body completely. Not even "ground" is shared. The cables and parts are shrouded in tough orange plastic.

    Second, the article is incorrect on two points: the battery is only 200+ Volts, not 500V. The 500V is only between the inverter and motors.
    Also, there are no high voltage components in the doors.

    Because the airbag accelerometers are used to monitor whether the car is in an accident, the main battery relay shuts off right next to the battery long before any metal starts twisting its way into high voltage areas. The bigger danger is the battery (several NiMH cells) being split open, but it is protected by its location and special shrouds.

    My biggest fear in an accident is that the E-personnel are scared into paralysis by rumors, and don't rescue me.

    BTW, you can see the Toyota Emergency Responder guide at http://techinfo.toyota.com/

  24. Not just the Big Orange Cables... by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 4, Informative
    I own a Prius and one of the first things I looked at is the Big Orange Cable location -- the maintenance book spends a lot of time reminding you to never cut into, touch, mangle, or otherwise molest the Big Orange Cables that carry the big wattage from the batteries (in the back) to the controller (in the front).

    But after an accident, any part of the wiring harness could be energized relative to the frame -- you just don't know, for example, if the dome light circuit is going to happen to be connected to the same bank of circuits that were smushed into the Big Orange Cable in a front-quarter collision that also happened to damage the fail-safe circuit breakers.

    It's a big deal -- I imagine your training is similar to what the rural fire volunteers are getting here in Colorado: if it's a Prius, don't touch it!

    Reminds me of the college kids who like to play with radiation warning labels: ``heh-heh. My laptop has a radiation sticker on it! Cool! heh-heh.'' The problem is that if you get in (for example) a car accident and one of those labels is visible anywhere around the car, there is no first aid for you until the radiologic response unit arrives from across town.

  25. Diesel is safer than petrol by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Diesel fuel is a lot safer in that respect. A freind of mine who drove a diesel car was in an accident once, and he and his girlfriend had to be cut out. If they'd been driving a petrol car there'd have been a bigger chance that they'd have been burned to a crisp.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  26. Definition? by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Hybrid Car Accident"? Is that where an SUV crashes into a mini, and the result averages out to a sadan?

  27. Um, no by Scott+Richter · · Score: 4, Informative
    You see a lot of panicy stuff about how dangerous all that electrical energy in the batteries is, but when it comes down to it if the car has the same range as a similar normal car then there is exactly the same amount of energy in the batteries as there would normally be in a car's fuel tank.

    There are two problems with the above: it neglects the rate of energy transfer and the barrier to it. With a gasoline engine, both are reasonably high unless someone's walking around with matches, and emergency crews are smart enough not to smoke. The risk of shock is higher than detonation.

    Also, there's no analogous concept of capacitance for gasoline. However, if the wrong cable gets severed, your ass is fried with an electric. Also, because stored electrical energy is less obvious than a puddle of gasoline, it's harder to avoid.

    So there's about 5 reasons why one need fear hybrids in a crash more than regular cars

  28. More Detroit FUD BS by T_O_M · · Score: 5, Informative

    Another load of premium male bovine excrement from out friends in Texas and Munich/Detroit.

    My THIRD Prius, an 04 (I've owned an 01 and 03 - both completely problem-free), is currently sitting in Port Newark. I am also a retired rescue captain so I can state with some authority that Prius fundamental design is such that it would take a deliberate act of stupidity for a rescue technician to manage to make contact with both the positive AND negative high voltage leads at the same time since both are ground-isolated and separately encased in conduit.

    In real-fife rear-end accidents, only ONE Prius battery was damaged and it's safety issue was some minimal leakage of electrolyte; NOT "Deadly High Voltage"!

    In fact, the Japanese national fire safety bureau (the official name escapes me at the moment) insisted that Toyota place the HV conduit inboard far enough that the "Jaws Of Life" can't possibly make contact in one or two "bites".

    Sigh...

    "I don't understand it???
    I'm afraid of it!
    KILL IT!!!"
    T_O_M

  29. Re:Then there are toxic chemicals by be951 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Those batteries can be pretty nasty. I'm not just talking the battery Acid either. Some of the batteries in electric cars have to be heated to 200 degrees to work properly. And a lot of them contain some pretty nasty and toxic chemicals. Far worse than gasoline.

    The Prius uses NiMH batteries. They have a highly caustic (pH 13.5) electrolyte, but other than that are apparently non-toxic. Vinegar or Boric acid can be used to neutralize any electrolyte that leaks, but leaks are not likely since the solution is absorbed into the cell plates and shouldn't normally leak even when the battery module is cracked.

  30. *dry look* by Control+Group · · Score: 4, Funny

    That'll be tough; his comedy license isn't current. Besides, he's been charged with battery in the 9th circuit court...and though he's been conducting himself well, the outlook is negative and he'll probably end up extradited to his native Poland for incarceration. Luckily, he's an optimistic sort, so at least the cell's Pole will be positive.

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  31. KVL by Cyclopedian · · Score: 4, Funny

    I invoke the Kirchoff Voltage Law and declare this pun-ful thread to be dead.

    Is there any resistance to this idea?

    -Cyc

  32. Stay in school by Safety+Cap · · Score: 3, Interesting
    As an EE, ... if I'm ever in an accident, I'll make sure that any responders are wearing rubber gloves and boots and if any cutting is done, the roof is the only area they touch.
    On my Toyota Prius, there's a service plug that one need only pull out and the hybrid's batteries are disconnected from the rest of the system. This is not new news. Carrying around some of your mom's playtex dishwashing gloves is unnecessary.

    Did you hear? There are conveyances that carry TOXIC, FLAMMABLE fuel in LARGE TANKS and in HOSES from the tank to the engine!!! If the conveyances get hit, there could be an EXPLOSION!! If I'm in an accident, I'll make sure that any responders are wearing fireproof hazmat suits, and if any cutting is done, the roof is the only area they touch!

    --
    Yeah, right.
  33. Not really by nonameisgood · · Score: 3, Informative

    1 - the path through the body is the key - if it passes through the heart at some level (low mA) you can/will/do get V-fib (VF)
    2 - you must have voltage to get to the heart - less than 80 will seldom do it, but this depends on skin moisture and pH, how much water you have on board, do you drink Gatorade or just sweat alot...
    3 - high-current electrocutions do kill people, because you don't get this high current instantly or constantly - imagine 2 A, followed by a trailing off to 80 mA - gotcha.
    4 - Gauss plays some role - if your skin carries the current because it is wet or otherwise highly ocnductive, you may feel a shock at a lower voltage, but no cardiac issues (except fright).
    5 - Cars are running on DC, which requires that you basically make contact with two dissimilarly polarized surfaces - it cannot ground to the earth - old electronics technicians only use one hand for this reason.
    Stick a 9-volt on your tongue and tell us about it.

    --
    Faith is the very antithesis of reason, injudiciousness a critical component of spiritual devotion. Jon Krakauer
  34. From a Prius owner: by Eneff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is difficult, but possible, to have the electric motor run out of juice.

    Flooring the thing for a few miles would probably do it. I remember taking the bugger to 100 and that engine was working way too hard to fuel the electric battery.

    The one time I ran out of juice from normal usage was going through Western New Mexico to Albuquerque with no stops. There is a long incline going into the city after a slight incline over the whole trip. The car wasn't ready for it and had to slow down to 55.

    Yes, that motor is only good enough to keep you sustained at 55 by itself.

    (Note: I still heartily reccomend the car for most everyone, and the 2004 model has a higher HP gas engine so I'm sure the problem isn't pronounced.)