Slashdot Mirror
Projected 'Average' Longhorn System Is A Whopper
greg_barton writes "At first I thought this was a joke, but this article from Microsoft Watch confirms it: 'Microsoft is expected to recommend that the 'average' Longhorn PC feature a dual-core CPU running at 4 to 6GHz; a minimum of 2 gigs of RAM; up to a terabyte of storage; a 1 Gbit, built-in, Ethernet-wired port and an 802.11g wireless link; and a graphics processor that runs three times faster than those on the market today.'"
Systems advance with time? FUCKING REVELATION!!!111one
IE starts up and renders faster than mozilla. Do a benchmark. Hell, my computer starts up faster than mozilla.
The thing that was omitted from the article was that Bill Gates was quoted "All we'll ever need is 640GB of RAM"
Join the TWIT army now!
Oh no, how will we survive? Better just not push the hardware market anywhere and let the whole IT industry die on its arse even more than it is already. Gimme a break and wake up. Supply and demand.
According to the article it's not a confirmation at all. Microsoft has released no official statments about hardware requirements, these values are just estimates from developers, who may or may not have a clue.
wouldn't that necessitate Microsoft users to have a clue?
Kent Simon Multitheft Auto
How often does that urban legend have to go around before MORONS LIKE YOU GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK FUCKING SKULLS that BillG never said "640K should be enough for anyone"
He never said Bill said it. NO ONE FUCKING CARES. SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GO CRY TO YOUR MOM UPSTAIRS.
Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.Reason: Don't use so many caps.
Glad you hear your machine is alredy up to specs for Longhorn.
US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
BTW, as an official Longhorn beta tester, I can confirm that this story is not a hoax.
As someone who knows what they're talking about, I can confirm that you're full of shit. Longhorn is still in early alpha stages. It's nowhere near beta, and the thought of getting beta testers together hasn't even entered Microsoft's mind yet.
I guess Microsoft decided to finally write their entire OS in visual basic (.NET?). Good job!
4-6 GHz is ridiculus. It's obvious they are not designing the OS to scale with a wide range of processor speeds, either that or they won't be releasing it till sometime in 2012.
The question is, what are all those CPU cycles going to be doing?
Your reply smacks of desperation.
Sad to see a Microserf stoop so low so quickly.
"Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
Because you never do any serious research on the web, nobody else needs to? Just because all you do with a word processor is write one page letters to your grandma, it shouldn't be possible to write a dissertation with it? Have the terms "arrogant" and "wanker" been applied to you lately?
I can't exactly say I'm going to hold it against the Firefox developers that their browser becomes a memory hog when people are using it waaayyyyy beyond its intent.
So bugs are OK, as long as they only affect other people in their productivity? Cf. last sentence of my previous paragraph.
If that's something you legitimately need, offer a patch or use a tool that's actually meant to do that.
Actually, Firefox is designed to browse the web. That's why it's called a web browser. The memory leaks and the crashing are not intentional. This is called a bug.
Otherwise, don't complain that it's not doing things it's not supposed to.
So Firefox isn't supposed to be a web browser? Better go and tell the developers then.
Second, the trite old "it loads slower than IE" is so incredibly irritating that I have to bite my tongue to prevent a slew of obscenities.
Not that it would bother you, obviously.
Boo hoo. So, you have to wait an extra 2 seconds for it to load up because the WEB BROWSER isn't tied to the KERNEL. After all, what sort of moronic dipshits would make a web browser an integral part of a system kernel anyway?
I guess it wouldn't really be a /. discussion without some incoherent ramblings thrown in.
Finally, I call bullshit on the "slow loads". If you've got benchmarks, show 'em. Otherwise, my anectdotal evidence says your anecdotal evidence is full of crap because the only lag I see on my 1.5/Cable connection is from the servers on the other end of the pipe.
I don't know what to say about this, really. Do you suffer from narcolepsy?
Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
Katz was as eloquent as a mynah bird.
Apple comes out with a dual-G5 with fast everything, and y'all start skipping down the street with your iPods up your buttholes saying "It's a Thupercomputer! Itth fathster than a PEE-THEE! Tra-la-la"
So Microsoft, if the story is true, has set the bar high for their next OS, and you all are saying "What ever happened to 640K being enough."
Why can't you be consistent?
Best Buy can have you arrested