Slashdot Mirror


NASA Funds Sci-Fi Technology

Michael Huang writes "Wired News profiles the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC), the $4 million-a-year agency most famous for Bradley Edwards' study of the space elevator. Lesser known studies include weather control, shape-shifting space suits and antimatter-powered probes to Alpha Centauri. Remember, 'if it's not risky, it's not going to get funded'."

135 comments

  1. Sounds familiar by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Gee. Sounds like Heinlein's "Long Range Foundation".

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  2. What? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    NASA is getting into space things? That's odd.

    1. Re:What? by linzeal · · Score: 5, Funny
      Nasa getting into sci-fi would be like the US Military getting into video games, never going to happen.

    2. Re:What? by dontbgay · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      uhmmmmmmm... on the contrary. try this on for size. I hear it's a decent game.

      --
      Sig not found.
    3. Re:What? by linzeal · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Yeah, I know. Check this out though, that is the game I want for Christmas.

    4. Re:What? by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      I don't know anything about the game but the CIA doing that is retarded. Haven't they ever heard of roleplaying games? In which anything is possible, and you are not limited by a game engine? Idiots. Not to mention that with their resources the CIA could create an entire support infrastructure where they used computers to model the effects of explosions and such, so you'd get the best of both worlds.

      Ever since I first read Zelazny's Amber series I've wondered how you could most effectively play the game. While the mind's eye can quite adequately provide a representation for players in most circumstances, I would very much like to have visualization tools at my disposal. My basic idea is a sort of combination first person shooter-style game and game editor which cooperate in realtime. Terrain could be stored in a central game engine. The storyteller would have available to them essentially the combination of CAD, the controls available in the average god game (raise and lower terrain for example), and the controls available in the average FPS level editor. Players could then interact on this landscape and the game master/referee/what have you could manipulate it as is appropriate.

      Combined with some sort of reality overlay-type system it would be a really amazingly cool way to play games - or a good way to drive someone to psychosis.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:What? by sparcnut · · Score: 0
      Nasa getting into sci-fi would be like the US Military getting into video games, never going to happen.
      They are into video games. America's Army, specifically - they wrote it.
      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10);'
    6. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      proves for the 100,000th time that Slashdotters have no *concept* of sarcasm.

    7. Re:What? by mujin · · Score: 1

      I remember playing some game (it was open source) almost exactly like this not too long ago... I have no idea what it was called though.

    8. Re:What? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2

      Those were great books.
      While a computer rgp like you describe doesn't exit, there was a "zork with slideshow" style game based on the first couple of novella's in the original series. However this was a long time ago and for the life of me I can't remember if it was for Dos or Commodore 64.
      There is also a regular, pen and paper, roleplaying game based on the two Amber series of novel put out by Phage Press, the game was diceless, based on some interesting concepts.
      For example it was a point buy system for most things. Including attributes, but your relative rank to the other players in primary attribues was decided in an auction, this also determined how many points you needed to go up later.
      And you could even spend more points than you had, or save some. Of course being in the hole on points meant you had bad karma (if your in debt to the cosmos,it WILL extract interest till you pay off).
      Sadly I think Phage press went dodo, so finding the main book or either of the expansions might be a bit hard. It was however really cool.
      The first book was main rules and covered the stuff in the Corwin saga. The first expansion had all the new stuff from the Merlin stories, and the second expansion was supposed to be about Atrifacts of science and or magic and related things. (I want my own Ghostweel please!)
      Sorry for the off topic drift down memory lane, but Nostalgia kinda took over.

      Mycroft.

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    9. Re:What? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      It's okay, I have Amber DRPG and the first expansion, I didn't realize there were two though. Is the second one really worth having?

      My last character had 5 points of good stuff. We did have one character with 10 points of bad stuff (the maximum he was allowed) and it was serious "look out for falling pianos" time. Metaphorically speaking of course, though assorted and sundry did try to hit him with other heavy objects now and again, and sometimes succeeded.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:What? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      I have no clue about the second espansion. It was listed as forthcomming and the rpg shops could order it. But, IIRC, Phage went dodo just a month or two after it shipped, so I doubt there are many copies out there. One printing at best. I'm pretty shure I saw it on a shelf at one time. Your best bet is eigther your local gaming shop or the online bookstores that specialize in used/out of print/hard to find stuff.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  3. I hope they keep their funding... by James+A.+O.+Joyce · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I skimmed the article summary I was going to write a comment complaining th at NASA should be investing in "proven technologeis". After all, it's the "proven technologeis" that help us about our daily lifes and help us fulfilll ourselves: space elevators don't enter into it, right? Besides, NASA needs to bring in some green and they can only do that by making proprietry software and crafts.

    But then I realised something important; no matter how important it is for NASA to make money, we still have to spend money to make money. Even if spending money on space lifts causes taxes to get nothced up by a few dollars, it will all be worth it in a few decades because we will all benefit from the advanced cabling tech. Besides, every dollar that's spent on this is another dolll ar that isn't spent on military applications or other less savoury things.

    Still, judging by their website, I'm a little suspicious of what they're up to! ;-) I guess their just busy working on something cool like transforming space suits, heh. Keep up the good articals, simoniger. (The shape-shifting space suits are almost certainly more useful than the shape-shifting trainers I saw linkked on Fark, anyway.)

    1. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by ziggy_zero · · Score: 2, Informative

      As Buckminster Fuller said, we should focus more on "livingry" rather than weaponry.

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
    2. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by theM_xl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Aye, if everyone only invests in "proven techonologies" we can forget about progress... Sure, we'll probably refine things, but some new ones would be nice. We can't rely on the guys in basements to do everything... Somebody has to do the hard science that at least on the surface offers little. If the NASA is the one to do it, more power -and funding- to them.

    3. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

      Buckminster Fuller. Now that guy had balls.

    4. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by DShard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And honestly, space elevators are not as far fetched an idea as they sounded when I first read about them in Kim Stanley Robinsons' Mars series. What it would return when we work out the tech is a solar system of resources at or disposal. With the price of bringing up and down cargo going to dollars a pound, the potential is breathtaking. There are worse pipe dreams to invest in.

    5. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by Nerd+With+Nalgene · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, that's more than a little optimistic. Theoretically, having a single space elevator might drop the price for lifting material to geosync to under a thousand dollars a kilogram. That's still a big improvement over tens of thousands, but it doesn't mean you'll be sending up your kids' science projects anytime soon.

      --


      "as if nothing were solid...and that would be the end of the world, not fire and brimstone, but goo."--Rand
    6. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by red+floyd · · Score: 2, Informative

      The idea of the space elevator is about 35 years old. Yuri Artusanov (spelling?) came up with the idea circa 1968, and Arthur C. Clarke ran with it in "The Fountains of Paradise". The anchor point's name of "Clarke" in the Mars series was a tribute.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    7. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by DShard · · Score: 1

      I knew somebody had previous examples! thanks.

    8. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by Log+from+Blammo · · Score: 0

      Anything worthwhile can be paid for by voluntarily invested money instead of tax dollars. And tax dollars are not a fixed pool of funding--a dollar spent on NASA pipe dreams is a dollar taken from the public, not a dollar taken from the military, or any other part of government. Both of those dollars could have been used to fund a private enterprise researching technologies of more immediate utility to humanity.

      In other words, if GE wanted to invent superior cabling, I could buy more stock to fund the project, and thus profit from the super-long suspension bridges that would be built. If NASA invented superior cabling, I get to pay more taxes so they can build a space elevator, which I would then be charged additional money to use.

      --
      "This quote is a product of the Frobozz Magic Quote Company."
    9. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by xmath · · Score: 5, Informative
      Quoting the site:
      The first space elevator would reduce lift costs immediately to $100 per pound, as compared to current launch costs, which are $10,000-$40,000 per pound, depending upon destination and choice of rocket launch system.

      Plus, if you look at their studies it seems they have figured out pretty much everything already. The only technical detail they're waiting for is a sufficiently strong carbon nanotube composite to make the cable of, and they're already making good progress there. After that, apparently it becomes just an engineering/funding problem.

      Of course the studies could be mistaken, but still it's definitely not in the pure "Sci-Fi" category anymore. With a bit of luck, we'll still live to see it built. :-)

    10. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If GE invents superior cabling, then only GE and its licensees get to use it, and they pass the cost on to you, the consumer. If NASA invents superior cabling, then everybody (including GE) can use it to deliver better products (including suspension bridges) at a lower price.

      Government expenditure on science is an investment by the people of the US (or whatever country is doing the spending) -- and one which (especially in the case of NASA) has quite often had a rate of return on investment which few if any private R&D operations can match.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    11. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by cft_128 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      In other words, if GE wanted to invent superior cabling, I could buy more stock to fund the project, and thus profit from the super-long suspension bridges that would be built. If NASA invented superior cabling, I get to pay more taxes so they can build a space elevator, which I would then be charged additional money to use.

      The problem with this is the vast majority of people are too short sighted to do this, it takes government (tax) money where an immediate profit is not needed to invest in these type of projects. People were shocked when Honda started getting into jet engines and said that the new division would not turn a profit for more than ten years, and that is just refining old technologies, not ground breaking new ones.

      Imagine the investor response if GE said "We are going to build a space elevator, it will take us at least 25 years to complete it and cost the majority of our R&D budget for the whole time frame". That investor money would be voluntarily moved to Microsoft where (relatively) short term growth is much more likely.

      Rather than say "a dollar spent on NASA pipe dreams is a dollar taken from the public" I would say "A dollar spend on a NASA pipe dream is a dollar invested in the public's future". Not all investments pan out but many do.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    12. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Heaven help us if it ever snaps. imagine a super strong cabel accelerating from a geosync orbit across some city? like a 4 km long 2 meter wide meteor.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    13. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Anything worthwile but not immediatly possible will NOT be researched by a private company unless the pay off is rediculously profitable like pharmacuticles.

      GE would not invest in a project that might come out with a space elevator in 25 years. They will invest in an oven that heats 25% faster that will be out in 8 months. For obtuse and long term project the government must fund it, for technology refinement the public sector will fund it.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    14. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      >> Buckminster Fuller. Now that guy had balls.

      Yeah, but really tiny ones.

    15. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by Saige · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cause, of course, we haven't seen every single technical article that describes the space elevator in any sort of techincal detail mention that it would be a wide but extremely thin ribbon that, were it ever to break or be cut, would float down with not even enough kinetic energy to hurt a person. That coupled with the fact that any sections not far enough into the atmosphere to be slowed that way would, upon reentering the atmosphere and building up a bit of heat, disintegrate.

      In other words, if their engineering ideas are even close, the only place we'll see a big disaster caused by a space elevator cable coming down is fiction.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    16. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If it's scientifically impossible, it's not science fiction - it's fantasy. The space elevator is something that we (meaning humans) pretty much knew would be possible eventually. Hence, the pure sci-fi category is not a bad place to be.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by brian728s · · Score: 0

      >> Yeah, but really tiny ones. But he had millions of really tiny ones. Surely that means something.

    18. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Anything worthwhile can be paid for by voluntarily invested money instead of tax dollars.
      If there's any chance that it will generate a financial return within 5 years.

      Fundamental science and the development of key engineering concepts do not pay back that soon. It took decades between the discovery of the structure of DNA and when people started making money off it. Top quarks are not paying anyone's commercial salary other than researchers and a few large particle accellerator component manufacturers.... this decade. But who knows.

      Doing studies like this tells us what engineering and directed science developments will be useful in the future, by pointing out applications and providing directions for research. Without them, nobody can tell ahead of time what the uses for and payback for new nanotube fibers might be, the uses for antimatter containment, large lasers, etc.

      That long term funding lets investors say "Ok, we could see making money at this" and then they may invest.

      The rise of technological society has been on the back of publically funded research, often followed by commercial development. The benefits of having some people looking out a ways on the public dime is well demonstrated. TCP/IP anyone?

      Disclaimer: I have before, and will again, applied for NIAC project funding.

    19. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by usmcpanzer · · Score: 1

      Besides, every dollar that's spent on this is another dolll ar that isn't spent on military applications or other less savoury things.

      Military applications like the internet, computer, or most everything digital, electrical, and mechanical?

    20. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They can have my dollar. As much as I like to see shit getting blown up, I would rather see a dollar going into some hair brained Nasa scheme than some black hole millitary project. Who's sole purpose is to kill people.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    21. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      space elevators are not as far fetched an idea as they sounded when I first read about them in Kim Stanley Robinsons' Mars series

      Geez kid, how old are you? Oh yeah, an idea didn't exist until YOU read about it.

    22. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      In the long run money spent on the space program has always come back to the economy multiplied, not directly, but it has.
      Powdered orange juice, microwave ovens,velcro,Kevlar,solar blankets,hand vacs, some of the early impetus in miniaturizing of electronics, artificial satalites,and lots of other things are a direct or indirect result of fundamental research and developement done for the space program.
      And if I've missremembered and one or more of those isn't a result of the space program I'm shure some idiot will try and use the error to disprove what I've said, but before that happens I'll just point out that the list I gave is just the tip of the iceberg.

      Mycroft.

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    23. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by Log+from+Blammo · · Score: 1

      If there's any chance that it will generate a financial return within 5 years.

      With any large advance in technology, there are usually smaller incremental advances that can be made profitable while research continues. Jumping straight to a space elevator with no interim benefits is the equivalent of not manufacturing desktop computers until you can use a 1 GHz+ processor.

      --
      "This quote is a product of the Frobozz Magic Quote Company."
    24. Re:I hope they keep their funding... by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      Theoretically, having a single space elevator might drop the price for lifting material to geosync to under a thousand dollars a kilogram. That's still a big improvement over tens of thousands, but it doesn't mean you'll be sending up your kids' science projects anytime soon

      Nah. The first thing we'll do is use the first space elevator to build more space elevators. And rotating tethers. Etc.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
  4. Be honest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Be honest, you were outraged to hear that funding was given to wacky pseudo-science projects, weren't you?

    1. Re:Be honest... by Reorax · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was outraged to hear that funding was given to their wacky pseudo-science projects. Still nothing for my magnetic levitation air-hockey table.

      --
      This sig is only here so people stop skipping the last lines of my posts.
    2. Re:Be honest... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      I was outraged to hear that funding was given to their wacky pseudo-science projects. Still nothing for my magnetic levitation air-hockey table.

      That's because it's already been solved. You take an air-hockey sized piece of superconductor, cool it down to liquid-nitrogen temperatures, and place a puck-shaped magnet on top. Since superconductors are naturally diamagnetic, the magnet will float. By adjusting the strength and weight of the magnet, you can change the float height.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    3. Re:Be honest... by i8a4re · · Score: 1

      While I know your post was a joke, it got me thinking. Maybe you could get a whole bunch of these kits together and make a graphite puck and you might have one.

      --

      If I drive fast enough at the red light, it'll appear green.
    4. Re:Be honest... by Ardillo · · Score: 1

      Then you have to worry about the puck being brittle. Boy, it would suck to have your multi-thousand dollar puck shatter in a gajillion pieces on the first volley!

      --
      Honor belongs to those who dare, not to the critic who sits by and stares
    5. Re:Be honest... by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      The puck doesn't need to be a superconductor. It just needs to be a magnet, and those are cheap. It doesn't matter if you break one every now and then.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  5. Reminds me of a quote by jafo · · Score: 5, Funny

    This reminds me of one of my favorite quotes, by Gordon Moore: "If everything you try works, you're not trying hard enough."

    Sean

    1. Re:Reminds me of a quote by antic · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Gordon Moore: "If everything you try works, you're not trying hard enough."


      And adapted for Slashdot:



      "If you're hard, you're not trying to work enough."

      ;)
      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
  6. Arthur C Clarke 2061 by eamacnaghten · · Score: 1

    I believe this concept (or one very similar) Arthur C Clarke aired in his book 2061.

    --

    Web Sig: Eddy Currents

    1. Re:Arthur C Clarke 2061 by DShard · · Score: 1

      Actually it was 3001 which came out later then Kim Stanley Robinsons' Green Mars which was published 3 years earlier. But I would not be surprised if there isn't previous examples.

    2. Re:Arthur C Clarke 2061 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yah, there are previous examples: Fountains of Kaldissa, by...Arthur C Clark. Much earlier than KSR.

    3. Re:Arthur C Clarke 2061 by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      You mean like Clarke's own The Fountains of Paradise?

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    4. Re:Arthur C Clarke 2061 by arhines · · Score: 1

      It appears in a number of his books actually. Another to add to the list is his co-written Songs of Distant Earth. In this, the elevators were used to lift huge blocks of ice from a waterworld type planet to build a space debris shield in front of a colony ship. Somehow it also killed people, though I can't recall what the circumstances were.

    5. Re:Arthur C Clarke 2061 by deimtee · · Score: 1

      It killed one man when he was lifted into space.
      He was showing some girl the block of ice and didn't know they had changed the lifting schedule.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
  7. How about... by CaptainPuff · · Score: 0

    starting a search for the Black Monolith?

  8. Do they have 500 Altairan dollars for by Intocabile · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. for the triple-breasted whore of Eroticon 6? Or is that not risky enough?

    1. Re:Do they have 500 Altairan dollars for by Temporal+Outcast · · Score: 1

      All in good time, my friend ;-)

      --

      Vote for a Man, Vote for Bush!
      Not a liberatarian flipflop hippie.
    2. Re:Do they have 500 Altairan dollars for by rpj1288 · · Score: 1

      You've been with Eccenletra Galumbits? (I totally mangled that.)

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
  9. 250x less by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It costs more than 250 times their yearly budget to fly one shuttle mission...That is a sad joke, I bet there budget is less than what NASA spends each year to fly the NASA highups around the country.

  10. Heh... by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 4, Funny
    Re-fund Orion.

    ...then Superfund the United States!

    --
    Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    1. Re:Heh... by linzeal · · Score: 1
      They have, sort of.

      No one is going to use a fission based launch system though, too many hippies alive still.

    2. Re:Heh... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would definitly want to see Greenpeace protesting against that one. The standard Greenpeace protest involves chaining themselfs against whatever they are protesting against.

      Just picture this:

      1) build nuclear launch system.
      2) Allow greenpeace hippies to chain themselfs to launch system.
      3) Launch system.
      4) Annouce the first hippies in space to the world.

  11. The most important thing said in the article by cft_128 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The most important thing said in the article was a quote by an analyst "It's impossible to make breakthroughs if all you're funding is immediate, near-term applications".

    In society today we all seem to concentrate on short term benefits and ignore the long term consequences, be it government budget deficits, long term research funding, balking at online music distribution, moving jobs off shore or the environment.

    --

    Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    1. Re:The most important thing said in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shareholders -- and by extention, "lobbied" politicans -- can't see beyond their own feet anymore. The sure buck is next quarter. The sure buck is the sequel.

    2. Re:The most important thing said in the article by MisterLawyer · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "we all seem to concentrate on short term benefits and ignore the long term consequences, be it government budget deficits, long term research funding, balking at online music distribution, moving jobs off shore or the environment. "

      You forgot one example: Military policy. Think of all the children in the middle east right now who are getting houses and cities bombed by 'American bombs' and having their fathers killed by 'American soldiers'. In 25 years, they will all be grown up, and they will hate America as much as their fathers did.

      This will probably get modded off-topic, but it's just a response to your generalization about society's impulses.

    3. Re:The most important thing said in the article by cft_128 · · Score: 1

      I certainly forgot more than one, the list is endless, from the eroding of our personal freedoms to shopping at big box retailers to save a few buck. And having said all this, I am by no means perfect either, I just try to do my best.

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    4. Re:The most important thing said in the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I guess we had better kill them now.

  12. Anti matter probe to Alpha Centauri ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Unfortunatly the brute force method to interstellar travel will never work. One sand grain sized particle hitting a craft going 1% of c will end the mission. Then there is the issue of having enough fuel and the multigenerational length of the mission.

    1. Re:Anti matter probe to Alpha Centauri ? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      With the energy being released at the backend theres enough to power some high energy magnetic field device to pass particles around or through the craft(and collect the stray hydrogen molecule). So particles aren't a big a problem, larger chunks would be though...

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Anti matter probe to Alpha Centauri ? by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Except your high energy magnetic field will have zero effect on the neutrally charged non-magnetic grain of silicon / aluminium oxide aka sand.

    3. Re:Anti matter probe to Alpha Centauri ? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      Dunno if the energy would be there, but a strong enough magnetic field can affect just about anything.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  13. Space Elevator is not sci-fi by Nerd+With+Nalgene · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My dad has worked with Brad Edwards on the Space Elevator extensively, and I can tell you from experience that it is not wacky science fiction. It is a six billion dollar investment that isn't likely to appear anytime soon. However, it is almost certain to happen within the next thirty to forty years. While it is nice that the government can handle that kind of long-range vision occasionally, if they are the only ones providing investment into technologies like this one then they will end up controlling those technologies. What would really be nice is if the private sector could see into the future too and fund some of this kind of stuff without NASA's help.

    --


    "as if nothing were solid...and that would be the end of the world, not fire and brimstone, but goo."--Rand
    1. Re:Space Elevator is not sci-fi by demachina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lets see, the U.S. spends six billion dollars in less than a month on the circus in Iraq which isn't producing any useful result. The U.S. has spent 6 or 7 times this on the F-22 and its still barely in limited production. Estimates very but the F-22 will run $200-$300 million a pop. Kind of shows you how screwed up our priorities are.

      I really doubt the major powers will let a private company own a space elevator. It will so dramatically alter the balance of power I wager the U.S., E.U., Russia, China, Japan and India in particular will vie for control of it as soon as the technology arrives to make it look viable. It will be interesting to see if it becomes the object of a new space race which will be the BEST way to insure that it actually gets built. You have to wonder if the world will pull together and build one or will fight like cats and dogs and we end up with 3 or 4.

      Don't recall if it has to be based at the equator. If it does when it becomes viable it will be interesting to see the major powers vie for control of the best spots for the base on the equator.

      --
      @de_machina
  14. Science fiction inevitably becomes fact... by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's too bad that a defenseless program like this is just the sort that would be hacked apart if some hackney news agency decided to do an expose on the $4m it gets. I'm sure John Stossel could paint horns on it.

    Even outlandish ideas deserve study. This isn't "duh" stuff like the speed at which ketchup comes out of the bottle, etc. I think it's important to keep an eye out on the horizon and if a couple bucks is enough motivation, then go for it!

    --

    ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
    1. Re:Science fiction inevitably becomes fact... by ThomasFlip · · Score: 1, Troll

      Well now that I think about it, I'm sure that one day a jewish graduate from MIT will figure out how to upload a virus onto an Alien mother ship's computer system and save earth. That doesn't sound so far fetched after all.

      --
      If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
  15. Corny as it may be? by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd like to see more research into replicator technology (maybe we will get there after enough nano-research?)
    If we get replicators, we can solve a lot of problems at once:

    - Food, nobody would have to grow hungry again
    - Money, nobody would need it ever again
    - Fuel, no more dependancies on oil
    - Nuclear waste/pollution, easy to clean that up now
    - Living forever, refreshing the building blocks of our bodies
    - etc.

    The only problem I can see here (and I'm sure there are more) is nano-warfare. As in "Let's make a nanobot that can kill all people with a certain DNA profile", that's the only thing I'm afraid of.

    I think it will take a long time before we finally have that technology, but I'm afraid I won't live to see that (and I'm still hoping to have about 70 years ahead of me to live to the ripe old age of 95)

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
    1. Re:Corny as it may be? by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd like to see more research into replicator technology (maybe we will get there after enough nano-research?) If we get replicators, we can solve a lot of problems at once:

      - Food, nobody would have to grow hungry again
      - Money, nobody would need it ever again
      - Fuel, no more dependancies on oil
      - Nuclear waste/pollution, easy to clean that up now
      - Living forever, refreshing the building blocks of our bodies
      - etc.

      You're high. Successful nanotech replictors probaly wouldn't solve any of those problems. It does not allow for escaping from the law of conservation of mass and energy. Materials are still going to take resources and energy to manufacture. both are commodities that, even if cheap, will prevent free replication. We'll be able to make our own oil but the energy to do that will have to come from someplace and might not be efficient as simply running electric cars to begin with. In fact, it may still be cheaper to pump the stuff out of the ground and use it. It might even still be cheaper to grow food naturally.

    2. Re:Corny as it may be? by king-manic · · Score: 4, Insightful


      - Food, nobody would have to grow hungry again
      - Money, nobody would need it ever again
      - Fuel, no more dependancies on oil
      - Nuclear waste/pollution, easy to clean that up now
      - Living forever, refreshing the building blocks of our bodies


      -Food: We can already fend off hunger, it's socio economic reasons why we don't. Food distribution, international politics cause grain and other excess food goods to be stored/rott instead of eaten, not supply. Replicators would not help this. Chances are they would require electricity to operate and most places with low food levels also don't have electricity.
      -money: Money is an idea, its a innovation to quantify the value of "work" or "goods". If replicators worked, they would require power, and then power and base materials would become the basis of a monetary system. Also replicators aren't magic, nanobots would still require base amterials and could only make things according to what is available. It's likly it will make manufacturing moot if it worked exactly liek you think it should.
      -Fuel: We will need more, it doesn' solve fuel problems it woudl create it. We dont' yet know the power requirements a replicator would need, but changing matter require energy. If it work just a syou think (ie, make anything you tell it to out of base materials) We'd need a lot of energy. If your thinking of the magical Star trek replicators it's going to need even more energy (and also a major major innovation in physics to overcome the uncertainty principle.)
      -Nuclear waste: Again nano machiens aren't magic They might be able to convert 8h2so4 into 8 h2 1 s8 and 16 o2 but it can't make pu-242 into 50 h2o.
      -Living forever: It may someday result in this, This is a fairly realistic possibiltity but not for a good long time. Even then you may run into some problems, like memory. IF your 350 can your brain remember enough to keep you functional, will we hae to invent a forgetting machine lest we fill up our brains? This one might happen I doubt the other 4 will.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    3. Re:Corny as it may be? by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      It might be reasonable to assume that if we manage to achieve clinical immortality, we might be able to transform ourselves to vastly increase our mental capacities, or download our consciousness into a computer, blah blah science-fiction-cakes. Read Diaspora, Schild's Ladder, or Permutation City by Greg Egan for ideas. Yeah, I know it's just sci-fi, but as long as we're dreaming, let's dream big, instead of assuming one fantastical thing and then assuming we wouldn't be able to get past problems it might engender.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    4. Re:Corny as it may be? by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Their might be some severe consquences form a race of functionally imortal beings. Who gets to be immortal is question? will it be a reward for talent and personal fortune or will it be applie to everyone, if it's to everyone overcrowding will kill us. If it's just the accademics and the rich will science and industry become more and more conservative (going broke or having all your ideas discreditted at 450 might suck a lot, the reputation may never leave you)? Or will those groups become rampant risk takers(hey, if you have all the rest of time to recover does 400 years of work really matter) then theirs the question of physchology. We live 80 years and we're mostly cautious about our lives. If we live 1000+ years will we develope racial paranoia like a Piersons Puppeteer?

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    5. Re:Corny as it may be? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      Nanotech isn't going to make everything free without switching to a communisme-like society (the theoreticaly happy one, like Startrek). But it could make things very cheap. Sufficent advanced nanotech factories could be as efficient as biological cells. (creating complex chemicals without any garbage). Combined with fusion it could make cheap fuel, cheap food and cheap thingamabobs.

      Even resources aren't an issue. We've got huge piles of resources that are considered so worthless that people would pay you to get rid of it (what would be the value of the contents of one garbage truck? And what would be the value of the same material after it's sorted on a molecular scale?). As soon as nanotech becomes a reality, those landfills are going to be a goldmine.

      Fusion fuel isn't going to be a problem either. Most of the planet is covert with water. A lot of this water is heavy water (1 or 2% IIRC), there are huge amounts of lithium too. Should be enough the get us through a century of 2 on cheap fuel.

    6. Re:Corny as it may be? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      it could make cheap fuel, cheap food and cheap thingamabobs.

      Um, we already have that, the products are generally referred to as "beer", "wine", and "liquor". ;)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    7. Re:Corny as it may be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...and also a major major innovation in physics to overcome the uncertainty principle."

      What, you mean the Heisenberg compensator?

  16. Hurricane shifters...... by j3ll0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The one thing that I like about the idea for shifting the hurricane is that when there wasn't a hurricane to be shifted, you could redirect all that energy onto a bank of photovoltaic cells.

    Of course...the one thing I don't like about the idea is that us humans don't have a whole lot of success in anticipating the consequences of fucking around with nature :)

  17. Will they fund.. by iNetRunner · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So.. Will they now fund Integrated Defense?

    --
    Store with salt
    1. Re:Will they fund.. by iNetRunner · · Score: 1

      *Someone hasn't clearly played Civilization.. :(*

      --
      Store with salt
  18. Risky Sci-Fi projects funded?? by dos4who · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..How about trying to get CowboyNeal a date?

    ~m

    --
    "Yes, I have a Disaster Recovery Plan. It's called my Resume"
  19. A modest proposal by icekillis · · Score: 4, Funny

    A modest proposal: Instead of just posting an article every time a Wired Article comes out, slashdot should just made a special section feeding everything from Wired.

    1. Re:A modest proposal by zokrath · · Score: 1

      And then, the next breraking story would be about a Wired article about pending litigation against an online news forum web site for large scale copyright infringement.

  20. 4 Milion.. is pocket change by NoMercy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Goverments deal in milions, 50 milion there, 20 milion there, the cost of some piece of stupid artwork to stick at the end of a bridge cost a insane ammount of money while another piece of local-goverment artwork is spiraling though milions of dolars while its schedule is pushed furthur and furthur back...

    Benifit of this is, a) the costs are fixed, b) we might just get that anti-mater powered probe to aplha-centuri ;)

  21. Web page desing by notany · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least they are not any of that 4 000 000$ year to web designers. That's allways a good sign.
    The homepage looks absolutely horrible!!

    --
    Dyslexics have more fnu.
  22. Re:Corny as it may be?...And it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about that for a sec. E = mc^2.
    Where are you going to get all the power to make food/fuel? And it sure as hell isn't going to be 100% efficient. Even if this was invented, we'd still have wars over oil.

    But yeah it would be cool. Just watch out for people wanting royalties on their replicator patern for meatloaf.

  23. Very fond of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Arthur C. Clark has been very fond of the idea. I belive he has plugged it in many books (including one with a title like "Songs from distant earth").

  24. Re:Corny as it may be?...And it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like waiting for a good meal to materialize in solar powered replicator.

  25. The Fountains of Paradise by DeepBlueDiver · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe this concept (or one very similar) Arthur C Clarke aired in his book 2061.

    He was just re using the concept he presented for the first time in "The Fountains of Paradise" (1978).
    Great book, BTW.

  26. Robert A Heinlein by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reminds me of this novel where there's an organzation that won't finance something unless it's crazy and has no chance of succeeding. I believe its motto was Bread cast upon water multplies sevenfold. In the novel the organization finances a novel way of communicating between Earth and starships.

    1. Re:Robert A Heinlein by Carnildo · · Score: 2

      Yes, the Long Range Foundation. The actual criteria was that if any potential payoff was at least a century in the future, the project had a chance of being funded.

      Of course, they had a slight problem with projects paying off too soon.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  27. My risky proprosal: by Saeger · · Score: 3, Funny
    Dear NASA,

    Here is my 'sci-fi' grant proposal. I hope you approve:

    1. Wait for advanced nanotechnology and brain-scanning tech to emerge over the next 25 years. I'll still need funding during this period to analyze the research landscape for suitable bla bla (i.e. sit on my ass.)
    2. Launch a 'seed' probe using the old space elevator.
    3. Have the seed probe attach to any unclaimed, suitably-sized asteroid and self-assemble the solar arrays, dish, and computing substrate necessary for a couple million transhuman beings + "matrix" environment.
    4. "Broadcast" the willing scanned human minds from Earth for $0/lb (and let the bio-luddites join the dinosaurs.)
    5. Grow our new home into a dyson-sphere-sized Matrioshka Brain around the Sun to add to the "missing [thinking] matter" out there. :)
    6. No profit.

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  28. Blueprints are already available... by GaryOlson · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    for this long term project. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0671 500937/102-4406470-8931340?v=glance

    --
    Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
  29. hmmmm by dnamaners · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sounds neat but i am having real problems with the physics. but i bet most people that read about it would ....

    They say a ribbon about a meter wide and 2 millimeters thick can do this. well OK ill give them that if that ribbon was constructed it may in deed be just that perfectly capabel of supporting that strain (this is a stretch by itself). However the plan to put that big thing into service required that a small one first be used. The small one will have to be one microns tick. this is gonna be the real sticker. How will you expect that to survive all the wind, and elemental forces assuming that you can get it attached inthe first place.

    I can see quite a few good lighting strikes and other interesting upper atmosphere charge effects splitting this up real good. Then let the wind just rip it lengthwise and then try to run a climber up it. All i can say is if you could do this you better start it off with a conciderable amount (perhaps 10% or more) of its final strength, and perhaps investigate a way to lower the cable from orbit. As an aside, can you imagine the effects of an airplane strike on this thing.

    Well the best hope in my humbel opinion is the research may lead to better materials for seatbelts and bullet proof vests ..... the world needs a better 10 micron seatbelt.... or better yet maybe a monofiliment whip.....

    1. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'd blame you for not reading the whole report, but then it is a bit lengthy. ^^; Point one is that I believe the initial design took alot larger margin then 10% in my recollection. And point two is, that they were always planning to drop it from orbit.

      Incidentally an airplane collision wouldn't do all that much, the plane likely would get wrecked, and the cable severed, whereafter it likely will remain hovering at near the same altitude it got cut. Reconnecting it might be to difficult though, Or maybe not, who knows.

      Quickshot

    2. Re:hmmmm by MisterLawyer · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well the best hope in my humbel opinion is the research may lead to better materials for seatbelts and bullet proof vests ..... the world needs a better 10 micron seatbelt....

      To clarify a little something for any non-physicists out there: Seat belts are designed to distribute force evenly across the strongest parts of a vehicle occupant's body (the hips and chest). We already have materials strong enough that 10 microns could restrain an accident victim, but a 10-micron seat belt would cut through your flesh, probably down to the bone in the case of an accident.

      In other words, the world does not need a better 10 micron seat belt.

    3. Re:hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably the point. If everyone was forced to wear a 10-micron seatbelt, people would drive a hell of a lot more carefully. We could save thousands of lives every day!

  30. Hmmm.... how funny by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    I thought that NASA had stopped funding their forward-thinking "breakthrough propulsion program." Perhaps not?

  31. for those who don't get the above joke... by funny-jack · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, Mr. Fuller had domes. The balls referred to above have his name in honor of the domes.

    --
    You probably shouldn't click this.
    1. Re:for those who don't get the above joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when I die, I hope my balls can be come someones house. Hell I wont need them either, I'll be dead (or going to get a new pair).

  32. Re:SUPERFLY TNT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuckin' awesome troll name I say!!

    Cool cat, keep up the good troll.

  33. Re:Article is wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning - parent contains link to gay porn and weird shit.

    Do not click parent link.

  34. Re:I, AlGore created the internet. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1, Informative



    I, AlGore created the internet.

    Many posts on this board accuse me of saying I only "invented the internet". This is patently false, I am greater than that, I said that "I took the initiative in creating the Internet" as the following interview with Mr. Blitzer will show.

    BLITZER: I want to get to some of the substance of domestic and international issues in a minute, but let's just wrap up a little bit of the politics right now.

    Why should Democrats, looking at the Democratic nomination process, support you instead of Bill Bradley, a friend of yours, a former colleague in the Senate? What do you have to bring to this that he doesn't necessarily bring to this process?

    GORE: Well, I will be offering - I'll be offering my vision when my campaign begins. And it will be comprehensive and sweeping. And I hope that it will be compelling enough to draw people toward it. I feel that it will be.

    But it will emerge from my dialogue with the American people. I've traveled to every part of this country during the last six years. During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet. I took the initiative in moving forward a whole range of initiatives that have proven to be important to our country's economic growth and environmental protection, improvements in our educational system.

    During a quarter century of public service, including most of it long before I came into my current job, I have worked to try to improve the quality of life in our country and in our world. And what I've seen during that experience is an emerging future that's very exciting, about which I'm very optimistic, and toward which I want to lead.



    Go play basketball with your buddy.

  35. NIAC by dmouw25 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I recently attended one of their conferences as a one of the student presenters. This is not a waste of money. Their grants come in two phases with the first one about $60,000 and the second phase much more. The amount they give is miniscule compared to potential rewards. As far as the space elevator, before I went to the conference I thought it was a joke as well, but it is a very viable concept. In response to the guy who made the comment about protecting it from planes, this will be constructed in the ocean and it would be very easy for a year round no fly zone. Also, if I remember correctly, the location was choosen because this area is storm free year round, but I am not sure on this point.

    1. Re:NIAC by wass · · Score: 1
      I would also imagine that the tension of the space elevator cable would make it nearly immune to plane attacks. Ie, an incoming plane would probably have it's wings ripped off by the line.

      In WWII the Brits used a 'wall' like this to protect against incoming German missiles/rockets. Helium balloons (big) would be tethered to the ground w/ a steel cable. Incoming missiles had the wings/fins ripped off and couldn't fly further inland.

      --

      make world, not war

  36. Re:Corny as it may be?...And it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nothing like waiting for a good meal to materialize in solar powered replicator.


    Or, as I like to call them, "plants."

  37. Good I can apply for a grant by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    The Warbot 1Alpha needs serious debugging. The nanobots got too smart and did serious upgrading beyond my control.

    I need funds so I can perfect the techniquie and build a billion of them to rule the world, er I mean explore space, yeah that's the ticket! :)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  38. MANIAC by nemeosis · · Score: 1

    Does NASA also have a group for the
    "Most Advanced NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts" as well?

  39. More at Defense Tech by noahmax · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a whole bunch more on NASA's way-out research over here.

  40. U.S Army videogame anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    US Army videogame.

    http://www.bluesnews.com/cgi-bin/articles.pl?sho w= 382

  41. MOD PARENT +6 by gomel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Imagine the investor response if GE said "We are going to build a space elevator, it will take us at least 25 years to complete it and cost the majority of our R&D budget for the whole time frame". That investor money would be voluntarily moved to Microsoft where (relatively) short term growth is much more likely.

    Rather than say "a dollar spent on NASA pipe dreams is a dollar taken from the public" I would say "A dollar spend on a NASA pipe dream is a dollar invested in the public's future". Not all investments pan out but many do.


    Exactly! Let me just add something:

    In some cases people who profit most are not those who pay the cost. The benefits are often externalized either in the form of lower prices through technology progress or by intellectual property moving into public domain (after some time). DARPA spend a lot of money on developing the predecessor of the Internet, which in turn reduced the cost of communication dramatically. They do not demand any royalties because of that.

    Companies need to have a shorter investment horizon than a government. Imagine an investment project whose costs are $10bln, but the profits are an expected cash flow of $200bln after 15 years. No company will invest, because it probably won't exist that long. But a government can do that because it is essentially immortal.

    --
    Fight Frist Psoting!
    Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
  42. Re:Web page design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you may be mistaken. Bad web designers charge more than good ones.

    It works on the idea that if a client is charged enough for a web site, they will be offended by any criticism whatsoever ("How dare you criticize my site! It cost $10,000!!).

    Not that I know anything about this kind of behaviour. Now, back to work on that site I was designing in MS Word. Time is money...

  43. FYI by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    Guardians of Order has secured the rights to publish all of Phage Press's product line. Mark McKinnon, the founder of GoO, was a regular on the Amber mailing list about the same time as I was many years ago. With Tekumel, Nobilis, and Amber, GoO is basically becoming a clearing-house for underappreciated yet brilliant games.

    Oh, and Amber player automatically go on my Friends list.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:FYI by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Thanks, Much appretiated. I'll keep my eye out for it (and thier other stuff) next time I go by the local gaming shop. Actually thier a small chain with 6-7 stores in St. Louis area, though the owner was talking with a someone seriously considering opening a franchise in the Chicago area.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea