Slashdot Mirror


Record Labels Push for iTunes Price Hike

csteinle writes "Looks like the major labels are getting their own way again. The New York Post reports that the price per track may be going up to $1.25, while the per album price for some albums could go as high as $16.99. The Register has its own take on this, too. Aren't you glad you starting paying for downloaded music?" Update: 05/07 19:15 GMT by M : Apple says their prices won't increase.

12 of 971 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Please... kill me now by palutke · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's so fucking stupid that I want to rip my nuts off, cook them, and then eat them.

    Yeah! That'll show 'em!

    --
    'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
  2. The RIAA. . . by noewun · · Score: 3, Funny
    Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

    Fucking idiots. They deserve whatever they get,.

    --
    I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  3. Re:Please... kill me now by SoTuA · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes! Terrific idea! After all, how expensive can it be to buy the record label that distributes "The Beatles"?

  4. Re:Please... kill me now by Q2Serpent · · Score: 5, Funny

    and go back to their tried and true anal ra... business model

    I think you meant "anal rape^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hbusiness model". Try changing your TERM environment variable; it may be set incorrectly.

  5. Film at Eleven by cgreuter · · Score: 4, Funny

    And so, laughing maniacally, the music industry snatches the gun from Apple and begins frantically shooting the stumps at the ends of its legs.

  6. Um, Did you learn math from Ross Perot? by UrgleHoth · · Score: 4, Funny

    You take 0.99 and subtract the line items:
    0.99-(0.70 + 0.20 + 0.10) = -0.01

    That mean that the artist OWES someone $0.01 for each song sold.

    --

    Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  7. Re:Please... kill me now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I heard that the Nazis used to do that too.

  8. Re:Please... kill me now by metlin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is there a mod for +5, Dream On? :)

  9. Re:Please... kill me now by driverEight · · Score: 3, Funny

    The problem is that the word "irregardless" breaks all rules about word construction in the English language. The root word is "regard". "regardless" means to have no regard, as per standard English suffixing rules. "irregardless" represents the negation of the word "regardless", as per standard English prefixing rules. So, it must mean to not not have regard for. IOW, it's a double negative, all in one word. It's like someone saying "unthaw" when they really mean "thaw"... it's just - plain - wrong! Watch what you say. Your ideas are inflammable.

    --

    It's not the size of your .sig that matters, it's how you use it.

  10. Re:Please... kill me now by Eccles · · Score: 3, Funny

    Unfortunately, you've fallen for one of the more classic blunders.

    ...the most famous of which is "Never get involved in a land war in Asia."

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  11. Re:Please... kill me now by supermojoman · · Score: 3, Funny

    But only slightly lesser known is, "Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!" Sorry, I couldn't resist.

  12. Re:Please... kill me now by SubconsciousSeraphim · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, I'm pretty sure he means Anal Ra, an obscure egyptian deity who was based on the sun god but was quite fastidious about his duties as a deity.