Slashdot Mirror


Amateur Rocket to Carry Ham Radio Payload to Space

n1ywb writes "An amateur rocket team this month will attempt to send a 21-foot-tall rocket carrying a ham radio avionics package into the fringes of space. The launch by the Civilian Space Xploration Team (CSXT) could occur as early as Monday, May 17. Some 20 months ago, the last CSXT try to reach space ended some three seconds after launch when the rocket's engine exploded. Avionics Team Leader Eric Knight, KB1EHE, says CSXT has since rebounded from that devastating blow with a newer, bigger vehicle. In terms of Amateur Radio, the GoFast rocket will transmit telemetry on the 33-cm amateur band and Amateur TV at 2.4 GHz using a high-quality color camera. The avionics also incorporate multiple global positioning system (GPS) systems to record the vehicle's precise location and flight path, redundant data acquisition and storage systems, and a variety of data sensors. Plans call for the solid-fuel rocket to zip upward from the desert floor and reach a speed of more than 4000 MPH in about 9 seconds. The suborbital vehicle will attain an altitude of 100 km or 62 statute miles--high enough to be considered 'space'--linger there for a couple of minutes then arc back to Earth some 26 miles down range. The whole thing will take somewhat less than a half-hour. If successful it would mark the first amateur rocket launch into space."

55 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. I suppose the X-prize is out the question by brejc8 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Imagine the rocket needed to take these three guys up there and back.

    1. Re:I suppose the X-prize is out the question by javatips · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a good thing they're sending a ham radio up

      don't tell me that they put a RFID tag on a pig and sending him in space!

    2. Re:I suppose the X-prize is out the question by ScottGant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Then again, those three guys you jest at actually did a cool thing. They dreamt about something and they up and made it. And it wasn't a cheap and easy feat either.

      In this cynical world where people crap on anything and everything someone else does...yet they themselves do nothing but sit and surf the web, it's refreshing to see someone actually BUILD something they think is cool, just for the sake of building it.

      --

      "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
  2. Webcast.. by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if they'll do a webcast of the TV signal for those of us out of range/without HAM equipment.

  3. Familiar Development Process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hey, it blew up!"
    "Guess we better build a bigger one."

    Sounds like management at my company...

    1. Re:Familiar Development Process by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously though, how smart is it to A)make it bigger and hence different and B)put equipment on there that isn't needed to test it out.

      Would it not be smarter to stick with on rocket and test and refine it to get it to work a couple of times then spend the money for the fancy broadcasting equipment...

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  4. Airbags? by purduephotog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does that model rocket come with an airbag?

    Honestly this is rather interesting. I've heard about the problems of establishing a GPS lock after a 25G sustained force- and that it's near impossible. Pulling it off is quite a feat.

    I don't understand why they are returning to earth so soon, however- shouldn't a parachute (which arguably wouldn't provide much slowdown with ~1000 molecules/cm3) delay the reentry more than 1/2 hour? Unless they are expecting to lawn dart ;)

    Here's to their success

    1. Re:Airbags? by mikeee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably no parachute is a ground safety issue; if they deploy one at that altitude, there's no telling where the thing might land.

    2. Re:Airbags? by kbonin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Recovery is a big problem for high power rocketry - how many hours downrange do you want to drive to get your rocket back?

      Normal approach is to eject a small drogue parachute near the apex of the flight, which is intended too let you lose lots of altitude without going to fast. It also keeps you from drifting too far from the launch site. Once you're close to the ground (via redundant altimeters) you eject the main chute to set it down 'relatively' gently.

    3. Re:Airbags? by confused+one · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFAs. It has parachutes (plural). It wouldn't deploy them until it's close to the ground. They're expecting it to land 30+miles downrange.

  5. One would think... by Power+Everywhere · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...that with all of the technology available nowadays we'd put something more advanced tham HAM radio into space. This is like using a submarine to deliver pizza.

    1. Re:One would think... by confused+one · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ham radio is advanced. They're using Ham frequencies most likely because they can do so without requiring special liscensing from the FCC for the transponder channels. All they need is one person who is a liscensed Ham radio operator on the ground.

  6. Xploration? by wtmcgee · · Score: 2, Funny

    they just HAD to use that 'X', didn't they?

    --
    *** For a better tommorow, change your life today ***
  7. Significant by Tuna_Shooter · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think most people don't realize the this is the FIRST non- governmental private ametuer vehicle to reach space. That by itselt is a VERY important milestone. I wish them well. !!

    --
    *--- Sometimes a majority only means that all the fools are on the same side. ---*
  8. Odd by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's amazing that the department of homeland insecurity would let ordinary people launch a homemade missile...

  9. Re:Ham Radio by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ha! Maybe so, but after BIGCO turns all our computers into useless purchasing appliances, the only cool hobby left will be ham radio.

    This post brought to you by an "old geezer".

    --
    What?
  10. Wish them luck! by BCW2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know if there is any real scientific value to this flight or not. But shooting a hobbists rocket into space is just cool. These folks are following in the footsteps of Goddard and the rest of the rocket pioneers. Not a bad path at all, they might even find something new. I hope they have fun, and everything works.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    1. Re:Wish them luck! by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is there scientific value to you driving your car to a movie? The future of space will not be driven by science, it will be driven by industry. Hobbyists are usually a reliable indicator of directions that industry will follow.

  11. Damn by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I thought it said "Rocket to Carry Spam Radio into space"

    I thought were sure to create even extra terrestrial enemies if were gonna start spamming space for crisake

  12. Okay, it's officially time... by Myself · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...to get my license ;)

    On that note, hams and electronics geeks in the midwest should note that it's time for Dayton Hamvention this weekend!

    Holy shit, this is cool even if it's very suborbital. I wonder how many years it'll be until the amsat launches are truly amateur-done :)

  13. Bah, amateur space enthusiasts... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    The amateur anti-missle defense club will try to shoot it down.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  14. Sounds cool to me by bigredmed · · Score: 3, Informative

    I realize that Ham radio seems passe' to the "basement full of Linux boxes" people, but its cool and this project, while rather unlikely to completely succeed would be cool to listen in on. For those of us who go outside, Ham is a great source of communication, as many people live where cell phone towers don't and many of the really cool places are not where cell phone towers are.

  15. Why? by slycer9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why is the /. crowd so anti-amateur radio?
    It's like, the original geekdom, and while a LOT of the geezers out there are boring as shit to talk to, there's a LOT of cool stuff going on.

    Tons of digital modes, (interfacing comps with radios), satellite coms, EME, meteor bounce.

    Really, it's just confusing to me that as a group, /. can still talk about how great pac-man was (with a straight face), and yet totally trash Amateur Radio.

    You want retro roots? THERE"S your roots.

    --
    Don't park drunk, accidents cause people.
    1. Re:Why? by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really, it's just confusing to me that as a group, /. can still talk about how great pac-man was (with a straight face), and yet totally trash Amateur Radio.

      I've had my license for ten years next month. I'm not on the air much anymore. Aside from emergency communications and such, the internet has ham radio beat hands down. Packet is STILL capped at 9600 bps as it was when I first got my ticket. Worldwide communications can take place easily over AIM, IRC and the like (no reliance on sunspots, can cuss and use encryption to your hearts content).

      I think there is a great educational value in ham radio, but the kids (who are the new blood to keep the hobby going forward) don't seem to be gravitating towards it in the face of such competition.

      Current hams, please feel free to correct me or debate the above.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Why? by hypnagogue · · Score: 2, Informative
      Packet is STILL capped at 9600 bps
      That's why hams are inducting 802.11b/g into Part 97 with the aid of 2.4gHz amplifiers. Just make sure you have WEP disabled, and are on the right channels.
      --
      Liberty you never use is liberty you lose.
    3. Re:Why? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Capped at 9600 bps? Hardly. Check out BayCom's USB modem - it does 78.6 kbps standard, 300 kbps max.

      Plus, you can run 802.11b/g with MUCH greater power and range than unlicensed users, provided you stay within the limits of Part 97 operation.

      Yeah, ragchewing is pretty lame when you've got the Internet. Never did much for me in the first place. My primary interest is in AVL, telemetry, and weather applications. The 'net doesn't do you much good when you haven't even got cell phone coverage.

    4. Re:Why? by sipy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your point appears to me to be that Ham Radio is no longer relevant. et tu, Brute? (You're a ham.) =)

      You just cited emergency communications, and said "aside from [that]". But "that" is one of the original justifications the government gave for creating the amateur radio system in the first place - to provide a mechanism for communications in times of disaster/crisis/where public safety is in jeapordy. This service to the public is still absolutely relevant.

      Just ask the victims of the Oklahoma City bombing, 9/11, any hurricane, most earthquakes, (in USA, Mexico, or even worldwide), and every other natural disaster where the existing communications infrastructure has been compromised (or overwhelmed by users).

      Not to mention - you'll see Amateur Radio operators helping out at every Cancer Walk/Run, March-of-Dimes event, (etc), and the list goes on.

      Treating Amateur Radio as irrelevant because it created, fostered, and/or promoted the technologies we all now enjoy (Auto Patch => Cell Phone, FAX => Telephone-based FAX, RTTY/BAUDOT => ASCII, GPRS => GPS handhelds, 220Mhz comm => Business Band, Walkie Talkies + Repeaters => Police/Fire/Ambulance trunking radio systems.....) is disingenuous. Many of the very technologies that you've cited above were either created, fostered, or promoted to the masses by Amateur Radio.

      Ham radio is not irrelevant. In fact, the exact opposite is true - it's actually way ahead of it's time!

      Look for the Next Big Thing(tm) to start now, and first, in the Amateur Radio world.

      - Mike S.
      Licensed since 1978

  16. Only 100km? Whew... Well my $1000 is safe. by Baldrson · · Score: 4, Insightful
    For a moment there I was concerned I'd have to fork over $1000 for The Bowery Award For Amateur Rocketry but that's for 200km and this is only 100km. It is, however, not too hard to get from 100km to to 200km given the lack of air resistance at that altitude.

    PS: That award offer will have been outstanding for a decade come a year from this coming fall.

    PPS: Does anyone know why the CATS prize had (and Ansari X-Prize has) time limits?

  17. You are just pissed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    that someone nerdier than you is doing this.

    My Dad is an Extra licensed Ham, and there ain't no bigger nerd in the world than a Ham.

  18. You sound like my girlfriend :( by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Funny
    Sure the thing can blow up. Or fail to ignite. Or fallover. All happened to other launches around the world no matter who did them.

    But apart from the joke value it would be real fun if they succeeded. Not truly important but nice to know that space exploration has become so "easy" that individuals can put a payload up there without needing a superpower to fund the project.

    Good luck.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  19. Good point- by purduephotog · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've chased an Estes rocket launched with 2D's in stages nearly 1 mile before it came back to earth, and I don't believe it got over 3500Feet (damn air currents).

    I cant imagine what a 62 mile arc would give it ;)

  20. What you don't know... by ParadoxicalPostulate · · Score: 2, Funny


    Ah, but what the public doesn't know is that the government is also testing the Star Wars Alpha Module on May 17th.

    Looks to me like the CSXT will earn the honors of having the first vessel destroyed in space combat.

  21. Caution Rant mode is on! by KD7JZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What a bunch of damn whiners. These are folks that are basically doing the Slashdot thing (learning, exploring, trying). Yes it amateur radio, but it is telemetry data and full motion color video. Hurray for them trying!

    1. Re:Caution Rant mode is on! by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      I thought the "Slashdot thing" was whining.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  22. Re:Linger? by hopemafia · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, linger. The vertical velocity of the rocket decreases to 0 at the top of its trajectory and then accelerates downward due to gravity, therefore the rocket will spend a longer time at the top than at any other point in its journey (besides the ground...). Thus linger is the appropriate term.

    --
    If God had had a computer it would have taken him 7 months to create the earth...if he even bothered to do it at all.
  23. Re:Huh ? Why ? by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny
    Why a Ham radio

    Didn't you get the press release? They need to achieve an altitude of at least 50 miles in order for the broadcast to be heard over the interference of your local powerline broadband provider. Space has nothing to do with it.

    In all seriousness I wonder what the impacts on a mission like this would be? Yet something else to consider in our BPL debate. Queue up the hams (I'm one of them) and the "broadband at any cost to the rest of the world" arguments!

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  24. Re:I cannot contain my excitement by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Funny

    After several launches and recoveries, I thought it would be a good idea to launch my hamster, Insomnia. When I found him, he looked like an overcooked waffle.

    I dont think I realized until just then the implications of removing the parachute to create the hamsters "quarters".

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  25. A Unique Recovery Plan by Eagle5596 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually the site says they intend for the recovery to be parachuteless, they decided to see what the effect of such a tall rocket would be if it impacted Lindon, Utah at several thousand miles per hour. Darl McBride will be waiting at the landing site with a target strapped to his forhead to aid in the experiment.

  26. Next step: amateur Sputnik! by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Russia launched the first satellite in October 1957. The 50th anniversary is less than 3 1/2 years away.

    It would be great if someone could get an amateur rocket to put a satellite into orbit in October 2007 to celebrate the anniversary. At this rate, it might even be possible.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:Next step: amateur Sputnik! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not even close yet. The R-7 rocket that launched Sputnik weight 280 tons and was 28m long.

    2. Re:Next step: amateur Sputnik! by BrodyVess · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, the CSS Hunley was turned by a hand cranked screw and took 9 men in a 35 foot submarine to sink a wooden warship. A commited hobbiest could probably build a ship with the same capability with a crew of 1, an electric motor, and clock it in at 8 or 10 feet.

      That being said, I doubt that if we re-launched sputnik today it would require the same size rocket. Engine efficiencies have increased by several orders of magnitude.

      --
      No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
  27. APRS by Eagle5596 · · Score: 3, Informative

    APRS: Automatic Position Reporting System. It's a great way to use a ham radio to connect two devices together, especially for telemetry data.

  28. Re:Only 100km? Whew... Well my $1000 is safe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know about CATS, but the X-prize (before Ansari stepped up) was funded by insurance -- basically, the X Prize foundation found an insurance company willing to gamble that no one would be successful and the prize wouldn't be awarded. The time limit was necessary before the insurers would assume the risk.

  29. My first thought upon reading the title. by 955301 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now there is a guy who's fed up with being a HAM radio operator.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  30. Cheaper, but still fun by Rorschach1 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Rockets are great, but for getting to the 'edge of space' and staying there for longer periods, balloons are a lot easier and cheaper, though they can still be pretty challenging.

    Check out Edge of Space Sciences and Arizona Near Space Research for some good examples.

    Balloons are a great opportunity to experience the engineering challenges of launching, tracking, and communicating with a payload under harsh conditions without the risk of things blowing up.

    I haven't built my own yet, but telemetry encoders (site down at the moment, freaking DSL) I've designed have flown on a couple of flights, and I've got a K-size cylinder of helium in the garage begging to be put to use, so it's probably only a matter of time.

  31. PIGS... IN... SPAACE! by CamShaft · · Score: 2, Funny

    Jim Henson clearly owns the IP to space pork, I'm sure his estate's attorneys will be contacting these Ham Rocketeers soon

  32. About the launch site... by ikluft · · Score: 5, Informative
    I talked with some of CSXT's Avionics Team about what would happen when this went up on Slashdot. And here it is. We figured it's inevitable that some people will try to show up even though it's short notice and a really inhospitable location.

    Bear in mind that the launch site is far away from populated areas on purpose. Over there in the deep desert, that presents a survival issue for anyone who comes unprepared. There is no city infrastructure that most people are used to - it's a wilderness. If you wander off and get lost and stuck, you may survive for days but not be discovered for weeks. That's why you should take this seriously.

    Cell phones do not work out there. It's well over an hour's drive from the nearest cell site. Amateur Radio and satellite phones are the only reliable communications out there. If you don't have those, don't wander away from the paved roads and the launch site.

    So if I haven't scared you away yet, here's some info that hopefully will help you survive out there. Remember that in the desert, bring your own drinking water - and lots of it. I have a web page about the Black Rock Desert. I have a page with a minimal camping checklist. Even if you're planning to stay in a motel, bring enough camping gear to survive overnight and wait for a rescue if you get stuck. (Overnight temperatures are usually in the 20's and 30's this time of year.) But don't go wandering off where no one knows to look for you. And lastly, see our page about "How to avoid needing a rescue at Black Rock", which we wrote after participating in many rescues of stranded people out there.

    I'm going to be out there with the Stratofox Aerospace Tracking & Recovery Team. We consider it an enormous privilege that CSXT has invited us to assist at their launch.

  33. Re:I cannot contain my excitement by rspress · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually Ham radio has been using TV, GPS data mapping, Packet and TCI/IP for many years.

    Packet is like the Ham equivalent of the internet with its own email system, file downloads and chat all via the computer and over radio. I was doing IM on packet long before there was IM for the internet.

    With the APRS system, people all over the world can trace the exact position of the rocket via GPS over radio in real time via a GUI with map overlays. It can also help locate the payload when it returns. Something a bug or hamster would have a hard time doing.....unless it was connected to Richard Gere.

    Ham radio may sound kinda dorky but a lot of internet tech has come from hams and visa-versa.

  34. Re:I cannot contain my excitement by rspress · · Score: 2, Informative

    A good primer can be found here:
    http://www.choisser.com/packet/part01.html

  35. Re:Folks, by zenyu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please keep in mind that Amateurs have primary use of much of the 2.4GHz spectrum.

    Amateurs have co-secondary use of channels 1-6, and no use of 7-11. They have primary use of a portion of the spectrum used by channel 1, so they can interfere with ISL use on that channel (and 2,3,4 actually), but probably not with unmoded 802.11b equipment (A filter that cuts out the high end, or better yet a mod that lowers the "carrier frequency*" a bit.) Now this still lets hams transmit at much higher power on channels 1-6 than part 15 users, but they still have to accept interference, respond to complaints of interference, and also can't allow commercial or encrypted traffic to be transmitted over their system. And, hams must transmit their license id periodically and prominently; this lets you find the cretin that transmits 100 Watts through their dipole.

    * 802.11b is a spread spectrum technology so there isn't a carrier frequency per say, but actually a set of frequencies per channel, some of which are above the frequency allocation for primary use for hams even on channel 1.

  36. Re:Why a solid fuel engine by other_things_to_do · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Solid Engines = Cheap & Simple
    Liquid Engines = Expensive & Complicated

  37. homer's waiting on the ISS by Transcendent · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Mmmm.... hhaammm..."

  38. When pigs fly by theblacksun · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's just a little airborn, it's still good! It's still good! It's gone Homer.

    --
    Ignorance kills, complacency kills, hatred kills, but usually not the ones guilty of them.
  39. Re:oh yeah? by ikluft · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Amateur would be more precisely described as not getting paid for your time. BTW, unpaid doesn't mean unprofessional.

    But you've got the right point that this launch is especially significant in that there was no government funding for development or operations. So if it succeeds (as we all hope it will) then it'll be the first suborbital space launch without funding from any government in the history of the world.

    Let's go make history!

  40. Orbital Mechanics 101 by ikluft · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just a rule of thumb - any object which is launched at less than 17,000 mph will not achieve orbit, and will fall back to the ground. But even on a suborbital flight, the faster it goes, the farther away it can land.

    The reason for this is because an orbit is where your rate of escape from the Earth equals your rate of fall. So anything which is in orbit effectively falls in an endless circle around the world.

    This is true of any object in space - larger objects have stronger gravity which increases the rate of fall, requiring faster speeds to orbit them. i.e the Earth takes a year to orbit the Sun, by definition, but covers enormous distance in that time. But orbits can be slower around smaller objects like Mars or the Moon.

    So even in orbit you haven't escaped gravity. You'd have to go about 25,000 mph to escape the Earth's gravity, which would just put you in orbit around the Sun. So gravity is always a factor.

    Anyway, back to the subject of the CSXT launch... The press release said that CSXT's rocket will go 4000 mph, better than any previous amateur launch. So since that's less than 17,000 mph, it's a suborbital launch and it will fall back to the ground. It'll land less than 30 miles away from the launch site.

    I'll be part of the search team who goes to retrieve it.