Slashdot Mirror


Lithium-Sulfur Batteries Unveiled

mobilemag writes "Sion Power is showing off its new Lithium-Sulfur battery design this week at the Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC). SION believes that its new Lithium-Sulfur (Li-S) batteries are the answer to the power hungry devices on the market today."

43 of 270 comments (clear)

  1. Isn't this already obsolete? by shaitand · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://www.army-technology.com/contractors/electri cal/ultralife/

    1. Re:Isn't this already obsolete? by georgewilliamherbert · · Score: 4, Informative
      No, it isn't already obsolete;
      the Ultralife rechargable batteries
      have half (max 162 Wh/kg) the energy
      density of the new Sion Lithium-Sulphur
      cells (300 Wh/kg).


      See:



      Sion tech description



      Ultralife batteries specs sheet

    2. Re:Isn't this already obsolete? by shaitand · · Score: 3, Informative

      lol ok by extraordinarily popular demand, here it is, in proper link form!

      Ultralife

      And the reason why this old article obsoletes these newly unveiled magic technology (specifically talked about within) is in this quote:

      "The future of lithium battery technology lies in Li/MnO2, a solid-cathode chemistry. Unlike both Lithium/Sulphur Dioxide (Li/SO2) and Lithium/Thionyl Chloride (Li/SOCl2), which are liquid-cathode chemistries, Li/MnO2 does not suffer from the effects of passivation, which causes liquid-cathode batteries to suffer from a voltage delay phenomenon causing the cell voltage to be depressed when a load is applied, particularly after extended periods of storage with no use. This condition is exacerbated at low temperatures resulting in the possibility that a liquid cathode battery may not start up when called into use. Li/MnO2 batteries, which are inherently safer than the other types of lithium batteries, do not suffer from the voltage delay phenomenon."

  2. Bloody Yanks... by Prowl · · Score: 5, Funny

    its sulphur

    --
    That man tried to kill mah Daddy
    1. Re:Bloody Yanks... by BigBadBri · · Score: 5, Funny
      It ain't sulfur, boy - that there is good ol' Biblical brimstone!

      The Lord has sent these here batteries to power the iBooks of the Sodomites, and will smite them mightily!

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    2. Re:Bloody Yanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      it's "sulfur" now, the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry says so.

    3. Re:Bloody Yanks... by dotwaffle · · Score: 4, Funny

      IUPAC don't speak for England. They're international. So they're commie chemists! Sulphur! Honour! Colour! Crisps!

  3. Excellent for the Chinese Market by BigBadBri · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the article:

    Li-S could be easily packed into the tinniest devices

    That means it'll be great for powering my tinny DVD, my tinny digital camera, in fact anything tinny and of far-Eastern manufacture.

    --
    oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    1. Re:Excellent for the Chinese Market by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "That means it'll be great for powering my tinny DVD, my tinny digital camera, in fact anything tinny and of far-Eastern manufacture."

      Oh good, I can finally have a heart!

      -TM

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  4. Very nice. by i_am_syco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about heat? I know that isn't always a big deal with batteries, but if you've got a device like a laptop, it can become a huge issue. I can imagine these powering the PowerBook G6 or something.

  5. Yeah right. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Li-S still has a long ways to go, only at half the current polymer electrolyte fuel cell technology runtimes and with a maximum of 300 recharge cycles. Polymer electrolyte fuel cells are planned for release as early as 2007, while Li-S is still 3-5 years away.

    Right, so much for 'news'. Call me when "still 3-5 years away" becomes "now available", then we'll give it a good look. As for fuel cells, they have been coming "Real Soon Now" (C) since... What? ... 2000 or so? Chances are we'll be stuck with Li-Ion batteries for quite a few years to come.

    1. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Quick update on fuel cells:

      The biggest problem of putting fuel cells into small electronics is the heat generated. Only the PEM (Proton Exchange Membrane) type fuel cell can operate at low temperatures (as low as 80 C). Obviously this is a little too warm, so it isn't really useful for an MP3 player just yet.

      PEM fuel cells must operate with hydrogen or use an external reformer to seperate hydrogen from a hydrocarbon. The big thing that prevents PEM fuel cells from becoming commercially viable (like being used in cars) is that a platinum catalyst must be used so most of the research on PEM fuel cells is to reduce the amount of platinum needed.

  6. cool by hdd · · Score: 5, Funny

    " Li-S is still 3-5 years away." Wow just in time for 4.6Ghz longhorn laptops!

    --
    This Sig is removed due to factual inaccuracy
    1. Re:cool by Mr2cents · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would make a great platform to play "Duke Nukem Forever" on! Drool...

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  7. Fix a different problem... by smart.id · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How about instead of making better batteries, we make it so the electronics don't use as much electricity? I think working on effeciency would be better. If someone is more knowledgable about this subject, though, feel free to correct me.

    --
    blog & fiction: jd87
    1. Re:Fix a different problem... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How about instead of making better batteries, we make it so the electronics don't use as much electricity?

      That's the approach that Apple takes. Their iBook line gets ~4 hours on a single charge. The problem is that they're bumping up against the lower limits of power consumption while still offering reasonable performance. If you want lower power consumption, you're going to have to give something up. That something is screen size, processor speed, hard disk, and memory.

      Personally, I'd like a little Pu-238 to power my laptop with. I figure that about 600 grams would power my laptop nonstop for ~40 years.

    2. Re:Fix a different problem... by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Of course they do that already. But there's only so low the power consumption can go and still provide reasonable performance.

      Personally, I think the laptop fuel cell mentioned in the article is a million times more interesting than this battery. Available as soon as 2007, they say, with capacity about four times higher than conventional batteries and of course the ability to be refueled instantly.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    3. Re:Fix a different problem... by Indian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Batteries are not used just in electronics. Just think of hybrid cars, pacemakers etc. Having a portable, high energy density power source benifits a lot more things than just "electronics".

    4. Re:Fix a different problem... by hayden · · Score: 4, Funny
      Personally, I'd like a little Pu-238 to power my laptop with. I figure that about 600 grams would power my laptop nonstop for ~40 years.
      I can see the marketing slogan now.

      "The battery that kills you long before it runs out"

      --
      Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
    5. Re:Fix a different problem... by mchappee · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Batteries are not used just in electronics.

      That's the funniest thing I've heard today. What else are they used in? Salads?

      Matthew

      --
      /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
    6. Re:Fix a different problem... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hate to spoil a joke, but I'm going to use this opportunity to inject some radiation education:

      1. Pu-238 is an Alpha Emitter.
      2. Alpha particles can't penetrate your skin (or even a sheet of paper) and are only dangerous if they are inhaled.
      3. From the EPA: "The isotope, plutonium-238, is not useful for nuclear weapons. However it generates significant heat through its decay process, which make it useful as a power source. Using a thermocouple, a device that converts heat into electric power, satellites rely on plutonium as a power source. Tiny amounts also provide power to heart pacemakers."

      Know anyone who's got a pacemaker?

    7. Re:Fix a different problem... by Trogre · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I still think there's a lot of potential in recyclable computing. Where the bit bucket is wired not to ground, but to a secondary storage like a capacitor.

      Every time a 1 becomes a 0, the battery is charged.
      Every time a 0 becomes a 1, the battery is drained a bit.

      Only when the battery is empty would external power above the recycling overhead be required. I guess the question is whether this can be done while keeping the amount of energy needed for the recycling circuits below the amount of energy saved. /. did an article on this some time last year but I can't find it.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  8. Hmmmm... by Alexis+Brooke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, these batteries might smell bad, but atleast they won't be depressed about it.

    --
    This is a special excite .sig
    This
  9. Light on details? by Monkelectric · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It all comes down to how many mah (milliamp-hours) the battery can output, and the voltage/drain curve (not sure what the correct name for this is), and I don't see either of those things on this website. So until then, don't bother getting excited.

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Light on details? by JesseL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      With the size, cost, and efficiency of buck/boost switching voltage regulators improving the way they are, I don't think that the discharge curve will be as critical as it used to be.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    2. Re:Light on details? by iammaxus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not so insightful... What you probably meant to say was "how many milliamp hours the battery stores", but this is also incorrect. Current-time (mah) is a measure of how long a battery can output a certain current, but this does not let you compare the batteries power to batteries of other voltages. The true measure of how "powerful" these batteries are is power or energy per volume or density depending on what you really care about. power is usually given in watts and energy in watt-hours (for batteries). energy per volume is probably important in cell phones while energy (and power)per mass is probably more important in something like an electric car or maybe a laptop. As for not getting excited because the companies website doesn't mention these details, a quick Google search turns up much of this information. A Lithium Sulfur battery does appear to be significantly better. Its discharge curve (i think thats what you were thinking of) also appears to be relatively flat. This means that it maintains the same

      Of course there are many other important factors in a battery other than these such as the shelf life and "memory effect" but in general, this technology does appear to be as exciting as batteries get.

  10. The Manufacturer has more information by PatrickThomson · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
  11. Standard Cell Sizes? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't say anything about the cell sizes. (It does say "with a better power/weight ratio than anything on the market, Li-S could be easily packed into the tinniest devices"

    The thing that's so attractive to me about NiMH's is they come in standard AAA and AA sizes. I make sure all my electronics take those (instead of say Lithimum Ion, which is usually proprietary), and then I can run everything on the same "fleet" of batteries.

    I hope this tech follows suit. (I imagine it won't at first, but will eventually)

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  12. Mmmm... by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q. what would the battery industry give me if I developed a lightweight, portable, inexhaustible power supply?

    A. A horse's head in my bed.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
  13. ... or reduce power consumption! by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    My laptop has a fan and blows out hot air.My ARM-based PDA at 400MHz is so cool you can't even tell that it is turned on.

    The major reason we need these ultra-fast and hot Pentiums in our machines is crap, inefficient software. Look at Longhorn: it wants 2G of RAM and a two CPUs.

    A friend of mine has a RiscOS box running a 100MHz ARM cpu. It is slicker than my Winshit PC with a 2GHz processor.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  14. Re:Mmmm sulfur by no+longer+myself · · Score: 5, Informative
    Environmentally speaking the lithium currently in use is probably more of a threat, and cadmium is most definitely not something you want to eat.

    We produce tons of sulfur waste every day simply because it's an abundant element to begin with. It may not smell nice when mixed with other things (as pure sulfur in its crytal form is nearly oderless), but it doesn't pose a significant health risk.

    Heavy metals, petrolium distilates, and other exotic chemicals are still the greatest threat to landfill leaching.

    All in all, with only 300 charges, I'll keep my fingers crossed they come up with something better.

  15. Meanwhile... by k4_pacific · · Score: 3, Funny

    Across the street at the Windows Reverse-Engineering Hardware Conference, a group of hackers got one of the Lithium-Sulpher batteries to work in a laptop running Linux.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
  16. Impact on the environment... by deragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, what will be the impact of this kind of battery on the environment, once it is disposed? Anybody can speculate?

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
  17. OMG sulfur is teh stink! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    For Crissakes people, if you own a car you're driving around with a Lead-Acid battery. Guess what type of acid it uses? Sulfuric. As in it has sulfur in it. Does your car smell like farts or rotten eggs? Not unless you're farting in it.

    UPS systems also use AGM (absorbed glass mat) lead acid batteries. Don't smell any farts coming out of your UPS, do you?

    Likewise, no, your laptop or PDA will not smell because of a battery containing sulfur. You'll have to keep blaming your flatulence on the dog.

    1. Re:OMG sulfur is teh stink! by pbi · · Score: 4, Informative

      H2SO4 is much different to H2S, olfactory wise. H2SO4, sulfuric acid, is what is used in car batteries. H2S, hydrogen sulfide, is the rotten egg smell. SO2, sulfur dioxide, is a colorless, odorless gas that can suffocate in large quantities.

      I think that the sulfur containing batteries are using alkyl sulfate, SO3- (immobilized, bonded on the polymer), no smell. However, there is another possibility that the polymer is using mercaptans or alkyl thiols. Depending on the purity of the polymer, it can stink (not completely bonded with leftover thiols) or not stink (all are bonded, without any leftover thiols).

      The alkyl sulfate polymer make sense as charge carriers, but the Li+ could be too intimate (closely bonded) to the SO3- group to make it a viable group. OTOH, alkyl thiols can work just as good, however these polymeric compounds are not quite that easy to synthesize. PEO, polyethylene oxide (CH2CH2O)x, is a polymer that has been used for many battery applications. Possibly, they could have something close to PEO using sulfur.

  18. This means.. by daishin · · Score: 5, Funny

    That Longhorn will be able to run on a laptop more than 30 minutes!

    --
    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. Add Bunny to your signature
    (> <) to help him achieve world domination.
  19. Could laptops once again be portable? by steve426f · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With gaming laptops weighing in at nearly 10lbs. and a battery life between 50 minutes and two hours, it seems they are less than portable.

    Perhaps the Lithium-Sulfur batteries can provide a reasonable amount of time without adding weight--bringing portability back to laptops. Afterall, all of the wireless technologies are useless when you're tied to an AC outlet.

  20. This has great potential by daishin · · Score: 3, Funny

    For portable personal-pleasure devices...

    Umm...I mean something running GNU/Linux ofcourse!

    --
    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. Add Bunny to your signature
    (> <) to help him achieve world domination.
  21. Really? by rixstep · · Score: 3, Funny

    SION believes that its new Lithium-Sulfur (Li-S) batteries are the answer to the power hungry devices on the market today.

    Really?

    They're an answer to Bill Gates, Steve Ballmer, and Microsoft?

  22. The real reason they used Sulphur... by GrpA · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is so that when you're working late in a confined machine room, 3 hours past midnight, the smell of burning sulphur will remind you that you're in Tech Hell...

    --
    Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
  23. Re:what is the big deal? by HuguesT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You missed the 2V thing. Storage is energy, and so measured in Joules or Watt-hours, not mAh, (or if you want, mAh at a given voltage).

    Sulphur: 2*4.5 = 9 Wh
    NiMH : 1.25*5 = 6.25 Wh

    So sulphur is better, if not by that much.

  24. More powerful batteries are nice, but... by dylan.ucd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    why have people forgotten about hardware/software efficiency? instead of using x86-based lap heaters, why not develop more low-power hardware around crusoe and or ppc-based processors.... ? my ppc laptop (500mhz G4) runs cool with no fan and accomplishes everything that a standard research student would be doing, plus many advanced modelling/GIS/rendering/image processing/ and map making functions... all with a 3hr+ battery time on 6 yr old Li-ion batteries...

    furthermore: stop writting/using bloated software!!! i can run my word processor/ of choice on a couple mb or ram, with the HD spun down for hours.... on a machines with less than 20mb of ram and a 33mhz processor... of course i use these same applications on more modern hardware.

    point is: efficient software/hardware can save much more power than these new batteries can provide. yeah, new batteries are great- but why does simple computing have to be so damn energy intensive???

  25. My Lithium 2 cents by Becho62282 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Okay, I have been working with Lithium Chemistries in batteries for 4 years now as a member of the UMR Solar Car Team (http://solar42.umr.edu).

    First a few things about Lithium based batteries. When they say a cycle life of 300 or 500 cycles that means the 80% thresh hold. In other words at 300 or 500 cycles, the "lifetime" of the battery you will still see 80% capacity when all those cycles are through. That doesn't signify the end of the battery either, we have some LG Chemical Lithium Ions (176 Wh/kg) that are 4 years old and still doing well. The problem is that after 2 years the chemicals inside the battery start reacting and could theoretically internally short, causing a dead battery, fires, or the classic cell phone battery explosion, yes that can happen. For this reason we are going to be disposing of those batteries soon, they pose a chemical hazard, you should also do that after 2 years with your cell phone battery just incase.

    In comparison to Nickels, Li batteries are much better 90-95% charge efficient (what you get out compared to what you put in). Nickels range from 60-75%. They are MUCH more energy dense (175 Wh/Kg - 500 Wh/Kg (theoretical limit I think)) while Nickels range in the 75 Wh/Kg range. And oh yeah Lithiums don't get hot, one crucial issue with Nickel based batteries is the end of charge temperature can hit 150+. Also cycle life is better Nickels can get about 200 cycles before they hit the 80% mark, and well that is only if you treat them very nicely. Lithiums are more forgiving with some missuse (just don't over volt them).

    So all in all Lithium Chemistries are pretty much the best battery format out there now, and for a while too. Lithium is the most energy dense element after all. This is why everyone is switching over to them for just about any serious work. sure cycle life is low, nothing compared to a Lead Acid, but companies are working on that, hell 5 years ago a lithium cell that lasted 200 cycles was impressive now Kokam sells Lithiums with 500 cycles and still 80% life with a starting capacity of over 200 Wh/Kg, roughly 4 times as energy dense as a Lead Acid.

    Thanks for reading if you made it this far.