Slashdot Mirror


Groklaw Turns One

JuliusRV writes "Today is Groklaw's one-year anniversary! As PJ writes, 'What a difference a year makes. When we started, all the headlines were saying that SCO was going to destroy Linux or at least make it cry. Now, looking around today, I see almost everyone predicting SCO's imminent doom instead. I think the truth, as usual, isn't in the headlines, and that it's somewhere in between those two extremes.' Thanks, PJ and all other Groklawyers, keep up the good work!"

19 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. First p0st! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    YEP!

  2. Ooh must be my lucky day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    First p0st. I pwnz0r j00. WHO loves FOOSBALL!!!!!

    1. Re:Ooh must be my lucky day by ircbuddy · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Stop whining.

  3. Did I get... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    first?

  4. Poastest with da Mostest! by RumpRoast · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    w00t!

    --

    My Ass hurts.
  5. Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I proudly say...

    IANAL.

  6. Re:effects by E_elven · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I'm going to create a company the secret purpose of which is to unify all people against AOL shorthand. YMMV.

    --
    Marxist evolution is just N generations away!
  7. In soviet russia by aussie_a · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    the article makes these stupid soviet russia jokes

  8. Re:effects by name773 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    against AOL shorthand
    also known as aolbonics

  9. Re:It is normal for a story to turn this way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Easiest way to get a girl is by putting a ring on your ring finger.

  10. Because I've seen it with all threads this weekend by richdun · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    In Soviet Russia, Law Groks You!

  11. Re:Remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    As well as:
    + Other detective said he wanted to put all black people in a pile and burn them
    + Other dectective "misplaced" a half vial of OJ's blood on a late night trip to the crime scene
    + Other detective also happened to be the one who found all the evidence, including a pin head sized drop of blood on OJ's car at 5:00 in the morning
    + Blood on OJs sock shown to have soaked right through from one side to the other, indicating it was placed on the sock when there was no foot in it
    + Lead Detective testified that Ron Goldman put up a fight for his life yet OJ had no marks or bruises on his body except a small scratch on his hand

  12. Re:Remember... by killjoe · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Completely off topic but...

    I know it's contraversial but IMHO OJ should have been aquitted. I watched the trial obsessively and quickly came to the conclusion that OJ murdered his wife and her friend AND the police tried to frame him. The police probably realized that the case would be hard to prove so they doctored the crime scene and planted the glove.

    Under these circumstances even the guilty should be aquitted so as not to incentivise the police to plant evidence.

    --
    evil is as evil does
  13. Re:If only... by arkhan_jg · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The thing about government monitoring and privacy is this:

    a) it's involuntary. People don't mind their doctors having their medical records, their electric company having their usage data so it can predict their bills, the phone company recording what numbers they called for how long for billing. People do mind someone taking all that data, without permission, and collecting it.

    If you want to look at central agencies knowing a lot about us, look at credit reference agencies. A lot of the time, the information they hold is out of date or just plain wrong. Personally, I dislike that some credit agency has so many records on me, but since it's impossible to get loans without such a record, and you can't stop them collecting the info on you anyway, I just have to suck it up. A government agency doing the same would be just as inaccurate in it's data, and would use it for far worse things, i.e. bugging people to gather evidence, interrogating them in secret for intelligence, or worst of all, lock them up without trial for an unlimited period - all based upon indications in a private database we know nothing about, don't have access to, and didn't agree to be collected.

    b) which leads onto my second point. Such a government database is unbalanced. They know all about us, we know nothing about them. In a small community, you have virtually no privacy. But the people that move there through choice like that. It's balanced, everyone knows everything about everyone else, and it leads to greater social interaction. Equally, if you live in a city centre, you likely will know nothing at all about most or even all of your neighbours. But again, that privacy is equal - nobody knows anything.

    In a sense, that distributed, non-profit internet based investigation would resolve both those problems. The information it gathers is hardly held in secret, it's there for anybody who wants it. The information it would gather would, de facto, be information in the public domain, i.e. information publically given out. Don't forget, the p-p-powerbook scammer gave over his email address, physical address and telephone number voluntarily, in the process of trying to commit fraud. Finally, it would be balanced (mostly) as anyone could try to use such a system to gain information, judged on it's merits to the crowd - a form of meta jury.

    The biggest flaw I see in such a system is not the invasion of privacy (as long as they don't start doing illegal things, like bugging phone conversations) but that it could turn into mob justice - a crowd so convinced of someones guilt, they ignore the evidence and jump straight to punishment. Sending a joke package to defraud a fraudster has a certain amount of karmic justice to it, but imagine if they'd sent something dusted with a diuretic? or a poison? Imagine, if instead of reporting the scammer to the police, the London agents had just taken him out back in the alley, and given him a kicking? (Assuming they'd found him) Not that I'm impuging the SA guys, and saying they would have; but it's a thin line between a mob investigation, and a mob action, as many a modern lynching illustrates.

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  14. Re:Remember... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The OJ trial was heavily colored by racism due to decades of repusisive behavior by the LAPD. The lead detective was an admitted racist. They had a race riot there a few years before the trial, you know. By saying "It is not a race issue" you just look like a 420 DOODZ!! hippy shithead.

  15. Re:15 Minutes Over in 3...2...1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Mod parent up, not down. If you think it's flamebait, trolling or Darl McBride himself, please first go check Groklaw's forum out for yourself, and then mod the post (according to your informed opinion).

    PJ does a top job investigating and making sense of the SCO lawsuit, but her website (forum) keeping is another story. Or maybe it's the rest of the guys there, dunno. But the parent post is correct -- unfortunately!

  16. Re:Great work, Detective Shitbrick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You've led an exciting and interesting life.
    Unfortunetly it's all been in your head.
    Seek help. You need it. Seriously.

  17. Re:Remember... by Killall+-9+Bash · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    + If the glove did not fit, you must acquit.

    ok.

    step 1-find yourself a pair of tighly-fitting gloves
    step 2-put on some latex gloves
    step 3-try (and fail) to put the gloves on over the latex gloves
    step 4-kill yourself for being an idiot.

    --
    "Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016