Slashdot Mirror
Fathers of Linux Revealed: Tooth Fairy & Santa Claus
An anonymous reader writes "The Alexis de Tocqueville Institute, which published the results of their very thorough investigation today, turned out to be right. Linus really isn't the father of the Linux operating system. After having been found out, Linus had no choice but to admit -- this is what he has to say: 'Ok, I admit it. I was just a front-man for the real fathers of Linux, the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus.'"
Article Text: LW Slashdotted already
LinuxWorld Exclusive: Linus Torvalds Makes Startling Admission, Discloses *Real* Fathers of Linux May 17, 2004 Summary As only Linus Torvalds can, the undisputed - except by the Alexis de Tocqueville Institute - inventor of Linux has as promised let LinuxWorld have his immediate comment on the AdTI's president's claims this morning that the parentage of Linux is in doubt. Read his startling admission exclusively here.
"Ok, I admit it. I was just a front-man for the real fathers of Linux, the Tooth Fairy and Santa Claus."
No more Micro$oft bashing from me. Its like bashing at the special olympics.
"It's a good thing Linus has a sense of humor. He might smite them down."
I wouldn't be sickened by this comment if it had been modded funny instead of insightful...
They don't exist. Santa Clause is just the Easter Bunny in disguise.
What do you mean it doesn't? The story is in the "It's funny, laugh" section.
On the Twilight Zone TV show, at least, the Tooth Fairy was male.
Commonly "soft" and "hard" (or some other appropriate adjectives) atheism are distinguished from one another and from agnosticism.
Agnosticism: We are incapable of knowing whether or not God exists
"hard" atheism: God does not exist
"soft" atheism: There is insufficient evidence to believe in God, or belief in God is irrational.
Database last updated 17-May-2004 19:14:38 EDT.
.net (and maybe .com too) database - which has obviously been very recent.
Uhh... that's the timestamp for the last update of the entire
Wrong. Linus qualifies as an atheist by his own words.
From an interview in the November 1999 Linux Journal magazine:
Margie: How about religion?
Linus: Hmmmm, completely a-religious -- atheist.
I have never seen it used in the sense of opposite to "agnostic" and OED only saw it once a long time ago.
You obviously don't watch Ren and Stimpy. The tooth fairy is one ugly little thing!
Larry Wall invented Perl. If that doesn't show the mind-twisting effect that religion can have on some people, I don't know what does.
Of course, Knuth is an absolutely wonderful computer scientist, so clearly religion goes either way.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
A truer definition of the word, "atheist", could then be, "Could care less if there is or is not a God -- so, quit arguing incessantly about it and pass the gravy!".
I think the actual definition is someone who believes there is no god. Compare to theist, monotheist, polytheist, pantheist, etc. Someone who does not know if there is a god or not is an agnostic - he professes no knowledge about the existence of a god.
Still, none of these words convey a sense of how evangelistic the believer is concerning his views.
Lots of famous scientists were deeply religious. I never claimed otherwise. I merely expressed lack of surprise that Linus is not.
Word History: An agnostic does not deny the existence of God and heaven but holds that one cannot know for certain whether or not they exist. The term agnostic was fittingly coined by the 19th-century British scientist Thomas H. Huxley, who believed that only material phenomena were objects of exact knowledge. He made up the word from the prefix a-, meaning "without, not," as in amoral, and the noun Gnostic. Gnostic is related to the Greek word gnosis, "knowledge," which was used by early Christian writers to mean "higher, esoteric knowledge of spiritual things" hence, Gnostic referred to those with such knowledge. In coining the term agnostic, Huxley was considering as "Gnostics" a group of his fellow intellectuals"-ists," as he called them - who had eagerly embraced various doctrines or theories that explained the world to their satisfaction. Because he was a "man without a rag of a label to cover himself with," Huxley coined the term agnostic for himself, its first published use being in 1870.
Just goes to show, I can learn something new everyday...
Doh !
I picked a couple of names at semi-random (names that seemed to be fairly uncommon) and did a Google search. Apparently, the requirements to be a "Teacher Choice Fellow" are not high. Google had zero results for both Don Koniezco and
Marilyn Ketter Rittmeyer.
Interesting.
It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
There are no [yale.edu] shortage [duke.edu] of [nd.edu] top [ox.ac.uk] universities [uchicago.edu] that have excellent theology or divinity departments. Some of the world's most influential and interesting thinkers have been theologians.
As someone studying at one of these top universities who has some familiarity with the Divinity school, I am going to humbly suggest that you might be surprised at the percentage of divinity students who are (gasp!) atheists.
To study religion is not the same thing as to want to be employed by it. The bulk of religion scholars want to be academics, not clergy, and they tend to study things like violence and religion, exploitation and religion, nationalism and religion, war and religion, mental illness and religion, history of religious conflict...
So yes, it's the study of religion at a top university, but by no means does this mean that all of these people hope someday to be pope.
STOP . AMERICA . NOW
I wonder if Linus was alluding to P.G. Wodehouse here. In some of Wodehouse's novels there is a character by the name of Finknottle (I think) who lives a lonely life in the country and is obsessed with newts. In one book (don't remember which...) he talks about the mating dance of the newt.
You're absolutely right. I seriously doubt there are enough divinity students around to fill up the clergy. I don't belive I've ever met a priest that majored in Divinity.
If you ask a priest what they major was in seminary, they'll most likely tell you Biology or some other science.
Ask one. They're nice people and generally open to discussions about religion in general.
A priest, though, not a pastor. They'll just throw a Bible at you.
Death and danger are my various breads and various butters.