Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Office 2004 for Mac Released

kylea writes "Office 2004 for Mac OS X has finally been released. From the Apple page: The latest improvements to the Office productivity suite promise new approaches to create, manage and distribute your projects. New features and tools in the programs help you get work done more efficiently. And now you can extend your reach beyond Office with greatly improved AppleScript support."

30 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. Download locations by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to previous reports, you can download Office 2004 from LimeWire.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Download locations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      That was just the beta.

  2. Features by Synesthesiatic · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope they removed the "wipe my home directory" feature.

  3. Yes, but... by smoondog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can it connect seemlessly to Exchange servers?

    -Sean

    1. Re:Yes, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can it connect seemlessly to Exchange servers?

      I hear it's because the MBU hasn't paid up the $100,000 for access to the APIs...

    2. Re:Yes, but... by nvrrobx · · Score: 3, Informative
    3. Re:Yes, but... by jeffehobbs · · Score: 5, Informative


      short answer yes with an if, long answer no with a but...

      If you have an Exchange 2000 server (with Service Pack 2 or later) then it's as close as it gets. If you're running an earlier Exchange server, then you're still in the same boat as you were with Entourage 2001. In either case, there's still no real MAPI support.

      ~jeff

    4. Re:Yes, but... by amarquis · · Score: 5, Informative

      Works great with an Exchange 2003 server, but, inexplicably, does not sync Tasks or Notes. Doh!Email, Contacts and Calendar work well, but I'm extremely annonyed about the omission. (Yes, I know it was mentioned previously in the fine print.) I can't see any technical reason why they would omit such an important feature.
      Overall, a great upgrade, but I wonder what else is missing.

  4. Let me be the first to say that by aflat362 · · Score: 5, Informative
    AppleWorks is way cheaper and is (for the most part) compatible with Microsoft Office documents.

    The only thing I noticed that doesn't transfer well so far has been bitmaps that are embedded in documents.

    --

    Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say that by aflat362 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I don't like the openoffice product on the Mac either. I use AppleWorks. It is a product of Apple Computer. The interface is very similiar to the Microsoft Office product for the mac.

      Your windows background will help you zilch using Office for the Mac. It is a Mac platform product completely different from its Microsoft Windows Counterpart.

      Yes, MS Office does more. But since I get most of the important functionality out of AppleWorks I can't begin to justify the $320 price difference.

      MS Office for mac is $399 and AppleWorks is $79.

      Keep in mind that I am a home user and am not in a corporate situation where I need to work with Office documents. Though - AppleWorks does have limited support for viewing editing and creating Microsoft Office Compatible documents.

      --

      Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say that by misterpies · · Score: 4, Interesting


      Appleworks is just about passable if you don't need to write anything more complicated than a letter or a memo. For any substantial document, it's hopeless. It's the big exception to user friendliness in Apple's product range - trying to get auto-numbered sections or create and use custom paragraph styles is needlessly difficult. And it has a tendency to lose any advanced formatting when importing docs from Word. It took me less than a day to realise that I needed to by Office for mac.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  5. Re:I'll stick to LaTeX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    \documentclass{article}

    \begin{document}

    \textbf{YES!}

    I agree \emph{completely}.\footnote{``Text markup'' is much more portable. I
    have 10-year-old \LaTeX{} files that are still usable on my \textsc{gentoo}
    box.}

    \end{document}

  6. Re:which version by Exitthree · · Score: 5, Informative

    Standard and Student/Teacher have identical features, except the latter version is discounted for Academic users. Professional is identical to Standard with the addition of VPC 7. VPC 7 has been delayed, and as such, so has Office 2004 Professional.

  7. Had some problems with it. by Thinkit4 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The spreadsheet just wasn't up to task--printing was a real problem. Information will be free and consciousness will be hosted on computers some day. But for now, office just does more.

    --
    -I am an elective eunuch.
  8. Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I downloaded this the other day off LimeWire. I think there was a bug in the installer because it deleted a bunch of my files. So I tried it on a friend's Mac too. Same thing there. Leave it to Microsoft to not know how to write an installer.

  9. More M$ Arrogance... by shrapnull · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The "professional version" will be released once they fix Virtual PC for Mac OS X Panther. That's right, MS Office Professional politely requests you install Microsoft Windows XP on your Mac.

    This is due to a lack of both Exchange server support and .NET technologies on the Apple platform.

    Their answer? Run XP. Defeats the purpose of getting an Apple to begin with if you ask me.

    Stick with the Mono project for .NET compatibility, and wait for a OS X Native Open Office port while using Appleworks in the mean time.

    --
    If you're half as beautiful naked, you'd be 4 times as beautiful with twice as many clothes on.
    1. Re:More M$ Arrogance... by The+Bungi · · Score: 3, Informative
      Well, the first non-Windows platform we'll probably see .NET running in will be OS X (Mono notwhitstanding). After all, the SSCLI runs there "out of the box".

      Things might get interesting shortly =)

    2. Re:More M$ Arrogance... by Fuzzle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, VPC 6 runs fine in Panthurrr. The problem is getting VPC to run on G5's, because they don't have quite the same functions as the G4's (something about little-endian's or something I believe). They aren't shipping VPC with Office as a replacement for an Exchange client, but it's a nice conspiracy theory. VPC is just part of the Office Suite in this new version.

      Btw, after using it, it's very similar to v.X from what I can tell.

    3. Re:More M$ Arrogance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
      x86 is little endian. PowerPC (at least as used in Apple) is big endian (it may be in the spec that it can support a native little endian mode; I don't know.) The G3 and G4, AIUI, have operands that perform little endian operations (add, subtract, shift, etc.) on registers, as well as the regular operands that do big endian operations. The G5 only has the big endian operations. (Note: if PowerPC can switch its endian mode, read the above as "non-endian-mode-endianness operations on registers".)

      Virtual PC took advantage of the afore-mentioned instructions to gain a speed boost. Without them, you have to do a few byte swaps (eg: an integer of the form ABCD becomes DCBA, but you need to keep strings in the same byte order, etc...) before doing the calculations. This means that Virtual PC simply will not run on the G5, and needs to have the optimised code re-written to work properly without those instructions.

      Presumably, they'll introduce a second code path: one that makes use of those instructions and one that doesn't. Of course, that depends on the code structure; it may be easier to just ditch those optimisations and keep it generic.

  10. Re:which version by Hes+Nikke · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't forget that the Student/Teacher also comes with three CD Keys. Someone in your household is supposed to be a student or teacher if you want it though.

    Anyway, after playing around with Entourage 2004 (to me the only reason I need office, the new word, and excel are just gravy) for a few hours, I just wanted to share my first impressions:

    The Good:
    I like the little popup notifications in the corner when I have new mail. Although now that I think about it, its a bit Windowsish - not that's a bad thing.
    I like the grouped sorting. I always sort my messages in the order in which they are received, descending. Entourage groups them so I have little blue headings for Today, Yesterday, etc. This helps me organize my email better.
    The other nice thing is that you can tell it to hide read messages. I have this set on all my mailing list filtered folders to keep track of things a bit better.
    I'm quite happy to see that I can *easily* use certificates so that I can digitally sign my messages. (assuming that you can figure out how to import them in the first place, see below)
    Unicode Support! (need i say more?)
    The last new feature that I enjoy with the new Entourage is that you can finally control the autocorrect settings without waiting for word to boot.

    The Bad:
    The Entourage database is bigger than v.X.
    Grouped sorting sorts the groups ascending or descending, depending on your settings, but it only sorts the items in the groups ascending. I haven't found an option to fix that. (Yet. Anyone have any suggestions?)
    Changing folders with a lot of messages seems a bit slower, probably due to those Today, Yesterday etc. headers, and the hiding of read messages.
    Entourage still doesn't have a grammar checker.
    Creation and/or importing of certificates is anything but obvious. This isn't even made clear in Help. It took me 20 minutes just to find a link to the Microsoft website that than had links to several Certificate Authorities. Then the one I chose (because the page said that they are free and trusted) was anything but clear as to how to create a certificate (no longer Microsoft land I know) and Entourage doesn't trust them to boot, so I can only assume that neither does anyone else's email client.

    The Ugly:
    I think the new icons are a throwback to the Office 98 days. They are flat and ugly, I want my aqualicious icons back. :(
    When I tried to install the new Handheld Sync Conduit, the authentication box said "Hendhel-" (with a cut off 'd') instead of OK. And than it turned out that it was the same old handheld conduit that shipped late in the Entourage X life.
    I don't get enough information in that little popup notification box. I would like to see *who* the message is from, as well as the folder it was filtered to.
    I can't move the little popup notification box. It is stuck in the lower right corner
    The popup notification box only seems to appear when I get new mail and Entourage isn't the currently running application.
    Preview Pane on the right doesn't give me enough options on the mail list on the left. I want more than 2 columns of information!

    I think I've run out of first impressions.

    --
    Don't call me back. Give me a call back. Bye. So yeah. But bye our, well, but alright we are on a shirt this chill.
  11. Re:which version by Atsi+Otani · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I generally like Entourage and its interface (which is why I use it), but I can't stand how it stores my mail.

    In the Apple Mail app, mail is stored in .mbox files. I like this - all I have to do if I want to backup mail is copy the mbox file. On the other hand, Entourage stores mail in its own proprietary format, and I haven't been able to find out how to work with it.

    I only recently learned that when you drag Entourage mailboxes to your desktop, they are saved as mbox files (although I haven't tried it yet - haven't been doing backups lately). Of course, this isn't documented by Microsoft - could have saved me a lot of trouble if they had.

    Does anyone know whether you can do this in the new version? I really don't plan to get the new Office (give me a good reason why I should upgrade), but I was curious.

  12. Question for early adopters - address book/iCal? by Sierran · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The single biggest block to my using Entourage for my email rather than Mail.app is the fact that Office X did not integrate at all with OS X's built in address book or calendaring functionality. While I can live without iCal integration (maybe) the plain fact is that I'm damn sick of massaging my address book data every time I need to use it somewhere else - usually because MS has stupid import/export options. Can anyone using the new version tell me if Office talks to the system Address Book, and if so, how well it does so? I like syncing my Palm directly to the System (iSync) and hence to .mac, rather than to a MS sandbox and then having to pry my data out of there with a crowbar.

    Now, there may be very good reason(s) why the MacBU chose not to integrate with the system PIM services (and yes, I know Office X predated stable versions of those services!). If that's the case, an informed explanation of why this is so would also be much appreciated.

    Thank you!

    --
    A hero is someone who knows when to run away. I am a hero. -Trent the Uncatchable
  13. Some features ... by Draoi · · Score: 3, Informative
    Well, I've been using it all day here and one of the features I've seen so far is that the startup time has been drastically cut back from the old Office.X version. Previously, it took an age for stupid Word to fire up in the first place.

    One other thing is that the floating toolbars alpha fade after a few minutes of inactivity. They go opaque again after you mouse over them. That's a nice touch and indicates as to a lot more MacOS X native integration under the hood.

    Other than that, well .... :-/

    --
    Alison

    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

  14. Re:Question for early adopters - address book/iCal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm using Office 2004, and as far as I have been able to tell it still doesn't integrate at all with Address Book or iCal.

  15. Comments regading teacher/student version by CaptainAbstraction · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have the (full) teacher/student version. I get the mailbox lock error constantly for my IMAP account. I have it checking for new mail every 5 minutes, and about half the time I get an error.

    On the web, people have suggested unchecking "send commands simultaneously" from the Account configuration menu (just google for it). But that doesn't seem to help. Any other suggestions?

    Also, the "live sync" option for IMAP accounts doesn't seem to work. I expect to be notified immediately when I get new mail, but it only notifies me when I'm actively doing something with Entourage (reading old messages, etc.).

    Finally, if you have "live sync" on AND have the account included in your "send & receive" schedule, Entourage seems to get the mail twice, resulting in duplicate mails appearing in my inbox. And then you can only "delete" one of them. To get rid of the second one, you have drag it to the trash.

    I ran into all these problems the first hour of using Entourage. Very disappointing.

    -Andrew

  16. Here's the *real* Office 2004 by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Insightful
    There once was a time when you really really had to have Office X on your Mac to interact with the vast majority of the Windows world.. while it certainly continues to work well (for Office anyways), I no longer think this is the case. I bought Office v.X but I haven't actually used it in quite some time.. instead:

    Word = TextEdit (reads/writes Word files)
    PowerPoint = Keynote (reads/writes Powerpoints)
    Entourage = Mail/Address Book/iSync (I will never give up my Bluetooth)
    Excel = Mariner Calc

    Two of those you have to buy. Keynote is $100 CDN, Mariner Calc is around $160. Panther was around the same and includes the rest. This is all cheaper - combined - than the standalone version of Word, last I checked.

    Don't shell out the massive cash for Office Mac unless you really think you need it. Mostly what I deal with day-to-day is Word and PP files, and I do just fine with the above.

    Sure, TextEdit isn't Word, but on the other hand.. it isn't Word, if you know what I mean, and I think you do.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Here's the *real* Office 2004 by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 3, Informative
      However, to claim that Keynote does all you could possibly need in Powerpoint is ridiculous. What about diagrams and flowcharts?

      No - I would never claim that Keynote does all the same things as PowerPoint. Keynote handily spanks PowerPoint into the ground, in my opinion.. even in version 1. Charts and diagrams are part of how your workflow goes - Keynote doesn't support those in an editable fashion, but I just do mine in OmniGraffle or some other program first, then paste them in. Obviously this doesn't work for everyone but in my workflow this is what I did with PP anyways (I'd never 'trust' a chart or data set to PP. Never.) I don't think I could ever go back after using the Smart Guides or text editor in Keynote. Or the transitions for that matter.

      And to claim that TextEdit and Keypoint read Word and Powerpoint files is like saying that vi is the only Desktop Publishing Program you will ever need. Sometimes it works. If you have created any serious work, it won't.

      My experience has been different. The Word features import to TextEdit properly for 99% of the documents I've received... its only when you've done some truly weird acrobatics in Word that it'll choke.. and even then, it never chokes to the extent that you can't fix it pretty fast. Embedded objects can be a problem, but hell, that's true just between different versions of Office.

      Believe me I am comforted by the fact that I do have Office just in case something really breaks... but it hasn't happened yet, knock on MDF.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  17. Re:apple should work with openoffice.org by jilles · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would you spend thousands of dollars on a proprietary hardware/software combination only to top it off with a poormans office solution? That's very inconsistent.

    I can appreciate your argument about most people not needing certain features but price aside, that seems to be the only argument against microsoft office. There are numerous open source and commercial alternatives that offer interesting subsets of features that are good enough solutions for most people. Some alternatives even have features that are better than the ms office equivalent. At the end of the day however, the full set of features found in ms office is pretty much unrivalled by any other product or collection of products.

    People with macs like to pay for quality so it would be natural for them to consider ms office 2004. MS seems to have pulled of some nice improvements over the previous version. Compatibility is good, it integrates with OS X better than most other office suits. It's hard not to like it if you have the money and a taste for quality hardware & software.

    --

    Jilles
  18. Re:Does anyone upgrade Office for the features? by bw5353 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The only reason for me to upgrade is a really huge bug-fix, which they call "unicode support". Why on earth was that not properly included in Office v.X?

    I have tried the demo. I have found nothing else new worth paying for.

    So this bug fix will cost me 300 euro. Yes, I will pay up, but I will spit at the receipt.

    Besides there is still no support for right-to-left writing (like in Arab and Hebrew). I guess they will add that to the next version in three years together with a new boring clip-art of a grey over-head projector, so they can charge another 300.

  19. Re:which version by Gorbag · · Score: 5, Funny
    Someone in your household is supposed to be a student or teacher if you want it though.
    Are we not all students?

    Are we not all teachers?

    --
    -- I speak only for myself