FSF Subpoenaed by SCO
An anonymous reader writes "Bradley M. Kuhn on the FSF website: Late last year, we were subpoenaed by SCO as part of the ongoing dispute
between SCO and IBM. Today, we made that
subpoena available on our website. This is a broad subpoena that
effectively asks for every single document about the GPL and enforcement
of the GPL since 1999. They also demand every document and email that we
have exchanged with Linus Torvalds, IBM, and other players in the
community. In many cases, they are asking for information that is
confidential communication between us and our lawyers, or between us and
our contributors."
Stallman? Cleaning?
Heh.
I propose, apropos of RMS's GNU/Linux, that SCO be hereafter referred to as MSFT/SCO to reflect the true source of the FUD.
ehem.
MSFT/SCO Sucks! etc.
(not an endorsement of GNU/Linux nomenclature)
Synergies are basically awesome, and they're even better when you leverage them. -PA
Uh. Yes, sure. Why not?
Have you ever been drunk? Can we take your liver so we can check?
Getting drunk is not illegal now. If it were declared illegal in the future, I'd certainly agree with such a check. Many workplaces check for drug use already.
Whoops party foul. Mentioning respect for the law in any context on slashdot is always considered -1, Flamebait. You should read the FAQ page.
> I for one have never quite understood your paranoia about the government.
Look at the monkey they've currently got running it, and then tell me that there is no reason to be paranoid.
Norman Cook's Ode to Sl