Slashdot Mirror


Microchips to Save Peru's Alpacas

lakeesis writes "BBC News has published an article stating: 'Peru has launched a campaign to implant microchips in hundreds of pedigree alpacas to try to stop the best animals being smuggled out of the country. Officials say they know alpacas are being sneaked across Peru's borders'."

84 comments

  1. Technology for the sake of technology? by metlin · · Score: 5, Insightful


    All it takes for the people smuggling the animals is to take a hand-held scanner and find out the location of the microchip and cut it out.

    If it is easy to implant, it would be easy to remove.

    Hmm, looks like they are just trying to throw technology at a problem hoping it would work.

    Then again, ofcourse, the smugglers maybe quite unaware of this and the more gullible ones may just get caught.

    And oh, first post?

    1. Re:Technology for the sake of technology? by shikra · · Score: 5, Informative

      Apparently you have not had any real world contact with such technology. I happen to be in rather close contact with the Asian Arowana (Scleropages formosus) industry, and this technology has been used rather successfully. The fish has been deemed endangered by CITES, and as such it would be illegal to catch it from the wild. CITES-registered farms are required to tag each fish with an electronic microchip, and these farm-raised fish can then be exported or sold domestically. All the officials needed to do during their routine checks for illegal stock is to scan the fish in question with a hand-held scanner, which would reveal a registration number instantly (which could be matched with a paper certificate of authenticity).

    2. Re:Technology for the sake of technology? by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      the smugglers maybe quite unaware of this and the more gullible ones may just get caught.

      The people who do the smuggling are not peasants or petty criminals. It's an upscale crime undertaken by those who are already quite well off, by the very nature of what's required to pull it off. Smugglers in business suits driving Mercedes, who read newspapers.

      And a legitimate pedigreed Purvian alpaca might bring as much as $100,000.

      That's right, for a single animal. We're talking big business here. An American bred alpaca with a couple of show ribbons to its credit might well run you $30,000.

      The headline is misleading. The Peruvian alpaca is in no danger. It's in danger of spreading. What's at risk is the market value of Peruvian alpaca fleece. For the most part what's going on constitutes what most people think of as "saving" an animal today.

      Camalids are being reintroduced into territories in which they have become extinct.

      This is a trade embargo vs. free trade/open market issue, not a "saving the poor little furry thing" issue. The only animals being moved are pedigree domestic stock. 4H club stuff. Legitimate tradable goods that the government doesn't want traded out of the country.

      KFG

    3. Re:Technology for the sake of technology? by MC_Cancer_Pants · · Score: 1

      To his credit, the parent did seem a bit misleading and certainly had me on the same high horse as him.

    4. Re:Technology for the sake of technology? by Threni · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >If it is easy to implant, it would be easy to remove.

      Or modded. A multi-region animal ought to be easy to move into another country.

    5. Re:Technology for the sake of technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still wrong.

      As far as protecting pedigree domestic stock, that's fine and dandy. But 4H club animals are not going to be registered, unless the animals are owned by an Alpaca owner and used by 4H kids as part of their 4H project. Horses it makes sense to plop down at least $1000 for a decent animal. Alpacas? Nope.

      Their wool fiber is valuable, but only because it is a niche product, in North America. Most alpaca breeders and owners, the fleece is a byproduct, and they send it to a combine. The real $$$ in alpacas in North America is in breeding (it's a big pyramid scheme, essentially). Just like Llamas were 15-20 years ago, and more recently, buffalos, ostriches, emus, etc.

      However, I do not think that alpaca fleece is quite the luxury item in Peru, Bolivia and Chile like it is in the US...

      Alpacas and llamas are nice animals, but as long as the only money in them is for breeding (and showing them, which helps build the hype), it's all gonna fall apart soon enough. At least there are some alternative uses (but little or no growth opportunities) for llamas: guard animals for sheep and goat flocks, pack animals. Llamas are certainly edible, but there is no sustainable llama meat market in the US.

      Just like dairy cows, llamas have to go somewhere when they die. Dairy cows get ground up into hamburger (dairy cows deposit too many carotenoids in their fat, so it's yellow, which doesn't look so good on the retail shelf. plus, dairy cows are scrawny. big, but scrawny). Llamas? well, I think they get shipped off to the knacker, or the less prudish will put them into their freezer.

    6. Re:Technology for the sake of technology? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      This is a different solution to the problem - an animal for resale is required to have a chip. This would be difficult to defeat (without accessing someone within the system). If an animal must not have a chip to be available for resale, all you need is a scalpel and some foreceps. Maybe a scanner, if they all don't go in the same general spot.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    7. Re:Technology for the sake of technology? by kfg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      However, I do not think that alpaca fleece is quite the luxury item in Peru, Bolivia and Chile like it is in the US...

      Exactly the point, from the Purvian point of view.

      You're certainly right about the showing, breeding and pyramid scheme aspects of the American Alpaca market though. It's the very reason that I don't breed Alpacas myself. It is also what makes animals of a certain pedigree so valuable here (Although they have closed down registration to new Purvian animals. When I said it is a 4H club type issue I was speaking about inside Peru where the animals are common and ownable on a peasant's budget, just like prize pigs or sheep are here).

      KFG

  2. Removal? by LordChaos · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Won't the smugglers just remove the chips, much in the same way that people now remove microchips from pedigree animals stolen from family homes?
    I personally think they will have to do a bit better than this, but full marks for trying :)

    1. Re:Removal? by acceber · · Score: 3, Informative
      The plan is to tag some 900 top alpacas within five years.

      I understand that Peru wants to save their pedigrees but tagging 900 out of 3,000,000 native Alpacas isn't going to be very effective. Although it's a great initiative, they're only micro-chipping a mere 0.03% which would make catching smugglers are very inefficient process.

    2. Re:Removal? by daniil · · Score: 1, Informative

      But protecting every alpaca from being smuggled out of the country isn't even the point. The point of this program seems to be to keep the "best" (best from whose point of view?) alpacas in. They are only going to tag 900 animals, as they assume that the smugglers won't be interested in the other three million animals (and if they are, then it still isn't as great a loss to the economy as the loss of these pedigree animals would presumably be).

      --
      Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    3. Re:Removal? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You are assuming an even distribution in alpaca quality. We know that this is not the case, as there are specific alpacas that are banned from being exported.

      If smugglers are trying to export the best of the best, it's likely that:

      * These alpacas are separated from the rest of the herd to avoid unwanted damage and breeding. This probably makes them easier to identify.

      * Even if mixed with lesser speciments of their breed, these alpacas may be visually differentiable to someone familiar with judging alpaca quality. For instance, let us assume that Peru is breeding alpacas to have particularly large, firm rear ends. One would imagine that someone that has worked intimately with alpacas for years would be able to quickly visually skim over alpacas and identify the ones to be stolen. It's even possible that they could take part in an "inside job" -- being hired by an alpaca owner, identifying the best alpacas, and then taking a list or marking these to later be stolen.

      * There is presumably some dissuasive factor involved in making the statement of microchip presence at *all*. Heck, the chips don't even really have to be there -- it'd drive a smuggler mad to think that he stole what seems to be a really excellent, high-quality alpaca, but cannot find the supposed embedded chip.

      * I'm of the suspicion that many Peruvian alpaca rustlers may have been deprived of a thorough statistics education (thus forcing them to smuggle alpacas instead of becoming credit card market analysts). They may not catch on to how unlikely it is to get the short straw -- Americans certainly don't when it comes to lotteries, for instance.

  3. Safeguard the genepool? by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sheesh! The things people do for greed.

    "...safeguard the gene pool of its three million-strong herd."

    You mean, safeguard the genepool to stay within Peru. Heh.

    Peruvian law bans the exportation of alpacas that win pedigree certificates.

    Wow. Safeguard the genepool so that the best stay within my borders. Not to troll, but unless these have been specially bred (say, genetically modified), you are trying to hold onto what nature has bestowed upon you.

    And prevent the best from getting out, so that if there is any disease or epidemic, the best will all die out with not too many of them outside my borders.

    And that is good how?

    1. Re:Safeguard the genepool? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...are trying to hold onto what nature has bestowed upon...

      Sorta like some countries like to protect their natural resources from getting out... like oil.

      Shame on them!

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    2. Re:Safeguard the genepool? by kunudo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorta like some countries like to protect their natural resources from getting out... like oil.

      Shame on them!


      Hi, I'm from Norway, the third largest exporter of oil in the world. You can have all the oil you want from us, provided you pay market price and keep your fucking army on the right side of the atlantic.

      Also, the difference between oil and alpakkas is of course that you can continue exporting oil and never run the risk of having some competitor set up his own oil-field based on top stuff he bought from you. Unlike with alpakkas, you either have it or you don't.

    3. Re:Safeguard the genepool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh! The things people do for greed.

      Yea, kind of like patents on genes, pharmaceuticals, software, etc.

    4. Re:Safeguard the genepool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just keep the oil coming and our "f'ing army" will stay away. Now go away and play in the snow.

    5. Re:Safeguard the genepool? by kunudo · · Score: 1

      Works for me.

  4. Has to be said. by Blue+Eagle+26 · · Score: 1, Funny

    All your Alpacas are belong to us.

  5. Intellectual Property... by brxndxn · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe Peru could start the new fad of turning 'pedigrees' into intellectual property.. It is bound to happen sooner or later with animals.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
  6. Best... quote... ever! by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the article:
    Alpacas, along with related llamas, vicunas and guanacos, are native to South America but are increasingly popular in other parts of the world - not only for their fleeces.

    They also make tasty, lean steaks.
    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Best... quote... ever! by beacher · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're also being exploited by the motion picture industry-- When I saw the picture I thought it was funny.. but later on when I found out that it endangered them.. I felt really sad...

      Directed By

      40 SPECIALLY TRAINED ECUADORIAN MOUNTAIN LLAMAS
      6 VENEZUELAN RED LLAMAS
      142 MEXICAN WHOOPING LLAMAS
      14 NORTH CHILEAN GUANACOS (CLOSELY RELATED TO THE LLAMA)
      REG LLAMA OF BRIXTON
      76000 BATTERY LLAMAS FROM "LLAMA-FRESH" FARMS LTD. NEAR PARAGUAY

      and

      TERRY GILLIAM & TERRY JONES

      Sad. Tragic.

    2. Re:Best... quote... ever! by KjetilK · · Score: 1

      They also make tasty, lean steaks.

      I can confirm that. I went to Peru two years ago to climb, and upon arriving in Cusco, the first thing was of course to go to a restaurant, feeling slightly adventureous, and try the local specialitites.

      I tried the alpaca and it is just awesome. It's like when to try the first bite, you think "well, I'm certainly never have a normal steak again, after tasting this!" Then you realize that this animal lives only at the high plains and marshlands of Peru (and that's how it should be). So, well, I guess I have to do without... Around here, we've got a lot of moose that tastes good too, but alpaca really is the top.

      I think we had alpaca steak about twice a day... :-)

      Yeah, and I remember coming across a FAQ of US farmers having alpacas, and they had an entry saying something like "Q: Do you eat alpacas? A: No, they are too huggable for that." I went, are you serious...?!?! The best food in the world, and you don't eat it? Well, yeah, they are really cute and huggable, sure, but it's sweet food...! :-)

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    3. Re:Best... quote... ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They also make tasty, lean steaks.
      Yeah, if you enjoy eating a $2000 steak. At least in the US industry, Alpacas can go from anywhere to $800 an animal (guelded male, pet quality, not the best fleece), to $400,000 an animal (one recently went for this much -- highly respected herd sire [breeding male]). Not to mention that the standard fee for a breeding (paid to the male's owner) is around $1000.

      Disclaimer: I do not own any alpacas, but my parents run an alpaca farm.

    4. Re:Best... quote... ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct answer to "Q: Do you eat alpacas?" would be "A: No, not unless you enjoy eating $500/lb steaks, and losing out on the profits that could be made by breeding them at $1000 a breeding (if it's a male) or selling their babies for the original cost of the mother (in the case of females). Oh, and they're also really sweet; eating them would be like eating your dog or cat"

      I doubt you ate alpaca. It was probably either llama or even just plain old cow meat. Alpacas are just way too expensive to slaughter them for meat.

      And no, they don't only live in the high plains and marshlands of Peru. There's some just down the road here in Columbus, OH, USA, and tons more around the country.

    5. Re:Best... quote... ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An $800 animal would result in a lot of steak. If you're going to be eating them anyway, I don't think you'd be too concerned about the quality of the fleece. Also, you're talking in the US here where the alpaca population is in the hands of a very few who control pricing. In Peru, you could probably go out in the wild, find yourself some alpacas, and breed them yourself without having to pay someone a "penis rental" fee.

      Breeding for show is a whole lot different than breeding for dinner. Ask any Korean.

    6. Re:Best... quote... ever! by KjetilK · · Score: 1

      I doubt you ate alpaca. It was probably either llama or even just plain old cow meat. Alpacas are just way too expensive to slaughter them for meat.

      Have a look at the picture I posted. You'll see a marsh where thousands of alpacas were feeding. There are a lot of them around Cusco. I saw herds of more than a thousand individuals, and the farmers around there sure slaughtered them. As for Llamas, they are very different from alpacas, they are in much smaller numbers around Cusco (in fact, I didn't see any there, only in Ancash).

      Perhaps you were thinking about Vicunas?

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
  7. Suppose it wouldn't go over well with the wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    if I asked about getting these for the kids? Sure, there is probably some kind of law against, but *you* try keeping track of a three year old in a supermarket.

  8. I would stop stealing them... by imag0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would stop stealing them if they stopped making them so goddammed cute!

    1. Re:I would stop stealing them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think they're cute now, wait'll you see the ones with implants!

      KeS

  9. news? not even for nerds - this stuff don't matter by daveb · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I can put a chip in my dog to ID it in case it strays or is stolen. Why is it news that someone is doing this alpaca's? It's bad enough that it's a slow day on BBC - but this stuff shouldn't raise a blip here. BTW - tagging 900 in five years? that doesn't sound very much. I mean, 3 alpaca's a week is hardly difficult. If there are 5000 alpas's in NZ (a href="http://www.lifestyleblock.co.nz/articles/753 _Alpaca_farming.htm">soucrce then I expect there are a tad more in south america.

  10. Finally by fiskbil · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thank god!

    I've been so worried about those poor alpacas I've been having trouble sleeping. We all know the only people who can properly care for alpacas are from Peru.

  11. Strange.. by RoderickMcDougall · · Score: 1

    If I am going to smuggle something over the border, I'm not likely to admit to the authorities that this thing exists in my possession. If it doesn't "exist" then they cannot put a microchip in it can they.

  12. Its a conspiracy! by dj245 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I don't know if the rest of you have seen the Alpaca commercials, but they reek of Multilevel marketing (MLM) pyramid schemes. They make it clear that you will raise Alpacas, then you will get others interested in Aplacas, and then you will sell them Alpacas! Kind of like the 1. 2.? 3. Underwear knome thing only less innocent and more evil. In fact, 8 of the top 10 Google hits for Alpaca are not articles of clothing made of Alpaca or Alpaca steak, but Alpacas for sale.

    This has me worried though (from the article):
    "We know that alpacas are being moved across the border with Bolivia and then on to Chile," Pilar Tuppia from Peru's National Council of South American Camelids told the Associated Press.
    This included "unscrupulous individuals" buying top animals from poor people in the countryside, she said."

    If these people's animals are such top-notch and pedigree, why are they so poor and living in the countryside? Isn't the Alpaca industry booming?

    I'm not the only person to thing that the Alpaca business is a little fishy. See here and here (google cache of geocities page)

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Its a conspiracy! by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Since it's reportedly a growing business, it's natural that a significant part of the market is selling studs to farmers. However, alpaca does have a market that's potentially much better than the emu and ostrich farming mentioned by the links you posted. Alpacas produce a fine wool, much nicer to the touch than sheep wool. They also come in several diferent natural colors.


      The part about poor people having top animals sounds strange. If that's true, then instead of trying to tag the animals they should be trying to develop the market so those poor people could profit from their fine animals.

    2. Re:Its a conspiracy! by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      The 'marketing scum' you refer to always appear at the introduction of some new superior technology or product. Hell, those were the sorts of people who opened 'computer stores' in the mid 80's (not the 'hackers', I mean that fat ugly guy in the bad suit selling '486 boxes to your dad with a 70% markup).

      Same as it ever was. It's wrong to indict the superior tech/product based on the kind of scum that gathers over it (not really 'around' it.)

      --
      resigned
    3. Re:Its a conspiracy! by Yartrebo · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the Emu pyramid scheme that happened a decade or so back in the USA.

      One of my relatives bet the farm (literally) on raising them. They were supposed to be really healthy meat or something like that. Naturally, when all you do with an animal is breed it, since it's too expensive to butcher for food, the market is going to get saturated exponentially, and the price will plummet.

      This is true even if Emus did displace cows for meat ... it would just have taken a few years longer since Emus breed rather fast.

    4. Re:Its a conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt either of the people who wrote those articles you linked to even know what an alpaca is or why you raise them.

      First off, alpacas are raised for fleece. You shear them like sheep. But unlike sheep, the fleece is extremely soft and clean. An alpaca's entire blanket of fleece can go for several hundred dollars. You don't ever eat alpaca unless you enjoy your meat around $500 per lb, because breeding females, for example, go for $5,000 - $50,000, depending on quality of the fleece, bone structure, breeding history, etc.

      There's no MLM about it, either. If you start a farm, buy some decent females, breed them to decent males, and get a baby on the ground, you can turn around and sell it. One or two babies later, you'd probably made back the money spent on breedings and the mother herself. Or, buy a bunch of males and sell breedings for $1,000 a pop.

      The catch is, you have to invest a lot to get in. But this is not like buying bottles of cleaner from Amway and letting them sit around in your house. You have to have a farm to raise these animals, and you have to be a farmer. Like any other livestock animal, they require pasture space, a barn... and you will spend time feeding, mucking out stalls, vaccinating, taking care of breedings (you never ever let breedings go on uncontrolled; breeding is done between specific animals and the animals are named, registered and kept track of very well), and all the other things you'd addociate with farming.

      Now, I admit my experience is in the US industry -- I don't know what goes on in Peru. But since most of your comment addressed the US industry, that is what I am talking about here.

      A very small number of the larger ranches are a bit fishy -- they have high death rates and don't take the best care of their animals. But for the most part, there's no MLM or anything like that. And like the commercial says, they are extremely gentle animals; the worst they can do is spit on you (which stinks pretty bad) or kick if you get too close (which they almost never do). If you get out there and work with them, they can be very friendly, almost like a dog or cat. Albient, a 150 pound one.

      The ads probably do make it sound like an MLM, but the only people I've seen saying it is are folks who obviously have never seen an Alpaca...

  13. Oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They just want a chance to earn a decent living for their families back in Peru. If Peru would improve the national economy there wouldn't be any reason for them to leave. They do the jobs no one else will take, would you eat grass in someone's lawn for $7/hour? I say, give them amnesty. And driver's licenses too! They want to buy car insurance, but can't because they are denied a driver's license.

  14. MMMM alpaca Steak! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Delicious!

    afrodisiac they say!

  15. But... but... by mangu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm an alpaca, you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:But... but... by ALpaca2500 · · Score: 1

      No, I'm an alpaca, you insensitive clod

  16. Does this mean... by Joff_NZ · · Score: 1

    Does this mean now that the Alpacas will be able to easily buy drinks in Ibiza?

    --
    The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
  17. take care when eating those steaks by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Funny

    depending on how large these microchips are, after eating one of those steaks, you may find yourself being hunted by l33t peruvian rangers, insisting you are an alpaca

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  18. Here's a precolumbian history lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    [i]"Not to troll, but unless these have been specially bred (say, genetically modified), you are trying to hold onto what nature has bestowed upon you."[/i]

    Alpacas were specially bred by native americans to create fine lineages of different quality hair. The hair was woven into prized high quality fabrics.

    When the Europeans came, they saw the Alpacas as beasts of burden and used them as such. They took the high quality alpacas (extremely fine and long hair fibers) and carelessly bred them with low quality alpacas (coarse and thick hair). As a result, a pedigree created from centuries of eugenics was destroyed because the European conquistadors didn't recognize the value of Alpaca fabrics.

    It's as if someone robbed a prize dog show or horsebreeding show, and used all the purebreeds to mingle with the mutts outside. Generations of selective breeding and centuries of hard work was destroyed.

    It's only been in recent years that Latin American countries have tried in vain to resurrect the old lineages with limited success. By carefully rebreeding Alpacas, they're hoping to recreate the old lines. Imagine trying to recreate esoteric dogbreeds from hybrids after losing all the purebreds.

    And this isn't just the destruction of a hobby, but the destruction of an entire industry. The Europeans literally destroyed the Alpaca fabric industry when they conquered Latin America.

    So in answer to your question -- this is NOT what nature gave them -- this is the result of centuries of eugenics from before the arrival of the Europeans. They're just trying to salvage that industry, with little success so far. Historians are aghast when they compare the fine fabrics of the past and the coarse, useless fabrics now being produced because all the purebreeds were destroyed.

  19. You might have a hard time explaining... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the braying noise from your very large suitcase. :)

  20. Tracking is short range only.... by tiger99 · · Score: 1
    .... so with a large border, the chance of a smuggling operation being intercepted is zero. So why bother, or do they rely on the smugglers not knowing the limitations of the technology?

    Implants like these generally need the scanner to be within feet or inches to be detected.

    There has to be a better way of doing this.

  21. Best article subject ever by bcmm · · Score: 1

    "Microchips to Save Peru's Alpacas".

    That just sounds really funny.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  22. "Save"!?!? by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 0

    The title here as well as on bbc seems to be quite misleading.

    They mention that the alpacas' population (in S america) is 3.5 millions and in general you'd expect the word 'save' to be used for animals that are endangered of extinction. With such a population (unlike the population of, say, the lions in africa and india) it'd take a loooong time for the alpacas to become an endangered species.

    But this effort it seems is to make sure that those that win pedigree certificates do not get out of the country. If it's only for having a very good class of the animals, fine ;but if it's only for preventing other nations to have them then it's *bad*

    (My knowledge about the breeding of this sort of animals is zero)Supposing someone'd have already been able to smuggle a few alpacas of the highest pedigree out of peru, isn't there a chance that some guy has already taken up this job of having only the best of the animals beating their purpose/?

    This is definitely a troll and excuse me for that, but the phrase 'safeguard the gene pool' reminded me immediately only of Herr Hitler

  23. isn't this just an effort to preserve IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Peru owns the genetic code to the best alpacas, and doesn't want it to be freely available. Hmm...

  24. other way around by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Peru forbids the export of price winning thingies (to lazy to check the name) and you could conclude that the export of non-pricewinning thingies is therefore accetable.

    So cutting out the microship turns a banned export into a legal export.

    Whereas in your example cutting it out would turn a legal export into an illegal one. If you had illegal fish you would have to insert a chip. This is probably a lot more work. Also fish don't have fur with wich to cover the wound.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  25. Re:Ann Coulter by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    Wow, is that person for real ? It's not some kind of super elaborate troll is it ?

    Who are these 'liberals' she hates so much, what do they do ? It must be have been pretty awful.

  26. oh yeah, those greedy sneaky peruvians by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i mean, a day doesn't pass where i am not reminded of the terrible capitalist peruvian greedy hegemony that hangs over the entire world

    the truth is, a lot of 3rd world countries are fighting tooth and nail with large corporations which try to PATENT the genetic legacy of creatures which live within their borders

    now you tell me about justice: does peru deserve the bounty of the creatures that live within its borders? or monsanto or archers daniel midland?

    now in an ideal world, no one would own the genetic legacy of any creature

    but i hardly think blaming peru for working within the confines of a world business climate that it did not create is the whole point

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:oh yeah, those greedy sneaky peruvians by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Sounds to me like the Peruvians are trying to play the same game as companies that patent stuff. They're hoarding the superior genetic material, using government and laws to keep the rest of us from having it's benefits.

      Now, what were you saying again??

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:oh yeah, those greedy sneaky peruvians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They live on Peruvian land and thus are subject to whatever laws the Peruvians want to make. Its the entire reason political borders exist. You're attempting to lay claim to another nation's property simply because it exists there and not in your country.

      Laws and rights do not cross national boundries.

    3. Re:oh yeah, those greedy sneaky peruvians by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      The genetic material being 'protected' is very similar to the kind of 'intellectual property' protection that everybody here bemoans.

      The Peruvian government is doing virtually the same thing as the RIAA and MPAA, in effect. National soverenity issues are irrelevant and off-topic.

      --
      resigned
  27. Too Bad by annielaurie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They have enough money to acquire implants for their top alpacas, but they don't seem to be able to summon up what's needed to develop a viable textile industry for the benefit of the people who raise and work with the alpacas.

    It's a marvelous wool--warm, lightweight, soft, and non-allergenic. It can be spun and knitted or woven into highly coveted, very expensive textiles. I suspect that if more thought were put into this effort, the owners of the pedigreed alpacas would have more interest in keeping them at home in Peru.

    Anne

    --
    DUCT TAPE: The Election Supervisors' Secret Weapon
    1. Re:Too Bad by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Sadly, third world exploition usually amounts to forcing poor people to export their raw materials to industrial centers elsewhere in the world.

      You're right that they should bring up a local industry and export fabric, yarn, or even completed items. It would employ the local people.

      But they'd need capital to get something like that started up, and both the left ('we can't be exporting our skilled Union jobs!') and the right ('give money to those dirt people and they'll fritter it away on baubles') conspire on this one, to keep the third world poor.

      --
      resigned
    2. Re:Too Bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but this is exactly what they do.

      Do you think the people who made that $200 alpaca wool sweater you see at Nordstrom's make a healthy profit off of that? Nope. Nordstrom's takes a healthy cut, the coop that collected the wool (and probably hires the locals to process the fiber and make the sweater) and the distributors between Nordstrom's and the coop make the rest.

      Just like anything else involved with clothing manufacture in the third world, the people actually doing the work still only get pennies relative to the end sale price of the product, if they're lucky.

  28. This is like... by fatman1683 · · Score: 1

    ...issuing double-barrelled shotguns to kill malaria-infested mosquitos. While it might work on some level, I find it unlikely that the alpaca-smuggling industry is going to be crippled by these measures. All the smuggler has to do is get his hands on a scanner, find the implant, and remove it. Or, if he's not particularly concerned about being able to sell the Alpaca on the white market, just ignore the thing altogether. I doubt the buyers will mind.

    --
    Look, defenseless babies!
  29. Microchips in my oil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorta like some countries like to protect their natural resources from getting out... like oil.

    That's why my car won't work. There are microchips in the oil pan, and alpacas in the gas tank!

  30. Han Solo--Alpaca Smuggler? by Owlman · · Score: 1
    How much does George Lucas know about this subject? Here's a little quote from one source:
    JABBA THE HUTT

    What if everyone who smuggled alpacas
    for me dropped their cargo at the first sign
    of a Peruvian farmer?
  31. Peru, Iquitos, and the Rubber Trade by p940e · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I thought somebody should mention that a little city in Peru, called Iquitos (it's in the Amazon basin), used to be the center of the rubber industry. Then somebody smuggled the rubber tree out of the country and the industry moved somewhere cheaper.

    It seems to me, Peru is just trying to prevent a similar disaster with their pricey alpaca fleece.

  32. Re:news? not even for nerds - this stuff don't mat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your dog probably isn't worth $10,000.

  33. Alpaca Rights Online? by amide_one · · Score: 1

    I'm astonished that nobody's objected yet to the idea of implanting microchips in alpacas - without their consent, obviously, since they can't give it - and then using the chips to make sure they can't cross borders.

    Replace "alpacas" in the above sentence with "immigrants" (or "the mentally handicapped") and there'd be a huge outcry about evil government conspiracies. As it is, the only real debate seems to be "will it work?"

    "But alpacas aren't people!" C'mon, what happened to the good ole' slippery slope? :) It's not Slashdot without kneejerk opposition to implanted tracking chips!

  34. Government officials are the same everywhere by Car+Guy · · Score: 1

    Officials say they know alpacas are being "sneaked" across Peru's borders.

    Yes, let's trust these officials. They are obviously brilliant people, along the line of Dan Quayle.

    Excuse me, now. My alpaca dealer is on the other line.

    1. Re:Government officials are the same everywhere by pauldy · · Score: 1

      Don't you know hillbilly. You might have sneaked them out but you have to have snuked them in. :-) for real though was this a non english speaker or something?

  35. They were wrong... by DoktorGonzo · · Score: 1

    All this time, people thought I was paranoid. Turns out I just think I'm an alpaca!

  36. The Alpaca Book by veg_all · · Score: 1

    The alpaca (Lama pacos) is featured on the front of the rather new (2003) O'Reilly book, Learning Perl Objects, References & Modules .

    --
    grammar-lesson free since 1999. (rescinded - 2005)
  37. RFID by Arngautr · · Score: 1

    Ths would have generated much more of a response if "RFID" was mentioned.

  38. Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the HELL is that? It looks like a sheep fscked a llama.

  39. Re:news? not even for nerds - this stuff don't mat by daveb · · Score: 1

    my (unpreviewed mungled) point was that this is pretty standard stuff and hardley news. Whether you use the technology on my $1k pooch or a $10k alpaca (which sounds way to high but anyway) the technology is trivial.

  40. So you're telling me... by lukestuts · · Score: 1

    ...Peru is real?

  41. yeah but by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    blaming peru for that, while ignoring the us, for example, is like going after rhino records when sony music is committing 99.999% of the crimes

    in other words, you are right, but about a drop in the bucket

    why don't you take all of your righteous hot air and point it at the us instead? why attack the little guy and let the big guy get off scott free? use your hot air where it counts, stop beating up on the little guy, peru

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it