Slashdot Mirror


NASA's New 'Exploration' Insignia

colonist writes "NASA has a new insignia for the program set by the Vision for Space Exploration. This UPI article describes it: "Three spheres--Earth, the moon and Mars--are arrayed in sequence, with the streak of a rocket passing through each. A Latin inscription on the emblem says 'Audentes Fortuna Juvat,' which, translated into English, says 'Fortune Favors the Bold.'" Compare it with other space mission insignia."

32 of 171 comments (clear)

  1. I love these things. by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't think there's many things that haven't changed much like nasa's insignias. To me they're all so delightfully kitsch 50s stuff.

    Nice to see something with continuity... even nicer that I like that base design.

  2. Cpt Sisko by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fortune Favors the Bold

    Didn't Sisko say this in DS9?

    1. Re:Cpt Sisko by blancolioni · · Score: 4, Funny

      Didn't Sisko say this in DS9?

      Well, Virgil said it in 10BC, but he probably stole it from Sisko.

  3. <RANT> by tekiegreg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it just me, or is NASA more of a marketing organization these days? Quit with the speeches and gimmicks and start working towards actually going somewhere interesting (aka Mars, Moon, etc.). I'd rather my taxpayer dollars do that than hype up going to one of these places :-/

    </RANT>

    --
    ...in bed
  4. In 2,300 years... by quinkin · · Score: 4, Funny
    NASA announces new plan to wait for next Earth, Moon, Mars alignment and build a great big slippery slide...

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  5. GeekMan Spacesuits by ryanmfw · · Score: 3, Funny

    Darn, now I need someone to sew one of these onto my cool GeekMan(TM) action figure battle spacesuits!

    --
    Hurricane Ivan: A 17th century prison collapsed. All of the inmates escaped.
  6. Re:Why Latin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should keep them in the original Klingon!

  7. Nice to see by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that the new insignia hints at the future without explicitly including specific targets outside of our moon and Mars.

    Visual representations like this can help reinforce what the mission is all about.

    I think its cool.

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
    1. Re:Nice to see by demachina · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Enjoy. This insignia is about as close as NASA will get to the Moon or Mars.

      It will be interesting to see what happens to this program after the election. The cynic in me sees Karl Rove sitting in his office at the white office toting up electoral college votes. Florida, of course, comes out at the top of lists in play he has to win. Its likely it will close in 2004. If you want to swing a few hundred thousand votes in Florida your way, look to the space coast around Cocoa Beach and Melbourne which is extremely dependent on the manned and unmanned space programs for its economic existence. Would Karl rather they were:

      A. Facing unemployment and economic collapse when the manned space program craters after the Shuttle and ISS are end of lifed

      B. Drooling over the prospects of a decades long manned program to the Moon and Mars which will be a huge boon to the local economy, and Florida as a whole, and keep all the NASA employees and contractors employed for life working on a very cool project.

      Its pretty easy to announce this program, put next to no money in it and cement the vote of everyone who's livelihood directly or indirectly depends on the manned space program. The space program is a prestige thing for all of Florida supporting it is the smart move if you want their votes. After the election and at the point they might have to bend metal and start spending real money on it is when you will see how much the Bush administration really cares about this.

      Its a pretty strong tell that they completely ignored this program in the State of the Union address. If it mattered to them they would have put it there front and center instead of goofy things like dealing with steroids in athletics.

      If the program does stay funded after the election and in fact starts to see some serious funding then the fallback rationale for this program is its another payoff to the big aerospace companies which are big backers of the republican party. They are giving them a lot through missile defense and other defense programs so I'm not sure this is a likely explanation especially as slow as the money ramps up. If it was like the huge payoffs to the drug companies, the energy contracts and the likes of Halliburton they would be throwing billions in to it right away.

      This programs fatal flaw is that it is so slow and it will take so long to achieve any interesting milestone that the political climate is certain to change. This changing climate is one of the key contributors to the disaster that ISS turned in to. One thing Kennedy did right was to set the goal early in his administration and set the major milestones, and the major expenditures to occur within his potential eight year term. That was a sign he was serious. The fact both Bush's waited until late in their administration to set the goal and the goal is so far out that they wouldn't have to fund when it got expensive is another tell that this initiative is another one of their many sucker plays.

      --
      @de_machina
  8. It's slightly better than the last slogan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Safe, sensible, and on the ground.

  9. Re:Why Latin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Probably becuase it's one of the oldest languages there is, and because space exploration is such an historically significant event...
    *shrugs*

  10. Re:Why Latin? by LittleBigLui · · Score: 5, Funny
    Why do all these insignias use Latin?


    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
    (Whatever is said in Latin, sounds profound.)
    --
    Free as in mason.
  11. Re:Why Latin? by CoconutFoobar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do all these insignias use Latin?

    If you look at this one, it has the phrase in Latin on one side, and English on the other side of the patch.
    That said, it should also be noted that Latin is a rather clear language. There is a reason that French and English are used in diplomacy, they can be interpreted in many different ways, there is alot of 'wiggle room' within them. Let's look at this short phrase. 'Fortune Favors the Bold'.
    Does this mean that people who write their name in bold will do better than those who write it in italics? How about Fortune, are we talking about luck or a magazine?

    While few 'speak' the language, Latin still remains one of the more 'universal' languages out there and since NASA is working with other space agencies more and more, it might be good to have a descriptive phrase that translates quickly into other languages.

  12. Nice logo NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Three spheres--Earth, the moon and Mars--are arrayed in sequence, with the streak of a rocket missing all three and flying straight into the sun

    One badge team must have been working in metric, the other in imperial.

  13. Re:Why Latin? by panurge · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A good point. Latin inscriptions date from when everybody in Europe who could read, read Latin. That's a long time ago now, since rebels like Dante and Chaucer started doing serious literary stuff in local languages (OK, they were doing it in Provence in the 12th Century, but who reads Arnaut nowadays?)

    I guess the answer is that if it's in English, you see how unimpressive it really is. Because the alternative to "Fortune favours the bold" is that saying of Flight Class 101, "There are no old, bold pilots".

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  14. Re:Why Latin? by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because Latin sounds more impressive than everyday English. It's the same reason that the Romans of Caesar's day spoke Greek when they wanted to sound especially impressive. (Hence the line in Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar", "But for mine own part, it was Greek to me," in reference to Cicero's speech earlier.)

    Better question: why do you ask and why do you single out NASA? The US motto ("e pluribus unum") is in Latin, as are countless other mottos, slogans, and inscriptions around this country. And if you look, the Latin is translated into English on this NASA patch.

    In any event, it wasn't exactly a vital safety message, it's just a slogan. If you haven't studied Latin, you're not really missing something important.

  15. Bold... or Risk-Averse by Azghoul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Fortune Favors the Bold".

    Too bad it doesn't seem to be true these days. Seems to me that the U.S. is so risk-averse that any attempt at space travel will be terribly expensive and will take decades. Not because the technology isn't there (remember, we DID go to the moon 35 years ago), but because there might be a .001% chance of something going wrong, and we just can't have that!!

    When we DO finally get space travel sorted out, my suggestion is to put the lawyers and insurance CEOs on the first flight and aim it at the sun (Hey, it's Pauly Shore! And Rosie! Ding ding ding goes the trolley!).

    1. Re:Bold... or Risk-Averse by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Funny

      The full slogan is actually "fortune favors the bold robotic vehicle"

    2. Re:Bold... or Risk-Averse by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not because the technology isn't there (remember, we DID go to the moon 35 years ago), but because there might be a .001% chance of something going wrong, and we just can't have that!!

      Actually, the shuttle has a roughly %2 failure rate. By comparison, SARS killed about %4 of the people it infected. And the shuttle is about as stable and mature a space launcher as you will find. So in other words, the technology is still gambling with the lives of astronauts, though it is more vegas roulette than russian roulette.

      As for being terribly expensive and taking lots of time... You're building a space ship. A space ship. How long would it take you to build a plane from scratch? How long would it take you to build a plane from scratch that people could live in? How long would it take you to build a plane from scratch that can work without oxygen, fly above our atmosphere, and let passengers out in the middle of a vaccuum? Did I mention protect the occupants from solar radiation, withstand several thousand degrees of heat, and recycle all body excretia into drinkable water?

      The space plane program is taking forever because the technology isn't there. The kinds of weight-to-thrust ratio to take off without boosters isn't possible without a lot more development of our engine technologies. Remember, our trip to the moon DID cost roughly 200 billion dollars, or 5% of the GDP for several years.

  16. Re:Why Latin? by Chatmag · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is a link with tons of Latin Phrases and the English translation. Latin is the root of many western languages. Latin was required in the European Universities, such as Heidelberg, which was commissioned as a University by Pope Urban VI in 1385 (note the obvious Latin connection).

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
  17. Re:Why Latin? by Avihson · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because it was originally written in Latin by Claudius in his epistles. It is an ancient truism, said well before there was a NASA, before there was an English language, well before the Earth was known to be round. Claudius lived from 10BCE to 54CE, and was emperor of Rome from 41CE until his death.

    More people in the western world know Latin than know English, for the "romance languages" were founded from Latin.

    Why are there Valedictorians, Baccalautate degrees, Cum Laude, Magna Cum Laude, Summa Cum Laude? I went to a Community College Graduation this week, and Latin was everywhere.
    Tradition!

    Lastly, Tradition states that a pithy motto be in latin, since it is a "dead" language, and therefore less likely to be misinterpreted.

  18. Can't attribute it, but... by quinkin · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Latin is a dead language.
    Dead as dead can be.
    It killed off all the Romans,
    and now it's killing me."

    - Allegedly etched on a desk in a classroom.

    Q.

    --
    Insert Signature Here
  19. Re: by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me, or is NASA more of a marketing organization these days?

    Just these days? As I recall, the focus of NASA back in it's heyday was scoring propaganda victories in the Cold War.

    The single most practical reason for the moon landing was to show up the Soviets.

  20. Fortune? by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    translated into English, says 'Fortune Favors the Bold.'

    Fortune? How Ferrengi of us. As American Indians are rumored to have said, "Moon people, watch you land! These guys will try to take it."

    (One thing about slashdot is that you can mispell just about any word, and nobody complains. But, mispell a Trek word and you are vaporized by the masses.)

  21. Sounds Familiar.... by WryCoder · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reminds me of some software projects. First the logo, then the web site, then the coffee cups, and finally start arguing about what is to be accomplished.

  22. short-term thinking? by WillWare · · Score: 3, Funny
    The Moon-Mars thing is only the next five or ten years, isn't it? NASA would presumably want an insignia that extends beyond the immediate goal. At least I would, if I were NASA. Otherwise I'd worry about whether I should be getting my resume cleaned up.

    "Fortune favors the bold", huh? So what favors the feeble? Whatever that is, NASA should be shopping for some of that.

    --
    WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
  23. "Three spheres--Earth, the moon and Mars" by 3LP · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its triplanetary! Curse those filthy Boskonians....

  24. NASA PR by Animats · · Score: 3, Funny

    NASA has a great PR operation. They should realize that's their core business area and dump the space operations.

  25. Good, a logo by kahei · · Score: 2, Funny


    Now all they need is funding, a plan, and some sort of stab at a space vehicle.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  26. Prediction... by mpaque · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This patch and a vast collection of 'white papers' is all that we'll ever see from this NASA initiative.

    The papers will be the result of spending several billion dollars on studies with NASA aerospace industry contractors.

    No hardware beyond conceptual models will be produced.

    Sorry folks, but if you want to actually GO somewhere, NASA is no longer the most effective way to spend money to get there. In a few more years, NASA won't be able to get people to LEO any more. That makes getting to the moon or Mars difficult.

    Delta Clipper series - 3 successful scale model flights of DC-X, project terminated for DC-XA after crash on 4th landing. It worked, though. Defunded in 1996 for the X-33 and following projects.

    X-33 started 1996, ended 2001. Concrete was poured for a launch facility. Lots of parts moved in (and out) of an assembly hanger. NASA discovers that when in contact with liquid hydrogen, lots of materials turn brittle and fail under load. (This bit actually develops some good materials science.) Two completed aerospike rocket engines were built and operated in a test stand for 1.12 seconds.

    X-37 orbital flight demonstrator. X40A scale model for free flight built in 1998. Fabrication of first X-37 started in 2001, with an orbital test planned for 2003. AIr Force withdrew support in 2002. Project defunded in 2003.

    CEV - Announced 2003. NASA Request for Information sent to contractors in April 2004. "Spiral development" plan call for launching a stripped down prototype in 2008, containing only about 30 percent of the systems of a fully developed craft, unpiloted test flights in 2011, and a manned mission in 2014.

  27. Re:Why Latin? by Deadstick · · Score: 2, Informative
    Why do all these insignias use Latin? More people know English.

    The fact that insignia is commonly accepted as a singular today makes that glaringly obvious.

    rj

  28. For those of you who don't know Latin .... by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Funny
    Nostrum navis praemium in luminosus incendia.
    My nose and navel have been set on fire and are burning brightly.
    Semper ubi sub ubi!
    Hit him below the belt!
    Ego nunquam ubi sub ubi! Planto vos fervens?
    Only arrogant non-coms hit below the belt! Why don't you go plant some ferns?
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana