Open-Source Cube FPS Game/Engine Updated
An anonymous reader writes "There's a new release of the open source multiplayer/singleplayer first person shooter Cube available on the official site. According to the site, this update, which has freely downloadable 'Win32/MacOSX/Linux/LinuxPPC clients and Linux/Solaris/FreeBSD servers' includes 'lots of new great SP [single player] and DM [deathmatch] maps, new textures, mapmodels, a completely new
soundtrack yet again, and a variety of code improvements such as better animation.' - the history document has more info on the changes."
I feel compelled to mention that the author has written other engines besides cube; those can be viewed here. Oh yeah, he worked on Far Cry, too!
I beat the Slashdotting! I found out about this on Doom World and I've been playing with it all day.
Couple of helpful hints for Windows users. First, run cube.bat in the root directory; the cube.exe in the bin directory mysteriously crashes if you run it directly. (Well, it did on my system.) Second, if you have a slower system, like I do, you might actually want to edit that cube.bat file and set the resolution to 640x480 instead of 1024x768!
Sunlit World Scheme. Weird and different.
How come this game that is open source, with what I have to think are fewer financial or programming resources than for-profit games, can manage to release a game for 4 platforms? For most games, you get a PC version, and maybe a Mac version or a Linux version significantly later. I know cross platform games exist, but I don't think I've ever heard of a release like this one.
Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!
That is completly beyond the point. Cube's goal is to be FUN. Not to compete in the commercial games market.
It is real 3d, but to keep things simple, the rooms are limited to what you call 2.5D. That's why it playable even on old computers. If you want room over room, you can always make md2 models and insert them in your level, it works marvels and still looks good, if you are good with ligthning of course.
The working of the engine is actualy very clever, try editing for it, it's done in the game itself and it's very fast. I have contributed a couple of levels for this release and after having edited for Cube, I'd hardly go back to a "real 3d engine" because Cube is so much more FUN to edit for.
So, next time, before posting something like this, maybe you'd want to consider the actual goal of the project.
You are mixing up quite a few issues, namely the difference between a 3d renderer and a 3d map format. Cube is decidedly 3d... take a look at the screenshot... does it look 2d to you? What do you think cube looks more like, a 2d sidescroller or quake?
c re enshot_802899.jpg
The orginal doom had a 2.5d renderer and a 2d map format, OpenGL doom ports now have a 3d renderer still with a 2d map format.. they are 3d engines. Cube is a 3d engine with a "mostly" 2d mapformat, but that is just a limitation for convenience, and doesn't affect things like physics, e.g.:
http://www.cubeengine.com/images/screenshots2/s
see the bridge on that shot? players can be on top of and below it at the same time. No limitations.
As to doom3 et al... Cube is not even competing againt that. It has some pretty cool features of its own which doom3 will never have. But for your uninformed mind that is not going to matter, is it?
It's small! It's FAST! It's free! It's FUN! What more could you ask for?
:)
I played tonight for the first time. Multiplayer play reminds me a lot of Quake. The maps are all very pretty. The lighting effects are really quite good. It's true that it doesn't currently support true 3d maps (although there is a hack to get rooms over rooms using map models), and that gives the maps a sort of doom-ish feel, but WTF? Does that really impact the fun of deathmatch? I don't think so!
Screw you for releasing such a fun game that I had to waste two hours of my evening playing it! Bloody video game time pirates.
-73, de n1ywb
www.n1ywb.com
I think you could conceivably make an interesting FPS based on this engine with some convinction and hard work.
Q2 is also true 3D, unlike Cube, which is (apparently, judging from the screenshots) 2.5D.
Cube does have some things that Q2 lacks, such as in-game editing of geometry, and probably better handling of outdoor areas.
Also, my guess is that the system requirements for running Q2 are somewhat higher than those for Cube.
The right game engine for the right game, I always say.
(Well, not always; sometimes I say other things, and sometimes I don't talk at all.
But when I do talk, one of the things that I may say is "The right game engine for the right game".
So I guess that it would be more accurate to say "The right game engine for the right game, I sometimes say.".)
Anyway, it's nice to see that people are working on these things.
Other open-source game engines exist, such as Crystal Space 3D and OGRE.
There used to be a comprehensive list of 3D engines (both free and commercial) here (which took over from here), but it's been a while since is was updated.
If anyone has a more recent version of this list, please post a link to it.
Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana