Slashdot Mirror


In The Works: Windows For Supercomputers

Robert Accettura writes "According to ZDNet, Microsoft may be feeling threatened by Linux gaining ground in the High Performance Computing (HPC) arena. As a result, they have formed a HPC group to bring windows to these systems. It makes a mention of how clustered computing may be a target. I guess the only thing better than crashing 1 computer at a time is crashing an entire room full at once."

32 of 705 comments (clear)

  1. I guess Bill thinks it's time... by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess Bill thinks it's time to slow the worlds fastest computers to a crawl. Apparently they aren't crashing enough, too.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    1. Re:I guess Bill thinks it's time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Doesn't for me, and millions of others.

  2. A super computer with Windows(tm) by castlec · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess then the computer wouldn't be so super :o)

    --
    When I tell an object to delete this, am I killing it or telling it to kill me?
  3. Field day for the worms by troon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope those guys have good firewalls.

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  4. Obligatory clippy comment by foidulus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It looks like you are building a cluster, would you like me to tell you how Microsoft can bring it to it's knees?"

    1. Re:Obligatory clippy comment by spellraiser · · Score: 1, Funny

      While we're at it, I think we need to get this one out of the way as well:

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of bluescreens!

      --
      I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
  5. Because they are supercomputers... by armacc · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... will they crash more quickly or more often than mine does?

    1. Re:Because they are supercomputers... by Kefeus · · Score: 1, Funny

      Both ;)

  6. hijack ware by wpiman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great- when the cluster gets hijacked by spyware and the like- it can send out 3 millions spam emails a hour as opposed to the 5000 a Dell does now.

  7. Windows HPC by LittleBigLui · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because every Node needs a Windowing System in Ring 0.

    --
    Free as in mason.
  8. finally, machines big enough for longhorn... by blackcoot · · Score: 3, Funny

    i think billy & co finally figured out how to get big enough iron for longhorn >D

  9. Wow!!! by PSaltyDS · · Score: 2, Funny

    A thousand processors...

    A terrabyte of RAM...

    Trillions of pixels per second...

    Processed at multi-terraflop speeds...

    Drawing the fastest BSOD ever!!!

    But...nobody WANTS a Beowolf cluster of these...

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
  10. is this a joke? by elbazo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ive been laughing like a madman for 5 minutes on the train because of this. Now im getting wierd looks from all the other passengers. Thanks /. No offense to gates but i doubt the takeup of this will be high, given microsoft's reputation for processor resource abuse. The windows source must look like this: while(extraprocessingtimeisfree) { doafewforloops }

  11. Yay for windows! by gwoodrow · · Score: 1, Funny

    This just in... the internet has crashed. Repeat... the entire internet has crashed.
    Apparently, all major servers and clusters running government-mandated "Windows HPC" have severely malfunctioned and automatically reformatted the entire internet. Thousands of IT workers and webmasters have reportedly killed themselves by jumping out of top floor... um... windows. Could irony BE any more ironic?
    Developing...

  12. Re:Windows on HPC? by hplasm · · Score: 2, Funny

    The point is that Microsoft can probably work very hard to castrate the gui windows out of Windows(tm) and end up with smallish kernel or micro-kernel architecture. With Internet Explorer.

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  13. WIndows for clusters by miquels · · Score: 5, Funny

    .. codename "domino" ?

    --
    Living is a horizontal fall
  14. Re: Yup, a balanced view from Slashdot as usual by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1, Funny


    > You do distinctly get the feeling that 90% of the /. folk haven't used Windows since 1997

    Unfortunately, I've had the "privilege" of going back to Windows at work this year.

    > it's a bit better than it was

    Yeah, XP is "a bit" better than Windows 95 was. But not a heck of a lot.

    > it's easy enough to build an incredibly unstable *nix box...

    But with Windows you get instability without all the extra work.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  15. Re: BSOD by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


    > All we need now is a BSOD

    Beowulfed Screens Of Death?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  16. Imagine... by Jugalator · · Score: 1, Funny

    Heh heh... Hey, imagine a Beowulf cluster of Win... ... *barf*

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  17. Crashing by Andy+Smith · · Score: 4, Funny
    I guess the only thing better than crashing 1 computer at a time is crashing an entire room full at once
    Yeah because Windows crashes all the time for me. Oh yes, every day. Every hour!

    Oh no, hang on, it doesn't. Ever. I boot up in the morning, switch between video and photo editing software hundreds of times throughout the day with regular use of MSIE and Eudora as well, and then I shut it down at night without it having crashed once. Every day. For years.

    Old versions of Windows crashed a lot. Current versions don't. Fact.

    This is part of the reason why Linux isn't gaining mainstream acceptance fast enough. Linux advocates talk about all these imaginary flaws in Windows and people out here in the real world think "well that isn't my experience at all". The effect is to create a distance between regular people and Linux advocates, which in turn pushes the mainstream acceptance of Linux further and further away. Linux needs to be seen as "the other big operating system", not some niche software used by a minority who seem to have a totally different experience of Windows than the rest of us.
    1. Re:Crashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      "Old versions of Windows crashed a lot. Current versions don't. Fact."

      Fact? Opinion!

      I'll match your claim: "Old versions of Windows crashed a lot. Current versions crash quite a bit. Fact."

      "...then I shut it down at night..."
      Oh.. that's why. Windows boxes get sleepy if they stay up too late.

  18. Re:nah, just a PR move. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    What do you mean, Windows doesn't cluster? Of course it clusters! In fact, Microsoft go to great lengths to tell you how to cluster your Microsoft Windows Server to achieve the best performance. There's the:

    • Primary Domain Controller
    • Secondary Domain Controller
    • A backup Secondary Domain Controller (In case the first one fails)
    • The Exchange Server
    • The second Exchange Server (Because the first can't handle the load
    • The backup Exchange Server (In case one of the two primary Exchange Servers fails)
    • The IIS Server..
    • The fallover IIS Server..
    • The fallover fallover IIS Server
    • The MS SQL Server
    • The MS SQL Server backup
    • Two or more file servers
    • The Backup server, running Arcserve or similiar (Because even an MCSE can tell you NT Backup is utter turd)
    • The Active Directory Server
    • The backup Active Directory Server

    • See? All those computers in multiple clusters. Microsoft are always ahead of the game!
  19. Re:Windows on HPC? by budgenator · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess I just don't understand this, what are we going to do, analyse the entire S&P 500 in a freaking Excel spreadsheet? I realise that these spreadsheet jockeys are doing things in Excel that are a lot more like applications than what most of us meer mortals think of as spreadsheets; but I just can't picture pitching to a PHB the need to purchase a 5T FLOPS cluster to run a spreadsheet app!

    Of course it gets even better, imagine telling your users that the "server" will be down for a millions dollars of transaction time, so that we can reboot after installing the latest Windows update.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  20. if cisco, then windows by curator_thew · · Score: 1, Funny

    If cisco can make IOS work on Massively Distributed Multiprocessor Systems (MDMS) for CRS-1 (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5763/index. html) [announced today], then doing the same for Windows should be a cinch.

  21. Yes, but by RCO · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those aren't MS approved methods of performing that particular task ;-)

    --
    'And all the monkeys aren't in the zoo Every day you meet quite a few...'
  22. Re:Strip out lots of Crap by fwarren · · Score: 1, Funny
    They should leave in Freecell

    Image being able to play every board layout at one time

    ----------------

    --
    vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
  23. Absolutely, MSware is very stable. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1, Funny

    I have never seen a platform that is capable to spawn so many viruses and worms every week.

    You could not do that in a shitty platfrom in which everything was down half the time.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  24. Re:What the fsck by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why in the world would someone want to run a bloated GUI based operating system on hardwared designed specifically to provide services (servers) to it's customers?

    I think you vastly overestimate how much CPU a Windows box uses to display that "Press CTRL-ALT-DEL to Login" screen.

  25. Wake you up? by aurelian · · Score: 2, Funny
    Wake me up when Seymour Cray buys a site license

    Given that he died in 1996, I guess that would indeed be something worth waking up for.

  26. longhorn hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    wasn't this the recomended hardware for longhorn?

  27. Windows on a Supercomputer/Mainframe by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love this whole idea of Windows on a supercomputer! Just think of how fast a spam drone it would make!

    Windows only technical asset is a (relatively) good GUI.

    And, as we all know, *ALL* mainframes, supercomputers and servers absolutely must have GUIs!

    After all,

    • GUIs are less resource-intensive than a CLI (but why would you care, having invested millions to get a couple of teraflops, about squeezing every last little drop of power out of it?)
    • GUIs save you time and effort! Rather than a simple shell, Perl, $whatever script to do things, have an operator point-and-click for that human touch!
    • GUIs, by virtue of being based on less code and with less features than a CLI, are inherently more secure. Microsoft, as we know, is the field's foremost expert in security and reliability.

    Memo at Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratory:

    "Please be advised that Deep Blue will be rebooted this afternoon at 5:PM in order to complete the installation of Service Pack 11. All jobs currently running and queued will be lost, even those which have already accumulated several years of processor time. We expect Deep Blue to resume normal operation sometime in early August. Thank you for your cooperation, LANL Informatics Department"

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  28. Microsoft Press Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We never intended to release Windows HPC for supercomputing. Our intention was to line out the minimum hardware requirements for Windows Longhorn. We apologize for any confusion this may have caused.

    B&S