Slashdot Mirror


Sneak Preview of VIA's next-gen mini-ITX mobo

An anonymous reader writes "VIA will preview its next-generation mini-ITX board for the consumer electronics market at next week's Computex 2004 in Taipei. The EPIA SP features a new graphics and memory controller hub (GMCH) supporting faster front-side bus (FSB), memory, and southbridge interconnect speeds. It also features a C3 processor clocked at 1.3GHz, integrated PadLock Hardware Security Suite, and MPEG-4 acceleration. Oh, and like the current top-end MII 12000 VIA board, the whole board probably draws under 20watts running flat out."

45 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. For anyone interested... by Mz6 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    These boards make for a great use in the car. I have used several of these boards to create a carputer for movies, music, and navigation inside my car.

    I have one myself and I love it :)

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:For anyone interested... by legoburner · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Screw cars... think supercomputing cluster. VIA have been talking about a dual CPU mini-itx board with 2ghz (esther core) processors for a while now. I'll leave finding info about them up to you (mini-itx.com and via's site for starters)

      You can get 1U cases which let you put in 2 mini-itx boards (there are quite a few if you [g|fr]oogle.

      Here are some specs for a rack full of them...
      336GHz total power. 84GB RAM, up to 22.5 TB HDD space, total power usage < 15kW (60W per machine).

      Costs:
      fixed:
      42U rack: $150
      Cables/Power supplies: ~$100

      per-unit:
      case: $200
      mobo (guess): $200
      ram (512GB*2): $120
      HDD (300GB): $250

      ttl per machine: 200+2(200)+2(120)+2(250)=$1340
      42 machines=$56280
      + rack bits=$56530

      in GBP=30584 (I am British)

      that's a spicy-a meat-a-ball.. still 22TB and 336Ghz cluster... hmmmm... Might get 5fps on Doom 3!

      15kW/h
      To be extra geeky... cost per day to run in London, England (electricity only, excluding air conditioning)...
      15kW/h per hour * 24 = 360kW/h per day
      * 8p per unit + VAT = 2880 + 504
      = GBP 33.84 per day
      = GBP 12351.60 per year.... ouch, that's a new rack every 3 years if you leave it turned off though

      Damn I cant wait for the 2ghz dual cpu mini-itx boards... and a bunch of rich, obscure relatives to pass on and give me money >:)

      And since this is slashdot... cue the 50 posts to correct and nit pick this post since it contains (bad) maths.

    2. Re:For anyone interested... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      VIA chips have crappy floating point performance compared to the competition, so this might affect cluster suitability.

      These little boards would make excellent web browsing machines, or little web and file servers.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    3. Re:For anyone interested... by Amgine007 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here are some specs for a rack full of them...

      A proof of your concept: the Mini-ITX Cluster

  2. 1.3ghz by zackeller · · Score: 2, Funny

    1.3ghz should be enough for anybody.

    1. Re:1.3ghz by Andy+Mitchell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1.3Ghz should be enough for anyone but....

      The VIA C3 had a rather poor floating point unit, so for apps that need it (e.g. 3D games) they do very badly.

      Of course for playing MP3 or WMA files and office apps the older 533MHz (Eden 5000) version was nippy enough :-)

      As far as I'm aware they havent improved the FPU yet. Someone let me know if I'm wrong. This armchair CPU designer would of liked to see them throw more silicon at this area.

      Simply increasing the clock speed always generates more heat, a more complex FPU would only generate more heat if your making use of the FPU.

      Controlling a fans RPM speed with CPU temperature is trivial so this makes a lot of sense.

    2. Re:1.3ghz by homer_ca · · Score: 3, Informative

      The FPU is a little better now. It runs at full CPU speed instead of half like the earlier C3's. It's still underpowered though. Sudhian has a review of the last generation MII 12000 here. The 1.2Ghz w/o hardware MPEG4 acceleration can't play 720x540 DIVX file smoothly. If the hardware MPEG4 works, 1.3Ghz should be fast enough for any home theater PC job except video encoding like recording TV. You'll need a TV tuner card with a hardware MPEG encoder.

    3. Re:1.3ghz by pc486 · · Score: 4, Informative

      While it is true that the FPU of the C3 still isn't up to speed with other processors, the C3 1Ghz can definatly play 720x540 MPEG4 back at full speed. I do it all the time with a CVS copy of MPlayer (DirectFB driver) on Slackware Linux. I can even play 720x460 WMV9 (windows binary DLL) with 80% cpu utilization. For comparison, libavcodec decodes 640x480 MPEG4 with only 32% CPU utilization, with 14% going to dealing with the framebuffer (not decoding, just frame copying or vsyncing).

  3. Froogle by Mz6 · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:Froogle by anethema · · Score: 2, Informative

      While Froogle is your friend indeed, a search for VIA wont turn up very good results.

      What you want to search for is EPIA, since all the mini-itx boards carry the epia name.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  4. oooh car by millahtime · · Score: 3, Funny

    makes my dreams of building KITT that much closer to reality.

    That is the Knight Industries Two Thousand

  5. I have one of the earlier mini-iTX boards by hattig · · Score: 2, Informative

    The EPIA-800 ... it is okay I suppose, it does what I'm using it for quite well (KDE on FreeBSD for work purposes, e-mail, light web browsing, SSH, etc). It suffers from being a first-gen product, the chipset is weak, and so on.

    A 1.3GHz CN400 based board will be a lot more powerful, and should be more than enough for media applications that these boards are ideally suited for.

  6. Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by Amgine007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Nano-ITX board that they announced last year still seems to be the coolest thing around in terms of potential for off-the-shelf, single board computer projects.

    I mean, it's only 4.7 inches by 4.7 inches! Of course I've never seen a price, but sell this thing in the $100 range and I'll take 3...

    1. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by Smallpond · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you just want small size, use PC/104 at 3.6" x 3.8" (90mm x 96mm). You get limited CPU speed, but you can make a tiny stack of modules.

    2. Re:Still waiting for the nano-itx.. by jdray · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I remember spotting a computer, probably a link off of LinuxDevices, that was the size of a credit card. It was mostly SMT solder-down components with a mini-PCI-like card connector at one end that was used to connect to a daughtercard full of ports and whatnot. I went looking for it yesterday, but couln't find it. Any ideas? I wanted to imagine a Beowulf cluster of them, but needed a visual reference for aid.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
  7. DRM? by Atario · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The latest C3 processor features an integrated AES encryption engine and two random number generators that work with the PadLock ACE software to perform user authentication, DRM, or other security operations in the background
    [Cue orchestra]: DUN DUN DUNNNNN!!
    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  8. hard to find... but not that hard... by anthonyrcalgary · · Score: 2, Informative

    I thought about getting one of the older ones, and my local place can order them in if you ask... try this with your local store. It's not worth hunting around online for a better price when shipping will eat the advantage many times over. With more expensive parts, it can be worth it but these things are cheap.

    I imagine I'll get one when there's dual-NIC version. They're pretty tough to beat for firewalling. There's cheaper and lower power systems in existance, but you usually sacrifice quite a bit.

    --
    When someone might yell at me, it has to be OpenBSD.
    1. Re:hard to find... but not that hard... by MoTec · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is an older dual-nic version, the
      VIA EPIA CL-Series. It's only 600mhz but that's lots faster than the old compaq deskpro that i'm currently using for a firewall. I'm planning on upgrading to one of these in this or a similar case.

      From what I've read, lots of people are using this motherboard for just this purpose.

    2. Re:hard to find... but not that hard... by darrylo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If you only want to create a low-power firewall, take a look at the Soekris boxes, which are designed to run FreeBSD, Linux, OpenBSD, and NetBSD. Some models have three (3) lan ports, as well as (optional) PCMCIA slots (for wireless LAN applications). Most versions boot from compact flash (or a microdrive), but there's a version that supports a 2.5" IDE laptop drive (however, note that the optional case for the IDE drive version supposedly has poor ventilation, and so the drive supposedly runs hot -- see the mailing list below). The processors are a tad slow (100-266MHz 486-class processors), but they're generally more than enough for firewall/access point purposes.

      There's a mailing list:

      http://cinematic.forko.com/pipermail/soekris-tech/

      There's also, "m0n0wall", a FreeBSD-based firewall originally designed for the soekris boards:

      http://www.m0n0.ch/wall/

      I'm in the process of upgrading my home firewall to soekris/m0n0wall, although I plan on using an EPIA VIA M 10000 board for an home fileserver.

    3. Re:hard to find... but not that hard... by anthonyrcalgary · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Right, but I'd prefer the new one as it has SATA on board. It's also a bit faster, more memory bandwidth, etc. I'd be using it to host dynamic content and as a file server as well. When they get a dual NIC version of the new one, I'll be able to build the server I want with no PCI cards, which is what I'd prefer to do. I'm not going to replace my aging system now when I can wait a little bit longer and get a system that does everything I want without any upgrades.

      --
      When someone might yell at me, it has to be OpenBSD.
  9. Re:Yeah but... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Informative
    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  10. Re:Yeah but... by kunudo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Forget mini-itx, I want to know when Nano-ITX will be availible... I get the distinct feeling that it's a vaporvare promo trick... it's only 2/3 of the size of the mini-itx boards and 10x as useful/easy to put into things.... I want one :(

  11. Athlon XP via chipset kt880 nowhere to be seen by donfede · · Score: 3, Informative

    Interesting, VIA is announcing yet more new products... Yet, I've been looking for the past several weeks (and other posts on the Internet go as far back as Nov of 2003) for VIA's latest generation Athlon XP chipset KT880 via kt880... yet other than VIAs website, it's nowhere to be seen!!!

  12. PVR? by dostert · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Has anyone tried setting up a nice small PVR with any of these? If you put like a Hauppauge 250 or another hardware encoding card in this, is there enough power for recording and watching TV at the same time? How about VIA's graphics? I assume I wouldn't be able to play FarCry... but will it be adequate to display DVDs on a non HDTV?

    1. Re:PVR? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2, Informative

      I use an ATI TV Wonder VE with my M10000 board. Works fine for recording/playback, but forget about pausing live tv.

      DVDs play fine, too. So does about every video codec I've thrown at it.

  13. Question ? by Jim+Buzbee · · Score: 2, Funny

    the whole board probably draws under 20watts running flat out.

    For the ignorant among us, how does that compare to say the power consumed by a 20 watt night light? Is it the same?

  14. Before you get your panties in a bunch... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...no, it's not Palladium/Trusted Computing etc. Basicly, what it has is an encryption accelerator, just like it has mpeg2, mpeg4 etc. acceleration. Why? Because the processor itself is a whimp.

    It doesn't do anything else than what a plain 3GHz machine could do. DRM is one *application*, since most DRM'd content is also encrypted ;). But it might just as well be used to run heavy SSH connections or your encrypted P2P net of choice.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  15. still waiting for nano-itx motherboards.. by dcstimm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    its been like 8 months since they were announced but no one seems to have them!!

  16. microatx still better by xlyz · · Score: 3, Interesting


    unless you need a real compact design, microatx + mobile processor can deliver same low consumption and more power and expansion possibility

    look for an Athlon Northwood to undervolt and it will be d*mn cheaper as well

  17. Yes but by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, but would it fit in a 5.25" slot?
    Then I could have a beowulf cluser right there in my bigtower case.

  18. Only one catch.. by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I must agree with other posters: the VIA boards are most definitely the shit. And the older ones, like the V-8000A, are a steal. I currently have Fedora Core v1 + XMMS on mine; to make a long story short, lots of fun..

    HOWEVER, do note that some VIA processors will advertise themselves as "686-compliant", when in fact their instruction set is missing 1 vital MMX instruction (SSE, I think). So do make sure your binaries are built for the 586. You'll thank me in the morning.

    --
    --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    1. Re:Only one catch.. by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Informative
      HOWEVER, do note that some VIA processors will advertise themselves as "686-compliant", when in fact their instruction set is missing 1 vital MMX instruction (SSE, I think). So do make sure your binaries are built for the 586. You'll thank me in the morning.

      MMX is a set of integer vector operations, SSE is the same for floating point. Neither of these implies 686; Pentium Pro was the first processor with i686 core, and it has neither of these instruction sets.

      To complicate matters further, GCC's idea of i686 seems a little different than the official spec (whatever that is). AFAIK, AMD's K6 processors are i686, but programs compiled with gcc for i686 won't run on it. I think it's about the CMOV instruction; please correct me if I'm wrong.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Only one catch.. by TeknoHog · · Score: 2, Informative
      Luckily you can use the -march=C3 nowadays.

      But this won't work on C3-2, the Nehemiah. It has SSE instead of the original C3's 3DNow. Thus I use -march=pentium3, which is fine instruction-wise. Timing and cache issues are another matter though...

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  19. Cool, but... by Kjella · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I really missed DVI or some other HDTV res output. I mean, what I want to use it for is a home theater kind of setup (with network disks, of course)... The Nanode + an LCD TV... now that would be cool.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  20. Re:Yeah but... by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 2

    Since I'm using an ATI TV Wonder VE in my current mini-itx Toolbox PVR (built into a $5.99 K-MART Toolbox), I decided to run Win2000 on it.

    I had NO PROBLEMS with getting the hardware to work. None. All the VIA stuff loaded and ran perfectly.

    Since I've committed the Sin of admitting M$ use, I will go so far as to admit records the season finale of Enterprise on it last night...

  21. Well... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...if you're an electrical engineer, no. The motherboard is probably reactive/inductive in some way, not purely resistive like a lightbulb. This means that the phase angle will be non-zero, and the true and apparent power of the circuit will be different.

    ...if you're talking about your electricity bill, then for all you could care, they're equal. 20W will be extremely close to 20W, regardless of what I said above. Personally I don't care much, since I live a place where most of the year have a space heater on...

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  22. EPIA mini-ITX boards by anakog · · Score: 5, Informative
    These are great. My home server is running on a fanless EPIA 5000 and I have never been happier about my choice. The whole machine cost me $300 (case, mobo, 256MB RAM, 120GB, extra NIC) over a year ago and has been sitting quietly under the table in my living room ever since.

    It is extremely quiet (only audible humming comes from two small fans on the case) which is important to me. It is also very low on energy consumption. I got an APC Back-UPS ES-350 (just a couple of days before the big black-out here, in North-East USA --- could not have been wiser :) The UPS is rated at 8 minutes under 100W load and 2 minutes under 200W but it lasts over 40 minutes powering my server and my DSL modem.

    Another thing I am really happy about is the fact that VIA seems to be doing a good job supporting Linux. Personally, I have never had trouble running Red Hat on mine (although, I hear FC2 had issues with it that were only recently fixed --- but that was FC2's problem).

    Overall, I feel that this has been a really great product and would wholeheartedly recommend it. I am also very happy to see that VIA has been constantly improving them. I am looking forward to seeing the upcoming nano-ITX boards.

  23. To build with recent GCCs by Daath · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've got a nice VIA Epia board (C3 Nehemiah).
    The instruction in question is CMOV.
    To build for these machines with recent GCCs build with c3 as -march or -mcpu :) If you don't use a recent gcc compile with i586 instead - Mine supports MMX+SSE (it has two SSE pipes).

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
  24. Mini boards by LesPaul75 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As much as I dislike Via, I gotta admit that these mini boards are a home run -- the best thing to happen to PCs in a long time. I'm looking forward to Intel and/or AMD jumping on the bandwagon. And soon after that I hope to see even smaller stuff becoming popular, possibly even system-on-chip designs. How sweet would that be? Yeah, I know you can buy a single-chip system now, but I want one that's just (or almost) as powerful as my home PC. Integrated graphics, gigs of RAM, all running at several GHz. Forget laptops... put the whole thing in a PDA. :)

  25. Re:Yeah but... by eviljav · · Score: 2, Informative
  26. Re:MythTV by deque_alpha · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bah. FUD. Go here to see more info. Also, there is support for the decoder specifically built into MythTV and it works very well.

  27. close, have a cigar by poptones · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's not the motherboard that's "inductive" (although everything does have inductance, capaitance, etc). What matters here is the power supply itself. Most every pc power supply (I would say every one of them, but there's probably one or two out there that would prove this wrong) uses switching circuitry to chop down a "bulk" supply of 70-200VDC into something the computer can use. This "bulk supply" was, in the beginning, created by simply rectifying the AC line directly and dumping into a fat capacitor. Most TV sets and CRT monitors still do this.

    But better power supplies don't simply use a cheap diode/cap bulk supply anymore because this puts a HUGE load on the AC line - especially when it's first turned on and that fat cap has to charge up. This capacitive load also causes non-ideal power factor alignment the entire time the system is on, which means your effective energy consumption (what it reads at the meter) may not actually reflect actual use in the system. Rsistive (neutral) to slightly inductive loads are generally favored by the power company and their meter equipment, and there are real benefits to optimizing power factor of euqipment (especially if you're in an office or hosting location with hundreds or thousands of computers). So, most of the better PC power supplies for PCs employ PFC, or power factor correction. Still, not all of them do.. it's something worth watching in the specifications when shopping for a supply (or a CRT monitor) for a new system.

  28. Re:are c3's on this board fast enough for regular by deque_alpha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    there are benchmarks all over, google for "via epia review" and you are sure to get some good ones. Anecdotally, they are plenty fast for basically everything but 3d games, multimedia creation, and viewing very highly compressed (mpeg4, high bitrate divx) video. This new board will hopefully change that. I've used one (an 800 mhz) as a desktop machine for a co-worker, and the only thing they commented on was how quiet and little it was compared to their old (p4) machine. They made no mention of a performance hit, and they work on the thing all day long. I've also used one (1 Ghz) as a firewall / server for my dad's business. And frankly, the poor thing is bored.

    Flash works fine, even those silly animated shorts and games. Remember that a "slow as balls" computer by todays standards will likely meet their (your parents) needs just fine. The biggest benefit over a cheap athlon is that these can be made small and quiet, making them unobstrusive. They also run cool enough that they don't affect the temperature of the room they are in noticably, unlike athlons / P4 which in a lot of ways are very expensive space heaters....

  29. Low Power PCs by tacocat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have two of the EPIA 533 fanless machines. One is my mail/web server for the internet, the other is my NFS/web server for my home use. These things are awesome at only a measured 32W power consumption with everything running (hard drive included). This 32W is using old 3.5 inch hard drives and a case fan. I expect to have done better if I went with the 2.5 inch lower power hard drives and external power supply.

    But what I find really amazing about all of this is that I got these little low power boxes and they are doing as much as many people dedicate on a 140W+ machine. There's really no need for that. If you find 533MHz too slow, then move up to a higher machine. But I was going for the silent/fanless models.

    I can't claim to have the fastest set up in the world, but for 99.9% of you with a home mail/web server, you really don't need to run it on that big of a box. And for 32W of power, it makes for a cool summer.

    In time, I think people will realize that the benefit of having a 3.2GHz mail server isn't that great. Sure, there might be exceptions and I might not survive a slashdot effect, but not many of us will.

  30. Re:are c3's on this board fast enough for regular by mercuryresearch · · Score: 3, Informative

    I agree, they're fast enough for most tasks. As an experiment I moved all my work to a VIA Epia 533 Fanless motherboard (with 1 GB of RAM, which helps a lot) for three months. This is the slowest motherboard VIA sells, and I think the slowest on the market that's still in active sales as opposed to used/inventory sales. I ran both XP and Slackware 9 on the box.

    CPU loading was idle most of the time. It was acceptable for email, web browsing, and word processing. There were a few places it bogged down: recalculating large spreadsheets, websites with Flash animated ads, printing, displaying PDFs (ghostview pretty much choked the system whenever it would run) and running compression (gzip tar backups would max out the load instantly.)

    I upgraded to a fanless Pentium M ITX box because I could, but still use the VIAs for web/mail service, which work fine -- one box's uptime reached 240+ days before I needed to take it down for hardware maintenance.

    They're not gaming systems or workstations, but otherwise completely acceptable for most uses -- and the fanless ones are pretty much silent (the loudest thing the VIA 533 PC was the hard disk seeking. Really.)