Slashdot Mirror


Tales of the Future Past

atlacatl writes "One of the coolest sites I've been to: Tales of the Future Past - It tells the story (In pictures) of the predictions of the new millenium, early in the 20th century. I had forgotten the web was actually fun and interesting - use at your own risk."

36 of 221 comments (clear)

  1. Troubled future... by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 4, Funny

    I see a slashdot about to happen.

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:Troubled future... by machine+of+god · · Score: 4, Funny

      Come on grandpa. Everyone knows the slashdotting is now.

  2. The future by thebra · · Score: 4, Funny

    I predict that the website will in the near future not load but show an error. It will be known as the "slashdot effect". I also predict that some one will comment on the fact this is the second article about the future. I also see that in the near future I will be modded down...

    1. Re:The future by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny
      I also see that in the near future I will be modded down...

      But by knowing the future, you can change it! What's really going to bake you're noodle later on is, would you still have been modded up if you hadn't said that?

    2. Re:The future by Deflagro · · Score: 4, Funny

      *high pitched alto*

      "In the Year 2000!"

      --
      Der Tod ist der einzige Weg hier raus!
  3. One thing they didn't predict by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thousands of people depressing a button, causing a small box far far away to burst into flames.

    1. Re:One thing they didn't predict by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  4. *sigh* by macshune · · Score: 4, Funny

    STILL no flying cars...:(

    1. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > STILL no flying cars

      I dunno. Those SUVs get some pretty decent air when the roll over.

  5. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had forgotten the web was fun and interesting

    Hanging out at /. will do that to you.

    1. Re:Of course by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Slashdot has totally changed my browsing habits since I started reading it a few years ago. I find that I don't "get out" as much as I used to and just surf around. When in doubt, reload the Slashdot main page and see if there's a new story. Nothing? Hmmm... Maybe there's a new comment in a story I've already read. Or maybe I'll read the comment thread under that boring story that I don't care about after all...

      Lately I've been browsing around at Wikipedia more. Just find an interesting page and open up a few internal links into new tabs as you go. It's easy to read half a dozen or more pages in one sitting, and you always learn something cool and interesting.

      Of course, I learned about Wikipedia from a Slashdot article...

  6. Hmmm... by Reorax · · Score: 5, Funny
    *checks website*

    "In the future, far too many people will make posts with jokes about the Slashdot Effect."

    --
    This sig is only here so people stop skipping the last lines of my posts.
  7. National Geographic by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is one of the great things about digging through old stacks of National Geo. Especially issues from the '50s and earlier. My Grandmother had tons of them and I would sit for hours looking at the diagrams of the moon base that was going to have been built by the '80s.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:National Geographic by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was built, it's just that you are not authorized to know about it.

    2. Re:National Geographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      You and I both know you weren't looking at National Geographic for "moon base" pictures.

  8. spell check you web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, settle on you jetpack, hitch up you blaster, and tune in the videotron as we tour Future Past!

    Dig that futuristic spelling!

  9. analyzing past predictions by pedantic+bore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's always interesting to analyze predictions of the future (made in the past) and see how reality differs. There's usually some assumption that seemed to make sense at the time, but turned out to be wrong over time. Then look at our current predictions about the future and ask whether we're still making those assumptions, or whether we're making different, newer assumptions that will turn out to be equally wrong. Excellent reality check.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:analyzing past predictions by nizo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Your post hit it right on the head. We have so many theories, beliefs, etc. that we cling to for dear life that people in the future will just laugh at. Phrenology, ether, and many others at which we scoff; makes me wonder which ideas we hold near and dear that will be considered just so much crap later.

  10. Smithsonian Exhibit by ncg · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is actually a travelling smithsonian exhibit going across the country to smaller communities on this ery subject. You read read about it here, it is currently in Rexburg, Idaho.

  11. Excerpts... by iota · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's quite a lot posted there. Mostly referring to images, but here's a couple excerpts -- It was slashdotted while I was reading it...

    TALES OF FUTURE PAST
    It wasn't that long ago that we had a future. I mean, we have one now; the world isn't going to crash into the Sun or anything like that. What I mean is that we had a future that we could clearly imagine. The future wasn't tomorrow, next week, next year, or next century. It was a place with a form, a structure, a style. True, we didn't know exactly what the future would be like, but we knew that it had to be one of a few alternatives; some good, some very bad. The future was a world with a distinct architecture. It had its own way of speaking. It had its own technology. It was for all intents and purposes a different land where people dressed differently, talked differently, ate differently, and even thought differently. It was where scientists were wizards, where machines were magically effective and efficient, where tyrants were at least romantically evil rather than banal, and where the heavens were fairyland where dreams could literally come true.

    A few years ago, people talked about building a bridge to the 21st century. Now that we're there, the phrase seems as odd as building a causeway to five o'clock. As Midnight brought in the year 2000 (or 2001 if you prefer), something odd began to sink in. For people of my generation, who had lived through the tarnished promises of the Atomic Age, the Space Age, the Computer Age, and the This That and Another Age, the year 2001 was a gateway. We waited twenty, thirty, forty years and some longer to pass though that gate into a time when spaceships the size of ocean liners plied between colonised planets, where cities were colourful collections of brand new towers without a single old building or blade of grass, where people wore jumpsuits like they were the togas of a technocratic Rome, where robots were our powerful and obedient servants, and where jetpacks were as common as galoshes.

    Boy, were we off base. It isn't simply that the predictions were wrong. No one with half a brain really expected that sort of accuracy. And true, though some marvels did not come to pass, others that were and weren't predicted did. We certainly live very different lives from that of our fathers and grandfathers. That is not in dispute. But what did not happen is what many expected, though never talked about much. Assuming that we dodged the 1984, Brave New World bullet, our future was supposed to be a sort of technocratic, atomic-powered, computer-controlled, antiseptic, space-travelling Jerusalem that would at last free us from the curse of Eden and original sin. We expected some how, some way that we would be on the road to being freed from the human condition. We expected a sort of bloodless, benign French Revolution with Hugo Gernsback as our Voltaire and Carl Sagan as our Robespierre. And what did we get? The City of Man with Tivo. The fact is, science fiction and popular science had set the bar so high that only the Second Coming with ray guns would have satisfied.

    Still, there was a romantic innocence about the 20th century's view of the future. It was a sort of plastic Camelot; in both senses of the term. So, settle on you jetpack, hitch up you blaster, and tune in the videotron as we tour Future Past!


    FUTURE CITY
    This is Frank R. Paul's depiction of a city of the future and is pretty typical of such predictions. The city is a massive pile of steel, plastic and glass put together in a way that not only has no past, but actively rejects it. It is a place of heroic technology with skyscrapers the size of whole districts, Roof-top aerodromes, wide pedestrian boulevards, and metal roadways strangely devoid of traffic. There are even urban space launch pads where giant rockets are winched upright before blasting off to the heavens. Noise regulations, Smoise regulations.

    The iconic image of the future is the city

  12. I predict by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny
    • people will continue to post comments that say "First Post"
    • Tinfoil hats will be all the rage
    • The next version of Windows will claim to "load faster and be more stable than ever! and will allow you to shut down a program without rebooting"
    • Linux will be on the verge of overtaking windows
    • slashdot will be a mainstream word
    • IANAL will initially be a mainstream word, but after Howard Stern uses it in a derrogatory way, it is banned by the FCC.
  13. Re:National Geographic, uh huh... by ashitaka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pffft. "...looking at the diagrams of the moon base..."

    C'mon admit it, you were ogling the african girls in their native state of undress.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  14. On the "Flying Wing" magazine cover... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...David Sarnoff, RCA President, Predicts "Television will Carry the Mail".

    Actually he wasn't too far off, eh?

  15. Still not fun and interesting by crawdaddy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had forgotten the web was actually fun and interesting
    And thanks to the Slashdot effect, I can't be reminded of that fact, you insensitive clods!

  16. the futures here we just can afford it by genner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lets see what don't we have. Flying cars? Yup got those just need some obscene amount of cash + piolts lisecense to get one. http://www.moller.com/skycar/ Hover boards? Got those too,although their more surf board than skate board sized, and with a large engine hanging on the back. Still not cheap. http://www.futurehorizons.net/hoverboard.htm Thos cool screens that take up the whole wall. Got those too, provided you can afford it. http://www.superscreen.com/ Video phones. Got those, not too expensive but most people just don't care about them. Won't bother posting a link every knows about these. OK so where still missing our space elevator, can't have everything I guess.

  17. The Shape of Things to Come by meehawl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The 1936 movie of HG Wells' Shape of Things to Come is good for this sort of thing. Captures that 30s "futuristic" look perfectly.

    --

    Da Blog
  18. Site is Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The images are doctored/faked. Check out the ferris whell of death, the picture of the magazine cover it was printed on says more about it can be read on page 666. Too many other mistakes to mention, looks like someone was looking for some /. attention

  19. Re:I feel for the little guys, I do. by Jason1729 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do what I do, and read the "old news" section instead of the front page.

    That's a neat trick since this is still the most recent article and you've managed to post a comment on it long before it got to the old news section.

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

  20. Mirror by Moonwick · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Only on slashdot can a posting be rated "Score -1, Insightful".
  21. A good comment on city architecture.... by tcopeland · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...from the "future city" pages:
    Unless a city is built from scratch in the wilderness at some insane pace, you will always be surrounded by the evidence of earlier times, which is a good thing. Otherwise you end up with something antiseptic, like Brasilia.
    More on Brasilia's depressing architecture here.
  22. Name that tune... by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny
    "I can slashdot that website in ten posts..."
    "I can slashdot that webserver in nine posts..."
    "I can slashdot that site in eight posts!"

    "Slashdot that website!"

    Persons of a "certain age" will remember that game show. I sure don't!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  23. Let's make fun of all visionaries !!! by PHPhD2B · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The author seems to find great pleasure in mocking everything about past predictions of the future. Rather than taking the time to write a coherent comparison and analysis the author instead put up a bunch of magazine scans and straw men and pushed them all over.

    This could have been a great website, featuring what people thought the future would look like, comparing it to what it ended up looking like, and featuring some analysis as to why the discrepancies occured, or at the very least some surmises.

    It's not easy telling the future, and I doubt very many of the magazine scans and "future" products were meant to be authoritarian "this is what it WILL look like" presentations. Rather, they were "hey, wouldn't it be neat if we could have this in the future?" With that view this could actually have been an inspiration to help develop what we already don't have. Instead it was turned into a poorly written "ha ha, what stupid ideas"-fest.

    What's the use of even putting up this website when all it is doing is slam those who try to have some sort of vision?

    --
    --I am Sun Tzu of the Borg. Resistance is feudal.
  24. Re:National Geographic, uh huh... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    The fact that I was most interested in the moon base and not so much the naked natives probably explains a lot now that I think about it.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  25. RIP by Dark+Bard · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was a good and decent website who brought joy to many. With it's passing it shall be missed. Let us all join hands and pray for it's resurrection with the adding of bandwith or mirrors. Amen.

  26. The common thread by rewt66 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Almost all of these predictions were based on bigger - more power, more steel, etc. The big (no pun intended) thing that the predictions missed was smaller and smarter - the transistor, the (micro) computer, embedded systems.

    But we may be making the same mistake. More power was the biggest deal until about 1970. Then smaller became the big deal. But this doesn't mean that smaller is going to rule forever. In particular, our predictions of nanotech and biotech may be just as naive as the predictions the site laughs at.

    So what will the future really be? I don't know. Maybe "more connected" is going to be the next big area.

  27. Re:The real problem: Physics has stalled. by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Lately basic physics has branched out into such technologically unproductive pursuits as String theory. They are interesting to mathematicians but the technological fruits aren't there yet.

    You forget the operative word. Basic, fundamental investigation is where all the neato cool interesting stuff comes from. We have no idea what that stuff will be, but it will come, if we are prepared to let people continue their research.

    Just think what the world would be like if the Powers That Were had told Messrs. Shockley, Brattain and Bardeen to quit messing with those ridiculous bits of germanium, that crazy chemistry and that silly quantum theory (none of which has any application anyway, you know) and work with something real, like better tubes.

    ...laura