Slashdot Mirror


SUSE 9.1 FTP Version Available

twener writes "The SUSE 9.1 FTP version is now available on SUSE's ftp mirrors for free installation via FTP/HTTP (installation instruction). It's almost identical to SUSE 9.1 Professional except some few packages which are missing due to licence reasons. Also don't miss "SUSE 9.1: The Complete Review" recently published by DesktopOS.com."

18 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Suse is not free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    why is it unusable? There is a boot.iso, burn it, boot it, install from ftp. If you want to have everything on you local disc, mirror the whole tree and install then.

    btw: YaST2 is GPL now ...

  2. Re:Suse is not free by RayAlmostAnonymous · · Score: 5, Informative

    Novell GPL-ed Yast2, so SuSE is free now. The packages that are missing from the FTP install are things like a database package and some other app. Nothing you cannot do without.

  3. Re:Suse is not free by MoonFog · · Score: 3, Informative

    I did that on SuSE 9.0, downloaded the entire tree and mirrored it on one machine. It worked great! It's still not the same as downloading the .iso files, burn them and boot up. The entire tree was somewhere close to 9 gb, while the iso files are often only 3 cd's.
    It does work rather well though, so if you have a fast connection and don't mind waiting a bit for it, downloading the tree is an excellent way of getting SuSE.

  4. Re:Suse is not free by pmjordan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even before Yast2 got GPLed, they supplied the binaries with the FTP version. You can, and always have been able to, install the FTP version fine. In fact, I've been doing so with every version since SuSE 8.1. (I bought some earlier versions)

    The only difference to the commercial version is that the FTP version doesn't include proprietary software that they can't redistribute via FTP for free for licensing reasons. They do have licenses for some proprietary software, such as Acrobat Reader, Opera, etc.

    Know the facts before you criticise/troll.

  5. Re:ok.. by ValourX · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the company, it's:

    SOO-suh

    -Jem

  6. Re:Suse is not free by pmjordan · · Score: 3, Informative

    They do, especially with the Professional Edition.
    Personal Edition is a bit dumbed-down (not even kernel source packages, useless if you need proprietary video drivers!) but still has some books, which are more entry-level aimed. Pair Personal Edition with the FTP version though and you're all set.

  7. I'll spring for the full media by krygny · · Score: 5, Informative

    I haven't gotten around to it yet, but I plan to purchase the full media. For ~$90, The documentation alone is worth that. It's a bargain in itself, plus the satisfaction of supporting the community.

    --
    Research shows that 67% of those who use the term "research shows", are just making shit up.
    1. Re:I'll spring for the full media by waveclaw · · Score: 3, Informative

      I haven't gotten around to it yet, but I plan to purchase the full media.

      I did purchase the full version. And I got a notice that CDs of SuSE 9.1 Professional is on back order.

      I was hoping to download the FTP version to pre-load my test system since the CD's won't arrive for who knows how long [1].

      Thank's to slashdot, now the CD's may arrive before I can get any iso's downloaded[2].

      1. I could have ordered the on-line donwload only, but I like being able to install new software on machines while they are offline. (Doing IT with M$ products has taught me this is a very important thing to do in far too many cases.)

      2. When a server dies in a slashdotting, does it make a sound? Or does it implode into nothingness forevermore? Thank you slashdot.

      --

      "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
  8. I installed this yesterday by danormsby · · Score: 5, Informative
    I installed this yesterday. Took around 4 hours on my home 1MBit to upgrade from SuSE 9.0 using the mirror.ac.uk mirror.

    Tip! Get the IP address of the ftp server before attempting the install! DNS isn't picked up on the SuSE boot/install CD.

    --
    Omnis amans amens
  9. Re:[Q] rsync mirrors? by nouser · · Score: 3, Informative

    An excellent public rsync mirror:
    rsync://rsync.mirror.ac.uk/ftp.suse.com/p ub/suse/i 386/9.1/

  10. My SuSE 9.1 experiences so far by arcade · · Score: 4, Informative

    First off, let me say that I quite simply love SuSE, it's my favorite distribution. Furthermore, I use the packaged version, not the FTP version.

    However, my first experience with 9.1 was not impressive. I tried to update my laptop, instead of reinstalling. The result was far from good.
    - The touchpad stopped working
    - Sound stopped working
    - Outdated daemons still started, and prevented other daemons from starting afterwards (acpid started instead of powersaved, among other things).
    - And loads of general badness.

    In short, it quite simply sucked.

    I suspected this was do to flaky update mechanisms, which also turned out the be correct. As a good user, I have /home on its own partition, so a fresh reinstall are a piece of cake without touching my actual data.

    The reinstall worked flawlessly. Most things was installed the right way, and worked as it should at once. With one exception.

    That xception was that acpi was loaded instead of apm - and acpi is buggy on my laptop. I edited /boot/grub/menu.lst and added acpi=off - then I edited /etc/powersave.conf and enabled user-suspend or whatever it was called. Worked like a charm.

    In other words, I think the 'update' routine sucks, while 'install' works like a charm.

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    1. Re:My SuSE 9.1 experiences so far by really? · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nah, you just got lucky on the install.
      I have installed 9.1 on a couple _IDENTICAL_ machines, and made the same choices. The installs were different, for example, in one of them the sound was not working. Reinstalling fixed the sound though.
      Also, I installed the Amd64 version on a Gigabyte board. Had to do it twice - also a fresh install both times - and although I selected all the packages both times the results were different. In addiction the first time sound was not working.
      Having said all that, it still remains my favourite distribution, and I will continue to use it on my desktop - freeBSD and, sometimes, netBSD on the servers though.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
  11. LINUX IS *NOT* BLOATED ... by torpor · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... you Anonymous Logic-Impaired moron.

    All those other CD's are extra CD's containing tons of free software that you can use on your newly installed Linux system.

    When was the last time you got 9gigs worth of free software with your operating system? No, don't answer that, I don't want to know ... and no, MSDN & Office "updates" don't count ...

    I've got a Linux setup that is only 1.4 megs worth of Linux, kernel, apps and libs. Everything beyond that is add-ons ... That is no bloat.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  12. Re:SuSE by big+tex · · Score: 4, Informative

    "I would only reccomend SuSE to a newbie who has no desire for messing around with things once its installed, and just wants it to work reasonably well from the beginning."

    Bzzt. Try again.

    I've been running SuSE since 6.1, and always mess around with things and install extra software, usually not official SuSE packages. Generic RPM's usually work OK. If not, SuSE still ships with enough to ./configure, make, make install - which works.
    Automatic package dependancy does leave a little to be lacking when you use non-SuSE packages (foolib? What the hell is foolib?), but since the monster CD/DVD set contains almost every library you would possibly want, you can install it then.

    As for actually installing the RPM's, you could do it with YAST, or KPackage, or by the CLI - the computer dosen't care.

    --
    I think I need a new sig here.
  13. SuSE 9.1 performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I switched to SuSE 9.0 when RedHat anounced the end of their desktop products as we'd all come to know them, and it instantly became my favorite distribution. YaST is awesome and performance was good.

    So I was excited to try 9.1. I borrowed the full 9.1 Pro CD set from someone at work to try. I installed it on a couple of Pentium 4 machines with Nvidia cards. While installtion was flawless on both, the performance was terrible. X takes forever to start, KDE takes a long time to initialize, and forget starting YaST - I can go for coffe while it loads. Even installing and running Unreal Tournament 2004 was painful because of some changes SuSE made to the way they mount removable media. Starting UT2004 is slow too. Since I dual boot, slow startup times are an issue.

    Before anyone says the obvious, yes - DMA is enabled and one of the systems is using fast U160 SCSI drives so there's just no excuse for the poor performance.

    Since Mandrake 10.0 is available for download, I tried installing it. I was hesitant, but it installed flawlessly on my system with the SCSI drives. I'm spoiled and used to the bazillion applications that SuSE installs, but no biggie.

    Mandrake 10 performance is what I expect from a P4 system : fast, responsive, snappy.

    No offense to the SuSE team intended, but they need to get their act together a little better. There's just no excuse for the poor performance of SuSE in my opinion - and yes, I have just as many services running in Mandrake as SuSE.

    I'll keep using Mandrake for now and try SuSE again when 9.2 comes out.

    I'm sure glad I didn't pay for 9.1, I would have been really p*ssed.

  14. Re:Can anybody help me fix my SuSE 9.1 sound probl by 5etanta · · Score: 3, Informative

    The sound failure is due to the kdemultimedia mixer app. So when you install "all KDE" you break the sound.

    Suse have posted a fix on their support page ( search under sound). I'd say its a bit of a poor show, but otherwise it seems OK.

    Its poor form that they havent fixed this yet in the updates!

    Setanta

    --
    "I see lots of Pengins, is that good?" "Thats good Dad, click yes."
  15. Re:So much for YAST by theblkadder · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can change your wireless settings through YaST. Network Devices -> Network Cards

    --
    Earth is a single point of failure.
  16. It's terribly buggy by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just installed it, and it is the buggiest Linux release I have used in a long, long time. I love the features, like automatic spell-checking as I type this in Konqueror, cool eye-candy stuff in KDE, Linux 2.6.4, etc, etc, but it is truly full of bugs. YaST doesn't start up the user admin module. I created a user using adduser, and that user can't log in because of some IPC bug. During installation, I installed it in just the plain old way and it gave error messages. This is truly beta-test software; it should never have made it through the release processes. I would have rather waited a couple more months for something that isn't full of bugs. I think I'm going to have to re-install it now just to figure out how to get basic stuff like adding users to work. It's a mess.