Slashdot Mirror
Constructing A Low-Power 2U Wireless Rack-Box
adelayde writes "Recently we decided to build ourselves a custom rack-mountable box that we could use as a web and DNS caching proxy and which would offer flexible wireless networking facilities and have an uniterruptible power supply. The result was a 2U rack-box with dual wireless networks built upon a low-power Via EPIA MiniITX motherboard. The box has two wireless networks built in with external antenna connectors, locking switches on the front to avoid tampering, a battery to give at least 20 mins of autonomous operation, a low wattage power supply and most importantly lots of blue LEDs :)"
Let's see how long she lasts ...
...and most importantly lots of blue LEDs
You may have meant that as a joke, but blue LEDs suck quite a lot more power than red or green ones.
When you care about power consumption, rather than coolness, come back and ask again.
http://mirror.us.psand.net/plinth/
good thing it's not a chick that made this thing, or I could get in a lot of trouble for say this....
"Hey, Nice Rack!!"
Looking at the pics on the page, it looks like they could have easily built the thing inside a 1U chasis of they used the proper power supply and heatsink. All of the other parts should fit within 1U.
That being said, they could have simply used an ultraportable laptop with the screen unplugged and unnecessary parts removed/disabled.
You'd be amazed as to how little there really is inside a laptop. Think about it -- the drives and batteries take up about 75% of the chasis. Leave about another 10% for the power supply and heatsinking, and you've got a REALLY small PCB.
If space, not power, was their main concern, they could have also used one of the Shuttle cube boxes. They pack an incredibly strong punch for their size, and are usually on par with their desktop equivilants. Hell... they've even got an opteron box. The performance on the EPIA boards is horrific. What were they thinking designing a processor without a FPU? That being said, they're pretty cool because they're small, low-power, and widely availible (which laptop MBs strangely aren't). Still, they're pretty expensive considering that you're getting a PC which would have been considered pretty slow 4 years ago.
-- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
The regulator looks like it's there to power the "6V yellow led". Obviously these guys know nothing about electronics - the wireless bridge is powered from a "DC-DC converter" made from an LM317(!) - that's a linear supply, not a DC-DC converter. This supply is probably superfluous anyway - the wireless bridge it powers runs off a 7V supply, telling me it most likely has an internal regulator. They should have checked - might have saved themselves some work...
A lot of people have been use Mini-ITX for HTPCs. The one thing you're going to need to do though is get a hardware based capture card. Not a cheap ATI PCI-TV or anything like that.
Also I believe the new VIA's have a special chip on them to help with the decoding, so you should be good there.
If you can live with only 2 PCI cards, go for it (You can always use USB Tuners as well). They do make very quiet systems.
A lot of people will use them as clients and have a server with the actual tuners in them though. Just another idea to toss out there.
I'm a college degreed Electrical Engineer with over 30 years of experience, including teaching electronics at the college level for three years. That regulator circuit looks quite familiar. As long as the heatsink is sufficient for the heat dissipation in the LM317, there should be no problem. Since this is powering only the wireless bridge, the current drain at 7 volts should be modest and it only needs to drop 5 volts across the regulator IC. The total power dissipation spread across both of the 1/2 watt resistors is only 85 milliwatts so no trouble there either.
If you are referring to the capacitor voltage ratings, the only requirement there is that the voltage rating of the cap be more than the voltage actually applied to it. For example a 35 volt cap is just fine with 6 volts across it. It could even be a 1,000 volt rated cap with no ill effects.
"Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
"Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
Personally, I found their antenna designs much more interesting.
1. Go to ebay.
2. Find and buy cheap notebook.
3. Get into argument with seller over shipping.
4. Wait for notebook to arive.
5. Pick up hammer.
6. Open notebook.
7. Hit notebook screen with hammer until it comes off.
8. Stick some WiFi cards in notebook and put it on shelf.
"Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
I'm curious as to what their definition of "low power" is. Low, compared to a power-sucking P4 or Athlon, maybe, but probably not very low by low power standards.
I've just set up a similar system as an home file server (no wireless, though, and I've added a cheap DVDROM drive), and my box is sucking up around 55-60W, idle. That's measured via an actual wattmeter connected to the power cord, and not by multiplying V*A.
On second thought, maybe a soekris board and a 2.5" disk drive might have been a better solution (less RAM and CPU, which would probably be fine for an home fileserver, but the power usage would probably be in the 10-20W range).
How fast a CPU do you really need? Years ago I popped open a 3COM Ethernet bridge/router and found a Motorola 68020, running at 25 MHz if I remember correctly. It was fast enough to handle two fully loaded 10-megabit Ethernet segments.
Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
He may have built this for remote locations
or heat filled rooms/closets. In those cases
you want decent space and decent airflow INSIDE
the box.
Laptops have neither, and tend to suffer heat
related problems easily enough.
Its good already that he went low power and
low thermal, and put it in a good solid spacious
chassis.
If dollars were a concern, going down to 1U
isn't bad, but no further for real applications.