Slashdot Mirror


Native American Wireless ISP Launched

babynerd writes "On Tuesday June 1st the Coeur dAlene tribe unveiled the Turbocharged Broadband Geek Project. The scheme, organized by project head Valerie Fast Horse and funded by a $2.8 million dollar grant from the USDA Rural Utilities Service and a 15% in kind match from the tribe itself, will help build a community technology center (CTC) with 40 computers, and a wireless broadband ISP that will provide high-speed wireless access to anyone living on and near the reservation at a price comparable to that of any other DSL or Cable Internet providers - there's currently no broadband Internet access of any kind available."

55 of 301 comments (clear)

  1. what are those mini-Vegas' for? by garcia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My biggest complaint about this is that the non-natives are funding this venture through the USDA Rural Utilities Service... Why doesn't their own tribe fund this effort? I have a feeling that they making more than enough money there to foot the $2.8 million bill themselves. Isn't that what those things are on reservations for? To build better Native American communities?

    1. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by themaddone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, gee, you know, trivial things like roads and schools, stuff the Gov't doesn't really fund.

    2. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why doesn't their own tribe fund this effort?

      Because the tribe, as are most casino operators, are good business men. They know a good investment when they see one and they know how to take advantage of an opportunity to make more money.

      Looking at it from a business perspective, it isn't very attractive at all. However, looking at it from the perspective of using someone else's money to provide yourselve's with services is quite attractive. Hence, the casino avoids such investments and the tribe benefits. It's sort of the same way that government grants support crappy research projects that the private sector wouldn't touch.

    3. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by Brandybuck · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they're anything like the Indian tribes in California, they're simply spending too much money bribing politicians to have anything left for useful stuff.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    4. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by Saxton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you ever driven through a Native American reservation? If we're compensating them, where did we go wrong? Seems like we sent some people into the top 5% tax bracket and left the rest of the tribes in the lowest levels of poverty. Not as nasty as killing their ancestors and forcing them into the worst parts of the country, but it's still pretty bad.

      -Aaron

      --
      My name is Aaron Landry, and I approve this message.
    5. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given that they're living under a Soviet-style planned economy, they aren't free to shape their own lives.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    6. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who's We?, and why isn't "They" part of "We". I was strangely under the impression that so called "native americans" were citizens of this country and have the right to vote.

      I also don't recall killing anyones ancestors, and I don't know anyone who did. This "we" and "they" crap is missleading. There's no we, and there's no they.

      --
      AccountKiller
    7. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by irokitt · · Score: 4, Informative

      I live within driving distance of about 4 reservations, 3 of which have casinos. 2 of those are less than 10 minutes from me.

      By and large, those two casinos send most of their money to out-of-state banks that fronted the money to build the casinos in the first place (and those banks are connected to Vegas). That will taper down once the casinos have paid most of the debt off. Some of the money gets sent to the state in the form of "taxes" (that's right, in order to have a casino the tribes do pay the state money). The rest gets split up amongst the reservation, tribal members, and employees (not all of whom are tribe members).

      In my community, the nearby casinos have paid millions of dollars (about 4 million total) to widen roads and improve the traffic situation-things which have been needed for a long time (a decade and a half) but didn't start to happen until casinos were built and the money became available. Both nearby reservations are undergoing environmental cleanup, since years of mis-management have made them polluted, dangerous places to live. Schools desperately needing rebuilding have been rebuilt.

      There are a lot of things that are bad about the casinos. I personally don't like to gamble and blame the casinos for the surge in DUI activity that I've seen around here. But at least here, where I am, some of that money is being very well spent and the tribes, who were historically shown the finger by both state and local governments, are worlds removed from the state they were in just a decade ago.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    8. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 4, Informative

      They can leave the reservation,

      Many have, my ancestors included. Others are trapped by economic circumstances. Still other don't want their culture to die.

      or try to organize a better economic structure for their tribes. No one's forcing them to run things that way.

      Ah, another ignorant AC. Actually, the Bureau of Indian Affairs pretty much requires a planned economy for the tribes. A couple of tribes have gotten permission from the BIA to have a freer economy, and they have succeeded. But in general, the vast majority of tribes in this country are forced to have 5 year economic plans by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    9. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by Trailwalker · · Score: 2, Informative
      For some actual information: Tribal Website

      May 28, 2004- Leaders of the Coeur d'Alene Tribe and invited guests will celebrate on June 1, 2004, the groundbreaking for the Tribe's state-of-the-art Community Technology Center in Plummer, Idaho.
    10. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by ksheff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Based on the Reservations that I know of in SD, the casino revenue is dispersed to tribal members and each one does it differently. In the early 90s, one tribe was giving away $1000/month to every adult member and $250/month to every kid. But they had to live inside a particular county, and that upset those that were still members, but didn't live within the county. Building roads and schools was still a function of the state and Feds, respectively.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    11. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by general_re · · Score: 3, Informative
      Oh, gee, you know, trivial things like roads and schools, stuff the Gov't doesn't really fund.

      Riiiight. And if you pull the other one, it plays a little tune for you. Funny how they could afford $3 million for new slot machines all by themselves. Or how they can afford a $15 million hotel expansion all by themselves. Or how they could afford a $32 million casino expansion to add a sporting arena and 18-hole golf course all by themselves.

      No, I think it's tolerably obvious that they can also afford to pay for their own wireless network all by themselves. I think it's also tolerably obvious where their spending priorities lie - why buy wireless for yourself when Uncle Sucker will step up to the plate? Who needs wireless when we've got empty floor space where we can squeeze in more slots?

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    12. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by Cat_Byte · · Score: 2, Informative

      I read a magazine article addressing the "trickling down of funds". Basically...it doesn't happen in many of them. The few who get the casinos get all the profit and the others on the reservations are living in poverty. Its sad really and I wish I had an online link to the story. I believe it was in National Geographic. I'm sure there are exceptions to this.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    13. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by peacefinder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My biggest complaint about this is that the non-natives are funding this venture through the USDA Rural Utilities Service... Why doesn't their own tribe fund this effort?

      Good point. Let's just give 'em back their land and call it even.

      --
      With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    14. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It doesn't sound sad to me, it sounds like justice. Why should tribes who put out the effort pay to support tribes who either don't put out the effort to put up casinos, or don't want those evil dens of iniquity on their land?

      Then again, why should I pay for internet access for native americans? I can understand tax money going to support them, make their land livable and so on since the US government took it all away to begin with, but it's not like we robbed them of their broadband internet access...

      I personally think that native americans' internet access should not take priority over anyone else's. There's plenty of white people out there who can't get reliable telephone service. Let's worry about that before we get all concerned about broadband internet.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by ePhil_One · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Doesn't matter when they arrived, they are now living on land that belong to the Native American people. If a friend gives you a stlen car, you are benefiting from that crime, it doesn't matter that you aren't the one that stole car. If you buy a car from someone who's friend stole the car for him, you are stil benefiting from that crime.

      If big evil corporation employees slave labor to make your shoes, you are benefiting from that crime. If your immigrant father worked as a piss boy for a tycoon whose father got rich building railroads accross the nation that forced native americans off the railroads right of way, you have benefited from that act. If you eat the bread that is produced from the huge American corn and wheat fields you are benefiting from the abuse the native americans suffered. If your Chinese father wasn't slaughtered at the fans of savage Japanese soldiers during World War II its very likely you benefited by the existance of the United States of America, which had the industrial power it did because of the callous way it forced the native peoples of the land it occupied out of its way.

      I'm not suggesting that we return North American to the Native Americans and go home, just pointing out that everybody who is enjoying the freedoms and rights of the United States or has been aided by this nation has benefited by the oppression of the native american people. Unless you have had all your belongs that you couldn't carry 500 miles stolen and forced to live on the least desirable chunk of property the theives could find, you aren't THEY.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    16. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by TheAngryArmadillo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Crap, now I hate myself for having both THEY and WE ancestry. I think I'll go outside and kick my own ass then give my land back to myself.

    17. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by ePhil_One · · Score: 2, Informative
      I won't deny you that native americans get some benefit from living inside the borders of the United States, but the conditions many were forced to endure for generations has left many in a position that owning computers isn't really an option. The casino thing is a relatively new phenomea, often funded by outside interests that syphon off profits, and lets not forget the nasty social issues that gambling also brings.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    18. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by ePhil_One · · Score: 3, Funny

      Once you give it back to yourself, don't forget to start your Casino!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    19. Re:what are those mini-Vegas' for? by Merovign · · Score: 2, Funny

      I vote we take everybody who wants to frame all their relations with other people based on what happened before they were born, and everyone who wants to punish someone else for something their ancestor did, and everyone who wants reparations for events which involve no one who is alive today, and we put them all in a BIIIIG room.

      And we give each one of them a grenade.

      And we close the door.

      And pour concrete over it.

      How's that for a solution to the twin problems of overpopulation and regional/racial hatred?

  2. Smoke Signals by Greenisus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...very slow bandwidth . . . .

    1. Re:Smoke Signals by owlstead · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but if you tend your fire carefully you can achieve an always on connection. During daytime, that is...

  3. Wi-Fi Power by cgrayson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If there's ever a sequel to Smoke Signals:

    "Hey Victor! Your mother makes the best wi-fi!"

    Seriously - great movie, set on the Coeur d'Alene reservation in present day (well, present day six years ago). You'll laugh, you'll cry, it'll become a part of you.

  4. $2.8 Million? by tmasssey · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Doesn't that seem like an awful lot of money for 40-computer technology center and a wireless ISP contained for a community?

    That seems like enough for a *heck* of a buildout and, what? 10 years of expenses? How can I get a piece? :)

    1. Re:$2.8 Million? by Cat_Byte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I used to work for a company (which will remain nameless) that installed networks for public schools. You wouldn't BELIEVE what they charged. It was way up in the 6 digits just for the cat-5 runs. Then they would have their $15,000 router I was supposed to install with no WAN. I was supposed to "make it blink and serve DHCP or something". Needless to say I quit when I was repeatedly asked to lie for my boss about why they had a million dollars worth of hardware for a grade-school lab. My guess is someone did the same thing to this tribe after they found out how much the grant was. Inflat x% until you use up the whole amount.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    2. Re:$2.8 Million? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Doesn't that seem like an awful lot of money for...

      2.8 Mill may seem like a lot of cash to you and me, but realistically, it doesn't buy a lot of IT these days. My guess is that building the facility and purchasing the 40 computers and associated equipment don't actually leave a whole lot for the wireless ISP end of the deal, which itself could consume 2.8 mill, easy. It's sad, but that kind of money is relativly minor for an IT investment of this type.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    3. Re:$2.8 Million? by ElForesto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It wouldn't surprise me on that. Contractors have been ripping off government agencies on projects since... well... whenever. Here in the Las Vegas area, the school district has a mandatory furniture replacement policy. Regardless of wear and tear, all the furniture is ripped out every 2 years for new pieces. And yet, somehow, we are told there isn't enough money for schools...

      I think a good moral to this story is to keep a watchful eye on government spending, and don't be afraid to speak up.

      I just realized this had little to do with the original story, so... I wonder if they're using WiFi or WiMAX?

      --
      There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
    4. Re:$2.8 Million? by bloosqr · · Score: 3, Informative

      There was an article in the NYTimes about NEC defrauding the federal E-rate program a few weeks ago. That article is gone but here
      is an AP wire article on the same thing. You did the right thing and its possible if you weren't working for NEC something similar will happen to other companies that are doing the same thing. In fact the NY Times article mentioned that congress going to hold hearings on this issue,
      so it is something that is being looked into quite seriously.

      -bloo

    5. Re:$2.8 Million? by tmasssey · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I was just involved with a company who built a new office for themselves. 50-so people. They built a reasonably attractive building in a city, not a reservation. I believe it was about 10,000 sq. ft. Total cost? Under $800,000.

      So that leaves $2 Million. Are we agreed that you could buy 40 extremely nice PC's for under $50,000? Let's add another $50,000 for a server, switches, printers, etc. $100,000 for the setup of 40 systems? I'd do it in a *heartbeat*.

      Now, bandwidth. Let's assume a frac-T3, say, 4Mbit. $50,000 for interface hardware. Maybe $50,000 for UPS's, proxy server, DNS, etc. Monthly costs of what? $6,000 a month for a 4Mbit T3? You could do it with 4 nice, redundant T1's for under $3,000 a month!

      Now, wireless. Let's assume that you want to put up 100 access points. And let's say that you pay $1000 per access point. $1k is going to get you a *kick-butt* AP, wouldn't you agree? And 100 AP's? That's some pretty good coverage, right? Cost: $100,000.

      OK, so let's total this up:

      Building: $800,000
      Techology for center: $100,000
      Back-end configuration: $100,000
      TEN YEARS of bandwidth @$6000/month: under $800,000
      100-AP wireless network: $100,000

      Total: $1.9 Million

      That leaves $900,000 (!).

      I know that I would do the entire job (without the building) for $2 Million. I would spend $1 Million to do it, and live off of the interest on the other Million! :)

  5. "organized by project head Valerie Fast Horse" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Valerie Slow Horse prefers a floppy disk for data transfer...

  6. Maybe they will compete with white men's ISPs by prostoalex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I live in Spokane, 15 minute drive from CdA, and hopefully this project, if it succeeds, will bring more wireless into the area.

    Right now the greater Spokane area is pretty much monopolized by Qwest's DSL (available some places) and Comcast's cable (available pretty much anywhere else). For a city with 300K plus total population it's a shame.

  7. Netcraft confirms it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too bad they ain't running Apache... maybe they've had bad experiences in the past?

  8. Real Free Community Wireless Networking by tomwhore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Want to see what you can get from donations and volunteer efforts?

    http://www.personaltelco.net

    2.8 million would be nice to have, do not get me wrong. Given what we are doing for what we have it would mean a heck of a lot of coverage.

    --
    Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap! Poor little clams! Snap! Snap! Snap!
  9. This is really wierd! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm starting to think my history teacher is psychic. Today, we watched Smoke Signals in class and now there is this in the news. Last week, we finished talking about Ronald Reagan, now he died. A while back, we talked about Elia Kazan in the 50's, within a week, he died. Wierd...

    I should get him to talk about Bill Gates...

  10. Re:About time. by acariquara · · Score: 2, Funny
    Yeah, but that was not because of link reliability as much of extra bits that were unneeded. The ancient PoS (Packet-over-Smoke) protocol was *really* a POS.

    When SSNeP was introduced the overall performance reached full potential.

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  11. USDA Rural Utilities Service by Scottm87 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Intresting the history behind this organization... It started as one of the "alphabet soup" programs under Roosevelt during the Great Depression to help provide both employment and electrify the Nation's rural farms. The program was very successful, and established rural "electric cooperatives" that allowed a number of individuals to form their own electric substation at a fraction of the price of the major electric companies. It recieved a lot of flak along with other New Deal projects because it evoked a socialist-like image, and the "red scare" was part of the period. Later, the Rural Electrification project got squished together into the a small piece of the USDA. I wonder if this is the future of the project - if so, it will play a major part at bringing the nation cheap broadband access.

  12. Re:All right, this will get me flamed, I'm sure. by jjjefff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe the idea here is that by giving them a handout with potentially limitless educational value, we increase the odds that at least a few more of them will be motivated and have the resources to get out there and make it on their own.

    I suppose you think fertilizer encourages laziness in plants...

  13. With thier own ISP... by haute_sauce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They can enter into the on-line gambling business ! And look at the advantages: It will not go off shore to Singapore !

  14. Re:i smell a jealous white boy by el-spectre · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wow, I didn't realize that we had posters that were around in the 1800's. They should really be ashamed of themselves.

    The natives got screwed royally. No one denies that. This does not mean that white people are evil for the rest of time. Funny how people decry racism until it fits their needs...

    --
    "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
  15. Re:No such thing as a "Native American" by brulman · · Score: 4, Funny

    actually several of us were born here.

    --
    "the best safety of the frontier...will be secured by total annihilation of the few remaining indians" L Frank Baum 1890
  16. Out-sourcing Call Centers? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The parent probably is flamebait, but funny none the less. Given the lack of humor show here in the modding, I should probably keep my mouth shut about the possibility of out-sourcing call centers to them (ducks...)

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  17. Coeur d'Alene has an apostrophe by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 2, Informative

    The apostrophe isn't a mistake: it's "Coeur d'Alene" (it's French).

    I live there, and it's really annoying when web forms try to "correct" it:

    Coeur Dalene
    Coeur dAlene
    No.

    Coeur d'Alene (I really meant it).

  18. Re:All right, this will get me flamed, I'm sure. by jestered1 · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Why in the world do we spend tax dollars to let native Americans surf porn and do email?"
    For the same damn reason we use tax dollors to let every Tom, Dick and Harry surf porn and do email from almost every public library in the U.S.. Fedral grants are handed out $millions at a time to put desktops in public schools or fund a new program at univeristies. Why does a tech grant to a tribe raise your ire any more than them?

    Furthermore, how much do you know about tribes' "per-capita" payments, or scholorship programs? They're not simply tax money diverted from your pocket to their account. Many are the result of interest from trust-fund-like accounts, large lawsuit settlements against the gov't and income from tribe run organizations. And before anyone complains about a tribe's right to have those types of funds, realize that they are from treaties that the government signed, or lawsuits where the U.S. justice system found the government in fault.

    Anonymous coward, indeed.

  19. second time's the charm by sacrilicious · · Score: 4, Funny
    the Turbocharged Broadband Geek Project. The scheme, organized by project head Valerie Fast Horse

    A previous attempt by a different group of native Americans failed to crystallize into an actual broadband offering. That group's spokesman, Eddie Slow Turtle, had no explanation.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  20. The Land of Idaho by Z4rd0Z · · Score: 2, Funny

    Idaho...where men are men and the women, well they kind of look like men too.

    --
    You had me at "dicks fuck assholes".
  21. FCC rules by FuryG3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So what are the rules for indian reservations and tribes according to the FCC? Does the FCC have jurisdiction over such areas?

  22. Do it right... by Tailhook · · Score: 2, Informative

    Since your actually funded and can, therefore, do better than fabricated pringle-can antenna's and 802.11, I recommend this. Grown-up wireless that works very well. 802.11 is an adaptation of Ethernet to microwave that does not scale. Canopy was created to do what you want to do.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  23. Abusing the status... by GPLDAN · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is a systems integration and networking company here in the American West. I won't name their name, since the I'm going to say some pretty strong things...

    The guy who owns gets a deep discount from distrubution partners because his is a "native-american" owned business. The company wraps themselves in the iconography and their logo is an animal synonymous with the American Indian.

    This guy is ONE-EIGHTH American Indian. I won't even name the tribe. Doesn't matter. This guy is fat, pale white and bald and looks about as American Indian as Tony Soprano. perfect guy to compare him to, as well. Actually, I think Tony is less corrupt.

    Nevertheless, he has a huge advantage over his competition. His discount is about 3 to 4 POINTS below a company without that status. Bidding an integration and database project that includes a $100,000 worth of Sun equipment? Going against these guys? Snap $4k off the top, just throw that money away or you WILL be underbid. Looking for an education contract? Good luck.

    Want to know what else you are up against? the Tax benefits to a large corporation when they give business to a "Small Business Administration-certified 8(a)" firm. Want to double up the tax breaks? Do it in a HUBzone - Historically Underutilized Business Zone. Does your company need to be in the HUBZone to qualify for the tax break? Not necessarily. Quite a few legal entanglements there, depends what state your corporation is incorporated in.

    Isn't about time we closed bullshit loopholes like these? I'm a Democrat and believe that certain inequalities exist and that in certain instances, Affirmative Action and tax incentives for areas make for good business and re-level a playing field that DOES have systematic racism in it. But laws regarding Indians are just being abused. Badly. I have a friend who is actually HALF Sioux. He moved away, but I wanted to start a business with him as an equal partner. 4 points on Cisco, Sun, and a myriad of other gear is big margin in the VAR world.

  24. Re:Turbocharged? by GPLDAN · · Score: 2, Funny

    Turbo Pascal, product by Borland.

    The word "Turbo" has become part of the lexicon for describing anything fast. I don't think anyone really understands that the product is not using it's own exhaust gases to boost internal horsepower. Imagine if Slashdot did that, it would FLY. God knows there is so much exhaust gas around here.

  25. Old news. . . . by Rogue+Leader · · Score: 2, Funny

    Native Americans have had wireless communication for centuries. Smoke signals, anyone? No offense to my red brothers, we smokem peace pipe.

    --

    worst sig ever. . .

  26. Angry Geeks by broadzilla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am shocked to read the number of angry responses to this story. I always thought that technology was neutral in the racial game, and was quite surprised at the number of angry, racial geeks out there. I guess I should be glad that your remarks are based on ignorance rather than truth or honesty. The good news: you angry guys are not the majority.

    1. Re:Angry Geeks by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hard to get further in my career because of the color of my skin.

      Have you ever actually been turned down for a job, because of your skin color? I have, and I'm caucasian.

      I interviewed at a govenment agency in the 90's, and the director flat out told me, "You're more qualified for the job, but we have to hire the other candidate, because he is in a minority."

      The other candidate ended up not taking the job. I took it, because I needed the money.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    2. Re:Angry Geeks by buddhaseviltwin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Everybody's 1/16 Cherokee. It does nothing for the record.

      This is not about handouts or reparations. Our government signed a lot of treaties that they were legally bounded by. Our government broke those treaties, so our courts have rightly decided that our government should PAY DAMAGES for violating agreements it entered in...

      It's not about you and me paying for our grandparents mistakes. It's about the US and Canadian governments paying for their mistakes. If you really don't want to continue paying for our countries past mistakes, then I can suggest a number of countries where you can emmigrate.

      Lastly, ending your posts with STFU cements your juvenille tendencies. IE, It makes you look really stupid.

  27. How broad is the lake? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What about north? Coeur d'Alene and Hayden (where I live) are both north of the lake.

    As another poster already mentioned, the service is available to non tribe member residents on the res.

    If they haven't already put an access point on your side of the lake, how broad is the lake? If only a few miles, you should be able to hit the access point with a directional antenna.

    24 db dishes can be had online for less than a hundred bux, and two of 'em face-to-face can easily go more than ten miles, while one of 'em pointing at an ordinary accesspoint can make several miles. Similarly, a short yagi (or a "pringles can" antenna) can get you considerable distance.

    So even if they don't have an AP on your side of the lake, you may be able to connect.

    And IF you can connect, you can stick a second card in your box, enable routing, and become a local access point for the others who can't hit directly. (Two such volunteers can provide a solid feed without leaving the rest of your community in the lurch when you're rebooting.)

    And I think some cheap routers can also be configured for this - just replace one of the rubber duckies with a directional antenna - or plug two of 'em - one with a directional antenna, one with duckies or roof-mounted omnis - into your ethernet hub or back-to-back with a crossover ethernet cable.

    But since the intent WAS to feed the whole community don't be surprised if such relay access points are already part of the plan. (Or, since they're so cheap to add, if they get added once they're suggested.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  28. Grant money also goes to real rural america by Ciphix · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am system administrator, as well as project manager for (Glenwood Telephone Company - the smallest independant telco in Georgia - www.gtconline.com) in Glenwood, Georgia (population ~~800 - average home income $16,000 a year) was awarded the Community-Oriented Connectivity Broadband Grant program by the United States Department of Agriculture / Rural Utilities Service as well. We have already successfully deployed this project to our area. The main portion of the grant funds that we were awarded 277,819 was used for the community center (www.thenetcenter.net)(10 computers [8 alienware area 51 systems and 2 Macintosh G5's, planning to add some linux pc's soon], however the remaining portion of this grant was used to deploy DSL within the city limits of Glenwood. While I can say that this helped our little company by aiding us in our broadband deployment there have been alot of other winners. The biggest winners in this so far have been the kids that now have somewhere to hang out, play games and use computers that they cannot afford to have, as well as have access to high tech equipment that the rural schools choose not to afford for them (only have 6 old computers per classroom). I must add however, another huge winner in this program was the critical care facilities (hospital, fire, police, city hall, schools within Glenwood) who get free broadband access for the first two years. Already our community center (thenetcenter.net) has a steady group of gamers coming in and they are helping us keep this project ongoing. Grants like this do indeed help out the smaller communities, and provide something other than just a local gas station to hang out in. As system administrator for Glenwood Telephone Company I can tell you that this was an excellent way to provide high speed Internet in our area. DS1's cost anywhere between $1300 a month to ~$4000 a month in our service area. What rural america can really use help in is getting backbone services cheaper to our area. Our telephone company's outside plant is among the best, if not the best in georgia (over 99% of our plant is underground and we deploy fiber constantly when doing new plant additions). Problem with deploying DSL in our area is that not many can afford it. This gets me into another problem I have that is really at the crux of the whole issue... the welfare society in america. People do not seem to realize that ISP's generally are a marginal profit business and I can guarantee you that our bandwith costs eat us alive. If we could have cheaper backbones to rural georgia we could definately see the "Rural Divide" narrow significantly. On another note even with the "subsidies" that our telco recieves with the Universal Service charge our customers would rather pay for cable TV anyday than to have a telephone or computer with internet access in their home (rural welfare society at its finest... another topic altogether). We are the atypical ISP. Many of our customers are the new computer users, average age 40+ who want to learn about computers and how they can make their lives more enjoyable. The beauty of rural america is its simplicity and access in rural america can make life simply more enjoyable. I sincerely hope that access can provide rural america the american dreams that many of them so desire. [steps off his soapbox]