Slashdot Mirror


Do You Really Want to Meet People on the Web?

Wolfspelz writes "Do you want to meet people on Web pages? The Jabber Virtual Presence project makes people aware of each other on the Web. Just like you are aware of other people in the real world anywhere you go, the virtual presence makes you aware of others on the same virtual locations. The project uses Jabber/XMPP as the transport protocol for virtual presence. Jabber conference components serve as presence servers. The code is GPL/LGPL. The Virtual Presence Protocol extensions are open and documented. The virtual presence system including the LLuna2 client is designed to protect the privacy and prohibit any indecent use, be it commercial use, advertising, or profiling. But: do you want to meet people on the Web at all?"

43 of 256 comments (clear)

  1. I don't think so by ralf1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't want to meet people who need the web to meet people.

    --
    "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
    1. Re:I don't think so by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

      You obviously have not seen many webpages of those lonely 18 year old cheerleaders desperately looking to meet someone.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:I don't think so by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not? It is just another medium to meet people. In fact it can sometimes be better. You might get to know the person, and like the person so that you would want to meet the person. This does not have to be for romance, but could be for friends. Back in the day when local BBS' were big - we would have get-to-gethers. I never did it to try and go out with a girl, but it was nice to meet the people I would play MUD's with. I have met a number of people from the web. Some nice, some not so nice. Some extremely hot, some extremely not :) I think it is a new medium - nothing wrong with it. People use newspaper ads, bars, clubs, parks, restaurants. Others may not have the time (i have been in this position) to go and hang out at these places all the time.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    3. Re:I don't think so by xmas2003 · · Score: 4, Funny

      HEY ... better to meet people on the web that say, on the road - how would you like to meet this guy who got caught Nose Picken' on Photo Radar ;-)

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    4. Re:I don't think so by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      On the other hand:

      But: do you want to meet people on the Web at all?"

      could easily be rendered as:

      But: do you want to meet people at all?"

      For a lot of people, this involves some sort of a negative answer, one way or another. Some folks have a low tolerance of human beings, depending on circumstances.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    5. Re:I don't think so by sosegumu · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't want to meet people who need the web to meet people.

      What!!! Just think of all those hot girlz waiting to be invited back to our mothers' basements to see our newest modded gaming pc!

      --
      It's easier to wear the spandex than to do the crunches. --David Lee Roth
    6. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      People use newspaper ads, bars, clubs, parks, restaurants.

      Don't forget toilet walls. I prefer toilet walls.

  2. We used some of the Jabber presence features... by tcopeland · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...for an internal project with the Jabber4R wrapper.

    Jabber ended up being too slow, though, so we built a more specialized message router in C++ - and open sourced it - to replace it.

    1. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by Earlybird · · Score: 3, Insightful
      • Jabber ended up being too slow, though, so we built a more specialized message router ...
      While I understand the intended meaning -- that Jabber was not suitable for your application -- I dislike (1) the implication that Jabber is somehow inherently slow (what was slow? The Jabber4R client library? The Jabber server? Which server? Or the architecture?), and (2) the fact that you are providing no new information, but merely throwing out some vague, critical remark about Jabber of no use to anyone, leading up to a shameless plug for your own unrelated product. What was your point, man?

      How about doing a design comparison between Cougaar and Jabber?

    2. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by tcopeland · · Score: 4, Informative

      > the implication that Jabber is
      > somehow inherently slow

      Hm. It was too slow for our purposes - i.e., passing large numbers of large messages around to track a distributed agent system. I'm sure it's fast enough for most uses.

      > The Jabber4R client library?

      Nope, that's fine.

      > The Jabber server?

      Yup.

      > Which server?

      The Java one, I think.

      > Or the architecture?

      Dunno about that.

      > critical remark

      Hm, didn't mean to be critical... just sharing experience.

      > a shameless plug for
      > your own unrelated product.

      It's not really a product, per se... I mean, it's open source and free.

      > What was your point, man?

      To share an experience with the Jabber server and offer a note on our workaround.

      > doing a design comparison between
      > Cougaar and Jabber?

      They're two different things - COUGAAR is a distributed agent architecture, Jabber is a messaging protocol. I'm not sure a comparison is really in order...

  3. Of course not! by jazzmanjac · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's why I'm on the internet to begin with... so I DON'T have to interact with other people. (Well, except for slashdot.)

    --
    Some cats swing, and others don't. Don't you be the kind that won't.
  4. Natural Consequences by Judebert · · Score: 4, Funny

    And of course, their #1 "topsite" is porn. Like we didn't know what it would be used for.

    No, I don't think I'm interested in listening to a bunch of space-hogging attention-whoring avatars while I surf, thanks.

    --

    For geek dads: Contraction Timer

    1. Re:Natural Consequences by no+longer+myself · · Score: 4, Funny
      I don't think I'm interested in listening to a bunch of space-hogging attention-whoring...

      But you're reading Sla--

      Oh nevermind... :-/

  5. Its vital by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

    that the tens of thousands of geeks out there can compete to meet with the one of the 2 geek girls in the world so the possibility of the uber geek child can become a reality.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Its vital by cyborch · · Score: 5, Funny

      If these 2 geek girls had tens of thousands of guys hitting on them and had to spend of bunch of their time dealing with these guys whould they still be considered geeks?

      Well, if they solved the problem by automating the process of dealing with all the guys hitting on them, then yes - they would still be considered geeks :)

    2. Re:Its vital by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Funny

      Automated Rejection System:

      You have made a/an :
      () stupid
      () hormonal
      () rediculous
      () unconvincing
      () overused
      () evolutionary
      proposal to get into my pants this evening. This will fail because:
      () I have to wash my hair
      () I have a boyfriend
      () I have to download and compile a new distro
      () You are laid off
      () You smell bad
      () I am a lesbian
      Thank you for trying. I am:
      () flattered
      () disgusted
      () demoralized
      () now a lesbian

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  6. You like /.? I Like /.? Funny we should meet here. by malakai · · Score: 4, Funny

    You like Woman being fisted by donkeys? I like women being fisted by donkeys! Funny we should meet here. ... yeah i can see where this will lead ...

    Mom?!? Dad?!?! Little Timmy!?! What are you doing on donkeypunch.com!?!?

  7. I'm all for it. by bcore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd say that the more opportunity to meet interesting people in this world, the better, and this just improves the odds of randomly meeting people your probably wouldn't otherwise have to opportunity to meet.

    As long as it doesn't supplant actual real world interaction with people as a primary social outlet, that is..

    1. Re:I'm all for it. by mwood · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm always puzzled by this sort of reaction. In what way is meeting on a Web page any less "real" than meeting at a bus stop or over the phone? The other person is just as real.

    2. Re:I'm all for it. by bcore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't disagree, I've met many awesome people through various online things.. I've just found that there have been periods in my own life where I have become so involved with online communities that I didn't put the time into real-world interactions. I find that for me at least, this trap just leads to me not being happy in the real world, so I try to balance online and offline life. To each his/her own, of course..

  8. Virtual selling points by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All of these services are just an excuse to gather a huge number of e-mail addresses and connections between people, and then to use that network to market stuff. If there were a service that banned marketing and advertising messages, maybe it would be worth doing. As it is, it almost acts like the "in-crowd", where if you buy what they want, magically you're the most popular. However, so what if people want to meet people online? How is that worse than in an establishment serving alcohol, where everyone's not themselves anyhow?

    --
    stuff |
  9. Could be interesting... by slusich · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While definately not the most obvious use of this software, it could prove interesting on sites such as /., cnn, salon etc. to talk live to others about an article. Posting comments is fine, but it's not live, and it could be days before anyone responds. It's certainly not something you'd leave running all the time.

  10. Another nice social networking concept... by fugas · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although I haven't downloaded this yet, it sounds like a fun social networking concept to me. Kind of a hybrid of the late Third Voice and the newer StumbleUpon (which I really love)

  11. I for one.. by hookedup · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would much rather ask someone looking at the same website as me if they have seen what I'm looking for, instead of a site map.

    And no.. I dont go walking around the grocery store asking strangers where the broccoli is..

  12. Sounds like Odigo by linuxtelephony · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sounds like what Odigo started out as about 5 or 6 years ago. They provided you with a display so you could see who else was at the web site you were visiting, then you could IM them if you wanted. There was more, like the ability to search for people, etc.

    However, the lluna interface looks more interesting.

    --
    . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
  13. More face to face interaction by jcostantino · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Even though "online" has such a stigma attached to it, lots of people meet other people just fine. What if someone is severely handicapped and can't otherwise easily leave the house?

    I've met people socially who I met online, some were freaks and some were decent well adjusted people. It's the same as meeting people in the real world.

    I'll admit that I have a bit of social anxiety in person and it's easier for me to start a conversation with a total stranger online and to subsequently dip out on the conversation if I don't like the tone or direction :).

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
  14. If i wanted to meet people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative


    i would go down the pub/club/bar/gym/golf/beach/pool

    i have no desire to speak to hotSexyGal14 who is really a fat pasty guy from texas with a hygiene problem and reads comics thanks

    1. Re:If i wanted to meet people by fuzzix · · Score: 5, Funny
      i would go down the pub/club/bar/gym/golf/beach/pool
      I think there's something wrong with me - I saw this post and thought "Wow, that guy's really messed up his filesystem hierarchy..."
  15. Now all I need... by JaJ_D · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can now make friends and be aware of people on the web!

    So I now can order food, beer, Geek toys, clothes, make friends, work and interact - all without leaving my home.

    Now if I could just be able to order sex, I can brickup my front door....

    ....checks google....

    Just found out that all my needs are now catered for.....

    Bricks are being delivered monday!

    :^]

    Jaj

  16. After the experience... by GypC · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... of reading Slashdot for the last 6 years, I would have to say, "Absolutely not."

  17. In Real Life by DrugCheese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IRL I'm sitting here at my keyboard typing this. The internet is no magical Alter Ego machine. I've met people from the internet, it's no different from meeting people in 'real life'. Sometimes it's good, sometimes it's bad.

    Why not ask the question: Do you want to see anyone in REAL LIFE at all?

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  18. Um...huh? by superdan2k · · Score: 3, Informative

    "But: do you want to meet people on the Web at all?"

    Well, given that I met someone on match.com more than two years ago and that we're getting married in August, I'd say there's nothing wrong with meeting people on the web.

    If it weren't for the web, I wouldn't have met my font-design mentor, Chank, despite the fact that we live in the same city. Some of my best friends on the planet, I've met through IRC and Livejournal

    That said, I still don't want to have a sitatuation as describe in the article of being aware of people that are surfing the same sites I am. Especially when I'm surfing the pr0n. I mean, yeesh...talk about TMI.

    --
    blog |
    1. Re:Um...huh? by British · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wait a minute, don't you and I moderate the twin_cities lj community?

    2. Re:Um...huh? by superdan2k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why, yes, I believe we do! Small Internet. :-D

      --
      blog |
  19. This can't turn out well. by Flyskippy1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can see how this will work: Jabber: You are visiting goatse.cx, there are 1 other visitors. Visitor: Don't you just love looking at this guy. You: Wait... is that you, Mom?

  20. ICQ had made it by Madarco · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some years ago ICQ (mirabilis) tried to launch something similar: a chat integrated with browser where you meet the people on the same page, but without the avatars. I don't know where it has gone.

  21. The Dynamics of Anonymity by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having met several people in person that I first met through e-mail or chat (fellow programmers and co-workers from remote locations), I've noticed several interesting dynamics from virtual communications relative to those of "real life." Some of these are obvious, such as judging people by how well they express their ideas and opinions in words (instead of by their appearance or personal hygiene).

    Others are more subtle, and are apparent only over time, such as the speed with which someone responds. Do they think quickly, but type slowly? Do they fly off the handle and just post the first thing that comes to mind, or do they carefully consider every response?

    In most cases, I have found that getting to know someone online, over time, gives you a better perspective on how that person sees themselves. If they have low self-esteem, that will come across (eventually). If they're confident and authoritative, that will show (again, over time). If they're egotistical and full of themselves, they'll have microsoft.com in their e-mail address.

    However, you *can* get to know someone really well on one level (or in a given context), and completely miss another. For instance, I used to manage several mailing lists about Borland Delphi. One of the moderators for the list, named Jo, was moving from one part of South Africa to another, and was offline for a couple of weeks. I had known Jo for years as a serious gearhead when it came to Delphi Database programming. After I asked one of the other moderators about Jo by saying, "Where is he moving?", I discovered that Jo was, in fact, a woman.

    At that point, Jo's signature line took on new meaning (and I got a much-needed lesson in gender stereotyping): "I am a programmer - I don't do relationships."

    Tim

  22. Do you want to meet people on the Web? by mwood · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Despite my rants elsewhere about the unreality of the "real world" concept, I'd have to say no. I do not have any unfulfilled desire to meet people on the 'net (or anywhere else). I meet people all the time, netwise and otherwise, and I find this sufficient.

  23. Offtopic, but may be of interest to some by CGP314 · · Score: 3, Informative

    But: do you want to meet people on the Web at all?

    I didn't think I would, but yes. When I moved to London, I didn't know anyone in the city and had to bootstrap myself a new social network. Graduate school helped, but after a while I wanted more than one group of friends so I turned to Orkut. I've been to a bunch of meetings and generally my experiences have been positive.

    For those interested, I wrote about my first orkut meetup on my blog here.

  24. Re:Not really by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really, and the person you meet at a bar, park, restaurant, club, etc.. cannot be a paedophile? The fact that there is no presence makes the interaction safer. You can chat with the person for months, and then chat with the person on the phone, and if you continue to proceed to meet the person face to face, you are better off (much better) then if you just randomly met the person on the "street." At least, utilizing the Internet method, you have some time you can attempt to get to know the person - on the street, if the person is psychotic, you may have very little warning. To assume psychopaths only proliferate on the internet is naive and wrong. Your example is sorely lacking. And your statement about being "genuine" lacks evidence. In fact, people are more blunt on the Internet because they have a certain sense of protection - hence people are more willing to speak their mind. While some people cannot control their emotions and decide to lash out, many people utilize this form of communication as a way to voice their, legitimate opinions, without feeling pressured due to society rules. That is VERY genuine.

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  25. The Rejection Form by Landaras · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, as a guy, I automated part of the process of being rejected by women.

    - Neil Wehneman

  26. Re:Not really by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are obvious advantages to meeting in person - body interactions, voice inflections, etc. I agree that it is easier to read people in person (and sometimes damn near impossible to read people online). Thank you for saying I may be a nice person...I like to think that I am. (my name is Avi). I do meet many people face - face, I utilize a blend of both online and offline. Everyone needs to find the niche that works for them. My problem comes around when people assume that online engagements are sub-par. Good luck to you, and enjoy a good room temperature beer for me :)

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  27. I met my wife online. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Funny

    We've been together for just over eight years, married for almost 6, and we have a 4-month-old daughter.

    So, can you and should you meet people online? Hell yes!

    Um, if they want your credit card right away, they're not just being inquisitive. ;)

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.