Slashdot Mirror


Theora I Bistream Format Frozen

p80 writes "The Xiph foundation announced today that the 'Theora I bistream format is now frozen,' even though Beta 1 is not out yet and encourage people to try it as 'there's no reason to delay adopting a free alternative any more!' Mplayer and Xine both support Theora. For Windows users, Directshow filters for Ogg Vorbis, Speex, Theora and FLAC are available here. You can get test cases here and transcode Quicktime movies to theora on that page." This freeze, as an anonymous reader puts it, "means that all future versions will support the format as it is now. It will be interesting to see if there is as much uptake for this as there was for the Vorbis sound format."

65 of 329 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by markv242 · · Score: 5, Funny
    "It will be interesting to see if there is as much uptake for this as there was for the Ogg sound format"
    You mean, almost no uptake at all outside of the Linux community?
    1. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by cowbud · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, I agree with you also. Especially since Microsoft will not allow the codec to be included in installs ever. However, there is still some acceptance take for example UT2004. All the music score is done in ogg vorbis now that is cool! If only all hardware players could play it.

    2. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or rather, almost no uptake outside and very little inside of the Linux community... I see a lot of people talking about it, wishing for stuff and so on, but very few that actually use it even inside of said community.

      And oh, whoever moderated the parent funny, that should have been "Insightful". =)

    3. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, the reason Microsoft includes codecs for download on their site is that the codec producer paid them to do so. They're not giving away bandwidth just because it's cool.

      If you want to get DivX, Theora, Ogg or WHATEVER in WMP, you'd have to pay the same price Intel does. It's not impossible, and if it's important to the community to do so, have a project manager get in touch with Microsoft and we'll start a collection.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, I converted all 3,000 of my mp3s to ogg sometime in 2003.

      Don't bother replying about the degradation in quality; I didn't notice it, and I prefer the oggs anyway for other reasons.

    5. Re:Oh, this will be modded as flamebait... by EpsCylonB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I recently ripped all my cd's and used vorbis instead of mp3. Admitedly the vast majority of my digital music collection is still mp3 but I think it is inaccuarate to say that no one is using vorbis.

  2. Fighting a losing battle by The_reformant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I realise that free (as in speech) sound and video formats are a good thing but it seems that certain formats, particularly mp3 are now more or less ubiqoutous (sp??). I mean how many people pick up their 128meg solid state ogg player in the morning??

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    1. Re:Fighting a losing battle by forkazoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The fact that you don't start the battle as a winner is no reason not to fight it.

      Many people create their own content. I consider it much more entertaining than just being a consumer of content, even if my content isn't as flashy as the Matrix or Britney Spears. Because of this, the ability to have free tools to work with is a big deal. I don't care if we never see a movieflix.com movie download site from the MPAA with exclusively Theora content. That isn't the point.

      As long as I have access to tools that aren't encumbered by patents, and I can do whatever the fuck I want with them. As long as Fraunhoffer or MS controls things, it means I can't be certain about what happens to my content tomarrow.

      Oh, and the guys who are interested in video compression have an interesting toy to hack. That's one step geekier than I currently am, but guys decided to make something cool, and they have done it. Isn't that enough? Why does it have to be a battle. Minix wasn't a battle. Fighting wasn't why it was written. But, because it was more open, and assorted Fins could gain access to the source code to see how things worked, they were able to make some sort of Leenoooks clone with help from the tooth fairy. It doesn't matter than minix didn't win!

    2. Re:Fighting a losing battle by node+3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I mean how many people pick up their 128meg solid state ogg player in the morning??

      More than there would have been had the ogg/vorbis/theora folks decided the task was just too daunting and given up.

      Changing the world for the better happens a little at a time.

    3. Re:Fighting a losing battle by BRSloth · · Score: 5, Funny

      you're connected to one of the largest repositories of human knowledge ever created

      This is Slashdot. You must be new here.

      Oh, you mean the internet! Yeah, there is knowledge there...

    4. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Talez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Especially when the Vorbis download page for Windows doesn't have a link to the damn (unofficial) Directshow codec on it.

      Hint to the Vorbis guys: People are more likely to adopt a format when they don't have to change their media player. Start giving people easy links to useful binaries god dammit.

      Hell. If I was a webmaster for Vorbis there would be a big "DOWNLOAD FOR WINDOWS" button on the front page which is linked to a Directshow codec.

    5. Re:Fighting a losing battle by The_reformant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      meh, im tired of these..ive got such and such which plays ogg. Your missing the point. Most people dont know what the hell ogg is.

      Your "Ogg player" is described thusly on the product webpage :- "The first MP3 digital audio computer built to manage, broadcast, and expand your digital music world. With Neuros, your digital music experience keeps evolving"

      Why? Because only a hand full of people use ogg, its part of the mental snobbery and one upmanship that is ridiculously prevalent in this so called "Community". Why dont you guys quite being such dorks and join the real world? When you hand over that wicked track on cdr to your mate down the pub theyre not gonna think "Wow! this guys smart, he's using a free (as in speech) audio format, what a swell guy!" Rather theyre gonna think, "oh crap i hate it when that guy whinges on about that younixks thingy i'll just smile and bin the cdr without bothering to find out how to play it"

      Wow that was a long rant!

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    6. Re:Fighting a losing battle by The_reformant · · Score: 4, Funny

      No you fool!!! they can succeed just on free operating systems. And only people clever enough to compile from the source are allowed to use it anyway. Oh yeah and windows media player sucks so anyone which uses that isnt allowed to have it either.

      In fact me and my friend keith are just going to keep it for ourselves. Keith had a girlfriend once

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    7. Re:Fighting a losing battle by zurab · · Score: 5, Informative
      I realise that free (as in speech) sound and video formats are a good thing but it seems that certain formats, particularly mp3 are now more or less ubiqoutous (sp??).

      I'm not sure that's the case with video. As far as products (not technologies), there's Quicktime/Sorenson and WMV which definitely are not ubiquitous; both are proprietary and somewhat expensive to license. Then there's MPEG-4 which is even more absurd at licensing. Real's format does not really fall into the same category. If anything was "ubiquitous" I would say MPEG-2, but that does not count in the same category either as it does not serve the same purpose as MPEG-4 (MPEG-2 is nearly useless at low bitrates).

      Yes, there are free divx/xvid implementations but those are useless in commercial offerings as they are not properly licensed. So as late as Theora would be getting to the market, IMO, the field is still wide open. Not only has the consumer market not been saturated with any single low bitrate high quality video compression technology, but video "sharing" itself has not reached a maturity level of audio streams when Vorbis first beta was released and standard frozen.
    8. Re:Fighting a losing battle by flacco · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Fucking idiot.

      short-sighted moron.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    9. Re:Fighting a losing battle by steveha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah... except no. You've got the encoder. You've got the decoder. You're safe, I swear.

      If all else were equal, why not use the tool that isn't patent-encumbered?

      And... just as AMD forced Intel to stop charging too much for CPUs, Ogg keeps Frauhofer from getting too greedy with MP3. Even if not that many people use Ogg, it's still keeping us safe.

      And... imagine someone puts together a whole collection of stuff on the web in a patent-encumbered format such as MP3. The patent owners can literally tell that person "we control the patent, so you have to pay us or take your site down." Free formats mean no one can tell you what to do with your own stuff.

      No one is seriously suggesting that jackbooted thugs will kick in your door and erase your QuickTime files from your hard disk. But that doesn't mean that there is no benefit to a free format.

      And finally, Linux distributions such as Debian, who are really careful about IP, are free to include all Ogg players, encoders, and utilities. They can't include IP-encumbered stuff. I love being able to burn and give away CDs (such as Gnoppix) that can do all sorts of cool stuff, but are still legal for me to give away. I'm sure you are comfortable with restricting yourself to whatever tools get approved by the owners of the various patents, or whatever tools you personally pay for, but there is no need to be rude to those of us who are interested in the freedom aspects of free software.

      Fucking idiot.

      Rude troll.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    10. Re:Fighting a losing battle by steveha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OGG isn't as good as AAC.

      Actually, they are close enough that this is arguable. In any event, Ogg passes the "Good Enough" test. So does AAC, of course.

      I don't know about this new thing, but I find it hard to believe that it's as good as MPEG-4 at high bit rates or Sorenson at low bit rates.

      It's my understanding that Theora isn't as good as MPEG4 at equivalent bit rates. Not sure about Sorenson. Theora should actually be better than MPEG2, and for many applications MPEG2 passes the "Good Enough" test.

      Of course, over time, as people come up with clever tricks, the encoders get better. It happened with MPEG and MPEG2, and Theora still has plenty of room to improve.

      But if Theora isn't suitable for your application, you can always license MPEG4 or Sorenson or something. I'm certainly not saying that Theora is the all-purpose answer to everything.

      It's a pain in the ass to use a nonstandard codec, so why bother?

      Actually, because I am a Debian user, it's more of a pain for me to use IP-encumbered tools. So why should I bother?

      And I'm not asking you to use Theora. I'm just telling you that you shouldn't say abusive rude things about the folks who are interested in it.

      Fraunhofer's own business plan keeps them from "getting too greedy."

      Can you count on that? How do you know that pointy-haired idiots won't make dumb decisions? It would be dumb to pick several of your customers and sue them, and drive away all possible future customers, but SCO did that.

      Besides, the very fact that you'd consider a company's pursuit of profit through licensing of patented technology to be "getting too greedy" makes me laugh at you derisively. Ha-ha.

      Go back and read what I wrote. I haven't argued that patent holders shouldn't be allowed to charge royalties; I pointed out that if you don't use IP-encumbered formats, no one can force you to pay royalties.

      There's absolutely no interpretation of patent law that would result in that interpretation.

      Um... how about the ability of patent owners to decide under what terms, and for what fees, they license the patent? If you are using patented technology, you have to comply with the terms of your patent license, don't you?

      They can't tell you "AND by the way you also owe us big royalties for last year." They can't change the deal retroactively. But as long as they own the patent, they could set a license fee and license terms that you would need to honor in the future, unless you have some sort of signed agreement with them that took precedence.

      Frauhofer let everyone use MP3 for free for a few years, then changed the deal and started charging. Are you saying that could never happen again?

      [free software distributions like Debian...] are irrelevant to any serious discussion. We're talking about the real world here, not the lunatic fringe.

      You really are a rude troll. No doubt you are laughing at me for taking the time to talk to you. Well, I won't make that mistake anymore.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    11. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In fact, it's safe to say that most people do not encode video on a PC.

      Most people don't do anything on a PC. Most people don't own PC's. What's your point?

      Compare this to audio market with CD mixes and portable players - you see the difference.

      Nope. I think you're confused about some things. MP3 is the thing that people like you (i.e., shitwits) are complaining about, claiming that it's "encumbered" by patents. And it's the self-same thing you point to as an example of ubiquity. Take a step back and use that great big brain of yours for a minute, you warthog-faced buffoon.

      You are not reading or not understanding - I even gave you a pasted content and a link for reference.

      Which I read and understood. You, evidently, did not.

      Unfortunately, downloading Darwin Streaming Server does not grant you MPEG-4 patent licenses.

      That's right. That's because none are required to either encode or broadcast. Go read, for chrissakes.

      Even if it magically did, this is not what I was talking about since Darwin Streaming Server is not intended to be used by average computer users.

      Darwin Streaming Server is the free version of QuickTime Streaming Server, which is intended to be used by average computer users.

      --

      I write in my journal
    12. Re:Fighting a losing battle by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, it would be fair to say then, that it is arguable whether AAC is really better than Ogg?

      Stop reading in the middle and you end up drawing erroneous conclusions, putz.

      That's funny, Ogg seems to be available for every computer platform I care about.

      Yawn.

      There are many portable music players that don't support it

      End of discussion.

      AAC doesn't meet my needs better than Ogg, so for me Ogg is better.

      Yes, it does. You're just perversely misrepresenting your own needs, either out of sheer ignorance or wrongheadedness.

      Hell, I wouldn't even trust you to be able to elaborate on what your needs are.

      --

      I write in my journal
  3. YANFF by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do we really need yet another format? i know the mantra of "choice is good," but then having to track down all the little things i need to decode every random video or audio file i come across is sort of the opposite of good. it's bloody obnoxiouse, honestly. i still don't know what an asf is (mostly because i am too lazy to look it up).

    1. Re:YANFF by n0d3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      having all these codecs around might be annoying yes, however howmany open codecs do you have besides the ogg suite?

      Some people prefer their pc's with all open software. Open standars, and even open src.

      this is where ogg comes in. now we have video and audio for free. For some of us, including myself, this is great, as mp3 is isn't an open format, nor is divx (and it's brethern) or mpeg for that matter.

    2. Re:YANFF by grumbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't Theora the first OpenSource and non-'Patent-poisned' Codec that we have that is also (at least more or less) up to todays standard? Xvid and so are all fine and nice, but rather useless if I am not allowed to use them due to patents.

  4. Have questions about this codec? by saskboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's where to look for the FAQ.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  5. Re:sigh. by Azrael+Newtype · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While this is true, it's always possible that we'll come up with something a bit better in the file size/quality ratio. I mean, look at XviD vs DivX. But, that doesn't mean we all have to jump every time a new codec hits, but considering the success of the Vorbis codec for audio, it's a bit sad to see another ogg bite it.

    --
    I'm always right and I can prove it, because to the best of my knowledge, I've never been wrong.
  6. Re:.ogg? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure... "Ogg" is the actual format of the file, which is simply a container for the content encoded within.

    I'd like to see ".ogv" start popping up to signify Ogg video.

  7. My God! by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 3, Funny

    I always thought Theora was kind of cool... But frozen? My God! They must really kick arse!

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
  8. What is with the compression ratio? by xiphy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Will Theora codecs ever be as good as MPEG-4 ones? Or we have to wait for wavelet based codecs to have a patent free good format?
    IIRC the MPlayer lead developer (Alex) said that he reckons Theora will never get close to MPEG-4.

    1. Re:What is with the compression ratio? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      VP3 is BETTER for low bitrates and low resolutions. It was one of the big improvements added to the PocketMVP player before I sold my PocketPC and stopped caring.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  9. Think this is likely to have better uptake by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the OGG video stuff will have an easier go of it than OGG the music format.

    OGG audio had a few problems - at the start, not as many people knew about it so it was slow to adopt to different players and rippers that people liked to use. The worse problem was that even now it's in almost no hardware, so it made little sense to encode to OGG if you might have wanted to use a portable.

    But with video the whole field is still wide open. Getting a Quicktime or Windows media file to my TV is equally hard, so I might as well store my video in OGG as anything - and I am more likley to be able to build a box I am happy hooking to my TV for video than I would have been trying to construct an audio device I would like. And I have a lot more motivation with every consumer video device being generally locked down in very annoying ways.

    The other thing that will help is that consumer device makers will have little reason not to adopt this video format since it can be another item on a checkbox and is free to implement. Also the processing power is going to be there in whatever device is created - with OGG audio, for a while there was no good example code for playing OGG files on devices without floating point support (as I remember it).

    So, good luck Ogg Theora! I plan to start using it as soon as I can and see how it fares.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  10. Re:Can Someone Explain What this is? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Informative

    Vorbis is an audio codec...but you knew that.

    Theora is a video codec.

    Ogg is the transport layer that both are stored in, so a video file will be Theora-encoded data inside an Ogg file, while audio is normally Vorbis-encoded data inside an ogg file.

    Ogg can/is used for other audio codecs, too, like FLAC.

  11. Great... by OS24Ever · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...so now we'll have 'xxx releases new xxx player' with a hundred responses of 'Does it do ogg' followed by another few hundred responses of 'Ogg is not the format, theora is the encoder'

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  12. Mod points to burn. by Talinom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Someone's gonna mod me down for trolling because I don't echo the Slashdot groupspeak on this. Oh well.

    Who honestly cares about or uses Ogg? Really. I have yet to even contemplate it. Sure I have the codec on my machine, but I haven't used it. Nothing is out there in the format that I am interested in or have even ran across accidently. I like portability of my music so I use MP3. (I can't very well install the codec on my machine at work.) I have no intention of recording anything into the format, so it would be a poor choice for me to use it. How many people is it a good choice for? Why?

    What about Theora? Probably the same thing, at least for me. Most people already are happy with using DivX, XviD, MPEG-1/2/4, WMV, or whatever. Adding another into the mix, while giveing people more choices, probably won't sway one person over. Ogg just didn't do it for me. Theora may not, either.

    The only place that I can envision Theora being used is by developers needing royalty free in-game movies.

    Or am I completely off base here and it will take the world by storm by sheer ease of use, compatability, support, file size, file quality, consumer knowledge, and/or consumer acceptance?

    Clue me up.

    --
    "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    1. Re:Mod points to burn. by sloanster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Someone's gonna mod me down for trolling because I don't echo the Slashdot groupspeak on this. Oh well.

      Ah, but that is the slashdot groupspeak - you're just one of the crowd, saying "so what, i got my windoze media player, who cares?"

      On the other hand, folks like me love the idea of having more choices...

    2. Re:Mod points to burn. by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Audio is often used in a portable sense and the market was saturated by MP3 files way before Vorbis came along - it didn't just have to be good, it had to be so much better that it could kill the competitor and motivate hardware purchases of compatible players, and to be fair it is good but not _that_ good. It is comforting to know that there is a high quality, open and unencumbered format there - trusting a market where there is no incentive to keep your patented codecs free (as in beer) is dangerous but a free (as in speech) codec deters patent issues since people can make the switch if using MP3 is made too inconvenient. In that capacity the existance of vorbis comforts me, but I won't use it until it runs on my iPod. Having said that, most games seem to use vorbis audio for their in-game sounds so it's got more marketshare than many people think.

      In terms of video there is not a real portable market (meaning no hardware replacement needed) nor is there a codec to which there is 'no competition' in terms of uptake like MP3 for audio. This gives theora a much better chance of taking off - all it needs is a little download, no selling on your iPod for an ogg compatible hardware player. The video market is a much more level playing field giving theora a chance to stand up on its merits rather than desparately clawing at the heels of an established standard, and even if it does not gain dominance what I said about providing an incentive to stay free and a possibility to switch is comforting - if DRM becomes too bad or divx goes paid there will always be something I can switch to.

    3. Re:Mod points to burn. by imroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You seem to think that Ogg Vorbis and/or Theora must have massive mainstream success (like MP3) or it is worthless. They're not commercial products. As long as people are maintaining the code base and using the software, then it has "worth". I don't think we'll see mainstream success, at least not for a while. And we shouldn't depend on success in that one market, or the lack of it, to measure the general success of Ogg Vorbis or Theora.

      As others have pointed out, Ogg Vorbis is being used by a number of games for the packaged music. I think we'll see the Ogg codecs (Vorbis, Flac, Speex, and Theora) showing up in more embedded packages/devices. Really anywhere there is the need to handle audio and/or video in an application. The application is responsible for playing (and encoding too perhaps) the material. All the user does is install the application and uses it like any other app. It could be VOIP, a training/teaching program, a demo, cutscenes for a game, a TiVO/MythTV/Freevo-like set-top box, etc. You get the idea.

  13. Re:Ogg isn't a format by Tranzig · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ogg is a format. Vorbis is the name of the audio codec, and Theora is the name of the video codec. Ogg is the container, just like avi.

  14. A reason to delay ... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... there's no reason to delay adopting a free alternative any more!

    Hmm. Thinking.... Thinking.... There must be SOME reason... This is tough. Oh, wait! I know! I've got one!!!

    Beta 1 is not out yet ...

    Yeah! There we go. See, I knew I could come up with something.

  15. What's the point? by Zarxrax · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's already an excellant open-source codec out there in xvid. Honestly, no one is even going to consider using this Theora codec. And Theora is based on VP3?? HELLO?! There is already a VP6!! And as far as containers go, theres Matroska, which is a far better open-source container than OGM (If you can really count OGM as a container, its really just a hack).

    1. Re:What's the point? by pldms · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's already an excellant open-source codec out there in xvid.

      For which you may, alas, have to pay a licence fee to MPEG-LA (depending on you usage). I agree that xvid is excellent, but it comes with strings. Theora does not -- probably (nobody can be sure given the current state of the patent system in certain locales).

      --
      Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
      me a number based on the order in which I joined
  16. Uses for Theora by SeanTobin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reading the posts, it seems that people are missing a major use for Theora and even Vorbis.

    You know all those games you have that use MP3 for music? They had to pay a fee to do so. You know all those games you have that use bink video for cutscenes? They had to pay a fee to do so.

    Now they don't. If there is a free alternative of comperable quality, the developers will use it instead of paying a $25k technology licensing fee. And the companies that don't will end up priced out of the market.

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
  17. 2 weeks ago by millette · · Score: 2, Insightful
  18. Finally... by Fooby · · Score: 3, Funny

    A format that can be used by the free-as-in-speech porn community.

  19. Classic betamax tale by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Producing a better product isn't good enough. You need a SIGNIFICANTLY better product. For me, ripping even a small ~50 CD collection to ogg isn't worth the marginal benefit, even if it is free. Perhaps if oggs were particularly small, say 10-20% the size of the standard mp3, you would probably see more people flocking to it.
    But in the age of $1/gig hard drives, space isn't such a huge issue.

    --

    Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
    1. Re:Classic betamax tale by Teach · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps if oggs were particularly small, say 10-20% the size of the standard mp3, you would probably see more people flocking to it. But in the age of $1/gig hard drives, space isn't such a huge issue.

      It's all about your situation. I run Linux at home, so mp3 vs. vorbis is a toss-up in terms of "support". (Actually, since mp3 support isn't shipped with RedHat/Fedora by default, Ogg Vorbis is actually *more* supported....) At work, I wrote my own music player software for my computer lab, and I found it easier to just modify the source to ogg123 than to try to get something else working. So Ogg Vorbis had the advantage. Not to mention I've got 24 client machines in my lab which I can get working on ripping and encoding all at once, giving me a net total throughput of about 4 minutes per CD (counting my walking around to physically swap out CDs).

      As far as portables go, I'm almost certainly about to get a Sony CLIÉ, whose audio player supports Ogg Vorbis. And 128MB memory sticks can be had for around $33, and each hold right at four hours of music encoded at 64kbps, so I can buy a handful and have several preloaded "mixes" for long car trips.

      I don't know if you've done a listening test with Ogg Vorbis at 64kbps (a.k.a. quality 0) vs. standard mp3 at that bitrate, but I'll give you a hint: one is quite listenable, the other isn't. And AFAIK I don't have access to wma or mp3pro encoders under Linux, so if I want listenable music at 64 kbps, it's going to have to be Ogg Vorbis.

      Now, I wouldn't want to listen to 64 kbps compressed audio sitting in my living room on my $150 headphones, but for my noisy car over my factory speakers, it's as good or better than the radio or a tape deck, I'd say.

      And speaking of space not being such a huge issue, on Thursday I should receive my new 160 GB hard drive from NewEgg. Then I should finally have enough hard drive space to rip my ~250 albums to FLAC and leave them there, so I shouldn't have to rip ever again, since I can just write a shell script to convert from FLAC to whatever format I like. (And in fact, I already have a couple scripts to do just that.)

      Anyway, the beauty of the open market is that consumers can choose the option that suits them best. For me, that's Ogg Vorbis, and I like that it's a format I could potentially use for the rest of my life.

      --
      Graham "Teach" Mitchell, computer science teacher, Leander HS
    2. Re:Classic betamax tale by Malc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But OGGs *are* that much smaller. I found that -q5 (~160kbs) were as good as 192kbs VBR MP3s. I ripped 80 CDs and found that the OGGs took 4.52GB vs 5.76GB for the MP3s. I have 20GB on my iHP-120, so to fill it with 20GB of MP3s will be only 15.7GB of OGGs... or alternatively, I can fit 70-80 more CDs encoded as OGG. Unfortunately it's not that simple as OGGs at this bitrate run the battery down in 11-12 hours, whereas MP3s last 16 or more.

  20. I think they mean BITSTREAM by BigAl_nz · · Score: 4, Informative

    They've refered to it as "bistream" in the title of the post on theora.org, and in the body of that post. But elsewhere they call it "bitstream", and that makes more sense to me at least. The term "bistream" is also not in their FAQ.

    Google returns Results 1 - 8 of about 17 for bistream theora for me, which is few enough for me to consider it a typo. Is it a typo, or does it mean a dual stream of some kind ?

    --
    --- There isn't any problem that can't be solved by a small, low yield nuclear device, is there??
    1. Re:I think they mean BITSTREAM by Ignignot · · Score: 2, Funny

      Man, you put wayyy too much work into decyphering a typo. ;-) Slow day at work?

      --
      I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
  21. Why another format? by node+3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because it's better, it's free, and it's open.

    It's not ubiquitous, so what? Do you have to commit to using just one format, and no other?

    If you prefer better, free, and open, when you see an ogg in the list of downloads, choose it over the WMP/QuickTime/Real file. If you don't, then pick the one you prefer.

    If you're worried about the web becoming more complex, don't. MS, Apple and Real will just have to work to make things easier than ogg--they have to in order to keep the money flowing in.

    If you're bothered that there's some people out there whose idealism you find disconcerting, just remember, you made a pragmatic choice (you gave up a little money and control in exchange for ease-of-use), these ogg (vorbis, theora, flac, etc) people are working to make it so that you won't have to make that pragmatic choice. They're trying to make the world how you'd really like it to be if you had the choice (unless you are all about acquiring money by controlling access to technology, in which case they are your worst enemy, and you are right to fear them--they will ultimately win).

  22. Why I used ogg for audio. by twitter · · Score: 3, Informative
    I like portability of my music so I use MP3. (I can't very well install the codec on my machine at work.) ... How many people is it a good choice for? Why?

    I used ogg audio to encode my music collection because I didn't have an mp3 encoder and I consider it a lucky break. It was easier to use krecord, audacity and abcde in Debian Woody than it was to get any kind of mp3 encoder. The files turned out to be smaller but of comparable quality to downloaded mp3's. I did it mostly so I would not have to worry about my dying phonograph player and saved out wav files before encoding. abcde worked great for my CDs and the collection, as you know, is much more convenient on a hard drive.

    As for devices, having ogg forced me to get a Zaurus as a portable player. My handspring visor, though still useful, needed upgrading. Zaurus plays both ogg and mp3 from CF or MMC and does so without the annoying DRM problems most players have. So, my $250 investment in Zaurus served more than one function, though it might not be as nice and surely is not as rugged as dedicated players that now cater to ogg. Sharp promisses you can sync Zaurus to outlook as well as read Word Docs.

    I'm not qualified to talk about video formats yet, but I have a feeling that I'm going to like theora.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  23. XviD isn't free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It may be open source, but MPEG-4 is patented up to the hilt. You could, in fact, be prosecuted for using it. Not likely, but possible.

    We're not talking OGM. OGG is a container itself. OGM was a hack to add extra functionality. Functionality which OggFile2 will supercede. Currently though, the OGG container is plenty powerful enough for the short-term.

    VP3 is a base to work from. MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 are MPEG-1 with tweaks and improvements. VP6 and VP3's code are probably a lot closer than you think. Don't be too suprised when Theora II comes out and matches its rivals. You're right though, Theora isn't as good as VP6, but it is as good as MPEG-4 (which you deemed excellent yourself).

  24. Like Unreal Tourney by gotr00t · · Score: 2, Informative
    Unreal Tournament 2003 used Ogg Vorbis for its audio, for example. Somewhere in its directory structure of its installation, you will find the audio saved in none other than vorbis format.

    I predict that many other games will follow suit becuase vorbis is smaller in size while being comparable in quality to mp3, and with modern computers being extremely fast already, the additional overhead that decoding ogg vorbis creates would not be significant.

  25. It's already happening by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 2, Informative

    I noticed the other day that Chrome, an otherwise dull and unremarkable FPS, uses Ogg Vorbis for its music. I'm sure there are others.

  26. Re:ONE example.. wooo by spoco2 · · Score: 2

    Yeah, cause outside of places like here AAC is a really well known format.

  27. Re:Well it's okay... by spoco2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, but it's not the fault of the format, it's the fault of "Who the hell needs it?"

    From the point of view of the general population, how does MP3 not fulfill their needs? They don't feel the need for anything more, so there's no need for OGG.

  28. Re:.ogg? by big+tex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But.......my file manager (and sometimes my browser) is launching the player based on the file extension.

    What the hell do you use?

    MIME-types, baby.
    Extensions are for suckers. I mean, even Windows gets it now.

    --
    I think I need a new sig here.
  29. Re:.ogg? by iabervon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, all of the file extensions people use are dumb. The file extension only really matters in any deep way to the user; the computer can determine trivially what's in it. The user never cares what container the file uses, and rarely cares what codec it uses. The user cares how the file behaves when played: Does it make noise? Does it look like anything? Does it have text? Does it change over time?

    In order to be sensible, .png, .gif, and .jpg should be .img; .mng and some .mpg and .wmv should be .vid; .wav, .ogg, and .mp3 should be .aud; and most .mpg and .wmv and now some .ogg should be .av; given that the situation is already hopeless, it doesn't really matter that they're using .ogg for both.

    If the people who chose file extensions ran a supermarket, it would sell "cardboard boxes", "jars", "cans", and "plastic bags".

  30. Re:Well it's okay... by Trejkaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By the same token there was no need for AAC either. Yet somehow that one made it into a player. I'm not sure whether we can really blame the public, or whether the true blame should go to the device manufacturers for not making their devices upgradeable to support more formats.

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  31. "WTF does 'Theora' mean?!?" by sirReal.83. · · Score: 3, Informative
    Read the FAQ:
    Q: Why the name 'Theora?' A: Like other Xiph.org Foundation codec projects such as Vorbis or Tarkin, Theora is named after a fictional character. Theora Jones was the name of Edison Carter's 'controller' on the television series Max Headroom. She was played by Amanda Pays.

    Now I don't wanna hear another fewl asking about it ;P
  32. Sample Videos by ArcRiley · · Score: 4, Informative

    We put up some sample video torrents including the three winning Creative Commons videos and a full length independent film called "Honey". All of them are made available under Creative Commons licenses. Free videos in a free format, fancy that? Share and enjoy!

  33. be pro-active by flacco · · Score: 3, Funny

    you want to spread Theora? encode a bunch of pr0n in it and spread it out on the net.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  34. Very good point by bogie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Vorbis people are pretty aweful in that department. Why are they hiding the freaking acm version of the codec? When 1.0 or whatever came out I thought for sure they would change their crappy policy of hiding the directshow codec. But alas no. They for some reason don't want to reach 90% of the computing public.

    From the readme for the acm version which your likely to find several places with the exception of vorbis.com

    "Vorbis Sucks, but I found the stupid goddamned folder on some site in Mexico.
    Right-Click on the vorbisacm.inf file, and choose install.
    Make sure you've got this dumb-ass vorbis.acm file in the same directory when you're installing.
    Why this was difficult to find and why there were dead links to this crappy codec all over the place I have no idea.
    Don't like me making this easy for you? Blow me."

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  35. Re:My Mplayer does not support it?! by ArcRiley · · Score: 4, Informative
    Yes. Add "oggvorbis speex flac theora" to your USE variables.

    You can also emerge libtheora first, just to make sure. mplayer/xine will only build with Theora support if you have libtheora on the system, and that may or may not happen automatically if you have the "theora" use variable in place first.

  36. First Live Theora Stream by thomasvs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Woohoo, Xiph ! Anyways, we have a Theora live webcam stream for you guys to test out. AFAIK we're the first doing this. http://mirror.fluendo.com:8801/ With MPlayer, for example, you'd do mplayer -cache 40 http://mirror.fluendo.com:8801 to watch it. If you're lucky you can catch Rupert coding. Not a lot goes on in this stream, we're fairly boring (Read: our boss is watching too) We'll be adding Vorbis sound sometime this week too. The server will be Coming Soon to a Repository Near You.

  37. Tips on Theora usage... by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative

    Okay, with any luck, everyone will go out, get their video players working with Theora, and start encoding content. So, I think I should throw-out some quick tips before people start complaining and/or getting frustrated...

    First, to get Theora playback for any players on Linux, you need to compile and install the alpha3 snapshot first, and to do that you need the CVS version of all the "vorbis-tools" as they are called. Once you've done that, you just have to re-compile your video playing programs (like MPlayer) with something like "--enable-theora" passed to configure...

    As for encoding, you're probably going to have sync problems... I don't want to waste my time getting in-to details, but suffice it to say you need a version of MPlayer newer than 1.0pre4 (CVS right now), and you need to use the "-vf softdup" option when you are dumping the video to the fifo (from which the Theora encoder is fetching the source video).

    Also, trying to have mplayer dump to video and audio fifos at the same time is guaranteed not to work... You need to either dump the audio to a real file (wastes space), or launch two instances of MPlayer, one dumping audio from the source file, one dumping video from the source file.

    If you don't know what I'm talking about, you haven't started encoding video with Theora, so just keep these tips at the back of your mind, because you'll need them when you do start.

    The only other tip I've got, is to wait until a better encoding program is written. The libraries are fine, but the wimpy example programs leaves a lot to be desired. When other media programs (mplayer, or transcode) start doing encoding via the Theora/Vorbis libs, we'll be a lot better off.

    Just hope that Theora/Vorbis encoding support finds it's way into MPlayer (or transcode I suppose), then you won't need to worry about all of these issues ('softdup' will likely still be needed though).

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  38. Re:Recipe for confusion - Re:Ogg isn't a format by parksie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Usually, Ogg files with video in are referred to as "Ogg Media", and given a .ogm extension.