InfoWorld 2004 Salary Survey Results
tverbeek writes "InfoWorld has released the results of their Salary Survey for 2004 [pdf], and in the intro they declare that there's less bad news and more optimism, as IT budgets and salaries in particular are starting to creep back up. So now we get to witness the curious phenomenon of Lake Anti-Wobegone, as all the techies we hear from complain that their salaries are still below 'average'."
Is there a listing of the companies that they talked to? This way I can make my map of where to grab their job applications from.
Hmmm.
A good European observatory is Jobserve where I have been able to consider the falling then re-growing number of job offer during the last 3 years.
Trolling using another account since 2005.
It's no surprise. When I was at college, it seemed half the people in my class wanted to get into IT just to earn lots of money. They saw how much a programmer could make. None of them had a love of the subject. They all became web monkeys.
Then there were suddenly a lot of people with computer skills.
Surprise surprise, the salaries went down. It's all about supply and demand.
Meanwhile, those of us with a love of the subject have the actual deeper understanding of computers that allow us to command a decent salary.
A 3.4MB PDF file? On Slashdot? Do you not like them or something?
There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
Somewhat relevant is today's dilbert
Back in my day, we didn't get raises. We got dirt. And we liked it. Dirt allowed us to build dirt houses, dirt garages, and make dirt pies. We could even get the horses to run on dirt. The damn hard thing was getting those gosh derned horseless carriages to run on dirt. They aaaalways gave us problems.
So you young ones should be glad you get money. Cause you never know when they'll pay in dirt again!
all the techies we hear from complain that their salaries are still below 'average'. First off, who is going to complain because they are making too much? Sometimes the minority is much more vocal than the majority *cough* christian fundamentalists *cough*. It is human nature to complain.
I submitted this story last night, and it didn't get posted.
Ok.. I am not sure what to think by the graphs, but is it a good thing or bad thing that the majority of the IT Budget pie, as asked to managers, is "I don't know"? On a lighter note, it did drop 3% points from 03 to 04.
Hmmm.
..because it looks too much like the scale that salary.com uses.
Right now, I'm a "software engineer III" according to my company and salary.com. But according to salary.com, I'm making $20k less than the median salary. My company's solution? Change their scale. Now there's like 8 levels and it doesn't match up at all. Maybe they're hoping that the mass exodus will stop?
'When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro.' -HST
Link to Google cache of the Salary Survey file.
Since it's a 3.4MB PDF that I'll never get to read, maybe someone could answer a question for me:
Is the increase in the average salary for an IT worker, or the average IT worker's salary? In other words, does this count the ones who are unemployed or doing burger duty at Mickie Dees? It's great that salaries are going up, but is employment?
I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
Well if they all claim that they're below average we know it's not true.
In this ever shrinking world people and skills are more a tradable commodity than ever before. How hard you work no longer has much to do with it, how much you can produce is. Hardly a newsflash, been going that way forever. But some still think they _should_ be making more money.
Straight from Google's cache
Take off every 'sig'!
All your 'sig' are belong to us!
How come we never see salary surveys of salary surveyors? Do they not want us to know how little or how much they make? Maybe they are making 6+ figures and just don't want us to know about it so they have they don't have any competition.
Anyway...no big surprise that IT related salaries slide a bunch the past few years. Supply and demand. There are a bunch of IT workers looking for jobs and it has been a "buyers" market, not like in the late 90's.
What I wonder is how do salary trends here [US] compare to those jobs that have been outsourced? Did the outsourcees salary increase/decrease/stay flat? Just wondering if there is any connection between the two.
"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
I started out loving the IT field. Gradually, it was ripped out of me by the typical working conditions: rediculous deadlines, long hours, managers who didn't have a clue, being called in the middle of the night, etc ....
It wasn't until the late 90's that I thought that I was being paid almost enough to deal with that horseshit. I know there's a few of you folks out there that thought we were overpaid. I guess that's where the system works. I felt I was underpaid - so I left. You feel you're being paid adaquately - so you stay. I honestly hope that enough people like me leave to give you guys a decent salary again. Because even if pay goes back up to the year 2000 level, I'm still not coming back.
tax free, last I heard. And they'll add the label "Contractor" or "Consultant" for free.
This survey really means nothing to me unless I can at least see a list of the companies that they surveyed. Pay is different in different areas of the country, and for good reason.
Anecdotally, the results look quite high to me. Maybe they surveyed companies where the cost of living is really high (silicon valley, etc.) I'm from the midwest, so I don't really expect to see numbers like this around here, and I don't.
See this study on the Lake Wobegone effect (pdf).
20 mil and I will! Learn Esperanto with 20M others.
Can you be a little more useful in your references please? There is no way that we are going to be able to do a google search on "The Lottery" and figure out what the heck you are talking about. Also, I find your "chinese guy" reference a little offensive. Not only that, but in my experience the people (chinese or not) who work 80 hours per week all the time are not particularly more productive than the 40-50 hour people - and they don't get higher salaries as far as I can see. I think that we have an unusual spread of salaries now, because anyone who made it through the massive layoffs still has the "boom time/stop the hiring raids from competitors" salary, which is 2x the salary of everybody else. At least it is like that in telecom.
I'm seeing this same sort of thing happen at a lot of firms. Many firms seem to be taking the attitude of "Well, given how bad the economy is, you're lucky to have this." But the truth, at least in my area, is the economy isn't bad. There are well paying opportunities out there. So the race for the door continues...
But let's not forget, they hire "only the best"! Surely the best will work under their conditions, right? Right? Right?
I was only out of work for 8 weeks, but that was enough for me. I ain't complainin' about my salary any more. No, really. I haven't yet. I've complained about other salaries being too low and some being too high. But mine's just right!
Now, I will complain about a lack of focus, nonexistent project management, unreasonable expectations and unclear goals. Heck, I'll complain about that all day long.
Amateurs discuss tactics. Professionals discuss logistics.
Lake Wobegone is where everything is above average.
Yeah, 3.4 MB and it was only 75% downloaded after 15 minutes? Anyway, I don't want to Know! I'm happy where I work, and I'm ignorantly satisfied with my salary. Last year I spent 12 months working at a crap software company. They had a market niche and the competition wasn't enough to make them get off their asses and write good software. Instead they had been stove-piping and patching together various client-database applications for 10 or 15 years. When I left for another company, everyone kept asking, "Oh, you're leaving because it's better money?", and I'm like, no, I'm leaving because the company I'm going to work for actually tries to design and implement good software. The fact that the salary was higher was just an added bonus. I would have taken a pay cut to go to this company. But everyone's always fixated on the money.
I went to school for liberal arts, so I'm one of THOSE web monkeys. But I learned my shit, and I'm happy to be making what I consider to be decent money, although most developers who have a degree and the same experience as me would probably feel undervalued making my salary. But like I said...I'm not going to RTF3.4MBReport. Sometimes Ignorance is Bliss.
...at least for me. I managed to get over a 20% increase in January through a salary adjustment. How? I worked my ass off. Smartly.
I did the normal IT stuff, but I also introduced new (free) tech, held training classes for staff, and generally took honest interest in my job (something I don't always see in the 19-year old wire contractors we sometimes hire).
This January I basically presented myself as a needed member of the team, explained my salary adjustment request (using an Infoworld-like survey) and got my boss to back it up to management (not hard, because we treat each other well). There's methods to increase your chances of getting a good pay raise.
The bullets fired at your car and the car bombs are free of charge too.
If he was, he'd know that it's completely possible for most people at Lake Wobegone to be above (or below) average.
Consider an exam taken by 4 people. 3 people score a 10. 1 person scores a 2. That makes an average of 8 (10 + 10 + 10 + 2 = 32. 32/4 = 8). Most of the people scored above average.
This is why Mean and Median are useful concepts.
Actually, that would only be correct if the numbers they gave were the median income. If you take the average salary of 10 people, 9 of whom make $10,000 and another who makes $910,000, your average salary is $100,000. However, 90% of the people are making less than that, and 10% are making more than it.
Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
People complain because the averages are scewed. The cost of living on the west coast vs the midwest. There are 100X more IT people on the west coast, where the cost is MUCH higher. If I'm close to the average (living in the midwest), I know I'm making a good deal of money for my area.
Those graphs should include cost of living and a calculator for getting "your area's" average salary.
Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
From everything I've been seeing lately, work is increasing, but much more for the independent contractors than for the large companies. With everyone trying to save a buck, these people are likely on the leading edge of any up-tick. After a co-worker was laid off and spent too long looking for another job, he went independent and is booked solid for the next several months, and makes his salary after just over half a year of projects. Granted, you can't be the typical office leach in this position, and you spend a lot longer doing your taxes.
You misspelled 'living wage'.
Seastead this.
I wonder how people are saying that this survey shows wages for IT workers increasing. It doesn't - in fact, it shows exactly the opposite.
I can see how you might believe this if you read only this paragraph:
But go ahead and read the next two paragraphs:
So the message is this: if you're not upper management - that is, if you're not part of the system that sets the salaries - the people who are part of upper management will continue to screw you. It's not going to get better on its own.
The salary of middle management and IT staff went down. It's just that the salaries of upper management went up by enough to raise the average.
No thanks. The money's no good if you can't spend it; I've grown to like the land of the living.
From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc
Oh, wait...
-----------------------
You are what you think.