Slashdot Mirror


Less is More: Thunderbird 0.7 Review

comforteagle writes "In part two of our look at Mozilla's less is more approach to thunderbird and firebird, Gareth Russell has finished the examination with a look at the newly released Thunderbird 0.7. Part one dealt with firefox and was discussed here on slashdot as well."

39 of 227 comments (clear)

  1. Had to go back to 0.6 by AGTiny · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had to go back to 0.6 because of several crippling bugs. 0.7 stopped checking for mail in many of my IMAP folders so I went a whole day thinking I had no mail. :( It also has an annoying habit of not displaying the message body in random messages forcing you to go out to SquirrelMail to view them. 0.6 works perfectly for me though!

    1. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by Gr8Apes · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've had this problem with multiple POP3 mailboxes, in 0.5 and Mozilla 1,7rc2 and 1.8a1. Mozilla 1.6 seems to work fine. It seems that shutting down the mail window and restarting the app solves the problem with Mozilla 1.8a1, but I believe Thunderbird 0.5 just couldn't read one of the new messages in one of the mboxes, and that was that. Really strange, it'd read the rest.

      No, I have not yet reported this, as I don't have a clue how to reproduce it.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    2. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 4, Informative
      Use the .zip instead of the installer for Firefox 0.9

      I had problems with the installer version, mostly unstable and slow and none of the extensions would install. And I was doing a clean install so no issue of migrating from 0.8 or anything.

      Anyway long story short, after tring install/uninstall (delete profile folder) for about 2 hours, I just got the zip and unzipped in C:\, and it works like charm. All my favourite extensions are back on.

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    3. Re:Had to go back to 0.6 by the+unbeliever · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tab browser extensions is compatible, if you get the latest version from the author's site. Link for the lazy

  2. What about the lawsuit? by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought Ford Motor Co. was making them change the name to "ThunderFox."

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    1. Re:What about the lawsuit? by archen · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, if they make a separate callendar, chat client, etc. I'm getting this bad vision of some sort of Voltron episode where Firefox, Thunderbird, Snowcat, and Crazyweasel all merge to become the Ultra-Netasour: Mozilla.

  3. someone has to say this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thunderbirds are go?

  4. Few teething problems, but good overall by XeRXeS-TCN · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been using both Firefox (since 0.7) and Thunderbird (since 0.4) for a while now, and I've recently upgraded. I seem to have hit a bit of a bug with having too many FireFox extensions installed, but beyond that slight problem, FireFox and Thunderbird seem to be going from strength to strength these days.

    Anyone who is still on OE or IE should seriously consider a switch, because they include things which you should really have by default in your software. Firefox has tabbed browsing and integrated popup blocking, and Thunderbird has built in encryption, supports PGP extensions, and has integrated "smart" spam filtering.

    What more could you ask?

    1. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Those extensions might not be 0.9 compatible. Seems that quite a few things changed between 0.7 and 0.9. I noticed that when I downloaded the new one that there was a warning somewhere about some older extensions.

      That said, I'd love a couple of more features in Firefox, namely the Forms tool from Mozilla, and the ability to default cookies to a set maximum lifetime. (Forms tool is probably an extension, just haven't found it yet) I'd also love to be able to block cookies from entire subnets (probably haven't read the appropriate part in the manual about how to set this) such as *.doubleclick.net, and *.hitbox.com. Being able to do this upon the resulting "Prompt to accept cookies" dialog would be very cool and user friendly.

      Those would be enough on Firefox. Thunderbird, the list is very very long on additional features. However, I'd like the current features to work more smoothly, and some interface improvements would be nice (have just downloaded 0.7, so I haven't delved into it yet, but I strongly suspect the UI friendly things I want won't be in there)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    2. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Informative

      "What more could you ask?"

      If you use Opera for a bit, you'll find lots of neat little UI additions that would suit FireFox well. In particular, the notes tab. That's pretty slick. I can highlight your post, right click, and say "copy to note". Then, in the notes tab, I'll see the first sentence of your post. If I single click it, the entire section I copy/pasted will appear. If I double click it, it'll show me the page it came from. I've been using that for cell phone hunting. It's a LOT easier than trying to come up with good names bookmarks.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by The+Salamander · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would ask for a VIM plugin for message editing.

    4. Re:Few teething problems, but good overall by the+unbeliever · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is an extension called "QuickNotes" for thunderbird and firefox. Configured properly, it crosses over.

  5. I went a whole day thinking I had no mail. by dark-br · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh *that* would be a dream! ;)

  6. Multiple IMAP by ajakk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was trying to get a setup going with T-bird under Windows checking multiple IMAP servers at once and it was having a very hard time doing it. I could never get it work well at all. Does anyone know if the newer versions of T-bird have fixed that problem?

    1. Re:Multiple IMAP by otisg · · Score: 3, Informative

      It works well for me.
      What is more, and this may be good to point out to other Thunderbird users, this release finally fixed a bug with accessing IMAP over SSL. Before, Thunderbird would start to hang after a few (e.g. 10-ish) minutes of inactivity, and the only solution would be to quit and re-start. This version fixed that issued.

      Another issue (with all previous releases - I used them all) was with saving outgoing mail to the 'Sent' folder. It worked only half the time or less. This version sends email faster and always saves to Sent folder successfully.

      To those using 0.6 or older, suggestion - upgrade.

      --
      Simpy
  7. getting real slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    It took a long time to load, so here is a mirror:

    by Gareth Russell

    Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 is the new lightweight email and newsgroup client from the Mozilla Foundation; it's a new take on the email client and has been built almost from the ground up, with the proven Gecko rendering engine. As with Mozilla Firefox its main aim is to try and satisfy the average user's requirements, with a minimum amount of fuss. Email clients over the years have tended to suffer from "feature creep" and "bloat", Thunderbird removes the clutter such as Intstant Messaging integration which you may never use. Thunderbird has all of the basic features you'd expect to find in any email client, with IMAP and Pop3 support, email filters and the ability to manage multiple accounts. Thunderbird also contains many other non-standard features such as built in junk mail filtering, S/MIME, digital signing, message encryption, spell checking and a flexible user interface. On top of this, Thunderbird is possibly the most extendible browser available with its excellent extension system, allowing you to create an email client that suits you.

    Thunderbird 0.7's changes, include: a smaller download size for Windows, speed improvements in Windows, Linux and Mac OS X, new themes and extensions managers, as well as a talkback program for the unlikely event that Thunderbird crashes. A number of bugs have been squashed for the release, helping to iron out any rough edges which existed in the previous editions. The most important change in 0.7 is the overhaul of the extension system with new extensions controls allowing for easier management of extensions and which, now make it possible to update your extensions to the latest versions without having to go and manually download them.

    The Interface
    As with Firefox, Mozilla Thunderbird features a stripped down interface, which is more thought out than previous editions of Mozilla Messenger. The default graphical interface features a three-pane setup much like Microsoft Outlook Express or the original Mozilla Messenger. On top of this; however, Thunderbird provides three other default settings including an interesting three pane vertical arrangement, which manages to use more of the display area to display your emails than the standard setting. Most importantly though, Thunderbird does not try to restrain you by its interface and its easy to customise the layout by adding new buttons to the toolbars or to add new window panes for content to get it exactly how you want it.

    Junk Mail
    One of the most attractive features of Thunderbird is the advanced Junk Mail filters included my default in Mozilla Thunderbird. The Junk Mail is adaptive by using a system of Bayesian filtering, this learns what is junk mail and what is not by you indicating to Thunderbird whether it is or is not junk. Junk can be defined by simply checking a junk mail icon next to the subject of the email. When a similar email appears in your inbox, Thunderbird will indicate that it believes the message is junk with the option to correct it if it is wrong. It's surprising how short a period of time it takes, before Thunderbird catches all of your junk mail with no mistakes. It only took a couple of days, before my inbox was junk mail free, with only a couple of false positives. Thunderbird can also be told to move the junk immediately to a temporary folder or to delete it straight off. This really sets it apart from programs such as Outlook Express which don't have built in junk mail controls, as you'll no longer to be forced to wade through a load of junk mail just to read you emails. No more time wasted moving all those offensive pornography emails which you receive to your work email address, no more time wasted deleting those university diploma emails and in particular no more being caught out by those emails with the viruses attached. Thunderbird really is revolutionary as an email client, when it comes to dealing with junk mail.

    Security
    Thunderbird includes S/MINE email support, which is a

  8. One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ThunderCougarFalconBird...

    The futuristic (no pun intended) car inlaid with the beaks of 1000 eagles!

  9. Won't start. by sporty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I downloaded it twice on two different days for the Mac. It mounts the dmg file fine, but won't launch. In the console for OSX, you see complaints about the executable being corrupt or truncated, then just dies out. Happens on two seperate machines too. Nightly builds don't do it either :\

    --

    -
    ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  10. Re:Extensions by fresh27 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Show Old Extensions 0.1.3 makes old extensions visible and usable in Firefox 0.9. I've only tried two old extensions using this, but they've both worked.

    --
    http://ipod.fresh27.net/
  11. One wish.. by boomgopher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is that the stupid address autocollect feature would lowercase everything before checking if the cotact exists.

    I'm tired of having multiple:

    Fred.Mertz@Lucy.Com
    Fred.Mertz@lucy.com
    fred.mertz@lucy.com
    etc...

    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  12. Re:What standards does it support? by respite · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am quite sure it supports all of those. Here is a page that talks about printing css2 and css1. Here is a fun little png demo.

  13. The only problem I have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    is that the icon on Mac OS X looks like an envelope with a bad toupe. If that is supposed to be a bird, please make it look like a bird and not a very bad comb over.

  14. Re:One wish.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hi, I'm Fred Mertz, please stop emailing me. You've already killed lucy.com, and charliebrown.com is mad, there isnt anyone there to pull the football out from infront of the webserver. Thank you.

    Fred.mertz@lucy.com

  15. Re:One wish.. by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 4, Funny
    fred.mertz@lucy.com?

    I imagine Ricky is getting more fed up with it than you are. Someone has some 'splaining to do.

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  16. I am very concerned by Tarantolato · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...about the official Mozilla project's continued split focus between Firefox/Thunderbird and the full Seamonkey suite, which is now apparently going to continue even after the standalones reach 1.0.

    Mozilla's crucial mistake early on was deciding it needed to be a platform. If this had just meant developing a cross-platform gui and tools, or just developing a whole application suite, it might not have been a problem. But they decided to do both. It cost them, and it continues to cost them.

    IBM's Eclipse project is a good example of how to do a platform. Start small with one app: in Eclipse's case, an IDE. Then build the rest of the stuff around the skeleton: IBM's new Workplace package is basically built from Eclipse plugins.

    But continuing to devote resources to Seamonkey is just a bad idea. Not only is it a distraction from making the small, focused apps better; but keeping around Mozilla as an Emacs-style do-everything suite does IMHO damage to the brand name. I for one have nothing but bad memories of Netscape, because of the ungodly bloat of Communicator. Any project that continues to officially perpetuate that mistake loses respect in my mind, and I would guess in many others' as well.

    1. Re:I am very concerned by jsebrech · · Score: 4, Informative

      Mozilla's crucial mistake early on was deciding it needed to be a platform. If this had just meant developing a cross-platform gui and tools, or just developing a whole application suite, it might not have been a problem. But they decided to do both. It cost them, and it continues to cost them.

      That mozilla IS a platform is the very reason that development on firefox and thunderbird went this fast. Firefox and thunderbird share all of their backend code with the full suite. Only the actual UI is not shared. That kind of freedom allows quickly creating entirely new applications on top of the mozilla framework. It also means that development on the backend benefits all mozilla project apps.

      I'd like you to show quotes from an actual mozilla developer (and not one who quit before mozilla really got going, like jwz) who agrees with your point of view. Creating the platform is what saved the mozilla project.

      Besides, the only way to compete effectively with microsoft is to offer an alternative vision to developers. The platform is key in that. Mozilla, without becoming a platform, would be like opera: forever irrelevant.

      But continuing to devote resources to Seamonkey is just a bad idea. Not only is it a distraction from making the small, focused apps better; but keeping around Mozilla as an Emacs-style do-everything suite does IMHO damage to the brand name.

      The seamonkey suite is not a distraction, because like I explained, most of the code is shared among all the mozilla projects. The only thing the suite has for itself is the UI, and that is only getting maintenance development. It's really not true that firefox and thunderbird compete for developer resources with the app suite.

      Now, I will agree that it does some damage to the brand to have so many products. But on the other hand, the suite still has a lot of users who find things of use in there they don't find in the separate apps. Cutting them off would not be nice, and would make corporate users less likely to ever use a mozilla product again.

  17. Re:how about sperating out composer and adding to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    > much needed functionality so that it can do everything frontpage can do.

    <span id="main">
    <blockquote>
    <blockquote>
    <div>Make< /div>&nbsp;<div>up</div>&nbsp;<div>your</div>&nbsp ;
    <div>mind.</div>&nbsp;<div>Do</div>&nbsp;<div>y ou</div>&nbsp;
    <div>want</div>&nbsp;<div>function ality</div>&nbsp;
    <div>or</div>&nbsp;
    <div>Front page</div>&nbsp;<div>compatibilty?</div>&nbsp;
    </ blockquote>
    </blockquote>
    </span>

  18. You should have expected that. by jared_hanson · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, it's written all over the Firefox and Thunderbird pages that these are prerelease versions (in case the 0.* version numbers didn't clue you in). You shouldn't expect them to keep your data clean on upgrades.

    Part of the development process is settling in on a format you want to use to store data in, and this format changes regularly in the approach to a 1.0 release. It would be far too much effort for them to support formats that they don't consider to be final. After 1.0 hits they will have to maintain compatiblity.

    Long story short, if you are looking for something to handle your data well, use an already stable app. Then, if you want Mozilla apps, switch to them once they release 1.0.

    It's your fault you lost data, not theirs.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  19. Try NVU by WD · · Score: 3, Informative

    NVU is a stand-alone composer, based on Mozilla.

  20. Calling International Rescue! by HBPiper · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thunderbird 1 was always my favorite. Official Site

    --
    "I went on a diet, swore off drinking and heavy eating. And in fourteen days, I had lost exactly two weeks. Joe E. Lewis
  21. Thunderbird Wishlist by JBMcB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Integration with GnuPG and/or PGP. Yes I know of engimail, I think it's essential enough it should be built-in.

    2. Integration with Jabber. IM + Email would be cool. I like how Windows Messenger does this, but with Thunderbird it would actually be secure :)

    3. Better LDAP integration. Current LDAP implementation is kludgy, I wish they would make it smoother.

    4. Fix the calendar app. It's nice, but could be a whole lot nicer. The original Netscape calendar app wasn't bad, I much prefer it over Outlook.

    5. Import/Export filters. There are third party filters already, it would be nice if they were built in. Import .mbox, maildirs, Outlook PST, Outlook Express directories, Eudora, MacOS Mail.app, etc...

    6. How about a text mode interface for uberhackers? It could be really lightweight, just ctrl- to go back and forth, ctrl-r to reply, etc...

    That's it. It shouldn't add too much bloat, the basic Jabber protocol is small and GnuPG integration should be cake. Any other ideas?

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    1. Re:Thunderbird Wishlist by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 3, Interesting
      1. Integration with GnuPG and/or PGP. Yes I know of engimail, I think it's essential enough it should be built-in.

      2. Integration with Jabber. IM + Email would be cool. I like how Windows Messenger does this, but with Thunderbird it would actually be secure :)
      I don't think either of those is that great an idea. The point of T-Bird is supposed to be about a slim program. GPG/PGP isn't used by the majority of people, so I sure don't think they need to put it in the main program. Doesn't having an easily accesible extention take care of the needs of people who want that? And people use several different IM applications, so I don't think they should be integrating any into an email program. A calendar I can see putting in to let this compete with Outlook in the email/calendar app space in businesses.

      You are reverting back to where we came from --> "I think besides email, it should be able to browse newsgroups. oh yeah, and an integrated IRC chat client...and maybe an HTML composer."
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  22. Just moved from Mozilla 1.6; will have to revert by toccoa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hello, my name is Toccoa and I am a tab-aholoic. I greatly prefer the way groups of tabs are done in Mozilla; or at least based upon my current understanding of 0.9.

    E.g. with a group of tabs on the tab bar
    Mozilla: click on tab, all tabs open & start loading
    Firefox: you get dropdown; for maximum hassle, the choice I want(Open in tabs) is always at bottom. Nor have I found way to set "add tabs" versus "replace tabs" preference.

    If Mozilla did not exist, I would use Firefox. But for now, tabs mean I prefer Mozilla.

  23. Just this week... by ScoLgo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...I switched everyone at my work over to TBird from Outlook2k. Everyone likes it much better than Outlook. They all especially like the speed of mail download (something was going on with Outlook where it would sometimes take up to an hour to download mail from the POP server - especially on a Monday where the mail had stacked up all weekend). Very annoying when you're trying to get your day going. TBird grabs it all in a minute or two.

    One thing everyone especially likes is the multiple mail account handling. Having separate folders for each account is very cool and makes organizing messages very intuitive. The only thing we're missing is Outlooks ability to insert multiple 'signatures'. Anyone know if this is currently possible in TBird? Having blocks of pre-typed text ready to go at the click of your mouse is a real time-saver. One kludge we came up with is to keep a message in the Drafts folder that contains the needed text but that's a rather clumsy solution.

    We are a small company so this changeover is pretty insignificant in the overall scheme of things but... it's a start. With the warm reception TBird received from my users at work (they really were getting sick of Outlook), I figure they'll go install it on their home computers. Their wives and kids will see it and begin to use it. They'll tell their friends, etc., etc... Word of mouth is a GoodThing(TM).

    Personally, I've been using TBird since it was first released and have never had any problems with it. Maybe I'm just lucky but it's been rock-solid for me. I currently use TBird on WinNT4 at work and on my laptop, which runs Mandrake 9.2. My wife, (who is not in the least computer literate), has no trouble at all with TBird on her Win98 box. This open source app is ready for mass use!

    --
    "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
  24. Malicious site for Mozilla users by tmk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The site http://xxxtoolbar.com/ tries to install a malicious program as XPI.

    Is this a proof of acceptance or is it an alarm signal?

  25. SeaMonkey is in maintenance mode by Anthracks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Every time there's a Mozilla story on Slashdot, several people make this comment and they all get modded up to +5. SeaMonkey (the suite) receives a very small amount of the official "Mozilla Foundation" support. It's essentially in maintenance mode, with only relatively minor work being done to it. Now *Gecko*, and the Mozilla-as-platform work, are still actively maintained, but that's not the same as working on SeaMonkey. SeaMonkey happens to benefit from work on Gecko, since both it, Firefox and Thunderbird run on the same engine, but a very small percentage of work going on now is beneficial only to SeaMonkey.

    Compare the new features in Mozilla 1.7 to the new features in Firefox 0.9/Thunderbird 0.7. I think you'll find very few that are limited exclusively to SeaMonkey, and vastly more that are found in the new apps but not the suite. The suite is minimally supported because some major coporations and organizations have rolled it out and contribute back code, money, etc. to keep it going, but it's definitely not even close to the main development focus as the new apps are.

    --
    Rock over London, Rock on Chicago. Wheaties: Breakfast of Champions.
  26. Mozilla Sunbird by Master+Of+Ninja · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just to point out for people needing a calendar, there is the Sunbird project which aims to build a standalone PIM application. While it is fairly good at the moment, it still needs a lot of work. Plus it needs a few more developers. If you have the time go help out. If they ever get round to integrating Thunderbird and Sunbird, we'll have one kickass Outlook killing application!! (don't mention Evolution - it really isn't cross-platform as such).

  27. Re:URLs still don't work by normal_guy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a very good link for both this and mailto: links in Firefox. I agree that this is a MAJOR design flaw in Firefox and Thunderbird.

    --

    Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
  28. Re:0.7 buggy ? by CritterNYC · · Score: 3, Informative

    I found that 0.7 is much more buggy than 0.5 ... at least on win32, the new mail notification in the taskbar is broken (no icon), enigmail does not work anymore, cross imap server moving of email did stop working ...

    At least for me a huge step backwards from 0.5 :(


    You need to do a completely fresh install of 0.7. Lots of stuff changed. The entire extension system is different, so you need to install the updated enigmail. Cross-IMAP server moves work fine (just did one). And the tray icon for mail notificatiions is sitting in my systray right now.

    The installation instructions should really be followed for the latest version!