Slashdot Mirror


Fuel Cells for Laptop Computers

ArbiterOne writes "An article in PC World states that the company MTI Micro Fuel Cells plans to demonstrate a new technology this week that could pave the way for better power technology for laptop and palmtop computers. The article claims that this new technology could provide a battery life 2.5 times greater than that of a lithium-ion battery. Could this be the solution to the problem of short battery life in high-end notebooks?"

18 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Informative

    hydrogen peroxide is extremely dangerous and unstable in its pure form. Even the stuff Armadillo Aerospace is using is only 97% pure. Every bottle of hydrogen peroxide I've found in a drug store was 3%. Could a fuel cell operate on mostly water?

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  2. also covered in NewScientist by grey1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    see New Sci home page, article is:

    • GIVE IT SOME GAS Ditch those flaky low-tech batteries: the miniature internal combustion engine is gearing up to power everything from laptops to cellphones p.26

    though of course you'll need to have paid money to read it...

    It does cover some useful stuff including the fact that any alternative to a bettery that produces even relatively small quantities of unpleasant exhaust won't be any fun in a small space - like an aeroplane cabin...

    --
    "we demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty!"
  3. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    > Try telling that to the user of this laptop.

    You do of course realise it's been well established around the mac web that it's a hoax. The owner of the site admitted to faking it in photoshop.

    The last Mac to catch fire was a 5300 in a lab setting in the 1990s, and even then only with a battery that didn't stay in production.

  4. Re:Practicality. by marnargulus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think the idea isn't that it will complete replace batteries immedietely, but rather supplement them for persons needing an extended time with out a charge. When I go on trips I usually need to bring along a power converter to change 12 volt car power to my laptop 110 volt charger. I would gladly have spent more on my laptop to not have the hassle of all those wires, the same way I spent a little more to get wireless instead of plugging in.

  5. Re:no no no by rcw-work · · Score: 2, Informative
    Sure, you can't run a laptop on the power off one 900MHz antenna, but what if you had, say 500 of them in a little bundle?

    What makes you think 500 antennas in a little bundle would be measurably better than one?

    Even then, if you couldn't run the laptop off it, you could use the little power you did get to trickle charge the battery - making it last a lot longer.

    You have a very interesting definition of "a lot".

    take note that an effective 900MHz antenna can be as little as half and inch long.

    A half-wave dipole for 900mhz is about 6.5" long. You'll seriously decrease effectiveness by using something smaller.

    Now, the trick is to fit the electronics to convert the AC signal into the same small package.

    They make pretty small diodes these days... Why don't you make your own crystal radio and see for yourself how much power you can capture from radio? Hint: most RF field strength meters (which need batteries) report in microvolts per meter.

  6. Re:Just what we need, another use for fossil fuels by marnargulus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, fuel cells run on hydrogen, which is the most plentiful gas in the universe. Which makes it more available than fossil fuels...

  7. mirrored by lart2150 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I saved a copy because it looked like the server was going down http://students.depaul.edu/~bengert/fule/0,aid,116 591,00.asp.htm

  8. Re:Just what we need, another use for fossil fuels by fishybell · · Score: 2, Informative
    Oh the ignorance, the ignorance.

    Almost all objects on the planet have large amounts of hydrogen in them. Hydrogen is not a fossil fuel, and being the most abundent material in the universe, we won't be running out of it any time soon.

    --
    ><));>
  9. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Heck, the most pure commercially available concetration of H2O2 (with a liscense to have it) is something like 33%

    It's kept in a brown plastic container, cause it dosen't like sunlight, and it'll eat pretty much anything (flesh, table top, metal, etc.)

    I can't imagine what 97% would be like.

  10. Recharging a fuel cell is easy by PhysicsGenius · · Score: 0, Informative

    Just run it backwards. It's basically electrolysis/hydrolysis, after all.

  11. Re:Just what we need, another use for fossil fuels by silas_moeckel · · Score: 2, Informative

    our correct in your statement but your neglecting that most industrial hydrogen is made from and with fossil fuels. Granted you need to get the demand there then you can work on that but it's not realy a clean solution today it's just moving the polution to the factory/plant away from the car.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  12. Methanol by Spazmania · · Score: 3, Informative

    From: http://www.c-f-c.com/gaslink/pure/methanol.htm

    Methanol: A colorless, flammable liquid with an odor repulsive pungent. Shipped and stored in dissolved acetone. Can decompose spontaneously if pressure exceeds 15 PSIG.

    Hazards: A toxic substance. Irriatates eyes and causes dizziness, nausea and is a possible carcinogen.

    Yeah, I'm going to carry a bottle of that onto a post-9/11 jetliner.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  13. I don't think so, and here's why: by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 4, Informative

    Take a typical FM broadcast tower. Say, DC101 in the DC-metro area. 22.5 kWatts. That power is spread out over the entire surface area of the region. Some tens of hundreds of square miles. And the inverse-square law is a bitch. Your antenna will receive the tiniest fraction of a watt. It's a good thing your radio tuner or cellphone has a filter and amplifier to do something with it.
    You definitely can't get usable juice from that.
    No, son, if you were being irridated with narrow band EM waves that were incident in such a fashion to be able to power a laptop (say, 50 watts), without a parabolic antenna, you'd be blind, or dead. This is how microwave ovens work (in the 802.11b range, no less)

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  14. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by bs_02_06_02 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You could run a Stirling engine on the exhaust output and start generating electricity, or power some form of locomotion.

    500 to 700 degrees is ridiculous. That's more heat output than when running a nitro-powered radio control engine...

    When the waste heat is that high, something is seriously wrong. They need to slow the reaction down, keep that temp down, otherwise, you'll never get approval to bring it anywhere.

    You'd be better off building a small portable steam engine.

    --
    -- No sig for you!
  15. Re:(Scratches head) by neurocutie · · Score: 4, Informative
    Most of the fuel cell prototypes proposed for laptop use and similar run on methanol, not hydrogen. This is probably because it is obviously much easier to deal with a few ounces of fluid fuel rather than a high pressure compressed tank of hydrogen. It would be lunacy to allow an average consumer to deal with a tank of compressed hydrogen that has the potential of venting into open air.

    So similarly, even if a hotel would foolishly allow you to crack tap water to produce hydrogen and oxygen in your hotel room in the quantities needed without causing a fire or explosion, how would you propose to carry around these gases ? You would need a good, portable compressor to fill up a tank.

    I think if you thought about it a bit, you'd realize that supplying and storing alcohols is much more simple and practical than hydrogen, for the same reasons that this whole "hydrogen economy" notion has so many problems of practicality that it will probably never happen and that biofuels (alcohols, biodiesel, etc) are much more likely.

  16. Re:At long last. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Li-ion cells don't have a memory effect, but the memory effect was a myth in the first place. Like all cells they degrade over time depending on numerous factors.

  17. Re:(Scratches head) by egomaniac · · Score: 2, Informative

    In addition to the difficulties already pointed out, electrolysis of water is a very inefficient process. The electricity it takes to generate a certain amount of hydrogen via electrolysis vastly exceeds the amount you get back by turning that hydrogen into water.

    --
    ZFS: because love is never having to say fsck
  18. Re:The nice thing about "normal" batteries... by goodster · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, that's not waste heat at all. The reaction inside the fuel cell isn't combustion - it's an electrochemical process... The reaction 'chamber' has to be heated up for the electrodes to start catalyzing the 'fuel'. There's a lot of research being done so that the reaction can occur at room temperature, but right now it's a limitation of the electrodes, not the reaction.