Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Transgaming releases "WineX" 4.0 "Cedega"

Posted by CmdrTaco on from the now-thats-a-strange-name dept.

visy writes "Transgaming has opened a new site at today and are announcing WineX 4.0, now dubbed Cedega after a unique variety of grape. Transgaming claims Cedega allows "Windows ® games to seamlessly and transparently run under Linux, out-of-the-box, with outstanding performance and equivalent game-play". Will we see a new era of game compatibilty?"

13 of 475 comments (clear)

  1. WINE by ChupaThePirate · · Score: 4, Funny

    does that mean that wine is now an emulator? ;-O

    --
    arrrrr
    1. Re:WINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      WOW, the transgaming server is so conjested i can't even access the home page until i reload about 50 times, where then i get a apache bandwidth error.

      You're new here, aren't you?

  2. MIA after before 5 replies by Astadar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I got here with only 4 postings and transgaming was already /.ed... good work team!

    --
    --Coming up with something clever... please wait...
  3. Saw it yesterday by ktulu1115 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was curious as to what was going on at Transgaming - they had a large banner on their site yesterday with today's date on it and "Where will you be?". Had a funny feeling something was brewing. :)

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  4. Re:For those wondering how to pronounce it... by iapetus · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ironic, really, since WineX makes Ports less likely...

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  5. Re:For those wondering how to pronounce it... by CdBee · · Score: 4, Funny

    So we're porting to wine instead of whining for ports?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  6. Re:New era by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, but it COULD be considered a circumvention device.

    "We made this game to play on Windows and X-boxen... now these Linux geeks have, totally without anyone's permission, made them play on everything including E-Z-Bake ovens! Which, in addition to being totally contrary to our intent, is in breach of the law!"

    And so, as the grandparent says, a new era of lawsuits must ensue.

  7. Re:Support Codeweavers by cloudmaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    I like being deceived, especially by a company that makes producs that I have absolutely no use for (like someone who makes software that'll make my computer do things that are *way* cheaper and faster on a console game system).

  8. Re:Will we see a new era of game compatibilty? by Gannoc · · Score: 2, Funny

    This guy said absolutely nothing new, interesting or insightful. He might as well have copied his post from 16,000,000 other posts just like it.

    Well, we have "redundant", but we need something which is "The opposite of insightful"

    I might suggest (-1 Banal)

  9. Re:Too bad by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 4, Funny
    That isn't evil, any more than its evil for a polar bear to eat a penguin. But the penguins don't like it.
    Don't say penguins preciousss. It hurts us, yes it doesss. Say...shark eats fish--yessss, nice fisssshhhh.
    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  10. Re:Too bad by CaptainPinko · · Score: 2, Funny

    which dates far far back to the 90's

    please don't use the concepts of "far far back" and "90's" together... it makes me feel old. :)
    --
    Your CPU is not doing anything else, at least do something.
  11. Re:Too bad by sydb · · Score: 3, Funny

    That isn't evil, any more than its evil for a polar bear to eat a penguin. But the penguins don't like it.

    Not evil, but definitely unlikely.

    Polar Bears - Arctic. Penguins - Antarctic!

    --
    Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  12. Re:New Win ZPI for Longhorn by Doogie5526 · · Score: 2, Funny
    lol. Technically, because they own the trademark doesn't mean I can't use the name. I'm just not allowed to market something that could be confused (by a layman) for the trademark. Though they can lose that trademark if the word becomes common language (like Xerox or Kleenex), that's why they always say Microsoft Windows.

    On that note, I plan to open a junkyard called Windows.