Slashdot Mirror
Sony Projector Gets Bright Images From Black Screen
da_foz writes "Sony has developed a new projector that can give a bright, unfaded picture without the need to eliminate ambient light. The secret is that they project onto a black screen instead of a white one. Their screen uses species filters so that white ambient light is absorbed, but the red, green, and blue light from the projector is reflected. Sony sees a possible use in home entertainment systems because of the ability to have a much bigger picture than conventional TVs as well as businesses adopting the projectors for presentations."
...they could come up with a lamp that would actually last. I've gone through at least 6 InFocus projectors in the last 1.5 years due mainly to bulb failure.
...hey, what's that bright thing in the sky outside?
This technique sounds really cool though, perhaps I won't need to have all my windows boarded up anymore.
We'll finally be able to see the Gettysburg Address Power Point presentation the way Lincoln intended it to be viewed.
--I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
It probably appears black (or close to it) from the viewing angle when the projector is powered off.
I assume the three frequencies that are reflected are fairly well tuned. I wonder if this means I will be stuck purchasing a Sony projector to match these? I also wonder if Sony may be able to stop others from making matching projectors since they probably own some Patents around this technology?
It would seem that the ultimate version of this would use RGB lasers as the light source and notch filters on the screen. The narrowness of the notches would determine the depths of the black. The biggest trick would be in tuning the notch filters to reflect the off-axis, angled laser light.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
This isn't a new projector. It's a new type of screen that only reflects the projector light, absorbing the ambient light, so the image remains clear even in a bright room. It works with regular projectors. I'd at least expect the submitter to RTFA...
Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
Pot, Kettle... meet Mr. Projector Screen.
The author of the article doesn't know what he's talking about!
In a bright room, the image on the screen is brighter
No, it isn't. It's clearer, it might _appear_ brighter because of that, but there's no way it could actually _be_ brighter. Unless the technology does something not described.
Since Thomas Edison introduced motion-picture projectors more than 100 years ago
I could have sworn the motion picture projector was introduced by Lumiere.
When your screen doesn't reflect so much of the ambient light anymore, you can use a projector that outputs less power. For one, this can lead to less hot projector lamps, thus a longer life for them.
It might also enable the use of lower-power technologies (LED-lasers anyone?), that might in turn make the projectors much cheaper.
Nice work by Sony
Now, is there a physicist in da house who knows how wide the reflection-band (in wavelength-terms) for R, G and B is?
Support a Europe-related section on Slashdot!
Actually, if it only reflect three specific wavelengths
then it's probably the _blackest_ thing you've ever seen.
I bought some high-end binoculars a while back. When you're looking through all the Nikons and Swarovskis and Leicas side by side, you start to realize when your eyes feel the little zing. It isn't pure resolution that does it, and your eyes compensate rapidly enough to changes in brightness (due to objective size or quality) that you don't often perceive differences except at dusk and dawn. (The only exceptions for me were old-style tank commander Zeiss binocs. Very bright.)
But when you hit a binoc that felt right for contrast, ahhh -- those were my handful of last choices. It's like seeing the world with the slanting light at around 6:30 on a summer night -- everything just pops out, so clear, and the slight 3-D exaggeration of the binocular view brings it out just that little bit more. The optics store people said that was a pretty common reaction -- a slight edge in contrast was a huge advantage.
Sounds like this screen has that going for it. Big selling point, next to potential competitors, if they can get it around the right price point.
"Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
If it reflects _anything_, it isn't black.
Of course it is. Every black object in the world reflects some light.
You are confusing black bodies, an abstract notion defined by physiscists which does not exist in the real, physical world, and the color black, which our eyes percieve just fine whether or not it is a shiny surface with a lot of reflection, or a matted surface with minimal (but still greater than zero) reflection. The black BMW I had the misfortune of following the other day positively glinted in the midday sun.
With light, black is defined as the abscence of color. With pigment, black is the presenece of all color (analogous to white light).
The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
The common vernacular "bright" can either refer to luminance (close the shades, the light's too bright), or it can refer to color saturation (Can you tone down that bright green to a mere pastel?). A projector screen that reflects ambient light is going to reduce color saturation; and one that absorbs ambient light will increase color saturation, i.e. make it brighter.
completely skirting around the fact that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS WHITE LIGHT!
Sure there is, there's no such thing as white monochromatic light, but white light exists. The term "white" (whether it be talking about light, sound, etc.) simply means that the energy is distributed evenly across all frequencies (technically between 0Hz and infinity, but in practice we're talking about more or less evenly over a given band of frequencies). Since the energy is distributed over such a wide frequency band, the energy of the white light in the very fine bands used by projectors will be very small, so by absorbing everything else you will almost be eliminating the white light's energy.
Trueth be told, unless you're talking about monochromatic light, the simplistic names of colours only describe what we see - they can be generated by any number of combinations of different frequencies. I.e. monochromatic orange light has a wavelength of 590nm, but that would look the same to us as a mixture of red (650nm) and yellow (570nm) light (or any number of combinations of different wavelengths).
http://blog.nexusuk.org
The technology here is in the screen, not the projector. In particular, the screen absorbs most light, with the exception of the primary bands illuminated by the projector's bulb.
Any projector with the same type of bulb---and in home theater nowadays, there are only two main types (Xenon and UHP), will work with this setup. And Sony could conceivably make a similar screen for the other bulb type too.
There have been so many dupe threads over at AVS Forum (by far the best place to go to discuss anything home theater) that it is getting a bit irritating.
Reading the article (although it is a little shy on detail) suggests it is bandpass filters in addition to what you suggest. I'm not sure why you think you need more than R, G, and B to produce all the colors present in RGB video. To reproduce the entire visible color gamut, you'd need more than RGB-- but RGB video has already reduced the color gamut significantly from what you can see. And, conveniently, consists of exactly three narrow wavelengths of light, and nothing else. Your suggestion that images require "many wavelengths of light" is completely incorrect. You'll have issues if your only source of ambient light is a bank of computer monitors, though, as they'll fall right into that nice RGB range.
I'm not sure they'd put too much dependence on angle, either-- most projectors these days are designed with an enormous optical offset (The popular Sanyo Z2 can be offset by 1/2 screen width and 1.5 screen height) and digital keystone correction (Allowing for projector placement even farther outside the offset range by correcting the shape of a picture projected at an angle). Lots of people use projectors but don't have a room situated so that the unit can hang conveniently from the ceiling dead center.
It seems like a feasible variation, at least to me -- keep the mostly-black coating to absorb nuisance ambient light, but allow transmission at narrow RGB wavelengths. Then backlight it with an LED screen, with the diodes tuned to the three transmission frequency ranges.
Don't know whether it's technically possible, but if it is, I bet it's in the works already.
GNU Info is documentation optimized for machine readability
The red green and blue of projectors or monitors or whatever are not a single frequency of light. LEDs don't give you pure frequencies either. Lasers are the only thing that give you light at a pure, single frequency I think. On the other hand, this page seems to indicate that DLP light consists of sharper spectral peaks than either LCD or CRT (3rd paragraph).
But still I suspect that their filters probably filter out some of the visible light coming out of the projectors, making this black screen not quite as bright as a comparable white reflective screen. After all it has to be easier to make a material with close to 100% diffuse reflectance across the whole spectrum than to create something that's near 0% everywhere except for three narrow notches which are near 100%. But I'm no expert on light
So I'm thinking it's highly unlikely that the the filters come anywhere near 100% black in the non-reflected parts of the spectrum. No doubt this is the blackest projection screen you've ever seen, but I really doubt it will be the blackest thing you've ever seen. Especially if you've seen Undercover Brother
Still it's a pretty neat trick. Anyone know how they make passive filters with such sharp tuning to specific frequencies. Is it some kind of diffraction thing?