Slashdot Mirror


SETI@Home Transitions To BOINC

SeaDour writes "The team at SETI@Home have finally released their highly-anticipated new client software based on the BOINC (Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing) software platform. This new platform promises transparent version upgrades, more efficient work unit distribution, and the ability to seamlessly integrate other distributed computing projects that are also using the BOINC standard. For now, SETI@Home is allowing both the Classic and BOINC clients to run, but eventually they will shut down the Classic data server and force everyone to upgrade. You can read more about the transition here."

45 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    welcome our BOINC alien-finding overlords. sorry.

    1. Re:I for one by Epistax · · Score: 4, Funny

      I prefer

      Scientific progress goes BOINC?

  2. Waste by mphase · · Score: 3, Interesting

    SETI seems like a bit of a waste of energy compared to Folding at Home. It's not that I don't believe in extraterrestrials or anything, I even think that SETI is a pretty worthwhile project but compared to curing some of the ailments folding works on...well yeah.

    1. Re:Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Maybe the new BOINC software will allow you to split your computing time between SETI and Folding?

    2. Re:Waste by Brainix · · Score: 5, Insightful
      While I see your point, I think you are being unfair to SETI. As I understand it, SETI has made leaps not only in the search for extra-terrestrial life, but also in the area of distributed computing.

      I once had a friend who was a psychology major. She asked me, "How can you study computer science when there are children out there being abused, and women out there being raped?"

      We must pick our battles, and contribute to the best of our ability.

      --
      Raj Against the Machine! http://social-butterfly.appspot.com/
    3. Re:Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >>I once had a friend who was a psychology major. She asked me, "How can you study computer science when there are children out there being abused, and women out there being raped?"

      People who think we should do anything because we can't do everything are annoying. I am supremely unqualified to produce peace in the Middle East, cure AIDS, or fix overpopulation in China. I can however spare a few computer cycles for something that interests me, and searching for aliens seems to be a better use of my time than watching flying cows.

      (BTW, this isn't directed at you, but at your friend who thinks compsci is somehow less important than psych. My guess is that computer science will do more to help the world than every psychiatrist and psychologist put together, though I certainly don't begrudge them pursuing their own interests)

    4. Re:Waste by CatLord42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Maybe the new BOINC software will allow you to split your computing time between SETI and Folding?

      Whoever modded the parent down should rethink their decision.

      Folding at Home seems to be another distributed computing project, just like SETI. I haven't RTFA-ed, but the original post says that BOINC will allow multiple distributed programs to run. At worst, this is redundant, but it is definitely on topic for this particular part of the thread!

      --
      Meow. Now!
    5. Re:Waste by StonyUK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I once had a friend who was a psychology major. She asked me, "How can you study computer science when there are children out there being abused, and women out there being raped?"

      How does she think she's helping? She's not preventing it, she's making money out of the aftermath.

    6. Re:Waste by fatmonkeyboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, there are a number of ways she could (theorhetically) be helping by working as a psychologist, though there is certainly no guarantee.

      * If she treats children she might prevent those children from becoming abusive to their own children, ten years down the line. Or she might prevent them from becoming rapists.

      * If she works in social services she might identify children who are being abused and put an earlier stop to it.

      * Even if she doesn't help prevent it, she might be able to help repair the damage in the aftermath. Just because she's making money from it doesn't mean it isn't still a worthy cause.

      That said, I've never been impressed with what I've seen from the field of psychology. I do think that just talking to someone who is genuinely interested in helping you work through your problems is helpful though.

      So, regardless of whether or not their science has much merit, I think psychologists are doing good work.

      But the whole "how can you study X when Y is occurring argument" is pretty lame. A society like ours which supports deep specializations has to have people specializing in every field. Might as well go with the one you enjoy and/or have talent for...

    7. Re:Waste by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Interesting

      " I even think that SETI is a pretty worthwhile project but compared to curing some of the ailments folding works on...well yeah."

      I help SETI because it's drastically underfunded compared to the types of things folding would cure.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Waste by kalidasa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thing is, it's pretty easy to get money from charities, governments, private philanthropists, and other institutions to fund medical work. How easy is it for Seti to get that money?

    9. Re:Waste by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "SETI seems like a bit of a waste of energy compared to Folding at Home. It's not that I don't believe in extraterrestrials or anything, I even think that SETI is a pretty worthwhile project but compared to curing some of the ailments folding works on...well yeah."

      A waste of energy? Its an exploration of a scientific question for folks interested in hard science. How is that a waste of energy? That sounds like an argument people use when they claim that money spent on NASA should be spent on fixing the problems of "the real world" such as poverty.

      Perhaps if mankind finds 100% proof (through SETI) that intelligent life exists out in space, us humans might actually try to live in peace with one another. Is that exploration a waste of time? Certainly with peace we could free up resources towards tackling diseases that plague our population. Then again, the counter argument is that most medical breakthroughs occur during conflict. Maybe we should be looking for hostile space aliens then...

      By the way, you can use BOINC to choose what resources you want to spend on various shared distributed processing programs, such as between SETI and Folding. At least the Beta version did...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    10. Re:Waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am fully qualified to bring peace to the Middle East. What I lack are the nuclear weapons.

    11. Re:Waste by Demodian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe the new BOINC software will allow you to split your computing time between SETI and Folding?

      ...or maybe merge the two looking for little origami ETs that have the cure for those bad tasting protein shakes...

    12. Re:Waste by metamatic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not contributing to Folding@Home until they state their position on patenting the results.

      They say the data will be released publically and not sold for profit, but they say nothing about patenting discoveries that result from my work and then forcing others to pay fees.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  3. Breaking Compatibility by Ricwot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real question is, will this help the project, or will it harm it when the classic is phased out, those users looking for a pretty screensaver who installed the software one day when they were bored are unlikely to upgrade, that said however, the way that it can now be used for any project means that more causes can benefit without having to write the software themselves.

    1. Re:Breaking Compatibility by igny · · Score: 5, Insightful
      There are ~5mil total registered users, and ~500k active users (at least 1 result in last 4 weeks). I guess there are >100k users who are die hard fans, running it 24/7 on all their machines. Likely those will be first to upgrade, followed by the rest of them. Possibly, many of inactive users might come back with this upgrade.

      In conclusion, you might see spikes in the userbase in short term, but it won't affect long term dynamics.

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    2. Re:Breaking Compatibility by jd · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The old version of SETI@Home used the COSM project as a base. (COSM is an offshoot of the distributed.net system, supposedly the "next generation".)


      Replacing the transport mechanism - in a well-designed system - would be a nothing thing. It's just the means of ferrying blocks of data around, it isn't actually necessary for SETI@Home to know any of the internal details.


      This suggests SETI@Home - and possibly COSM - were not as well-designed as all that. Interesting to speculate. COSM isn't progressing, as far as I can see, which may also be a reason SETI@Home moved away from it. It looks like a dead project - a pity, as it had some great ideas - and so any bugs wouldn't get fixed.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  4. SETI running out of Work-Units? by SB5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A very long time ago, I heard that SETI@Home was running low on work-units because their client was so popular that they were just burning through them... Did they restructure it? What happened. I remember when I heard that I started downloading work-units that were taken by the dishes more recently then I had been seening too...

    --
    If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
    it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    1. Re:SETI running out of Work-Units? by Thng · · Score: 5, Informative
      Not sure if this is before or after the news you heard, but for version 3.03, they added additional processing capability in the client so workunits would take longer to process
      News posting
      Text:
      Added additional science coverage. We now do a thorough search out to a chirp rate of +- 20 Hz/second. The cost of the additional coverage is that clients will take longer to process a workunit

      However, as 3.03 is rather old, I wouldn't be surprised if the new and faster computers and old clients that weren't upgraded negated some of the effect.

      thng

  5. Beta Means What? by stecoop · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The team at SETI@Home have finally released Bonic

    On Bonic web page: Status BOINC is under development. We are conducting a beta test of BOINC using the SETI@home and Astropulse applications. The public release will be announced on the SETI@home web site. Several other distributed computing projects are evaluating BOINC.


    Bonic has been "released" for use for a long time; I thought when a release annoucment arrives then the product is no longer beta. So which is it - Released means ready for use or does it mean Please beta test now?

  6. Bill Watterson was right... by CaseyB · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Scientific progress goes BOINC?"

  7. a great joke by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, I'd love to setup a transmitter and inject a signal into the seti data collection dish - you know, a low level non-random mathematically transformed character stream that roughtly translates to "The earthlings will never find us here" or something.

    If done right it could be a bigger practical joke than the War of the Worlds broadcast of 1938!

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:a great joke by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 4, Informative

      Best you'd conceivably get is a detection from one dish; without actually putting a transmitter way out in space, the confirmations that would be required (things like confirming parallax of the signal, motion of the signal consistent with it being X light years away, etc.) would require access to every radiotelescope in the world.

      Best you might get is "oh, neat, a candidate signal" until one or the other of the rejection mechanisms coughs and says "Bullshit."

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    2. Re:a great joke by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      SS1 wouldn't have sidereal motion, it isn't high enough. Also, there's the fact that its only up there for a couple minutes. But basically, it wouldn't "look" like a signal from extraplanetary sources.

      The Moon, well, they would say "It's coming from the moon". I suspect there are ways to tell if someone is bouncing it off the moon... like the fact that it would be an on again, off again signal in synch with the rotation of the planet.

      To successfully hoax the SETI program would require a *lot* of effort and smarts.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
  8. Me predicts... by Maljin+Jolt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This BOINC thingy seems to be an adequate infrastructure for the next generation of... worms.

    --
    There you are, staring at me again.
    1. Re:Me predicts... by sploxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, why?
      Because it (the application) uses networking and is 'distributed'? It is not p2p. It is 1-N, i.e. the workunit server to all the clients. That's a bigg difference. Although you can argue that there is a single point of failure because the workload server could be hacked and transfer malicous data to the clients, it is a scenario IMHO not very likely because: a) the workload server has to be hacked, b) it has to stay so for a longer time to have any effect and c) the client software must have a buffer-overflow-like flaw.

      Set it in relation:
      If you do apt-get in debian without *really* checking the author's reputation and getting his *certified* PGP/GPG keys, you're essentially doing much worse things in terms of security. Probably 95% of all debian users do this (me included).

      And it is similar to websites which install worms by exploiting flaws in IE. This is a way of infection which has to be blocked, of course, but the main way of infection is still either by unpatched services running on well-known ports or eMail...

      This is, of course, one of the reasons why I won't use SETI@Home until it is GPL or similar [Would it be GPL with BOINC?]

  9. Interesting... by ndavidg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well this is interesting... probably the first time a service provider was required to upgrade software: "You better upgrade if you want us to continue using your cpu cycle service."

  10. Ah, Seti@Home by jb.hl.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    The practical implementation of a million monkeys at a million typewriters... ...finding nothing.

    Seriously, what has Seti@Home found as of yet?

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    1. Re:Ah, Seti@Home by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's found a lack of signs of life - at least a lack of certain types of sign. That in itself is a find.

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  11. Tax break? by SkyWalk423 · · Score: 4, Funny
    If I sign up for SETI@home, are my spare CPU cycles tax deductibe as a charitable contribution?

  12. Criminal Intent by EssTiDee · · Score: 3, Funny

    From article: "Will the format of input and output files change? Yes. The new format is XML-like (though not legal XML). " Sorry SETI, the RIAA has long since scared me away from having anything illegal on my PC. :-P

  13. Will new client screen out 'cheaters'? by Siergen · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I recall reading that some SETI contributors had found ways to artificially raise their rankings for number of packets processed (forget how they did it). This angered some contributors whose high rankings were based on real results, and who were now being knocked from the top spots by the 'cheaters'.

    Does the new client include methods to block the methods used to spoof the current SETI@Home client?

    1. Re:Will new client screen out 'cheaters'? by SkyWalk423 · · Score: 3, Funny
      You'll be happy to know that the new SETI@Home client is PunkBuster-enabled. The days of SETI@Home aimbots are finally over!

      Score one for the good guys!

  14. Source Available by eeg3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Interestingly enough, the new client has the option to compile it yourself. The old client didn't have this option, or atleast it was very difficult to find, _if_ it was available. Now maybe it can be ported to archs that were previously unsupported.

  15. I don't do pushed software upgrades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "BOINC transparently and securely downloads new application versions. This lets us upgrade and extend SETI@home without requiring you to download and install new software. "

    Well, if I can't turn this feature off, they've lost my cycles. I don't even allow my OS vendor to perform automatic downloads of "new versions" of programs.

    For those with the tinfoil hats, the Patriot Act could be used to force Berzerkeley to download random "interesting" ware for the Feds, and keep quiet about it under penalty of law, under the umbrella of looking for terrorist activity. This ain't Java playing in a secure sandbox either.

  16. File format is not XML: why not? by LightStruk · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Will the format of input and output files change?

    Yes. The new format is XML-like (though not legal XML).
    Anybody familiar with the rationale behind this decision? The sample file is indeed very close to legal XML. If it is so close, why not go the last mile and make it legal?
    Well-formed XML facilitates communication and interoperability, because standard XML parsers can grok it, making it easier to write new implementations that understand the same XML format.
  17. Not quite ready for the unwashed masses? by stefanb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had heard about the eventual switch-over some months ago, but never found the time to play around with the beta, so I took the opportunity now to install the client and check it out.

    On Mac OS X, all went well, and my PowerBook is munching on it's first unit, fans spinning. However, when I tried to start the client on a Sun box at work, it failed with "ld.so.1: ./boinc_3.18_sparc-sun-solaris2.7: fatal: libstdc++.so.3: open failed: No such file or directory." A quick Google confirmed my suspicions: the client is linked against the GCC stdlib, which is not a standard part of Solaris. Now, that's easy enough to fix if you've worked with Solaris before: just go to sunfreeware.com, and find a suitable binary package to put on.

    However, someone not knowing about Solaris, GCC, and sunfreeware.com might be a bit stumped. And the boinc/setiboinc boards reveal that quite a number of beta testers are confused about this, not only on Solaris but also on Linux. It's not completely obvious which GCC/libgcc packages contains libstc++.so.3 (as opposed to .2.x or .4.x).

    The real kicker is that I couldn't find any hint of this problem or a solution on the site. I probably looked in all the wrong places in the last half hour... And I couldn't find a feedback form or email address either. This definitly needs to be improved if they want people to move over to boinc.

  18. Can you disable automatic updates? by Hibernator · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In the transition FAQ it says
    BOINC transparently and securely downloads new application versions. This lets us upgrade and extend SETI@home without requiring you to download and install new software.
    which makes me wonder if users can disable that. I don't want anybody installing software on my computer without my approval, thank you.

    The FAQ didn't answer that question--does anyone know?

  19. So long, SETI@Home.. by Hibernator · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This may very likely be the beginning of the end for SETI@Home. One of the attractions of SETI@Home for many people is the excitement of tracknig the counter of the number of work units completed. In contrast, the new BOINC-based system has a ridiculously complex and unintuitive "credit" system that users are very unlikely to find compelling.

    I guess this just shows that every project, even a non-commercial one, eventually needs to have someone with some marketing sense if it wants to continue to thrive.

  20. Be careful what you search for by xyote · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have a suspicion that any advanced galatic civilization, realizing the nature of expansionistic species, broadcasts instructions on how to blow yourself up, knowing full well that any sufficiently aggressive species will not be able to resist following the instructions. The tiny note at the end "Do not attempt this on your home planet" just indicates a puckish sense of humor.

  21. BOINC by Sunspire · · Score: 5, Informative

    Boinc is more than just an updated Seti@Home, it's a generic delivery platform for distributed projects. That means you, yes you, can develope a BOINC app. Just gather some people to run it for you and compute away without needing any approval from the guys at Berkeley. Basically the participants enter a project URL into the BOINC application, the program then downloads your code and the crunching begins. BOINC handles all the network, workunit, results, distribution, security, versioning etc. issues for you.

    Participants can even choose to split their resources among several projects, say, Seti@Home and Folding@Home. Another thing that will also be used in the new Seti@Home is that you can have clients participating in the same project working on completely different computation sets. For example, clients that have proven themselves to have a fast workunit turnaround time and a long history of participating and that have a gigabyte or more of RAM can be given special tasks that would normally be impossible because of the high number of griefers on the net.

    --
    It's like deja vu all over again.
  22. the be all end all of posts by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lets see what we can cover:

    BOINC isn't nearly as usful to society as Folding@home, AIDS research@home, help feed starving disabled puppies in war torn african nations@home, etc.

    BOINC != Seti@Home. BOINC is a step up the ladder from Seti, it provides the infrastructure for multiple projects. *you* choose the project to attach yourself to and contribute time to. In an ultra-perfect hippie world, Folding@home would use the BOINC infrastructure. Instead you get to help out who you want.

    I ain't trustin no Berkeley hippies to silently install no black helicopter, tinfoil hat disablin' technology on my system.

    Then don't use it. If you ran seti, you really had no way of knowing what was coming down the pipe now did you? You opened up a nice big gaping connection into your system while trusting that the work units weren't poison pills and that Berkeley's infrastructure hadn't been comprimised. Run the client on a non-critical machine, put it outside your firewall if it makes you happy.

    Scientific progress goes BOINC!

    You're very clever. You're the only person that ever thought of that.

    Aliens will enslave the earth when we make contact!!!!!

    You really shouldn't have rented Battlefield Earth.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  23. BOINC SETI@home - Ready for Prime Time? by wintermute1974 · · Score: 3, Informative
    In the hopes that someone working on the SETI@home client reads Slashdot, I am posting my bug report about the new BOINC SETI@home client here. I tried to post a bug report on their Windows Client Forum, but the authentication routine failed to recognize my account ID when I copied and pasted it from the e-mail message I had just received. (If you don't yet have a BOINC account, it looks something like 213ed9ba2da1696f77b0d0fa3165a3ab, but no, this is NOT my real user account.)

    Anyway, enough preamble. Here's the problem:
    In the Work tab, when I right-click on the currently-running work unit, the context-sensitive menu displays one option, Show Graphics.

    When I select Show Graphics, a window pops up, the entire contents of which is black. At this point, my Windows 2000 SP4 computer freezes. CTRL-ALT-DEL doesn't bring up the Windows Security window. CTRL-SHIFT-ESC doesn't bring up the Task Manager. I can't move the mouse. The keyboard is completely unresponsive.

    Being a sucker for punishment, I sent a non-maskable interrupt to my CPU, and rebooted the machine. Then I tried the exact same steps, and got the same results. Yup, this bug is repeatable.

    So is the new client ready for prime time? Um, not really. Add the insult of the website not recognizing the account ID that it gave me to begin with and I'd say this program should stay in beta a while longer.

    A final note: If you happen to be one of the programmers for the client, and know why this problem is happening, reply here. I'd appreciate a reply.

  24. BOINC SETI@home - Second System Syndrome? by wintermute1974 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I find the BOINC client to be far from user friendly. I could figure it out and get it working but I have my doubts that the average Joe could.

    I have to agree. It was with some sadness that I uninstalled the old SETI@home client before installing BOINC. The old client was compact, quick, and friendly. In contrast, the BOINC interface seems cheerless and industrial.

    If tonight had been my first experience with the SETI@home project, I would have uninstalled it completely and told all my friends to avoid it. I refuse to keep any program that crashes my system when I try to use its basic functions.

    That said, I really like SETI@home, and I'm willing to stick it out with the new BOINC client. I only hope the most egregious bugs are removed. Ever since I was a kid, I have wanted to contribute to the search for extraterrestrial life. Since I didn't grow up to be a professional astronomer, I would continue to gladly contribute my spare clock cycles even if the SETI client was much worse than it is now.

    I think that SETI@home does important work, but I worry that BOINC might become a classic second system, with plenty of new functionality and configurability, yet big, cumbersome, and bloated in comparison to the original version.