Slashdot Mirror


Official Firefly Movie Web Site Launched

The Orange Hatter writes "The official Universal Pictures web site for the Firefly Movie 'Serenity' is up. It includes a blog, message board, opportunites to get point for Firefly swag, and lots of other fun stuff. Check it out."

39 of 281 comments (clear)

  1. lightweight pages by chris_mahan · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are html, css, and 508 validators.
    There should be a slashdot validator for pages: The likelihood that if slashdotted, your pages will take your server down for the count.

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."

  2. Of course by arrow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And of course the mods miss the blaitant spam. Submitter is getting points for every slashdot clickthru.

    Non spammy link in 3..2..1...http://www.serenitymovie.com/

    --
    symetrix. We are building a religion, a limited edition.
    1. Re:Of course by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      And his blog is now completely slashdotted in less than 20 posts. I wonder if the clickthru counts if the page never loads?

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Of course by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Submitter is getting points for every slashdot clickthru."

      So? He's the reason we know about it. Let him have the reward.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Of course by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Deja vu. I swear you said the exact same thing about a book reviewer a few months back.'

      Heh yep. That was me. Only in that case, somebody saw the 'referrer=sr' in an Amazon link and went on a bloody stink about how he was making money off it. Turns out, 'referrer=sr' meant "this was found via the search engine. Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Of course by Cecil · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've gotta say, I've listened to all the actor's commentary on the Firefly DVD series, and I'll be damned if that's not Alan Tudyk ("Wash").

      "Space-torture-plex-thingy"? "If Nathan Fillion was any more charming he could turn a straight man gay. I'm just sayin' is all."?

      Who else could it be?

  3. heroes! by maxbang · · Score: 4, Funny

    It appears the website appeared just in the nick of time. What do you suppose that makes the designers? Big Damn Heroes! Ain't they just?

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
    1. Re:heroes! by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No power in the 'verse can stop a slashdotting ^^

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
    2. Re:heroes! by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, at least they made the webpage before the movie came out...

      I mean, firefly has had problems with stuff being done out of order, right?

      ~Wx

      --
      sig?
    3. Re:heroes! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Funny

      No power in the 'verse can stop a slashdotting

      I won't let them! They can't take Serenity away!

      You can't take the sky from me...

      (Yes, I've been itching to say that.)

  4. Shouldn't that be fire fox movie? by TheUncleBob · · Score: 3, Funny

    It was fox that dropped the series ? See not a mozilla joke in sight

    Doh

  5. Re:Firefly rocks. by mrwonton · · Score: 4, Informative

    No. They will not continue to record the series. The movie is all thats left, unfortunately. It was a terrific series.

    --
    Not more than you need, just more than you want
  6. The unofficial site is also well worth a look... by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Point yer browsin' gear here for news and discussion, including recent blogs by Nathan ("Mal") and Jewel ("Kaylee") from the set.

    And by dint of shameless grovelling the webmaster has just wangled himself a part as an extra on the movie! Kudos.

  7. FireFly DVD set is great - why did Fox cancel? by PenguinOpus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I didn't watch any of the episodes on Fox because I hadn't even discovered Buffy yet. 6 seasons of DVD Buffy later (waiting for the 7th), we buy Firefly's DVD set and were really impressed.

    Firefly, the series, has the usual Joss Whedan good characters interacting in interesting ways.
    Apparently they didn't show the pilot first on Fox and I can't imagine how that could have worked. The 2 hour pilot (also called Serenity) is a must see and its CGI special effects are surprisingly good.

    15 episodes (pilot + 13) + extras.

    Strongly Recommended!

    1. Re:FireFly DVD set is great - why did Fox cancel? by sflory · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seeing it out of order really destroyed the experience for me. My biggest complaint was that it was rather disjointed. I really wasn't a big fan until I watched it on DVD. Personally I'd rather watch the FireFly DVD again than anything Fox is currently showing.

      --
      IANALBIPOOGL (I am not a Lawyer, but I play one on GrokLaw.)
    2. Re:FireFly DVD set is great - why did Fox cancel? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The series seemed to confuse the NeuroTypicals out there. I read a review in the Oregonian (Portland, OR newspaper) where the critic completely focused on what he felt were technological inconsistencies ("they've got spaceships and bullet trains but most people use horses?") and uterly failed to understand the backstory at all (of a Centralized "galacticazation" trade group that kept the core rich and the outlying planets poor, quite an interesting social commentary there about the power of corporations in cahoots with governments). It just went right over his head. And I know that reviewer, read his TV reviews quite often, I'd put him slightly above normal intelligence; so obviously the great number of boobs who would fall for "Joe Millionaire" and other Fox Reality shows just weren't smart enough to get Joss Whedan. And thus we're stuck watching the idiocy they CAN understand.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  8. no time travel by fermion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    That says it all. That is why i think firefly is a better that the late incarnations of Star Trek and B5. Don't get me wrong. B5 is a wonderful story that is more ambitious and make a better effort to be technically accurate than practically any other sci-fi show. And Star Trek is great, it is the Granddaddy.

    But the time travel, unless we are traveling in time and not space, is the overused plot device of the past ten or 15 years. Enterprise sucks because that is the basis of the whole show, and hopefully they can compensate for the mistake. B5 was nearly fatally wounded by it's misuse of the time line.

    But Firefly concentrates on the basics. The relationships. The flawed characters. The goal of living life the best you can. You don't have people floating willy nilly in and out of time. You don't have have people going back and forth in time so that the writers can cowardly destroy a ship at the beginning of the episode only to have it resurrected at the end. All you have is a totally unbelievable ship floating throughout a totally unbelievable universe with totally unbelievable characters. Just like real life.

    This is also why Battlestar Galactica was so cool.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:no time travel by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is actually possible to make good time travel stories. I just read an amazing one in Axiomatic by Greg Egan. Others, like 12 Monkeys and Heinlein's "All You Zombies" are at also entertaining and well-conceived. What ruins Star Trek is just bad writing, not time travel per se. Read this paper if you're really interested in the conceptual issues in Time Travel. It will make you hate that cheapo Star Trek crap even more, because you'll realize exactly why that "second time 'round" crap they always pull with time travel is completely incoherent.

    2. Re:no time travel by Noren · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Hmm... I can certainly understand not liking the concept of time travel in science fiction, or of not liking specific episodes. But... in B5 there were only three episodes out of the 110 which contained any (out of sequence) time travel- "Babylon Squared" and "War Without End" parts 1 and 2. The three basically comprise one story (even though two years separated their production) and the net result was interesting in my opinion. Though not a totally novel outcome, it was at least mostly self-consistent and I hadn't seen it on the small screen before... unlike the average Star Trek "We must not alter the past and/or we must fix how someone else altered the past" or "Visit to Earth in some time period for which we already have sets" plot. More episodes were produced before the first time travel episode (19) than were ever produced for Firefly.

      There were a number of anachronistic things (e.g. "Comes the Inquisitor", "A Late Delivery from Avalon", Garibaldi's Daffy Duck poster and motorcycle) which were not results of nonsequential time travel, as well as some episodes which took place over odd timelines (the "camera" going years after the rest of the series) but which had no time travel per se ("The Deconstruction of Falling Stars", "Sleeping in Light")

      There was precognition at many points, though, and lots and lots of foreshadowing and glimpses into the future. What time travel there was also implied some amount of predestination. Was it the predestination more than just the time travel which you found objectionable?

  9. Re:Is this "just" the first episode, remade? by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, it takes place about 6 months after "Objects in Space".

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  10. Pathetically stupid web designers! by Rasputin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shockwave required before you can see anything on their worthless page. Same with the "Ghost in the Shell 2" page.

    How hard is it to design a page that is usable by EVERYONE? Not hard at all and yet here we have examples of two groups that couldn't pull it off. Are web designers like these born stupid or do they learn it in school?

    --
    "I once preached peaceful coexistence with Windows. You may laugh at my expense - I deserve it." Be's Jean-Louis Gass
    1. Re:Pathetically stupid web designers! by nizo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How hard is it to design a page that is usable by EVERYONE?

      That all depends on how many people you want to actually use your site. Note how fast yahoo/ebay/google/etc load (used by tons o' people every day). I hate flash sites, and any site that depends on flash must hate having people visit it, I mean how many people actually sit and watch the flash intro on a site? Excuse me while I go outside and throw a I-hate-flash tantrum.

    2. Re:Pathetically stupid web designers! by Blublu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How many non-geeks do you think are interested in this website in the first place? It's not that we're unable to view them. It's that shockwave is freaking annoying. What if you want to download something? Oh, you can't just get a simple link you have to click on a "shockwave" link and if you're lucky, it might work (usually only if you're using IE) Also, shockwave sites can take years to load. (not to even mention when it's being slashdotted) Shockwave, flash and all that stuff is crap and it must die. It's okay for a few things, but WHOLE PAGES IS NOT ONE OF THEM!! Argghhh!!!! Aaah, now I feel better....

      --
      meh
    3. Re:Pathetically stupid web designers! by SpankMonkeyPox · · Score: 5, Funny

      But Shockwave is pretty! It's the PowerPoint eqivalent for the web. I love power point and shockwave so much, I hope the Microsoft People buy the Macromedia people and make a new company callded Macrosoft and make a program called SchockPoint.

    4. Re:Pathetically stupid web designers! by slaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bullshit. It's completely moronic for me to give up control of my browser to some every moron with a copy of Macromedia Fuckweaver and a bad idea.

      Let's see... standard web content: I can control text sizing, colors, whether or not (and which) images load, save or print things out, even use a screen reader if I'm particularly lazy (or, y'know, blind)... and generally make my browsing experience comfortable for myself.

      Flash Bullshit: I wait for hundreds of kilobytes of useless crap to stream onto my computer. I can't control sizing. I can't print it. I can't save it. Plus "people" (using only the most liberal definition) use it for stupid shit like dancing badgers and 1.5MB intros on motherboard manufacturer home pages. The only thing that keeps me from declaring fatwa on Macromedia developers is the living fucking saint who wrote the "Flash Click to View" plug-in for Moz/Firewhatever.

      Not that I'm bitter or anything.

      Yes, Flash sites should be available as an alternative. But only after the regular site conveys all the information one needs.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    5. Re:Pathetically stupid web designers! by Methuseus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm sorry, I replied before viewing the site (it was loading sloooow). The Flash does absolutely nothing that couldn't be done more easily with CSS and *whatever I'm thinking of but can't remember the name for*.

      That said, I do like sites that use Flash well, for something that is useflu. My favorite is Westwood's COmmand and Conquer websites. They use Flash but it is mostly unobtrusive and do things that would be inconvenient up to impossible with other tools.
      And, hmmm, it seems the Red Alert 2 website isn't working in Firefox at the moment. But it worked last week...

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  11. Don't get too excited! by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When was the last time you waited for a movie to come out and it was good?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  12. No tv series for a while... by Mechanized+Elf · · Score: 5, Informative
    Posts by Nathan Fillion on one of the fansites indicated that the movie deal with Paramount was exclusive--i.e. that there would be no TV series until the film franchise has run its course. Assuming the deal is a standard 3-film option, we can assume that Firefly is reserved for the big screen for at least the next few years. Kind of a shame since the prolific Joss Whedon really shines in serial format.

    Maybe the answer is an entirely new distribution channel like Mark Cuban's HDNet. Whedon should not be burdened with product placements and FOX-style scorecarding.

  13. Ron Glass by hchaos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is finally being listed in the cast. I've always thought Book was one of the more interesting characters of the show.

    1. Re:Ron Glass by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, to bad the show got canned before they could get around to what his deal was. "How's a preacher know so much 'bout crime?"

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Ron Glass by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, to bad the show got canned before they could get around to what his deal was. "How's a preacher know so much 'bout crime?

      "That's no preacher." I figure he must be an exile from Blue Sun who sided with the browncoats, but for some reason is still considered untouchable.

  14. Re:Gimme a break... by afriedel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think you have it all wrong. This was simply one of the best shows on TV period. Not simply best Sci-fi show, best show overall.

    I made several other people fans of the show by just letting borrow my DVDs. These are female, non-geeks who hate anything sci-fi who simply love the show and were shocked that it had been cancelled.

    I don't know if you actually watched the show but it was the western motiff was just a small part of the show and only played a part in some of the episodes.

    The dialog cheesy and cookie cutter characters? Come on!! The dialog is great and very original. The characters were also unique. We had a legal prostitute, former military soldier (low rank, not a general of anything) turned business man, gorgeous amazonian warrior, not entirely loyal hired muscle, former minister looking for his way, very feminine female mechanic, dorky, talented pilot who landed the amazon and a weakly, gifted
    doctor who risked everything to save his sister.

    I don't know about you, but that is an extremely original group of characters thrown together in a very plausible way. I have never watched Cowboy beebop so I can't comment on that. What I can do is comment on is the quality of this show.

    I never post on /. but I had to on this. Go see this movie. You won't be sorry.

    --
    Aaron Friedel
  15. Re:Gimme a break... by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    See above post on why the NeuroTypical just don't get the show. The whole point was a centrally controling military/industrial complex wins a big war and makes the rest of the world poor, including a part of itself. Replace planets with Europe/Canada/United States (after WWII) or the North in the Civil War, and you've got the REAL plot line. The rest is just surface story to bring out the deeper character development and commentary on the evil corporatists who seek to turn even human life itself to their goals (not sure what those goals are yet- I've yet to watch the DVDs but caught every episode Fox broadcast. WHY did they need to rip away that girl's ability to shield herself emotionally? What purpose did that serve?)

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  16. I just went by the set of Serenity by duffhuff · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was at Universal Studios Hollywood on Tuesday. During the studio tour (where you drive around on the busses) we went through a "quiet zone" where they were filming several movies. Right beside the Jurassic Park ride was the set of Serenity, and who was right outside the set? None other then Nathan Fillion, the Captain himself.

    Although I don't subscribe to the obsessive-fan mantra, being a huge fan of Firefly and seeing him, dressed in his usual captain garb, was the highlight of the day for me.

    I really hope the new movie does well, but either way, we've kept flying.

  17. Re:Gimme a break... by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Criticism of the mix of high tech space stuff and low tech western stuff strikes me as silly, when all you have to do is look around in the real world, and you'll see a far wider range in technology levels on just this one planet than they showed in the whole Firefly galaxy.

  18. But the DVD.. you owe it to yourself by Random_Goblin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Firefly is not a nerd-science sci-fi show, there is no techno babble, just really good scripting, and real characters.

    Don't go into it thinking its all about space ships, technobabble and special effects, its not.

    Its a set of really good stories,(think the good the bad and the ugly in space) told against a backdrop that happens to be sci-fi.

    In fact I think that is the mark of good sci-fi, (at least in print, most film adaptations suffer somewhat), the story is the important thing, the science part is just a way of looking at the human conditon through a different lens, and enabling new and interesting questions to be asked.

    I think it is probably the best science fiction series that has been aired on tv... which was probably why it was canned so quickly

  19. Re:Gimme a break... by neurojab · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >Criticism of the mix of high tech space stuff and low tech western stuff strikes me as silly..

    I agree. Think about it this way: Imagine if you were going to colonize another planet, that was earthlike in enviromnent. Which would you rather bring with you: A car, or a horse? A car requires a replenishable source of gasoline, a mechanic, new tires now and then, belts, hoses, wiring... a car is not viable outside a civilization that can support it. A horse, on the other hand, just needs some room to run and some plants to graze on. In the same token, would you rather have a knife or a laser pistol that runs on Duracells?

    I think Joss Wheadon was right on when he predicted that colonization would result in a return to older technologies... or at least not throwing away the tried and true.

  20. Re:Saw the Firefly episodes by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Insightful

    all the relationships are strained and uncooperative

    Ywah, that guy and his sister, what a strained and uncooperative relationship! Or the flirty thing he had with the mechanic! Whoa! Thalk about animosity there! Like cats and dogs!
    Oh! Or the preacher and the merc, training together, with the talking and joking around, boy, that was brutal! And that married couple? Now there's hate at its purest form! Or the captain and the mechanic, she loves her captain and he treats her like his daughter...I'm surprised they didn't kill each other in the first shows! Etc.
    Sheesh.

    Plus, you get the added bonus of knowing without a shadow of a doubt that they're never, ever going to kill off a character until they've run a few seasons

    When the show was cancelled, Inara had just told the captain she was leaving the ship...
    Whedon is the only writer out there not afraid to kill off his characters. Go troll some other thread now.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  21. Serenity Now! by TheMeddler · · Score: 4, Funny

    Serenity Now!

    --
    90% Professional Slacker