Slashdot Mirror


Road to the Robocup 2004

RuiFerreira writes "Artificial Intelligence and Robotics researchers meet in Portugal from 27th June to 5th July in the 8th Robocup Football World Championships. RoboCup is an international research and education initiative. Its goal is to foster artificial intelligence and robotics research by providing a standard problem where a wide range of technologies can be examined and integrated. The RoboCup Federation proposed the ultimate goal of the RoboCup Initiative to be stated as follows: 'By 2050, a team of fully autonomous humanoid robot soccer players shall win a soccer game, complying with the official FIFA rules, against the winner of the most recent World Cup of Human Soccer.' Robocup has an exciting programme including RoboCup Symposium, the RoboCup Soccer (humanoid, middle-size, small-size, 4-legged, simulation), the RoboCup Rescue (real and simulated robots) and the RoboCup Junior (dance, soccer and rescue) competitions. The robotic competitions will take place at Pavilion 4 of Lisbon Industry Fair located at the Parque das Nações, the site of the 1998 World Exposition (EXPO'98)."

15 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. pics & videos by rd4tech · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.robocup2004.pt/imgs/demos/segway-with-b all.jpg
    http://www.fair.or.jp/robocup/2004/photo. htm

  2. The end is near. by Chucklz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Skynet....

    The soccer team became self-aware at 6:21 pm. Slashdotters everywhere scared shitless. Knew the end was coming, but were more concerned about their kernels.

  3. robo rules 2004 by rd4tech · · Score: 4, Informative
  4. Two words... by Zorilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    Robo Hooligans

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  5. Beating human players... by DavidNWelton · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will they be allowed to use lasers? Is that against FIFA rules?

    I think the human players will win by rolling around the ground clutching their knees to draw penalty shots. A robot will never be able to do that convincingly.

    1. Re:Beating human players... by hkfczrqj · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think the human players will win by rolling around the ground clutching their knees to draw penalty shots.

      You're right, but robots can have ultra-sentitive detectors so when a player comes near, the robot mysteriously falls, rolls on the floor and some fake blood comes out of its structure.

      Also, robots can have more "eyes" than humans, so they can foul/spit/punch humans and be sure that no referee was watching.

  6. a GOAL! by jokach · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if the robots will run around taking off their shirts when they score a goal ...

  7. humanoid by InternationalCow · · Score: 4, Funny

    We'll know that they're really close to being like humans when they start asking ridiculous salaries, wear interesting hairdo's and date has-been pop stars :)

    --
    ----- One learns to itch where one can scratch.
    1. Re:humanoid by Zorilla · · Score: 5, Funny

      All they need is a Brazilian robot name....like Robaldo

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  8. Don't forget the simulation league. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the server for the simulation league. I helped code a team for one of my college classes; it was pathetic :). The University of Amsterdam Trilean team has won three years straight. You should check it out; their team kicks some serious ass. If you're interested in the simulation league, be sure to check out the publications by the Trilearn team. The Master's thesis especially is a must read for anyone attempting to write a client. Tons of information on everything from self-localization to optimal-pass-determination.

  9. if it's down to penalties it will be sooner ;-) by fantomas · · Score: 5, Funny

    By 2050, a team of fully autonomous humanoid robot soccer players shall win a soccer game..

    Well I think if it comes down to penalties against England, they might not have to wait until 2050... has Beckham's shot come out of orbit yet?

  10. Re:2050 way too soon by rebelcool · · Score: 3, Insightful

    robotics and classical AI, while related, have diverged alot in the past 20 years. The future of practical AI will probably be found in robotics.

    Classical AI has made little progress at all. Cyc is really a formal machine that is the epitome of classical AI, and all its bizarre limitations - and it doesn't do hardly anything. Autonomous robotics on the other has made leaps and bounds. If you think things like the QRIO and Asimo are impressive, wait till you see their platforms are merged with the latest navigation and communication abilities currently found in labs. Part of the point of the robocup is to show off the latest in teamwork abilities.

    2050 is a reasonable estimate and a decent goal. You don't need a robot that will debate the meaning of life and philosophy with you to play good soccer. I somehow doubt many of those soccer players could do that very well, either :)

    Consider how it wasn't all that long ago that assertions were being continously made that machines could never beat a human at chess...

    --

    -

  11. Re:2050 way too soon by Saeger · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think that robots winning against a human team will happen much much later than 2050.

    It's more a gut feeling than a "sicentific based" prediction

    Your "gut feeling" is more accurately described as the "common-sense intuitive linear" view of the rate of change, and it would be wrong.

    It took evolution 1 billion years to create animals that run around and "act smart".

    If you'd look a little closer, you'd notice that each evolutionary advancement took exponentially less time. Exponential progress is a feature of ANY evolutionary system, including technology.

    From the Law of Accelerating Returns:

    If we examine the timing of these steps, we see that the process has continuously accelerated. The evolution of life forms required billions of years for the first steps (e.g., primitive cells); later on progress accelerated. During the Cambrian explosion, major paradigm shifts took only tens of millions of years. Later on, Humanoids developed over a period of millions of years, and Homo sapiens over a period of only hundreds of thousands of years.

    With the advent of a technology-creating species, the exponential pace became too fast for evolution through DNA-guided protein synthesis and moved on to human-created technology. Technology goes beyond mere tool making; it is a process of creating ever more powerful technology using the tools from the previous round of innovation. In this way, human technology is distinguished from the tool making of other species. There is a record of each stage of technology, and each new stage of technology builds on the order of the previous stage.

    The first technological steps-sharp edges, fire, the wheel--took tens of thousands of years. For people living in this era, there was little noticeable technological change in even a thousand years. By 1000 A.D., progress was much faster and a paradigm shift required only a century or two. In the nineteenth century, we saw more technological change than in the nine centuries preceding it. Then in the first twenty years of the twentieth century, we saw more advancement than in all of the nineteenth century. Now, paradigm shifts occur in only a few years time. The World Wide Web did not exist in anything like its present form just a few years ago; it didn't exist at all a decade ago.

    Robotics is just one advancing tech we'll see on the shortening road to the Singularity.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  12. Re:Sounds easy. by Khazunga · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I could achieve that next time Euro comes around; just do what Portugal and Greece did this time. Bribing the referee is no longer against FIFA rules. :-)
    I can only answer with a "Daily Show" Whaaaa?

    Let's just say the backbone of the Portuguese national team are FC Porto players: Nuno Valente, Ricardo Carvalho, Jorge Andrade (former player), Paulo Ferreira, Costinha, Maniche and Deco. Finish up the Champions' League winner team with players the likes of Cristiano Ronaldo and Figo, and only ignorance could claim Portugal needs referee work to win against any Euro'2004 team. We did stumble the first time, because a naive Scolari thought he could rely on former glory players like Couto. No longer. He's on the right track, and now we're poised to be European Champions.

    --
    If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
  13. Re:Sounds easy. by Khazunga · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I also believe the disallowed goal, was the wrong decision,
    The keeper gets run over in his area, and it isn't foul? What kind of football do you play in England?
    --
    If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you