Slashdot Mirror


Smart Systems Threaten More Jobs Than Outsourcing

fbform writes "A strategy consulting firm called Strategy Analytics has announced that outsourcing to India and other countries is a small threat compared to having IT jobs replaced by 'smart systems'. Quote from a different news-source: 'higher value-added jobs - involving identification, assessment, conclusions, decisions, and recommendations - will continue to be lost to systems with increasingly intelligent capabilities'." Such as this one.

5 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. Maintenance? by simp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great. And who will keep these clever systems up and running 24h * 365days? And who will troubleshoot it when it malfunctions?

    The more complicated the systems are the more people are needed to keep it running.

  2. Hurry! by dignome · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's not too late to destroy the machines. I'm content with going back to the cave, who's with me!

  3. What they really mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look out for /etc/crontab

    It will take your job from you!

  4. hee, hee by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My first civilian job, I worked with a tech writer
    who would make technical illustrations by *manually*
    deleting centerlines and such from AutoCAD drawings
    before exporting the images. Said it was great
    mindless work to rest his brain.

    When I showed him how to turn off layers, his eyes
    got huge. "Don't tell anybody that! We'll lose our
    overtime!"

  5. Re:what to do? by mangu · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The chasm between the haves and have-nots will will widen.


    But even the life of the have-nots will be better. The poorest beggar in the world today is safe from smallpox, which even the richest people died from in the past. And even a refrigerator box is better than whatever shelter a beggar could get a hundred years ago.


    Do we become a socialist welfare state


    Something like that. What made communism inviable was the fact that wealth is finite. When productivity increases enough, people start giving things away. We get "free" email accounts with 100Mb capacity because the investment per account is just $0.10. Food productivity is so high that the goverment must buy and stock some farming products to raise the price.


    The future I see is one where few things will be valuable. Real estate is one of them. Corporations are trying to raise the value of intellectual property, but I think it's obvious they will fail in the long run. For a while, arts and sports will be valuable skills, until art becomes fully automated and anyone can become a super-athlete, thanks to medical progress. In the end, we will either have the ultimate communist state, where wealth is distributed evenly by law, or we will the ultimate feudalist state, where the only wealth is owning land, acquired by inheritance. But the poorest serf will have a much better standard of living than any of us has today.