Slashdot Mirror


DoJ - Making Data Public Would 'Crash System'

orthogonal writes "The Justice Department today denied Freedom of Information Act requests to make public data on foreign lobbyists, claiming that '[i]mplementing such a request risks a crash that cannot be fixed and could result in a major loss of data, which would be devastating'. The requestor responded that '[t]his was a new one on us. We weren't aware there were databases that could be destroyed just by copying them,' Bob Williams of the Center for Public Integrity said Tuesday. Maybe we should tell John Ashcroft about open source database and copying solutions?"

86 of 879 comments (clear)

  1. Ahhh... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 5, Funny

    And that's why you shouldn't use Access for your Enterprise Solutions.

    1. Re:Ahhh... by WarMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      or flat files manipulated by a Perl script. :)

      --
      -- I could tell right away that she was impressed with my HUGE Slashdot Karma.
    2. Re:Ahhh... by beacher · · Score: 4, Funny

      I heard it was one big Excel workbook with a tab for every SSN#.

    3. Re:Ahhh... by Prune · · Score: 2, Funny

      SSN#

      The N in SSN stands for number. The pound sign '#' also stands for number. Essentially, you wrote 'Social Security Number Number'.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    4. Re:Ahhh... by Niet3sche · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obligatory Simpsons quote follows:

      Mr. Burns: Lets see, social security number. Nought nought nought nought nought nought nought nought two. Damn Roosevelt!

    5. Re:Ahhh... by Mattintosh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow. They must not collect much data, then...

      Excel can only have 255 tabs per worksheet. Maybe they have a whole Access database full of Excel worksheets with 255 tabs each.

      Ow. That one made my head hurt.

    6. Re:Ahhh... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gentlemen, Gentlemen please!

      This is an MS Works project

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    7. Re:Ahhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      well everyone says atm machine... why no double everything...

    8. Re:Ahhh... by tunabomber · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, c'mon. If our government can build cruise missiles that can reliably fly through the goalposts of a football field after being launched from hundreds of miles away, I don't think they'd be using Bronze age technology for storing our vital public records.
      I'm sure that they designed a new high-density storage medium that encodes bits of information as the polarizations of photons bouncing around in nanoscale optical cavities.
      After storing all that data, the government realized that thanks to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, if we now attempt to read the information, we will destroy its quantum state, thus destroying the data in the process.
      I'm sure that's it- they're just dumbing down the details so that us SlashDotters can understand it... *snicker*

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    9. Re:Ahhh... by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

      I heard it was one huge tank full of colored, irregularly shaped rocks tied to notes. You just tell the tank's dolphin to pick up the teal-tinted green-sparkling mauve rock shaped like a triangle with a hook at one end, and you've got the record for AIPAC's 4813rd lobbyist to enter the US.... ... Whoops, my mistake. I just checked it out, and I was confusing the DoJ's lobbying database system with the Pentagon's accounting system. Sorry!

      --
      I'm an owl exterminator!
    10. Re:Ahhh... by Brandybuck · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's still a darn sight better than http colon slash slash slash dot dot org...

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
    11. Re:Ahhh... by terrymr · · Score: 3, Funny

      I prefer SSN# Number

    12. Re:Ahhh... by tunabomber · · Score: 4, Funny

      A redundant acronym on Slashdot?! Well I never! I can hardly believe my LCD display!

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    13. Re:Ahhh... by f00zy · · Score: 2, Funny

      that's BS. everyone knows a CSV would use much less disk space.

    14. Re:Ahhh... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, he wrote "Social Security Number Hash," which is exactly the data structure *I* would use to organize them.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    15. Re:Ahhh... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 5, Funny

      thanks to Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle

      We can't know what the data is because somebody wanted to know how fast they were entering it?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    16. Re:Ahhh... by another_henry · · Score: 4, Funny
      He must work for the Department of Redundancy Department.

      Anyway, I'm off to use the ATM machine.. if only I can remember my PIN number.

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    17. Re:Ahhh... by Bull999999 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I believe that would be "Social Security Number Sharp".

      --
      1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
    18. Re:Ahhh... by radd0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now wait a second! ...When did they upgrade from FoxPro?

    19. Re:Ahhh... by Jodka · · Score: 4, Funny

      "if only I can remember my PIN number"

      A "PI number" would be even more difficult to remember.

      So I think "PIN number" is more rational.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    20. Re:Ahhh... by Eccles · · Score: 2, Funny

      He must work for the Department of Redundancy Department.

      Which one?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    21. Re:Ahhh... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Funny

      True story: I once worked for a guy who wanted me to convert a fairly large Access database into an Excel file because he thought it would be easier for him to work with. Luckily, I was able to convince him that would not be the case and that he would lose a lot of querying functionality, so he ditched the idea.

    22. Re:Ahhh... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Funny

      I believe that would be "Social Security Number Sharp".

      This raises the question 'what would SSN flat sound like? Maybe SSM#?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    23. Re:Ahhh... by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least it isn't http colon backslash backslash slash dot dot org.

    24. Re:Ahhh... by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Funny
      You have a long way to go.


      Nonsense! Memorizing all the digits in Pi is easy. From memory, here they are: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    25. Re:Ahhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I prefer that too. Do you like those little dogs with the flat faces? I do.

    26. Re:Ahhh... by fireman+sam · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or, if you were giving directions to slashdot for a complete novice:

      http shift colon, no hold down shift and press the button with the two dots one on top of the other, good. forward slash, no that is back slash, yes, that's it, and another one, yes a forward slash. Now type slashot, no don't press slash then dot, type the words in. yeah, s l a s h, d o t. now press full stop. and type o r g. Now press the enter key.

      error: http;\\slash.dot.org not found

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    27. Re:Ahhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You pick him up on Fujiyama, and then let "shitake" pass without comment? Please try to be more consistent in your pedantry!

  2. Well, we could... by th1ckasabr1ck · · Score: 4, Funny
    Maybe we should tell John Ashcroft about open source database and copying solutions?"

    Well we could, but then he would have to come up with ANOTHER bogus reason. Cut him some slack, the man works hard enough as it is.

    1. Re:Well, we could... by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > In other news this evening, internet discussion forum Slashdot.org personality CowboyNeal presented a petition in Washington, D.C. in which 10,000 database professionals demanded polygraph tests for Attorney General John Ashcroft."

      Dude. Read between the liens. Ashcroft knows that making data on foreign lobbyists would result in a YRO Slashdot article on the front page, with predictable results for the poor server on the other end of the line.

      We just pwn3d the entire USDOJ today, without firing a single HTTP GET. And Ashcroft just humbled himself - in public - before our mighty geekness.

      Now you want polygraph tests? Dude, it's over. We won.

      A couple thousand "WE PWN3D J00!" and "ALL YOUR DOJ ARE BELONG TO SLASHDOT" would have sufficed. No need to rub it in. Let's be sporting about this and gracious in our victory.

    2. Re:Well, we could... by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Funny

      What kind of evidence is that? And who are we wanting to impeach ashcroft or bush?

      Hell it doesn't matter, someone pass me a torch. Ohhh wait that a lynching.. someone give me a petition or somethign.

    3. Re:Well, we could... by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

      You don't need to impeach him; you just need to stop DC supermarkers from stocking cooking oil around his next swearing in ceremony. As we all know, Ashcroft is such a religious nutcase that he literally has himself annointed with oil, he'd never get sworn in, and we'd be rid of him once and for all.

      Hmm.... but then who would spend 8,000$ on drapes to cover up naked statues, run scared from Calico cats, try and stop states from implementing their voter-approved euthenasia laws, or crack down on elderly pot smokers? Do we really want him gone? :)

      --
      I'm an owl exterminator!
    4. Re:Well, we could... by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Funny

      He could just give the memos to Laura Bush. Then they could disappear, and mysteriously reappear in the living quarters of the White House in a few years...

      --
      resigned
    5. Re:Well, we could... by khallow · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hell it doesn't matter, someone pass me a torch.

      It depends. If you string them up, it's a lynching. If you burn them at the stake, then it's a witchhunt.

    6. Re:Well, we could... by statusbar · · Score: 2, Funny

      The fetus is a potential soldier to be drafted into the war on terrorism. In that respect it is worth quite a lot. It will be unwanted and uneducated and will be happy to be in the army.

      --jeff++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    7. Re:Well, we could... by Rasputin · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...the man works hard enough as it is.

      Yes! There are a hundreds of semi-naked statues out there he hasn't yet covered!

      "Curtains for semi-nude justice statue"

      --
      "I once preached peaceful coexistence with Windows. You may laugh at my expense - I deserve it." Be's Jean-Louis Gass
    8. Re:Well, we could... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Funny

      What if you hang them from a tree and light a fire underneath?

  3. A New Low by JaxGator75 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Must... Resist... Urge... to Kill...

    In other news, I won't be paying my taxes this year as I firmly believe the influx of cash will "Break the Bank".

    --
    Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
  4. Beam Me Up by the0ther · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously. If this is where we've arrived, where public officials try such a blatant lie...their incompetence is unmeasurable! Please, please, won't the aliens take me home?!?

  5. Re:Backups by strictnein · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess we just have to hope (or not) that their computers or hard drives never fail.

    Don't worry, I'm sure they're using a RAID 0 setup.

  6. Re:Backups by hazem · · Score: 4, Funny

    That explains everything... Clearly, they are using a quantum-based computer. If you try to read the data to copy it, it gets changed. Can't fault them for trying to use the newest technology, I suppose.

  7. Already suffered "major loss of data" by hoggoth · · Score: 5, Funny

    What this REALLY means is that they have already suffered a "major loss of data" but never made any backups and have been trying to hide the fact that the database has been GONE for weeks, months, or even years under grade school-level excuses.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:Already suffered "major loss of data" by llefler · · Score: 2, Funny

      What this REALLY means is that they have already suffered a "major loss of data"

      Graduates of the Richard Nixon School of Data Integrity.

      --
      It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  8. Maybe they're telling the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    afterall, they might be using Access.

  9. Take a page from adult websites by maddugan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am sure there are pr0n websites with backend databases more relieable than what the government is using.

    1. Re:Take a page from adult websites by base3 · · Score: 2, Funny
      backend databases

      No pun intended, I'm sure.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    2. Re:Take a page from adult websites by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      That only stands to reason. If you're in porn, you're going to have a well-exercised (and therefore highly stress-tested) back end.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. Re:Backups by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

    That explains everything... Clearly, they are using a quantum-based computer. If you try to read the data to copy it, it gets changed. Can't fault them for trying to use the newest technology, I suppose.

    Yes, it's the all-new Heisenberg Data Store 2000 from Uncertain Storage Inc.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  11. Re:This database will self-destruct... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quick! Toss it in the trash can where Chief is!

  12. Plausible deniability by blair1q · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ashcroft is saying he doesn't know how without opening up the computer and copying it all using pencil and paper.

  13. In related news by Big+Nothing · · Score: 3, Funny

    This warning just in from John Ashcroft:

    "Whatever you do, do not vote for Senator John Kerry in the upcoming presidential election. Implementing such a vote risks a crash that cannot be fixed and could result in a major loss of data, which would be devastating."

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    1. Re:In related news by jlaxson · · Score: 2, Funny

      You know, with touch-screen voting, that's not as +1, Funny as it was intended to be.

      --
      On Apple Input Peripherals: They're okay, I guess, but I was really hoping for a one-key keyboard and a 109-button mouse
  14. Re:Backups by orthogonal · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hmm, so I guess they don't keep backups of their own data, if making copies of it would cause the data to be lost. I guess we just have to hope (or not) that their computers or hard drives never fail.

    There's a back-up bit on each suspect's Department of Justice file. If the backup bit is set (value = 1) for a particular file, it's backed-up, if it's not set (value = 0), then to save space no backups are made of that particular file.

    In order to economize even more on space and save government money on the database, in a brilliant bit of design, the backup bit was combined with the bad party affiliation bit: the bad party affiliation bit is unset (value = 0) for Republicans, and set (value = 1) for all other parties.

    Without backups, of course, some files are irretrievably lost, and the suspects are never prosecuted. It's mere chance that most of those are Republicans.

  15. Not very original by Zygote-IC- · · Score: 2, Funny

    In my IT job I use the, "Sure, I could do that, but it would blow up the entire system," all the time.

    Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go back to the important work playing City of Heroes.

  16. Re:Backups by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not affiliated with Schroedinger's Ledger Service. Motto: "In the Black or in the Red, we'll all find out if the cat's dead!"

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  17. The Patriot Act by The_Real_Nire · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe we should tell John Ashcroft about open source database and copying solutions?"

    With the Patriot Act in effect, and all of your lines tapped, I'd say John Ashcroft already knows.

  18. The RIAA is making inroads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps the DoJ is using a database that only allows a limited number of copies before it determines that the user is a copyright abuser and self-destructs.

  19. Why even make up excuses like this? by FauxReal · · Score: 2, Funny

    They might as well cut to the chase and just destroy the data... But then again, they'd lose track of all the favors they need to hand out after the elections. I guess they can wait till (hopefully) some court forces them to share the information. Then they can use that "The data was destroyed" excuse.

  20. Maybe they tell the truth? by t_allardyce · · Score: 3, Funny

    What they mean is their database runs on "EasyDB123 Trial Version" and they cant give more than 10 queries per day or they will be forced to upgrade.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  21. Re:Backups by Jason+Earl · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, their computers are even more high tech than that. They are using Infinite Improbability Computers. No matter what data you put in all you get out are invoices for $200 hammers.

  22. Re:Ashcroft is a Nazi by Starji · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll probably be labeled as a terrorist for this post

    No, you'll be labeled "informative" :-P

  23. Re:Backups by uberfruk · · Score: 1, Funny

    Don't worry, I'm sure they're using a RAID 0 setup.

    I'd bet they're using 0 RAID

  24. There Is No Spoon by notcreative · · Score: 4, Funny


    DEEP VOICE: Unfortunately, no one can be -told- what the data on contributions from foreign lobbyists is. You have to see it for yourself. This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back.
    (shows a blue pill.)
    You take the blue pill and the story ends. You wake in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe about the FOIA.
    (a red pill is shown in his other hand)
    You take the red pill and you stay in Wonderland and I show you how fucked up the DOJ really is.
    (you begin to reach for the red pill) Remember -- all I am offering is the truth, nothing more.

  25. Re:Ashcroft is a Nazi by flacco · · Score: 2, Funny
    Fuck Ashcroft. Fuck him up the ass.

    NOW it makes sense. i thought he annointed himself with oil before his swearing-in for *religious* reasons...

    (no, seriously, this jesus-psycho actually annointed himself with oil.)

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  26. Re:This deserves a prize! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This paces the Justice Department on par with Muhammed Saeed al-Sahaf

    I'd go even further, I won't be surpised to see this one turn up in the next court filing by SCO. "Your honor, we have mountains of evidence showing millions of lines stolen by IBM and inserted into Linux, but we can't show you any of it for fear of destroying our computers"

  27. Which would be devastating? by alw53 · · Score: 2, Funny



    What a coincidence! My financial information is stored in the same kind of database, so I cannot risk giving a copy of it to the IRS.

  28. Re:Backups by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ever notice how a joke just isn't as funny anymore when someone explains it? Even when the explainer completely missed the joke to begin with?

    Not that that has any bearing on the current situation or anything.

  29. Re:Backups by Bishop923 · · Score: 4, Funny

    When is the election in the US finished?


    Depends on wether or not Florida has it's shit together this time.

  30. Re:Not being able to copy? by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Never back up? Never read the data? Never actually use the data?

    What can you DO with the data?

    Can we file an FOA request for material that states how this is actually used? Or will this be declined because "Said documents are stored in special formats which do not allow their export beyond the system, and said printers use ink made from phosphorus ensuring that the papers ignite when read?"

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  31. Taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...such a request risks a crash that cannot be fixed and could result in a major loss of data, which would be devastating"

    Dear IRS:

    Thank you for the kind note reminding us about payroll tax withholdings (yes, we do remember that the S in IRS stands for 'service' though the little pamplet you sent about all that was appreciated).

    Regarding the issue of us not submitting any payroll tax payments, well, you see our database gurus got together and discovered that the process of running such reports through our employee database actually risks a crash that cannot be fixed and could result in a major loss of data which would be devestating.

    I'm sure you'll appreciate this difficulty (if not, please contact the Justice Department and they can fill you in on the details). I'm sure there's enough other taxpayers to chase that the loss of our money is of no significant matter.

    Good luck with your own database issues, by the way. I see you too have your hands full - apparently several billion dollars spent upgrading things didn't work after all. If I were you, I'd stop sending out those tax deliquency messages or else you too could be affected by these nasty database crash problems!

  32. Quick, someone notify the RIAA by Derekloffin · · Score: 5, Funny

    And the MPAA for that matter. The Government has found a truly uncopyable storage media and I'm certain both of these organizations will be overjoyed to put it to good use.

  33. Re:As usual by llefler · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not the number of records that is the problem. It's the fact that they are on punched cards in the basement....

    We laugh at your puny drive failures.

    No smoking please.

    --
    It is amazing what you can accomplish if you do not care who gets the credit. -- Harry Truman
  34. Backup Excuse #2 by serutan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Overloading the DOJ servers at this crucial time during the War on Terror could bring critical network communications to a halt, making America vulnerable to terrorist activity.

    To justify anything nowadays you have to use the "t" word.

  35. Not quite true. by TahitiNut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Officials subject to Constitutional Advise and Consent are impeachable. However, as we know, getting a blow job and not sharing is the only impeachable offense currently recognized by the Greedy Old Perverts.

  36. Re:Ashcroft is a Nazi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll probably be labeled as a terrorist for this post, and summarily arrested and imprisoned without a trail

    Would you be so kind and give us, Mr. 99, your name and address? We have some problems to track your real irentity...

    Sincerely,
    Ashcroft

  37. See? Code is Free Speech! by e.m.rainey · · Score: 5, Funny
    /* politcal-pseudeo-C */
    int ashcroft_test()
    {
    int error = ERROR_NONE;
    char *quote = "[i]mplementing such a request risks a crash that cannot " \
    "be fixed and could result in a major loss of data, which would be devastating";

    if (isTellingTruth(quote) == TRUE)
    {
    if (ashcroft.budget < ashcroft.expectedBudget)
    {
    ashcroft.requestLargerBudget();
    error = ERROR_BIG_GOVERNMENT;
    }
    else if (ashcroft.StaffIQ < IQ_SEA_TURTLE)
    {
    ashcroft.admitIncompetence();
    error = ERROR_INCOMPETENT_GOVERMENT;
    }
    else
    { /* developer note: I could never get
    * this condition to activate in
    * testing... oh well. */
    error = ERROR_UNKNOWN;
    }
    }
    else // less than honest answer
    {
    if (isTooDifficult(quote) == FALSE)
    {
    ashcroft.takeVacation();
    error = ERROR_LAZY_GOVERNMENT;
    }
    else if (dislikeFOIA(ashcroft) == TRUE)
    {
    ashcroft.evadeFOIA();
    error = ERROR_CLOSED_GOVERNMENT;
    }
    else
    { // some sinister plot I'm sure!
    crackpots.startDreaming();
    error = ERROR_UNKNOWN;
    }
    }
    return error;
    }
    --
    The next remark is false. The previous remark is true.
  38. Quantum computing? by Lonath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe they're quantum databases containing all possible information, and actually looking at them to copy them would collapse the possibilities into only one state.

  39. NO FUN by quantaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    I mean co'mon, it used to be you took at least ten seconds to figgure out exactly how the government was BS'ing you, they're not even trying anymore!!

    --
    I stole this Sig
  40. MOD PARENT UP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... and then down. And then up a couple of times, then down one more by a stickler for on-topic posts. Then down to zero by one pissed off moderator using all his points at once. Slowly climb back to +3. Down again. Up again. Down. Up. Down. Finally, when the story is 13 days old and the editors have already posted a couple of duplicates, sneak in and mod it up to +5, Insightful.

    Hey, if they won't give me mod points, I can at least be a Back Seat Moderator!

  41. Coming::Back!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Rumor has it executives from Digital::Convergence have been meeting with Bush administration officials. Could a proposal to re-activate the 'Cat' as a mechanism for tracking every taxpayer be in the works? Imagine a government and big business ploy to track every consumer/taxpayer with a barcode on their physical person!

    Certainly barcoding each tax return would be nonunique; with a social security number uniquely identifying a filer. Could a more intrusive human barcode be in the works? In 1999, the USPTO issued a patent for an invisible human barcode. Armed with millions of CueCats, tax men and merchants worldwide could track the movement of money (and people!).

    According to MoveOn.org (and posts on AlGoreDemocrats.org), Michael Moore has been circulating a draft of a script to follow Sicko (currently in the works about the US medical system) called 'Beep This' which exposes the Bush administration's bar code plans with Digital Convergence. Rumor has it part of Microsoft's DoJ settlement with the Clinton Justice Dept. involved Microsoft's endorsement of bar coding plans already under consideration. Of course, Kerry's big business connections (including campaign contributions from major chinese barcode manufacturers) doesn't look good either.

  42. Good for IRS audits by hikerhat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't show the IRS my records, because they'll vanish if I access them. But trust me, I've paid all my taxes.

  43. Think I heard about that by smchris · · Score: 2, Funny

    Must have a hair trigger on that database. I hear that can blow enough sectors out of a cylinder to take down a domain at full gallop.

  44. awww, come on, you've seen it in the movies by dekeji · · Score: 2, Funny

    The hero or villain (as the case may be) pulls too much data out of the computer system too fast and soon sparks fly and the whole thing goes up in smoke. This kind of "system overload" is going to be a real problem with computers 10-20 years down the line, as Hollywood has shown us. The computers at the DOJ are just a little ahead of their time.

  45. Re:Never could avoid a good flame war.. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 3, Funny

    The soul gets installed after it's downloaded but before it's executed. If it comes as source code, it must also be compiled, usually with a "make" script (R-rated).

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  46. What would SSN flat sound like? Maybe SSM#? by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 2, Funny

    A flat SSN does not make sounds. In the way of becoming flat though because of the pressure exerted by water at these depths, a submarine makes sounds.

    I guess like a coke can, just lasting longer.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  47. With apologies to Futurama ... by RPoet · · Score: 2, Funny

    Said Ashcroft, "I don't pretend to understand Ashcroft's Law, I merely enforce it."

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.