Slashdot Mirror


Lysergically Yours

scsiiscs writes "I have just had the pleasure of reading Lysergically Yours, the first offering from author Frank Duff. As the chemically aware among you may have guessed from the title, this is a novel which deals in part with the synthesis of and culture surrounding LSD. It is much more than just a drug book though, and what's better, it has been released under a Creative Commons license. " Read on for the rest of his review. Lysergically Yours author Frank Duff pages 120 publisher Insurgent Productions/No Media Kings rating Excellent (10) reviewer Ben Konrath ISBN 097348070X summary Clandestine chemists accidentally open the doorway into new modes of human consciousness.

April 16th, 1945: Dr. Albert Hoffman's work on obstetrics pharmacology at Sandoz Laboratories is unexpectedly interrupted by a "stream of fantastic pictures and extraordinary shapes with intense, kaleidoscopic play of colors."[1]

The following weeks saw Dr. Hoffman and his colleagues perform a series of self-experimentations which led to the discovery of the psychotropic effects of D-lysergic acid diethylamide 25, the most potent hallucinogen yet discovered -- and better known as LSD. The doors were suddenly flung open for a new age of exploration into the human mind. Government sanctions however quickly put an end to this line of research. Lysergically Yours, the first novel from Toronto-based author Duff supposes that this research program is still going strong, but not in the places one may traditionally think to look for it.

The reader is first introduced to Johnny, a computer science student at the University of Toronto and one-time high school acid dealer. It is through the lens of Johnny that the reader meets the book's delightfully diverse cast of supporting characters. From Lyle the punk-rock chemist to Tinka the manic witch and surprisingly affable career criminal Ivan, Duff continuously delivers with characters that you almost expect to run into the next time you're on campus despite the fact that they are so eccentric as to verge on unbelievable. As a former University of Toronto student myself, I must admit that the setting of the book was also wonderfully realized. From Convocation Hall to Lash Miller Chemical Laboratories to the basement of Hart House, Lysergically Yours romps across the university and the city bringing to life each locale that it touches.

The story itself is somewhat hard to classify. The opening throws Johnny and the reader into a very tense scene in which Johnny is the prisoner of Korean and Vietnamese mobsters and the building in which he is being held is being assaulted from outside by unknown forces. From this action-movie introduction, the story flashes back and begins to relate a decidedly non-action-movie drug culture caper story wherein Lyle and Johnny attempt to fund illegal research and a hedonistic lifestyle through the synthesis and sale of LSD. By the end however, as Johnny and Lyle find themselves deeper and deeper in trouble, the plot of Lysergically Yours verges strongly on the science fictional, yet Duff manages to wrap it all up into a bundle which leaves the reader feeling both entertained and satisfied.

At times the discussion of the technical details of drug synthesis and of various less than legal money-making schemes seem unnecessarily verbose, but perhaps they will be appreciated by those who are more familiar with the fields or even looking for a few pointers. In general however, Duff's prose is poetic in its spareness and simplicity. His dialogue also is unflowery and believable, conveying a real sense of character and situation. Even the far-sweeping conclusion of the novel, suggesting a world forever and fundamentally changed by the actions of a couple of punk rockers, is presented in a crisp and unapologetic style. As a reader, I could not help but be reminded of Neal Stephenson and, to a certain extent, Philip K. Dick.

My largest complaint with Lysergically Yours is that it is too short. Weighing in at 120 pages, the book is an easy read but leaves you feeling that it could have easily been expanded to fill twice as many. Still, in a time when most books seem to be guilty of the opposite sin, I am willing to forgive Frank Duff this indiscretion.

Another thing which makes this novel worth noticing is that it is released in affiliation with No Media Kings, an organization started by Toronto-based author Jim Munroe to promote a return to grass-roots media. In accordance with this "media of the people, by the people and for the people" ethos, Frank Duff has released the novel as a free e-text under the Creative Commons Attribution/Non-Commercial/Share-Alike license. This license not only allows the text of the novel to be freely distributed in any medium, but also explicitly allows for anyone to create derivative works from the novel for any non-commercial purpose. The use of this contract follows in the footsteps of successful science fiction author Cory Doctorow. The book is available as a physical artifact at a variety of small bookstores or directly from the author via his website where the e-book and several of his other shorter works are also available for free download.

[1] Hoffman, A. (1980) "LSD: My Problem Child," New York: McGraw-Hill.

Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, carefully read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

22 of 486 comments (clear)

  1. More information... by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Very interesting to see this on slashdot.

    Lysergically Yours is a good book, but is nothing compared to some of the other books available out there.


    I would suggest TIHKAL and PIHKAL by Alexander and Ann Shulgin

    That is, if you're interested in the chemistry... but for more casual psychonaughts, I would explore Erowid for information.

    The best part both TIHKAL and PIHKAL's more interesting and (knowledgable) parts are available for FREE online via those two links. Have fun, and remember, psychoactives can be a valuable learning experience but to anything good there's equal if not more bad. Read everything with logic and don't go and turn out like Huxley.

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    1. Re:More information... by TheCarp · · Score: 5, Informative

      I wholeheartedly agree that these are great books, and I think that before anyone forms an opinion about people who use psychedelics based on those idiot kids that eat too much E and go to parties and get themselves in trouble, that they should read these books.

      The portions that are available for free, while wonderful for their own reasons, pale in comparison to the first half of the books. That is the story.

      These books are the "true story" (names changes etc in an attempt to avoid prosecution which worked well enough to keep the shulgins free, but not enough to save Sasha's Schedule 1 chemicals license as the opening of tihkal tells) of a chemist and psycopharmacologist.

      This man has invented drugs that later hit the street. He is so well respected in the community, that his job is a consultant. The DEA often brings him in to testify as an expert witness on chemistry and drugs. He is the real deal.

      More than that he is personally amazing. I saw him speak at MIT last year, and for an 80 year old man (or just about hes what 79 or so?) he is vibrant and totally with it. If I am half as with it as he is when I am 70, I will be thankful for how I ended up.

      Not exactly what many people would expect from a person who has had the experiences he has.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:More information... by daveashcroft · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, certain psychadelic drugs allow complete ego loss. Whereas recreational use may not be the best, if a person with deep-seated emotional problems can be taken by a trusted professional (ie psychiatrist) into a state of ego-loss and therefore allow themselves to see their "problem" from a different angle, as an outsider...then this can be very useful.

      Until the early 70's, LSD was used VERY succesfully in many cases in the treatment of alcoholism. "Clarity of mind" is an often overused statement, but for some people who's whole *normal* life revolved around wanting to satiate a craving for alcohol, limited and controlled LSD use could help them see what they were doing to themselves from another persons perspective.

      LSD was also succesfully used (as MDMA is now beginning to be tested) as a treatment for rape victims. Temporarily dissociating the victim from the experience and the emotion of what had happened to them allowed them to asses the situation and separate the act of violence from the emotional scar.

      Im not saying we should have a free-for-all, but i think its a damn shame that trained and trusted professionals are now banned in most of the world (by UN directive) from developing alreayd proven treatments for debilitating emotional disorders.

  2. LSD in my hometown by Nos. · · Score: 2, Informative
    Most of the early research on LSD was conducted in my hometown of Weyburn (before I was born).
  3. How about some non-fiction, from the source? by BadDoggie · · Score: 5, Informative
    Try Albert Hofmann's own book, LSD - My Problem Child, which has been available on the Web -- for free -- for about a decade already. It's also available here as a single text file.

    Much more interesting, exciting and enlightening.

  4. PDF Version by siliconjunkie · · Score: 2, Informative

    I made a quick and dirty PDF (with the cover art) for those of you who aren't into reading flat text files (i prefer PDF's myself).

    http://www3.telus.net/public/gsell/ly/

    1. Re:PDF Version by siliconjunkie · · Score: 2, Informative
  5. Re:Ah, LSD by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Informative

    P.S. Since I advocated the use LSD or shrooms, please note: Never, ever, ever, ever take it alone and if you have never taken it, take it with some one who has. If you don't follow those rules, you will have a bad time. Guaranteed.

  6. Re:Ah, LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    (Having to post anonymously because of the fear of company anti-drug policy sucks)

    LSD certainly helped me out immensely. I used to be very shy and pretty antisocial. This is hard to explain but when I first did acid, I was able to have two very distinct tracks of thought one which was me interacting with people, and the other which was me observing myself interacting with people. I saw that what I had always thought of as people being antisocial toward me, was an illusion. These people behaved the same way toward me as they did everyone else... it was me who was being antisocial.

    After that trip I was able to change the way I reacted to people, and finally have normal relationships with the people around me.

    I've done LSD a few times since then, and have never had a bad trip, or any sort of flashbacks.

  7. Re:Ah, LSD by TwinGears · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's been years but I would have to agree with you. Nothing better than a good head trip to clean the cobwebs in the brain.
    Flashback is a foolish term for that which will never happen. There are those that haven't a clue how memory functions...some of them work for M$. Thus the problem continues...

    --
    The immature mind measures.
  8. Re:Ah, LSD by ktulu1115 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Very good advice but I'll take it a step further - Read the FAQ before you do. It will make the experience infinitely better, and if you follow it very closely your chances of having a bad trip will be next to none.

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  9. Re:alternative medicine by cubic6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did you actually read the page you linked to? They drank water with LSD dissolved in it, then smoked the "banana joints". Wonder which one caused the psychadelic experiences?

    --
    Karma: Contrapositive
  10. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by ktulu1115 · · Score: 4, Informative

    All of your questions (and more) can be answered right here. But I'll answer these ones directly:

    -Getting the real thing? Only an issue if you choose to do shrooms, potency varies *greatly* between patches. LSD is always returns consistant results. On the other hand, the fungus gets you about 6 hours total, while acid is 12.

    -Music/environment/people? Tough one. Complex subject. I personally like the following: Pink Floyd/outside in the woods (no one else around plus nature is a great setting)/1-2 other people max who are tripping with me as well

    -Things going bad? Always remember you have complete control of the situation. At times you might lose yourself (you will if it's a good/strong enough trip) but keep in mind you can change the way the trip is going at any time. If you feel funny and don't like something almost guaranteed one of three things will change it: Change the music, change the lighting, or go to the bathroom.

    Since you mentioned you have smoked before, I highly recommend doing so right after popping whatever substance you choose. It will make the voyage from reality much smoother and not quite as abrupt. It sorta smacks you hard and fast if you do it sober.

    Only other advice I can give is: "relax, don't panic and enjoy it". Try to take your mind off of what you just did after you eat them so you're not thinking about it all the time. I like to take my watch off and if you're out in nature, take a walk somewhere that will last at least 30 mins, preferably an hour (you'll start to feel it definately by then).

    --
    # fuser -v /dev/attention | grep work
    #
  11. Re:LSD vs. Lucid Dreaming by simetra · · Score: 2, Informative
    I used to take LSD but haven't in many years. I have been Lucid Dreaming quite a bit in the last few years. They're nothing alike.

    Lucid Dreaming is just knowing that you're in a dream, and doing whatever you want. You know it's a dream, you know there are no consequences. It's like playing a video game. You can stop playing and go about your life.

    LSD completely alters your perceptions and how you think - or how you interpret your thought. You're committed to the experience. You can't just walk out.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  12. Re:Fear of mind altering drugs. by davidkv · · Score: 2, Informative

    The LSD-Strychnine-thingie is a myth. As long as you go with blotter acid (LSD on a small sheet of paper), you can be quite sure it's not strychnine.

    Here are some links on this:
    Shulgin
    Strychnine in LSD

    Or just go to Erowid and search for Strychnine.

  13. Re:What a shame... by Grond · · Score: 3, Informative
    Oh, and shame on the US for not approving hydergine for use. It's one of the safest drugs there is, and useful to most anyone. Unfortunately, like many good drugs, the patents are owned by non-US companies, so no US company stands to profit, and so the FDA doesn't approve it. If it were the case that nootropics weren't useful, then Nobel laureate Eric Kandel wouldn't have announced devoting the remainder of his career to creating them.


    I don't know if you're misinformed or just didn't check your sources (I would certainly hesitate to claim that you're lying outright), but hydergine is most defninitely approved for use in the US. Furthermore, while the company that makes it (Novartis) is primarily a Swiss company born out of the merger of Ciba and Sandoz (the company Hoffman was working for), I imagine any patents they had on the stuff have long since run out as it was discovered in the late 1940s.

    My sources:
    FDA approval
    Discovery date
  14. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 4, Informative


    That's interesting considering it's physically impossible to be allergic to marijuana

    Why is it impossible? Allergies are not caused by ANY danger in the allergen itself. Allergies are caused by your own body's immune system falsely labeling a particular thing as being dangerous when it really isn't. All the symptoms of an allergy are the same as the symptoms of a cold or flu bug - extra mucus production, coughing, raised temperatures, nausea, swelling etc - are all actually being caused by your OWN body. Those reactions are ways you fight off the foreign intruder. Your body chooses to raise the temperature, because your body is better able to survive the ordeal of being too hot than a lot of foriegn microbes are. Your body chooses to produce extra mucus, to trap the microbes at the source and keep them from passing into the lungs. Your body initiates nausea to try to expell the bad microbes from your stomach. etc, etc etc. All an allergy is, is your own body choosing to kick in those reactions in response to something that wasn't actually a threat after all, but it has a bad pattern-recognition that has "learned" incorrectly that a particular thing is bad for you, and that mistake is now stuck in your system and it won't undo it.

    So, sure, someone could be allergic to marijuana. People can be allergic to just about *anything* that enters the body through the air. Anything that gives off fumes, dust, or particles. This says nothing about the danger of the actual thing in question - just about the relative stupidity of the human immune system.

    The reason it's so hard to find ways to cure an allergy is that the cure is to alter your immune system, telling it, "Please cross off Foo from your list of big bad dangerous things you like to fight against. It was added by mistake." And we haven't found a way to do that without also crossing off *other* things from that list - things that it would be dangerous to cross off, like "the common cold".

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  15. LSD for programmers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Informative

    The best book I've read about LSD was one of the first published: John C. Lilly's Programming and Metaprogramming in the Human Biocomputer. Lilly invented the isolation tank (known from the amusing, but fictional, Frankenstein movie _Altered States_), and wrote Meta/Programming while one of the USA's foremost clinical psychoanalysts, a study for the NIMH just prior to the political outlawing of legitimate LSD research. In it, Lilly totally nails LSD's role as noise in the neurotransmission system, incidentally offering seminal insight into the nascent field of cybernetics (when the most advanced computers were dumber than your watch). And it's a really short book, without all the fancy indulgence in sensory hallucinations and utopian speculation so common in the field.

    Try reading it - you might learn more not only about your self, but about your computer, and how similar you might one day become.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  16. re: book. 5/10 by Rage+Maxis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Okay, I read the book (it only took an hour or less). I lived in the neighborhood the story describes for several years and am dating a korean girl. This made it a bit more interesting at first.

    This should have been 3 times as long. The plot is barely coherent at times, although the critical events are covered it is not as verbose as one might have liked. The characters are barely developed -- they are introduced and disappear.

    I found it to be more like a side-story xfiles episode, only with about 30 minutes of content. When I read a book I expect at least a 3 hour movie of development and content.

    5/10.

    ragemaxis

    --
    --- ask me about nihilism, I will have nothing to tell you.
  17. HPPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As a warning to anyone here who might be considering trying any psychedelic drugs, I'd like to mention HPPD, or Hallucinogen Persisting Perception Disorder. It's a disorder with unknown causes, but is generally linked to the use of psychedelic drugs, LSD most strongly. Without describing it in too great detail, victims of the disease basically live out their lives without their "trip" ever ending; in the worst cases, the psychedelic effects one experienced while using the drug never cease.

  18. Re:Slashdot and Drugs? by shostiru · · Score: 2, Informative
    There's more than one "drug culture". You and I may associate (or refuse to associate) with different crowds of stoners and psychedelic enthusiasts. Although there are exceptions, those I spend time with tend to be:
    • Intelligent and able to think logically and speak coherently. Obviously, this doesn't apply while intoxicated, but then I'm sure even Nobel Prize winners can turn into idiots when they're overindulged, and none of us have won a Nobel Prize yet.
    • Clean and well-groomed. Backwoods camping doesn't count (I'd like to see how you look after a few days in the woods), and I think one really ought to make allowances for festivals where shower facilities are limited or nonexistent (e.g., Burning Man. It's a fucking waste of water. Baby wipes only go so far in a dust storm).
    • Diverse in musical taste. Which can make for some long arguments when trying to choose trip music.

    But then, I tend to associate with people who view drugs as tools, means to an end rather than an end itself. Sometimes that end is fun, sometimes it's self-exploration, sometimes spirituality, sometimes social lubrication, but rarely is it just to be high or satisfy a craving (that's what caffeine is for dammit!)

    OK, so the drumming thing is true ... but have you ever been around a drum circle where the drummers actually know what they're doing? I've been to several (not as a drummer, I'm not that good!). Babatunde used to teach at my favorite summer festival and that made a huge difference. Drum circles are like any other team: experience matters.

    Oh, and I don't really do MDMA (didn't like it much ... left me dysphoric) so I don't see much of the random stranger hugging.

  19. Re:DXM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Anyone hoping to try this out, please, please, please first read William White's DXM FAQ.

    I'm pretty liberal and I trip on some far-out things, but I heartily recommended that a friend kick his DXM habit.

    One really ought to know more about any drug before doing it. Read the "Major Risks" section in the FAQ.