Slashdot Mirror


Linux Users Are Spoiled

Dozix007 writes "NewsForge carries an interesting article on how spoiled Linux users are. It sites examples such as the availability of wide ranging software packages that Microsoft can't hope to provide. Microsoft has to be careful about what kind of application software it ships with Windows. Microsoft reps sometimes point to Linux distributions and ask why they can get away with shipping stacks and stacks of applications without getting in trouble. The answer to that one, of course, is that the Linux distributions give you a choice. You aren't locked into one particular application. Most Linux distributions include several choices for most program classifications; even single-CD distros usually include several Web browsers and email clients."

6 of 753 comments (clear)

  1. Damn Spoiled Brats by elasticwings · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn those spoiled Linux users. They should be made to suffer ad-ware, popups, and virii just like Windows users!!! :P

    1. Re:Damn Spoiled Brats by linuxelf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, you probably don't believe 'boxen' is the plural of 'box' either...

      --
      - "That's just the kind of fuzzy-headed liberal thinking that leads to being eaten."
  2. Spoiled? Uh huh. by whjwhj · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah when I used Linux I was sure spoiled all right. Spoiled by all those half-days and days spent struggling to install software. Spoiled by all that quality time trying to get my wireless adapter going. Spoiled by arcane command line syntax. Spoiled by the absence of decent documentation. Spoiled rotten, I say. ROTTEN!

    Now I slog through my days running Mac OS X. The drudgery of one-click installs. And gone are those sweet, sweet hours of dealing with hardware compatibility issues! Add to that the cruel twist of LOTS of documentation where little is needed! I SUFFER! FEEL MY PAIN!

    (I'd still rather run Linux than Windows though!)

  3. Today's word is narcissistic by dslknowitall · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe this actually in considered an article, it's basically somebody giving themselves an ASCII blowjob. I can't get my sister to figure out how to right click reliably, but somehow a linux distribution would be easier for her to use because it somes with more options..in theory? Having 50 free programs don't mean jack if: 1. you can't install/run them easily 2. define a standard of usability among them all 3. coordinate thier appearance and setup You don't like Word...fine, but guess what, there's no learning curve practically. If you can't figure out how to download a program and install it (a task infinatly more easy in windows) I don't care how long your desktop has been up. Security thru obscurity is a lousy thing to brag about.

  4. Re:I'll be really spoiled when... by McDutchie · · Score: 4, Funny
    2 - I can save some text in OpenOffice as .DOC and be certain it'll show up in Word as good as I made it.

    Given that you can't even save some text in Word as .DOC and be certain it'll show up on somebody else's Word as good as you made it, it'll be a cold day in Hell before that happens.

  5. which is better? by m3rr · · Score: 3, Funny

    no OS is better or worse than any other one. it depends on what you want out of it. i run slackware linux and the only issue i have is that i can't play games on it. that's fine with me, whatever. i just whip out my PS2 if i want to play games. as a programmer, i personally enjoy trying to solve problems under linux. i don't mind that it make take me 3 or 4 hours to get a driver to work properly or that i may have to do some hefty configuration to make an app work. but, that's me. if i just wanted a desktop system to play games and surf then net, i would use windows... but, im a programmer and windows programming is homogay.