Slashdot Mirror


Java 1.5.0 Now Officially Java 5.0

Quantum Jim writes "In a move which out-does Netscape's one-version number skip and Winamp's two-numbers skip, Sun has announced that the upcoming Java2 release will be marketed as version 5.0, skipping three-and-a-half numbers. Can version 6.022E23 be far behind? Thanks to David Flanagan for the heads-up."

19 of 534 comments (clear)

  1. 95 - 2000 by alitaa · · Score: 3, Funny

    that number skip was quite huge too :p

  2. Not really that odd - Emacs did it already by Chainsaw · · Score: 3, Funny

    Isn't GNU Emacs really at version number 1.21.x.y but they just skip the leading "1." when writing it? Then this would be the same, except that it's just a programming language and not an operating system in desperate need of a good editor.

    --
    War is one of the most horrible things a human can be exposed to. And one of the worlds largest industries.
    1. Re:Not really that odd - Emacs did it already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish people would stop saying that about Emacs, when there exists a perfectly good vi implementation for it.

  3. Re:Other Famous Version Number Skips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can think of two:
    Windows 3.1 to Windows 95: 91.9 version numbers skipped
    Windows 98 to Windows 2000: 1902 version numbers skipped

  4. Re:Other Famous Version Number Skips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In that vein, Sim City 3000 to 4 dropped back 2996.

  5. Re:Winamp didn't skip version 4 by GnuVince · · Score: 4, Funny

    Winamp could go with 8 for the next version and go with fibonacci version numbers

  6. they must have Jedi on the payroll by eidechse · · Score: 5, Funny

    "This is the version you're looking for."
    [waves hand Alec Guinness style]

  7. Re:Winamp didn't skip version 4 by Epistax · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it has the features of 3 AND the ability of 2 any boolean logitician will tell you that the version number should be 6.

  8. Systems already in place. by ameoba · · Score: 3, Funny

    They should've just adopted an existing versioning system such as the one GNU Emacs uses and called it Java 15.0 to avoid creating any unnecessary confusion.

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
  9. Re:Other Famous Version Number Skips by NitsujTPU · · Score: 5, Funny

    Windows XP = Windows written using the buddy system, on daily builds, where code is thrown away at the end of the day if it isn't complete. The entire design is sitting on flash cards taped to a filing cabinet somewhere in a break room at Microsoft.

  10. Now it's obvious... by omicronish · · Score: 5, Funny

    that Java is better than C#/.NET: 5.0 > 2.0. I was so confused as to which I should choose. Thanks Sun for helping!

  11. Linus makes announcement by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news:

    Linus Torvald announced today that the next version of the Linux kernel will be released a "Linux Kernel Version 11". Said Torvald, "Thats one more than Mac's OS, and several more than Microsoft, so people will know its better."

    --
    Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  12. Not as fast as gentoo linux by ringer9cs · · Score: 4, Funny

    What happened from Gentoo Linux 1.4 to Gentoo Linux 2004.0!!!

  13. Re:Winamp didn't skip version 4 by VertigoAce · · Score: 5, Funny

    Winamp v8: twice the features of 3 with the speed and ability of 2. Or none of the features of 3 with four times the speed and ability of 2. Or the speed and ability of 2 cubed.

  14. Re:Embarrassing and Harmful by Alexis+de+Torquemada · · Score: 3, Funny

    Java has a good name for professionalism, but whoever came up with this ought to hang their head in shame.

    You misspelled "ought to be hung".

  15. Borg Numbering by Boyceterous · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should have called it
    Seven of Nine
    and introduced a couple of bulging container classes.

  16. Re:For non-physics people: by fcw · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now also known as Javagadro's number, the number of functions in the standard class libraries.

  17. Re:Pedant time... by Laser+Lou · · Score: 3, Funny

    They raised it to MS-DOS 8, even though it had fewer commands. If they really want to kill DOS, they should announce a product called "MS-DOS Forever."

    --
    No data, no cry
  18. Aerospace Industry by greyhoundofdeath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let take a look at some airliner sequences. Just when you think they're being consistent, they zing you.

    Airbus:
    A300
    A310 up 10
    A320 up 10
    A330 up 10
    A340 up 10
    A319 down 21
    A321 up 2
    A380 up 59

    Boeing
    707
    727 up 20
    737 up 10
    747 up 10
    757 up 10
    767 up 10
    777 up 10
    717 down 60
    7E7 D0?
    I guess they've been using HEX all along. Who the $#%^ versions in HEX?