Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

World Computer Chess Championships Underway

Posted by timothy on from the hushed-crowd dept.

azaris writes "While the FIDE World Championships for human players in Tripoli, Libya are down to the last two contestants, the computers are playing their own 12th World Computer Chess Championship in Ramat-Gan, Israel. How will the open source chess engine Crafty do against the proprietary closed engines? Will the computers play more interesting chess than their human counterparts?"

5 of 230 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Interesting computer Chess? by kyle_b_gorman · · Score: 5, Insightful


    you think kasparov is interested in any move that won't (at least indirectly) help him win?

  2. Re:Interesting computer Chess? by ookabooka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    True, except human players can make simple mistakes. A computer never makes a mistake, it just only looks so far. Deep Fritz 8 has beatten Kasporov. I mean, if you can evaluate 2.4 million positions a second (i can on my dually) there does come a point where a human player cant keep up, what if that were 24 million, 240 million? Computers dont have finite limits like a person. It used to take a super computer to even compete with a GM (grandmaster) now the average home computer can give him a run for his money.

    --
    If you are about to mod me down, keep in mind that this post was most likely sarcastic.
  3. First "GO" Post by Saeger · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Forget chess. To truly push the limits of computing and AI we should instead be trying to improve on the ancient game of "Go". No computer can even come close to besting a human here yet.

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
  4. Re:Interesting computer Chess? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except a human has this neat thing called intuition.

    Your intuition can tell you things that will take you hours and hours to prove on paper. Or even in your head, following logic.

    --
    tasks(723) drafts(105) languages(484) examples(29106)
  5. Re:Interesting computer Chess? by AshtangiMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    yes he is . . . but not from the economic only standpoint that the computer algorithms demand. Looking at even recent Kasparov games shows that he does not play the economy equation the way computers do. This is why he (and the other human) chess players are infinitely interesting to watch, while the computer, while nearly unbeatable, is also very boring.